Boeing's China Problem

Просмотров 3,5 млн

% 51 215

Learn new skills with Skillshare for free for two months at skl.sh/wendover7
Listen to Extremities at ExtremitiesPodcast.com
Subscribe to Half as Interesting (The other channel from Wendover Productions): ru-vid.com
Get the Wendover Productions t-shirt: standard.tv/collections/wendover-productions/products/wendover-productions-shirt
RU-vid: www.RU-vid.com/WendoverProductions
Instagram: sam.from.wendover
Twitter: www.Twitter.com/WendoverPro
Sponsorship Enquiries: wendover@standard.tv
Other emails: sam@wendover.productions
Reddit: Reddit.com/r/WendoverProductions
Animation by Josh Sherrington
Sound by Graham Haerther (www.Haerther.net)
Thumbnail by Simon Buckmaster
Music by epidemicsound.com
Select footage courtesy the AP Archive
China Eastern 737 Takeoff Video Courtesy PDX Aviation
References:
[1] data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.AIR.PSGR?locations=CN
[2] www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/Documents/TopTenPaxMarkets_graph.pdf
[3] www.scmp.com/news/world/russia-central-asia/article/3024610/you-can-buy-russias-putin-pitches-su-57-stealth-jets
[4] skift.com/2019/01/08/boeing-edges-airbus-to-stay-worlds-biggest-commercial-aircraft-manufacturer/
[5] s2.q4cdn.com/661678649/files/doc_financials/annual/2019/Boeing-2018AR-Final.pdf
[6] www.cnbc.com/2019/02/04/boeing-stock-all-time-high-on-china-demand-production-acceleration.html
[7] graphics.reuters.com/ETHIOPIA-AIRPLANE/010091341G7/index.html
[8] www.routesonline.com/news/29/breaking-news/283437/what-routes-does-the-boeing-737-max-8-fly/
[9] www.airbus.com/newsroom/news/en/2018/09/airbus--china-assembly-facility-marks-10-years-of-quality-manufa.html
[10] www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-and-its-737-max-jets-have-a-china-problem-11554904340
[11] www.nytimes.com/2019/03/13/business/china-boeing.html
[12] www.apnews.com/88d5235d2107400680d8b0870d30d218
[13] www.marketplace.org/2019/02/11/ceo-americas-biggest-exporter-manufacturing-america-doing-business/
[14] www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-25/airbus-is-said-to-seal-long-awaited-aircraft-order-from-china
[15] www.mhi.com/news/story/190625.html
[16] ukranews.com/en/news/612803-antonov-planning-to-resume-production-of-an-148-an-158-and-an-178-planes-in-2019
[17] www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/china-comac-919-new-plane-ryanair/

Опубликовано:

10 сен 2019

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 4,1 тыс.

@canadianplanespotter 5 лет назад

"A new aircraft was delivered to a Chinese airline every 21 hours". Wow, sounds like you should make a video on how manufacturers deliver their aircraft to airline customers! :)

@blackdoveyt 5 лет назад

Or how china destroys the climate with jet exhaust. We need to get China to ban planes, ban coal and rebuild all their houses to save the planet! Think of how many emissions we could reduce! They're the world's biggest polluter! We have to stop climate change!

@knd775 5 лет назад

Canadian Plane Spotter They fly them.

@canadianplanespotter 5 лет назад

@@knd775 Fascinating -_-

@andyw_ 5 лет назад

Black Dove's RU-vid Channel lol

@IntellectualHazard 5 лет назад

I think the Chinese would make and deliver planes every 5 hours

@blemone7481 5 лет назад

A video about planes AND China? What is this, some sort of crossover episode?

@billkariri 5 лет назад

It's a self crossover

@lionlife3917 5 лет назад

Didn‘t expect mr.peanutbutter to be here

@rock3tcatU233 5 лет назад

Crossover Productions.

@justinliu7357 5 лет назад

Bill I broken my own ankles doing that

@lucimon97 5 лет назад

Most ambitious crossover ever

@stapler3063 5 лет назад

Please make a vid about how airline alliances work (Star Alliance, SkyTeam and Oneworld). 😁

@MattiaMonticelli 5 лет назад

I always wondered how they worked!

@honestyisthegucci 5 лет назад

Yess

@davidtitanium22 5 лет назад

Make it happen!

@AndreaZzzXXX 5 лет назад

good idea !

@The-Mov 5 лет назад

I always wondered why some airline pairs for longer flights required a self-connection, and others don’t. Is that alliances?

@xjhao3125 5 лет назад

2 crashes, 346 deaths. And FAA give authority to Boeing to review themselves?? Very fishy

@test-mm7bv 5 лет назад

china quality - boeing is learning about the local market

@bickyou4696 5 лет назад

@@test-mm7bv Just blame China for every American fault

@limerickman8512 5 лет назад

Boeing is able to sell, because people like you choose to fly in their planes, via airlines. It is called a market.

@Isa-cr7fd 5 лет назад

The FAA and Boeing are very close due to both being American. The FAA lets Boeing get away with lots and cut corners to beat airbus/catch up when it comes to tests. This happened in both the Dreamliner and the 737-8 cut so many corners and was so rushed to compete with Airbus’s new engines they literally stuck the new fuel efficient engine ABOVE the wing so they wouldn’t have to change the design as the engine was larger and if it was below the wing it would hit the ground. This proved to be fatal and caused the planes to stall!!

@limerickman8512 5 лет назад

@Hernando Malinche Boeing is not the only aircraft manufacturer. Multiple airlines used multiple airplane manufacturer's. Same with type of transportations. Your fears are unfounded as if you fear airplanes, then either heart attacks and cancers are far more likely to kill you than any airplane, even those with poor maintenance.

@TheLorax787 5 лет назад

We’ve had Boeing’s China Problem. We’ve had China’s Geography Problem. Now to complete the trinity we must have... Geography’s Boeing Problem

@16kashman 5 лет назад

Boeing's geography problems: Boeing is situated in Washington state, which has a lot of forest, water bodies and mountains. And planes can not fly through these things. Unless you see two skyscrapers and hijack couple of planes.

@keksitzee1094 5 лет назад

Sounds like a video to cover the attempts of Boeing aircraft trying to hug the earth, and the two notorious cases where they've succeeded.

@RandomboiSam 5 лет назад

@@16kashman bruh the planes can just fly _over_ them

@Septimus_ii 5 лет назад

See: global warming

@davidliu2243 5 лет назад

MCAS vs terrain

@markstuckey6639 5 лет назад

In China most big companies are government owned, in the USA most government is big company owned.

@aniksamiurrahman6365 5 лет назад

No wonder these two nations are on a collision course.

@Endika98 5 лет назад

@Harold Potsdamer hahahaha, wtf, how you simplify that so much! -.-

@aniksamiurrahman6365 5 лет назад

@Harold Potsdamer Ah! Dream. The government of the people, by the people and for the people complemented by the economy of the people, by the people and for the people.

@pakan357 5 лет назад

In capitalist America, company owns you.

@scampishchicken2589 5 лет назад

naive

@daniyalali4055 5 лет назад

Planes and China together You’ve combined your hobbies

@alexfactory5426 5 лет назад

Daniyal Ali Soo true 😂😂

@phil9916 5 лет назад

Daniyal Ali next video: USA's TRAIN PROBLEM

@syedatif8806 5 лет назад

@@phil9916 In this channel seldomly you will see any problem in America

@AndrewSephiTV 5 лет назад

I think he has a crush for Chinese lolies.

@MrMediator24 5 лет назад

@@phil9916 guess what...

@jackwilbur9419 4 года назад

No airplane company should EVER. Be able to self certify anything on their plane. Like a fox in a chicken coop

@joefreeman2799 4 года назад

Actually I'm not aware of any human area of endeavor the does a good job of riabily reviewing monitoring and disciplining itself and it's own capers i.e Mistakes errors and misconduct. That includes thr Ccp who police department s

@yoyozent 4 года назад

No one is above big corporations! No one has the right to check them!

@indranilchakrabarty4196 4 года назад

Yes. What about the Police

@sangay9361 4 года назад

The thing is that car manufacturers and every other kind of manufacturers do it themselves. This is because it costs a lot to do those tests and such extensive tests are (usually) already done by the manufacturers so they can verify the result and usually states are happy to take those results as confirmed. This is also how VW was able to cheat on its exhaust scandal

@jackwilbur9419 4 года назад

Sangay I agree but car manufacturers can,t kill hundreds in one shot or fall 40,000 feet

@dereksgc 5 лет назад

A new plane: *exists* Ryanair: we can do $20 each if you can do 800 seats

@alek488 5 лет назад

DerekSP they will probably order like 500 for like 1 million dollars each

@jesusgonzalez6715 5 лет назад

Ryanair did some "advise" on the C919. Which is not notable in the actual (probably minimal) input they actually gave, but huge news in them saying publicly to the world (and Boeing) "we're talking to other airplane makers". Which is of course the point...

@16kashman 5 лет назад

How big or influential is ryanair? Cuz i have no idea.

@thierryvt 5 лет назад

@@16kashman When looking at passengers moved Ryanair is the 2nd biggest operator of Europe with 140 mill passengers in 2018, second only to the Lufthanza group at approximately 145 million passengers. Though I should note that the Lufthanza group consists of multiple individual operators, if you'd split them up then Ryanair would be first by quite a large margin.

@user-xu2xx6pc3o 5 лет назад

kaushik ghosh Ryanair is well known for their landing skills.

@xeroxsos3659 5 лет назад

"There seems to be some news of planes development related to China" Wendover Productions : Oh yeah, it's all coming together

@ursodermatt8809 5 лет назад

@grimm reaper good luck

@Shadogi 5 лет назад

Can you do more Geography problem videos? Those were my absolute favorite!

@tm03035 5 лет назад

yes

@birrymays 5 лет назад

"Best I can do is planes"

@dogetea 5 лет назад

He should do europe or Australia

@lildrippa1759 5 лет назад

Yes yes

@risannd 5 лет назад

Indonesia Geographic Problem

@我爱中国共产党-w2l 4 года назад

Boeing:we will fix the max problem shortly, please be patient. China:ok I will be waiting for you. Coronavirus:you know what? no one is going to fly anymore.

@kimberlywilliams7543 4 года назад

Trump Considers Halting GE Venture’s Engine Deliveries to China CFM venture between GE and France is asking for license to export the LEAP 1C jet engines for China Trump administration is considering a proposal to stop deliveries of jet engines co-produced by General Electric Co. for the Comac airliner being built in China, a potential escalation an protective trade measure bu US could inflict harsh trade by the US Government. The administration may decline to stop the license license allowing CFM International, a joint venture of GE and France’s Safran SA, to export more of its LEAP 1C jet engines to China. People familiar with China's thievery of jet engine technology could be reversed engineerd by the dishonest Chinese Governmement.

@SM_Fato 3 года назад

underrated

@wshtb 3 года назад

Honestly I think the coronavirus thing is a blessing for Boeing. It takes a very long time to certify a plane. For the 737 max, the problem is even worse, because it has fundamental design flaws. Boeing can't go out and fix these design flaws, so it must use software to smooch them. After the two accidents and the loss of life, I personally wouldn't want to fly in a 737 max no matter what the FAA says.

@zacharymohammadi 5 лет назад

Wendover: * makes vid on China * Me: oh is this about China’s economic laws? Wendover: *P L A N E S*

@SixFootScream 5 лет назад

Planes are awesome.

@swissbreeze 5 лет назад

Zachary Mohammadi you’re hilarious dude I would’ve never known he made video about planed if you didn’t comment on every single video about it!

@BirdRaiserE 5 лет назад

I'm afraid you'll need to go to polymatter for the economic vids, pal. This is plane country.

@zencezzz3760 5 лет назад

The most ambitious crossover in recent history

@riograndelocos9639 5 лет назад

trains are better

@SteveBueche1027 5 лет назад

The FAA shouldn’t have ties to anyone except the people and their safety.

@mickfunny4185 5 лет назад

Jackson Brown you clearly haven’t met Senate Majority Leader Moscow Mitch

@aniksamiurrahman6365 5 лет назад

Man, Just like COMAC is a Chinese govt-owned airplane manufacturer company, US govt. is a Boeing (and other corp.) owned govt.

@53smalltrain 5 лет назад

In the mid 70's, FAA always popped up the 747 un-announced before boarding on international flights, hand picked one or two f/a at random to have a sudden quiz on emergency evacuation procedures . i wonder do they do it nowadays?

@pasodeminick 5 лет назад

This is actually the biggest issue with the 737-8-9/Max: the the total loss of confidence in the FAA by other countries and regulators. Before all the MAX "issues" were known, the "seal of approval" of the FAA for any american manufacturer was more than enough for any other country or group of countries (the EU) to consider the aircraft safe and properly checked. You could trust the FAA. EASA (European Aviation Security Agency) will now make its own second check of the MAX.

@changamanga3419 5 лет назад

Yes ideally i should be that way. The problem is technology. Boeing has all the technology and FAA is dependent on Boeing.

@patriciaw1137 5 лет назад

"This is an aircraft particularly suited to China's geography." I think he out-Wendovered himself

@ursa81 5 лет назад

Lol yeah as if the A320s, A220s and earlier B737s are not also perfect for the exact same geography 😆

@comityoun9300 5 лет назад

China next wwⅢ

@rickfeng4466 5 лет назад

The best aircraft was actually the 757, because there are just so little slots(because of the military) for so many passengers and the airport was not big enouth for the likes of 767 or A330.

@bladerunner12 4 года назад

"Perhaps Boeing's largest problem is still to come." Buddy, you had no idea.

@garyenkwong1683 4 года назад

bladerunner12 haha😅

@maxnava6136 4 года назад

Anubhav Jais corona

@David-lr2vi 4 года назад

Coronavirus: I’m going to end Boeing’s whole career!

@heidirabenau511 2 года назад

2022: 787 deliveries halted for 14 months

@pimpabootejettanut122 8 месяцев назад

From 2024: Yup. Still coming.

@commonsense31 5 лет назад

737MAX destroyed FAA’s credibility and that will be costly!

@mybumbrash 5 лет назад

FAA lost its credibility over the past 20 yrs.

@lostn65 5 лет назад

It wouldn't surprise me if FAA was receiving checks from Boeing tbh.

@andersenzheng 5 лет назад

FAA gave up its credibility when they let Boeing to grade their own homework.

@andersenzheng 5 лет назад

@@lostn65 I was be very surprised if Boeing doesnt. They spent 15 million dollars on lobbying alone last year, and thats just documented amount from a quick google search. imagine how much money do you have to give your college professor so you can grade your own work.

@JackieChan-eq6jz 5 лет назад

They deserve everything of the crashing.

@Chezzy 5 лет назад

Perfect, just what I needed to avoid doing my homework!

@KrekreDoBusao 5 лет назад

Go do your homework! Haven't you watched til the end? You gotta keep improving yourself!

@bw1678 5 лет назад

You probably learned more from this than your regular curriculum any way.

@sweep_swoop 5 лет назад

I listened to this while doing my homework

@guremi_ 5 лет назад

@TeamHansen19 we don't know it yet. Maybe he's going to be a RU-vidr once he found out he failed on his study. Gotta learn them videos while he can

@RyuKimGaming 5 лет назад

And the GRE Test!

@frankpinmtl 5 лет назад

How do you get your very own 737 Max? Buy a piece of land and wait...

@stormysamreen7062 5 лет назад

nice

@asp4497 5 лет назад

Pitch this on Shark tank

@frankpinmtl 5 лет назад

@@asp4497 Kevin O'Leary will ask too much

@Inkling777 5 лет назад

Yeah, but if you end up with one it's likely to "need work"-meaning putting a million pieces back together.

@frankpinmtl 5 лет назад

@@Inkling777 Details, details

@badguy1481 5 лет назад

I did an avionics certification at Boeing in 1980. At that time Boeing had TWO competing engineering groups to develop new products. One group was called (the best I can remember) "Product Engineering". The other was called "Staff Engineering". The job of the "Product Engineering" group was to layout the "nuts and bolts" of the product installation (hardware design...wiring diagrams, etc). The job of the "Staff Engineering" group was to test the installation to see if it met all safety considerations. Of course there were many disputes between the two groups...arguing "nuts and bolts" considerations against "safety" ones. I had heard, the "Staff Engineering" groups were downsized and/or possibly eliminated, to "speed up" certification of new systems. If that is true (but I hope it's not), Boeing's move to save a little on development and engineering costs, cost them BIG BUCKS paying reparations for their 737 Max fiasco.... a payout that might have otherwise been avoided if they spent more time (and $'s) evaluating the operation of their new pitch control system...that caused those two crashes.

@adamthomas8069 3 года назад

It's a new world, #BadGuy1, and everyone will have to(?) follow China's lead in its taking over the world's transportation systems and follow the Chinese far different attitude to "casualties" from its expeditions in taking over the world...

@tzwacdastag8223 5 лет назад

RealLifeLore : Real things in life. Wendover production : Planes forever (literally in every video). Half as interesting : Full as interesting.

@randomdude9135 5 лет назад

Bendover**

@randomdude9135 5 лет назад

Hotel? Trivago

@PedroEmanuelMusic 5 лет назад

What does WH mean?

@taipizzalord4463 5 лет назад

Mustard: Trains and Planes

@Gardz 5 лет назад

This comment makes no sense

@JamesSoult 5 лет назад

If only Boeing had cared about getting a quality plane out, instead of just meeting a corporate deadline for as cheap as possible.

@aandwdabest 5 лет назад

Interestingly, some CEOs are opposed to quarterly earnings - saying that such metric often hurt the company in the long run.

@jlassijlali290 5 лет назад

i really watch a documentary about that issue! they really care only about the money! and i know their greed will be their doom!

@coldcoilinc 5 лет назад

If you think Boeing wanted a problem then you're crazy. The last thing they wanted was what's happening. Nice try though

@JohnHill-qo3hb 5 лет назад

Never, ever let the accounting department run your company, they work for you, not the other way around.

@Scrizal 5 лет назад

@@coldcoilinc Then they should've act like they don't want any problem.. That's like saying "oh just because i don't study, it doesn't mean i want to fail" .. See how stupid that is?

@Peizxcv 5 лет назад

Boeing's problem are self-made. If they didn't cut corners on 737MAX it wouldn't be in such trouble.

@PwerRanger01 5 лет назад

pretty much.

@ひひはひひ無し 5 лет назад

Care to explain how corners were cut, Boeing expert?

@nothanks-nr2lk 5 лет назад

@@ひひはひひ無し primary, secondary and tertiary language training on the mcas system (an ipad style bulletin was clearly ineffective) and trying to fit a bigger engine on an old style frame. The 75 could've fit those engines and saved that line but thats personal bias towards that gorgeous aircraft

@ひひはひひ無し 5 лет назад

@@nothanks-nr2lk Alright, cut corner implies Boeing knew the language training was ineffective but opt out of more in-depth training, can you explain how Boeing knew it was not adequate, and the trade study on the cost to sink more time into training mcas system vs training other aircraft operation, in relation to safety risk? 757 was a larger airframe, a size up from 737's role, can you provide the analysis on how modernizing 757 would still be viable as 737, and show how at the time of engineering development, the risk caused by the larger engine, despite mitigation measure, outweights the value lost by using the 757 platform? On a bonus, have you considered if you re-engineer 757 to fit the role 737 was supposed to fit, would it not have caused at least just as much aerodynamic stability problem as using a bigger engine on 737? If yes, can you explain this impact and how it would have been better mitigated by using 757 platform than 737 platform?

@ridef0rlife 5 лет назад

@@ひひはひひ無し do you work for boeing?

@123fourfive5 5 лет назад

Does take a genius to figure out somethings wrong when two of the same plane crash within months of each other. And it doesnt take a genius to figure out the FAA is a biased authority (And is basically owned by Boeing)

@shogunofjapan6833 4 года назад

1 2 3 Four Five regulatory capture is the phrase you’re looking for

@mickeydoolittle2057 4 года назад

1 2 3 Four Five I don’t think it’s that simple & the FAA is not owned or run by Boeing. Where Boeing went wrong is when they let the accountants run the show. Lion Air has much blame for not taking that particular accident out of service. The previous flight nearly crashed. The Ethiopian crew had all of the emergency communication from the Lion Air crash, but crashed anyway.

@gr8cescale 4 года назад

The FAA is to Boeing as Boeing is to the American government.

@David-lr2vi 4 года назад

@@shogunofjapan6833 “Regulatory capture” is just a nice way of saying corrupt!

@wshtb 3 года назад

It only takes a genius to decide an air plane manufacture should be trusted to certify their own planes.

@josephjackson1956 5 лет назад

Wendover Productions: Airplanes PolyMatter: China Both: This video

@Kishishev1903 5 лет назад

Wendover = ✈️

@toyotasupra1141 5 лет назад

Ahahaha true af

@PaulusCunctator 5 лет назад

speaking of, I never really got an answer before why is polymatter so furiously supportive of anything china related and focuses on them so much?

@vtron9832 5 лет назад

Real Life lore, Toyota Corolla

@chickfighter5587 5 лет назад

@@PaulusCunctator For views i guess

@MrxstGrssmnstMttckstPhlNelThot 5 лет назад

I misread the title at first as BEIJING'S China Problem and I was intrigued. Now I see it actually says BOEING... *_AND NOW i'M EXCITED_*

@prim16 5 лет назад

Ironic that you're excited considering Boeing is only one letter from Boring

@MrxstGrssmnstMttckstPhlNelThot 5 лет назад

@@prim16 funny.

@prettypic444 5 лет назад

A video about Beijing’s relationship to the rest of China would be fascinating (particularly the minority and autonomous zones considering what’s happening in Hong Kong)

@TijmensAviation 5 лет назад

that ARJ21 is like a plane version of Berlin Brandenburg airport

@tamaslapsanszki8744 3 года назад

I'd like thiscomment, but it's at 69 upvotes and i don't want to change it

@gteixeira 3 года назад

The first plane Boeing made was much less complex than the ARJ21. In fact they took a good 30 years to make their first jet liner and that was with a lot of government aid since the project was originally a military one.

@korathmathew 4 года назад

The writing on the wall is clear. It's just a matter of time before they start manufacturing aircrafts and start exporting. USA is only speeding up the process.

@res0nance197 5 лет назад

Boeing: No, we won't pay you billions of dollars for compensation. China: We could always go to Airbu- Boeing: No! You shall not use the A word.

@chickfighter5587 5 лет назад

Thank god for Duopoly!

@serenachen9385 4 года назад

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@scanida5070 5 лет назад

China: **Makes even more problems for Boeing** Boeing: *NOW THIS IS AN AVENGERS LEVEL THREAT*

@E1craZ4life 5 лет назад

China: “I am inevitable.”

@shahimagesyt 5 лет назад

@@w花b Chinese airlines will fly comac. They literally just carbon copied A220. And their C292 is a CC of the A350 and 787. When will they make something ORIGINAL

@georgedang449 5 лет назад

@@shahimagesyt Both "copies" are more fuel efficient than their Airbus counterparts that are supposedly copied. Airlines these days have razor thin margins - they live and die by fuel efficiency. You can accuse the Chinese of whatever you want, these planes are going to sell.

@shahimagesyt 5 лет назад

@@georgedang449 I'm not saying they arent going to sell, I'm saying is if they're gonna build and aircraft, at least try to make sense of originality in design. The fuel efficiency part can leave out since everyone is doing it.

@georgedang449 5 лет назад

@@shahimagesyt Laws of physics are what they are. Wheels have to be round, square wheels don't work. Neither the Chinese nor anyone else will use a less aerodynamic shape and ruin their fuel efficiency just for your amusement. The only innovation the Chinese had for C929 was using larger percentage of light composite material, in places of the plane that Boeing/Airbus previously thought not possible or not cost effective using old western manufacturing process. That's where the edge in fuel efficiency came from, not the shape. It's not the '50s. The most fuel efficient shape has already been calculated down to every last drop of fuel by supercomputers. Commercial airliners will stay boring to you for the foreseeable future.

@WorldHistory_CE 5 лет назад

I love these long detailed videos about transport. Love this channel!!!!!!

@devikakarmakar99 4 года назад

To all the people who love there family never be a passanger on a Boeing 737 max. It has a major design problem and very high stalling chances.

@devikakarmakar99 4 года назад

@Hal 9000 keep your trap shut and stick to your toilet paper world.

@77.88. 4 года назад

@Hal 9000 My you folks sound like very intelligent people born with a sewer mouths?

@puma.will.pounce7590 4 года назад

@Lucas Wu - Yeah, the U.S. is so "third world" that everybody wants to move here and nobody wants to move to your shit country.

@stcredzero 5 лет назад

When I went to the Museum of Flight in Seattle, I passed by so many China Eastern planes parked at Boeing.

@andrewmcclure2905 5 лет назад

Been there twice. Epic place. Dis you sit in the SR71 pilot seat?

@aniksamiurrahman6365 5 лет назад

Whoah?

@sammeir4145 5 лет назад

Andrew McClure what? SR-71 was there?

@1mrs1 5 лет назад

They were probably 737 MAXs already ordered by China Eastern but unable to be delivered because of the grounding.

@rasterb1aster 5 лет назад

classiccarz um ok Keep following the Alex jones cult I guess

@AbrahamLupercio 5 лет назад

The CR929 is being developed by CRAIC which is a joint venture between Chinese COMAC and Russian UAC.

@georgedang449 5 лет назад

Russians joined in half way, as the trade war happened. Trump's making Russia great again.

@alexlo7708 5 лет назад

@@georgedang449 Yes, they also select non US engines development as choices between RR and Russian PD engines.

@bryan90124 5 лет назад

George Dang totally absolutely and targetly right

@laocongge 5 лет назад

Russians dropped out from the program because the Chinese side insisted on them getting all the revenue of the Chinese market whereas the Russians getting the revenue of rest of the world.

@alexlo7708 5 лет назад

@@laocongge That's your imaginary. The CR929 finished it design detail and on process of making prototype. They share parts manufacturers like Airbus among EU countries.

@fludblud 5 лет назад

Hearing a public company say the word 'self regulate' is almost ALWAYS a giant red flag.

@michelcharbonnier7603 4 года назад

Man, how much half a year can change. In September, Boeings goal seems to have been to stay the #1, now their only goal is to somehow survive for a few more weeks.

@shinnyii 5 лет назад

Take a shot every time he says *“Chinese”* *“Boeing”* *“MAX”*

@kierancalder8573 5 лет назад

You killed my son!

@joshuav9005 5 лет назад

not SirBeasty he says “Chinese” “Boeing” and “max” in a video about China, Boeing and the 737 max? No way.

@keeganmoonshine7183 5 лет назад

@@kierancalder8573 not the boy!

@bumfist88 5 лет назад

Brb grabbing my bier

@CitySlicker34 5 лет назад

Dude I have alcohol poisoning now, FUCK

@mr-rio2819 5 лет назад

This guy really can't go a month without making an episode about planes

@flashtirade 5 лет назад

I wouldn't have it any other way

@randomuser5443 5 лет назад

@chunchoi4434 5 лет назад

Plane is interesting

@zealman79 5 лет назад

You can't 5 mins without having a moan about something.

@qaiser648 5 лет назад

zealman79 ok boomer

@colonelkk 5 лет назад

Wendover Planes and Polymatter China. It's my lucky day

@Kishishev1903 5 лет назад

KK ✈️

@airplaneengine1900 5 лет назад

B737max might be cheaper, also means less safety and less feautures The A320 might be more expensive but is safer and has atleast all important feautures without AI controlling it

@cedricye1767 4 года назад

Uh... no, the a320 relies on automation even more than the 737 MAX. Do you wanna know the fatal flaw of the MAX that the Frenchie doesn't have? The MCAS relies on a single sensor, every other anti stall system relies on two or more.

@abbysnowmist 4 года назад

Airplane Engine The A320 is actually more fly-by-wire than the 737.

@TheMinimumPC 4 года назад

Airbus has usually relied more on automation. But that just means they have more experience with making it safe and the pilots flying Airbus are more used to it = again more safety.

@forgaoqiang 4 года назад

Maybe, maybe not

@FroddyPlay 5 лет назад

I would really love to see SAAB make more commercial planes, with their long experience of all different types of planes i really think they could become a major competitor

@doso4782 5 лет назад

It’ll never happen but I’d love it if they re-entered the automobile market

@martijn9568 5 лет назад

SAAB is basically Swedens IKEA for the military market now

@NE0MAS 5 лет назад

I work at Saab, ask me anything

@FroddyPlay 5 лет назад

@@NE0MAS Dont really have to, both my parents to and also my brother does

@alek488 5 лет назад

SAAB is a competitor in the jet fighter market

@NaumRusomarov 5 лет назад

Tbh, the same is true for Airbus. Comac is a new player that has the potential to disrupt the entire airplane market, this is not something that should be taken lightly by the current players.

@alexlo7708 5 лет назад

Given relationship between EU and China , Airbus no wonder would have it's share in China market for long znd so on. But Boeing might dim there. The US government's caused it.

@ursodermatt8809 5 лет назад

keep on disrupting. russia does lots of disrupting, but certainly not in the airplane market

@PwerRanger01 5 лет назад

I wouldn't fly on any of that chinese shite. They have garbage standards.

@alexlo7708 5 лет назад

@@PwerRanger01 Until you find super standard on 737MAX.

@valonvalonsoft3227 5 лет назад

@@PwerRanger01 Bet you typed this with either a laptop or a phone made in China

@uzasi669 5 лет назад

Woah, what is this. I got a wendover production video recommend to me after being posted 10 min ago?

@akhashdhillon2159 5 лет назад

Reading this hurt my brain

@longfang98 5 лет назад

Who could have predicted a day when the CAAC, would have more credibility than the FAA.

@jimbrown7748 4 года назад

STUPID COMMENT .VICTOR YOEEEER

@moneymikeslickwill8749 4 года назад

Jim Brown 41 people disagree

@e13kid 4 года назад

hold my coronavirus

@ImTakingYouToFlavorTown 4 года назад

@Hernando Malinche only 500? that is rookie numbers for china

@jcgongavoe337 4 года назад

@Oh_ My_gawd lol what? you gotta be making a joke right?

@owendiaram3870 5 лет назад

"Hey, that cloud looks like a Toyota Corola!"

@me0101001000 5 лет назад

Wrong channel. Still funny tho

@slaitm9289 5 лет назад

the fuck

@nicolasreinaldet732 5 лет назад

Would you do a video about Boeing and Airbus buiyng Embraer and bombardier ?

@TISU07 5 лет назад

they're not bought Embraer nor Bombardier, they're just bought a SMALL division of Embraer and Bombardier. IIRC

@nicolasreinaldet732 5 лет назад

@@TISU07 I know about that, but i have sinplified everithing so i could make a shorter, more direct and easier to call atention coment. Ps: Not a small division but theyr bigest divisions.

@Baseshocks 5 лет назад

@@nicolasreinaldet732 Airbus only owns 51% of the CS series aircraft, Quebec province of Canada owns 30% of the aircraft. They did not purchase Bombardier, Bombardier gave 51% of the CS series to Airbus to use their power to get those Delta sales to keep the production lines open. Bombardier has a option to buy back majority of the plane over a period of time.

@nicolasreinaldet732 5 лет назад

@@Baseshocks I know about that, but i have sinplified everithing so i could make a shorter, more direct and easier to call atention coment.

@nicolasreinaldet732 5 лет назад

@@Baseshocks Ps: By how defensive your coment is i guess that the C-series sale wased as polemic in Canada as EMBRAER comercial wased in Brazil.

@akeemlawrence9750 5 лет назад

Aviation management major here and I loved this video/ channel.

@eldermoose7938 5 лет назад

I didn't know that was a major? Well regardless I appreciate what you do it's pretty facinating

@funnymonkeee9803 3 года назад

The main reason China is developing their own planes is to keep up with Chinese demand for airliners. There is too much demand. China cannot wait years for an airliner. Also old planes have to be replaced with new planes because of air safety regulations. So there is a huge growing backlog for airplanes

@digyourowngrave97 5 лет назад

Hell, I didn't know youtube even said posted __ seconds ago, I've never seen that before.

@raihanrizki2207 5 лет назад

"random dude coming from nowhere" *I BUILD FOR CHINA*

@KevinRawbay 5 лет назад

this make me want to play original C&C

@raihanrizki2207 5 лет назад

@@KevinRawbay the general one

@Nickelodeon81 5 лет назад

It's very hot in here.

@zomgitskai 5 лет назад

It will look *real* nice when it's done

@emmanities2450 5 лет назад

With matching old Chinese guy sound.

@PlaystationMasterPS3 5 лет назад

as a boeing investor, I'm really growing cold on them

@swissbreeze 5 лет назад

PlaystationMasterPS3 okay PlayStationMasterPS3

@youngz13o 5 лет назад

Dont understand why you would invest in a company that doesnt invest in itself

@baronvonlimbourgh1716 5 лет назад

You are missing out on a lot of growth markets and companies by investing in boeing. All these old giants are one step away from the ledge.

@JohnSmith-dv5sr 5 лет назад

@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 New markets are risky.

@arthas640 5 лет назад

@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 They're too heavily diversified to be on the edge, even if the Chinese quit buying commercial ariliners Boeing still has massive military divisions and they also make less noticiable things like satellites as well as various types of computer systems and parts for airplanes. They also either outright own, or own stock in various aerospace subcontractors so even when you buy from some "competitors" you may wind up with Boeing parts. Boeing is also starting to expand into the growing market of commercial space related equipment and will likely be a pioneer in future industries like asteroid mining. I hate to use the phrase since it's so overused/misused but Boeing is frankly "too big to fail" and even if they start to lag in commercial airlines, even if China slows down purchases or even stops purchases, there are so many different militaries and governments they sell to that Boeing is unlikely to fall off any ledge even if they do stop being the global leader in the aerospace industry

@TheMrFishnDucks Год назад

Fantastic video. Looking forward to the ABC future and how the Comac planes perform. Keep up the good work.

@alphaxalex1634 5 лет назад

No one: Probably no one: Wendover Productions: *Makes another Video on planes*

@raphaelr.1576 5 лет назад

FAA was never the world’s aviation regulator. That’s why ICAO exists

@christopherbazaka1564 5 лет назад

oof

@cnnewyam 5 лет назад

I think wendover more meant it as a „respected authority“ in global terms rather than a global regulator itself. The FAA only regulates US-Airspace anyway 🤷🏻‍♂️

@raphaelr.1576 5 лет назад

Jeffrey Johnson you are correct. For some member states it is a copy/paste situation, since the Chicago convention some differences have appeared but the fundamental core remains the same, which is why they made standards applicable worldwide, not necessarily to look like they copied since back then every states was doing whatever it wanted with regulations

@ThisTheAviator 5 лет назад

@Jeffrey Johnson Except that it's the other way around,the annexes to the Chicago conventions were made to harmonize aviation and increase safety,the regulations are made by icao,then the countries that agreed to the convention can choose to implement them,make their own regulations or reject some and implement others.

@alexlo7708 5 лет назад

Now Boeing manuals become FAA regulation. Good bye.

@intrepid1160 5 лет назад

Planes *and* China? Kronk: "Oh yeah, it's all coming together."

@JEOGRAPHYSongs 5 лет назад

Still a better channel than Bendover Productions.

@andreyazevedo683 3 года назад

ye, they have too much "step-sis" content

@cha4990 5 лет назад

You make it sound like they are not supposed to ask for compensation from 737 max?

@thecooletompie 5 лет назад

This video has been made from the perspective of Boeing. It's quite obvious that they wouldn't want to pay compensation for their broken plane.

@daveutube1231 5 лет назад

Not surprise coz Boeing has mis managed the whole situation

@DJAlexParker 5 лет назад

1 minute after release, 1k views, Wendover is basically notification king

@dododakowski2813 5 лет назад

Xi JingKing

@mbamebe 5 лет назад

Someone loves the aviation industry very very very very very much =] great job!!! Keep up the good work!!!

@danyala.1659 4 года назад

COVID: I'm about to end this man's whole career.

@ekanem2954 5 лет назад

Wendover, PolyMatter and China walk into a bar...

@azpatriot7937 5 лет назад

saying the trade war will be over soon is a big assumption

@coolguy3848 4 года назад

Its likeCold war which was focused on technology but trade war is focused on greed of govn.

@blava3155 5 лет назад

Mustard: planes Polymatter: China Wendover: “why not both?”

@enterfil 5 лет назад

It’s so sad that Embraer was bought by Boeing, Brazil is selling all of its companies

@koyotekola6916 5 лет назад

Enter Fil Has Taurus been sold? I hope not.

@antilove84 4 года назад

Very Sad news, but it's expected consequence for the far right dominance. extremist are evil, right, left religious and wherever ideology they follows

@koyotekola6916 4 года назад

@@antilove84 Are you talking about Arabs or Iranians?

@antilove84 4 года назад

@@koyotekola6916 am criticizing fanatics from all religions, not just radical muslim , either sunni or shiaa (aka arab and iranian as they battle for power and dominance )

@koyotekola6916 4 года назад

@@antilove84 Then why are you criticizing the far right? I know there are extremists on both sides, but criticize only one? Hitler and Stalin were fascist, yet they were socialists, wanting total control. That's what the Democratic Party in America is all about. As soon as they consolidate power, it will be apparent what their grand plan is.

@goldplaybuttonwithoutanyup1121 5 лет назад

You sound exactly like that guy from Half as Interesting

@maxant4285 5 лет назад

I bet he also looks like one.

@emperor_of_the_romans 5 лет назад

Half as interesting is Wendover's another channel

@woody6436 5 лет назад

@@emperor_of_the_romans that was a joke boi

@emperor_of_the_romans 5 лет назад

@@woody6436 ish I'm sorry

@eudaldguell3004 5 лет назад

The ABC of aviation. Airbus-Boeing-Comac

@jamesburke8348 5 лет назад

You forgot Ilyushin. It's coming up behind you . . .

@oscardighton8580 5 лет назад

Eudald Guell Comac is better than Boeing, Chinese companies are always better than American companies

@jakobgrene5905 5 лет назад

@@oscardighton8580 that's just not true

@TheAllMightyGodofCod 5 лет назад

Airbus-Boeing-Comac-Dornier-Embraer- oh.... It's a shame Fokker is out of business or we could have this "ABCDE" of aviation thing going a little bit longer.

@eudaldguell3004 5 лет назад

@@TheAllMightyGodofCod ok

@streamyoutub 5 лет назад

Finally a video of planes by none other than Wendover Productions. Much awaited ❤️

@pradeep8056 4 года назад

competition is always good for customers

@youngz13o 5 лет назад

I like your videos cause there not biased. Thank you

@tropickman 5 лет назад

Biased much?

@MrSvenovitch 5 лет назад

how about their they're there?

@shaunakwarty 5 лет назад

Wendover Productions somehow managed to combine both of his common video topics: planes and China

@johnchow8372 5 лет назад

Tweaking the software to solve the 737 Max8 problem is naive! Boeing should solve the root problems in aerodynamics!

@alexgallagher4594 5 лет назад

You mean build a whole new plane?

@perspective500 5 лет назад

Too late for that, they fucked up hard

@an-tm3250 5 лет назад

BA rejected the Demming principle, " eliminate bonuses because execs work for bonus money instead of what's best for the company". Seems like he was spot on.

@lindsaysmall7471 4 года назад

But moneyz 💰

@waterdrinkingexpert6797 4 года назад

The plane can fly fine without MCAS. What you have said is incorrect. The larger engines do not change the way the plane flies, they change the amount of force required to push down on the yoke during high AOAs and Bank Angles.

@maxheadrom3088 5 лет назад

Just a note about Embraer, Wendover: the company was created by the Brazilian government in the 1969 and developed its airplanes in-house. The joint venture with Boeing came about after Bombardier did its own joint venture with AirBus - quite recently.

@Pali4life2 5 лет назад

The 919 doesn’t use “GE” engines. They are CFM engines. CFM is a 50-50 joint venture between GE & Safran. “50-50” hence Safran plays as much a role in the engine as GE does

@metaparcel 5 лет назад

When China does joint ventures, the foreign company must transfer IP to their Chinese counterparts. It's not really 50/50 buddy.

@lucienpan1679 5 лет назад

When USA does joint ventures, the foreign country must cede over 90% of the profits made. Case example: AAPL got this big by exploiting China which only gets $6 per $1400 iphone sold, when it only costs $350 including parts & manufacturing. AAPL is also exploiting the ego of US citizens by exorbitant profit margins. Plus the USPTO and US IP is complete farcical BS, when one can patent 1) rounded corners, 2) slide-to-lock and 3) rubberbanding, now revoked patents everywhere all over the world, including the USA. However this didn't stop the $1Bn payout from Samsung to AAPL in a California Kangaroo court on the payola. Even though the patents were already invalidated. IP really stands for idiot propaganda. It's not really 50/50 buddy. And nobody forced the US to setup elsewhere either. They did it out of their own volition, willingly. Leftovers of exploitation, colonialism, imperialism, slavery and exceptionalism. Old vicious habits die hard in the greedy capitalist states.

@mp4986 4 года назад

@@lucienpan1679 This still doesn't explain why you can't park straight on the main street of Ewoo

@Pali4life2 4 года назад

BoosterBoxTrader Safran is a French company, not Chinese

@Pali4life2 4 года назад

Lucien Pan The joint venture is between a US company and a French company - not sure why Apple is relevant here. There is no law that says foreign countries must cede 90% of the profits for joint ventures. This is bonkers.

@abhisheksahu8753 5 лет назад

Please make a video on logistics of movie making..for example all aspects of avengers,from star cast to planning to VFX pipeline

@devanshkamdar8244 5 лет назад

that's actually a great idea

@RonzigtheWizard 4 года назад

Good show and so very well thought out statements.

@Gluluman 4 года назад

In ten years the Chinese are not going to buy a single jet from Boeing.

@theccpisaparasite8813 4 года назад

Nope, they will have have stolen enough of Boeing's technology by then.

@zeroandcl27 4 года назад

@@garethifan1034 just lol

@Danker19991 4 года назад

Durian Durian No, America used the best German Scientists after the war to help in the Cold War.

@markuax5046 4 года назад

Lol, exactly like all of the Chinese ripoffs of LEGO and such.

@jm3565 4 года назад

Gareth Ifan yes, they did. without Operation Paperclip american post war aerospace industry would not have advanced at the rate it did. nasa would not have happened and the space program including the moon landing would not have happened without the german scientists. america kidnapped top german scientists at the end of the war and forced them to relocate and work for america in exchage for their and their families’ lives. these are well known facts, but don’t let that stop you from being a hypocrite

@zJimmyDrew 5 лет назад

Another great video by WP. In fact, Hainan Airlines' major shareholder (24%~25%) belongs to the Governmnet of the province of Hainan. It's not quite accurate to say HNA is not a state-owned enterprise.

@alantan9863 5 лет назад

If 51% is not owned by government, then it should be counted as a private enterprise. Government ownership is also common in other Asian countries.

@Elementalism 5 лет назад

I'm going to take a wild guess on the C919's dispatch rate once it is in service. Not good.

@michaela.257 5 лет назад

Why?

@Elementalism 5 лет назад

@@michaela.257 State owned manufacturer selling to state owned airlines. The ARJ21 is so bad one of the state owned airlines is creating a subsidiary to shield itself. I don't expect the quality of the C919 to be much better. It is what it is.

@ciditan1615 5 лет назад

HighBrow Customs share cut.

@Elementalism 5 лет назад

@@theesotericenvoy5694 There is more to an aircraft than its initial price. Russia and China have a horrible track record in commercial aviation. I don't expect this to change anytime soon.

@roberttsui4941 5 лет назад

You forgot one point, Boeing is one of the defense contractor that got involved in Taiwan arm-sales. It is up to China when and how to put sanction to Boeing on such arm-sales.

@MilanVVVVV 5 лет назад

Bingo, everything is more or less tied to the power game. Thank you

@marcelogouveia9614 4 года назад

Wendover productions: "Everybody has a PROBLEM" LOL....

@bgezal 5 лет назад

China: Takes a sharpie pen and draws a small semi circle including Taiwan into China.

@Phlegethon 5 лет назад

Failed analogy cause the storm is not part of Alabama

@bgezal 5 лет назад

@@Phlegethon I don't think you understand the politics.

@ulfpe 5 лет назад

China could swap Huawei against Boeing "safety concerns"

@jifa17 5 лет назад

Only Boeing is indeed a safety concern, but Huawei has not been proved to be unsafe.

@BobIoNix 5 лет назад

@@jifa17 not exactly, I own one Huawei phone an MTS Mtag 3.1 whose battery almost exploded, when I was working for United. Had to spend INR 700 or about $20 dollar for a replacement, which was not available in the local market, only on shopclues.com Nobody asks how it got this bad, the worlds largest defense aerospace organization Boeing knows what customers WANT: Safety foremost, you think they're stupid enough to auction off safety to a cheaper bidder just for higher sales volumes? The COM aircraft may be a regional jet volume seller, but for airlines the long haul routes maybe the bigger seller. Think Emirates, Qantas, Qatar, United, even ANA, global brands with good safety records. I'm sure technological evolution is the way forward, with real time aircraft health telemetry and batteries that don't explode and stronger safer airframes and thrusters. I haven't heard of a single Tupolev hull loss in North Korea, or a Soyuz in recent times missing its mark. Is design a problem? Is maintenance? Is security and surveillance? Is telemetry and glitchy software avionics? Ask yourself! Actually each human knows the answer to that, cause you only need to see the news to know these are real problems, that need urgent solutions. So stop whizzing around the planet in hypersonic corporate jets Mr. CEO, and travel cattle class for 20 hour flights, to know and feel what its like. And corporate jet crashes? Exceedingly rare.

@BobIoNix 5 лет назад

Or all business class twin and triple decks?

@myfreespirit58 5 лет назад

@@BobIoNix you are a terrible lier. How do you define "almost exploded". You were lucky you didn't have a Samsung. We all know the so called "safety concern" around Huawei is not the phone battery. Plus Huawei's main business is not phones. How can you operate telecom infrastructures with a battery? Find me evidence Huawei is unsafe on 5G. I give you a chance to create more lies. The chance is you going to make your own government a laughing stock even more. 🤣

@BobIoNix 4 года назад

@@myfreespirit58 for horsd'ouevre, try using your real name, if you really know what truth means. As for the swollen huawei MTS mtag 3.1 battery, I can show you the real image. Ping me your email address. And I don't hate huawei or MTS but the swollen battery almost overheated.

@funny-video-YouTube-channel 5 лет назад

China is too smart. They are trying to develop their own aircraft. Sooner or later, it's going to be ether build in China, or build by China.

@mr.showers3265 5 лет назад

I am predicting the weather. "Todays forcast is showers closely followed by Chinese made aircraft...."

@benleno 5 лет назад

I've flown on a Chinese made MA60 with Lao Skyway in Laos. Who are these owned by?

@dmontpelier 5 лет назад

Ben Leno MA60. MA0. Mao. Mao = aircraft?

@donewitheverything2292 5 лет назад

The Xian MA60 is a turboprop-powered airliner produced by China's Xi'an Aircraft Industrial Corporation under the Aviation Industry Corporation of China.

@spetsnazttv6724 5 лет назад

It is a xian manufactured aircraft. However the MA60 is not considered airworthy by the FAA (USA) or EASA (Europe).

@theashpilez 5 лет назад

Spets Pubgm Does it have high speed self crashing technology?

@georgedang449 5 лет назад

@@spetsnazttv6724 They never applied for permit in US or Europe. MA60 has STOL capability, is meant to be used in tiny 3rd world country airports and improvised landing strips with unpaved runways, the kind that still used DC-3 and DC-5s. US and Europe didn't have these kind of conditions, and they're not fuel efficient enough to compete against normal commercial planes. In its niche, the plane had no competition aside from ancient DC-3/DC-5 and Russian AN-24, since modern turboprops, much less turbofans, can't land in places these are supposed to operate out of. It had a fatal accident, when it tried to land in an island airport (repurposed from an old military air strip) in fog, ruled to be due to human error after blackbox recovery. The pilot tried to land it like the old DC-3 that used to operate out of there, and found out it's not as rugged.

@Snubben123143 5 лет назад

Boeing really needs to get their shit together. First the disaster that is the max and now the 777x is delayed...

@HermanWillems 5 лет назад

Doesn't matter if your a Airbus fanboy. Just convert yourself to Airbus.

@hgbugalou 5 лет назад

@@HermanWillems Airbus has their issues as well, particularly the looming money suck the A380 program will be moving forward.

@Patchuchan 5 лет назад

Maybe Lockheed should consider reentering the airliner market.

@chairmanofrussia 5 лет назад

Notice these problems started happening after the merger with McDonnel Doiglas. Knowing that, I wasn’t shocked to see the Max struggling.

@ivegottatightanus8589 5 лет назад

I mean 747 has been going over half a century. How long did the gem airbus A380 last again? Do tell. Boeing innovates. Airbus and China steals and copies.

@TheGamefreakr 5 лет назад

Boing 737 Max 1: Drops out of the sky Boing 737 Max 2: “I mean, why not?”... *hits the ground equally as hard* China: “Uhm. Nope” ... Wendover: “Did anyone say planes?”

@jesusgonzalez6715 5 лет назад

Dennis Muillenberg: "READ THE FUCKING MANUAL RRRREEEEE"

@BladeRunner21577 4 года назад

I have a feeling recent events have changed some of the "facts" in this video

@forgaoqiang 4 года назад

what things?

@BladeRunner21577 4 года назад

@@forgaoqiang The fact the world airline market seems to have died off due to the SARS2 virus

@DirtyRobot 5 лет назад

Wow, that departures board was about 30% destinations in Japan.

@StukovM1g 5 лет назад

The Chinese are the number one foreign tourist group in Japan.

@ItsMikeLearns 5 лет назад

*i've been to boeings museum in Seattle! it is called the museum of flight, truly an amazing place*

@asktoseducemiss434 5 лет назад

Boeing might have earn all these money in this few years but everyone knows that China will strip the aircraft and copy every damn thing on the plane. Benefit this generation

@ItsMikeLearns 5 лет назад

@@asktoseducemiss434 china metal is garbage. I don't think they will copy anytime soon.if so let them go what they like. But I see where you're coming from tho

@myfreespirit58 5 лет назад

@@asktoseducemiss434 like Iphone11 series copied Huawei Mate 20 pro?

@myfreespirit58 5 лет назад

@@ItsMikeLearns The crane used to build your aircraft carriers were made in China.

@australianpopulism3490 4 года назад

@@asktoseducemiss434 Lol, piece of shit like you does not know airplane.

@SupremeLeaderKimJong-un 5 лет назад

China isn’t a problem, Comrade Xi (some people like to call him Pooh) is amazing

@Alv11269 5 лет назад

Put him in your toilet.

@RicciChoi1109 5 лет назад

Kim Jong-un I feel China is like USSR back in 1989... Uprisings in Eastern Europe is replaced by protests here at Hong Kong with possible US, EU and/or Commonwealth intervention, and very coincidentally 2019 also sees a new Japanese emperor succeeding the throne just like 30 years ago...

@TheTotallyRealXiJinping 3 года назад

6:58 he- HEY!! THATS ME!! ON THE BIG SCREEN WITH THE BIG CHEESE!!

@angbald 2 года назад

Calm down pooh bear. Your tummy may get rumbly.

@odzergaming 8 месяцев назад

Ok pooh bear, we dont care if you are a Chinese president wannabe

@hoodie4439 4 года назад

The airbus beluga: imma bout to end these men whole careers

@shoonliu 5 лет назад

I've noticed the map you used in the video did not include Taiwan as part of China.

@liangkunlong8004 5 лет назад

Yes

@Someone-cd7yi 5 лет назад

because de facto it isn't.

@brobdingnagianone900 5 лет назад

Taiwan is not a communist shit hole.

@atzuras 5 лет назад

Ryanair + Comac = Fly if you dare!

@aristokatclaude3413 5 лет назад

LoL

@wilkinlow 5 лет назад

Hey if it's cheap why not.

@huntyfla 4 года назад

Wendover loves aviation which means I love wendover

@cedricye1767 5 лет назад

Plane thing: *exists* Wendover: ITS FREE REAL ESTATE

@headcrab4090 5 лет назад

In my opinion the 737 MAX is a rushed redesign that willl end up as a sunk cost fallacy.

@percivalkestreltail6311 5 лет назад

9:04 Why blur the names of the airlines? Those are obviously Air China planes.

@Infamous_man 5 лет назад

I highly doubt the clip at 9:04 is from Wendover themselves. The people Wendover stole the videos from probably blurred it. Wendover clearly showed Air China's logos in the video.

@kimjong-oink6217 5 лет назад

@@Infamous_man Given the size of Wendover's channel, it's likely just stock footage, and whoever made the stock footage censored it to avoid possible legal issues.

@kierancalder8573 5 лет назад

Its just a little foggy