Bofors demo 92 4-4 

30 years ago. God knows what these maniacs are working on now...

Or a funnier party, whenever they say "penetrated", "penetrate" or "penetration", you do just that.

as long as Saab does not make any more cars!

@@johnny6148 idiot

Bushmaster and rheinmetal both these days. The bushmaster 57mm is absolutely everywhere. And it has rivals even in it's early time of ww2 fame but remember it had to be upgraded a few times before it was really effective so don't let your passion get you so confused as to facts

@@BeKindToBirds Not really, the basic design of the Bofors 40mm remained constant throughout WWII. When made under license in the US, the cooling system was changed from air to water for the naval version of the 40mm, but that was pretty much the extent of the mods. This was done to cope with the intense rate of fire during wartime conditions. The guns were made under license in 3rd party nations much in the same way weapons are now, as no one nation can shoulder the manufacturing burden, plus nations buying the system want to give jobs to local suppliers (as paid for with tax dollars). The Bofors gun was responsible for 80% of downed Japanese aircraft. It was also credited with averting a lot more damage from waves of Luftwaffe bombing over London and the UK.

@@klmn2000 I realized after your comment that I was mixing up it's cold war anti-jet service with it's ww2 service and pre-production teething.

............................"carry on."

Which countries military are you talking about?

@@themalhama9129 🇺🇸

I'm not sure I understand. As far as I know the Challenger 2 has never been destroyed by enemy fire. Tha's a claim not even the vaunted M1 Abrams can make. I think the Challenger ranks up there with the best tanks in the world. The only real problem as I see it is that England has so few of them. The tank used in this demo was an old Centurion tank.

+Matthew Waddington No worries! UK and Sweden are best mates ;)

+Tennessee Ridgerunner Problem is that if you use this stuff for home defence, you'll take out half the neighbourhood if you shoot a thief 🤣

That's okay man, I don't like my neighbors anyway. Ha ha

Neerest IKEA under the counter, just ask for it...some asymble will be ....

Everything that make Nukes obsolete.

Nlaw and programaable fragmentation granades. And of cause excaliber where the seak head is from bofors

Neutral doesn't mean that you never have to or don't have a right to defend your sovereignty.

You just have to have a military capable of defending your sovereignty.

They have Big Cash Deposit.

@Weedus the reason Germany never conquered Switzerland was both economic and political. Switzerland was a middle power and had some political importance as did Sweden. Hitler wanted to invade Switzerland and had plans to do so after the fall of France but he never gave the order. Search 'Operation Tannenbaum'.

@@ut000bs Time to do it now with all these 3rd world invaders being flooded in, defending their sovereignty has never been so fundamentally vital.

Money doesn't smell

Bald Zeus cv-90 was used by Swedish forces with great success in Afghanistan under UN flag.

@@hampuskarlsson2035 NATO, not UN :)

I know this is 6 years ago. But there is many examples of Taliban, IS, Hamas, and many other terrorist organizations using older cold war tanks. (I.e. T-55, T-54, T-72A/T-72B and many other variants. As well as light armor like BTR-60s and 70s, BMP-1, BMP-2.) Most of all of them are captured tho.

@@hampuskarlsson2035 Norge använde dom i Afghanistan

...and the CV-90 has 8 soldiers in the belly too.

the entire electrical system is of course fully contained and isolated so they would not be not be affected one single little bit.

Emps are no were near as damaging as people think, and large ones are more likely to break big things like powerlines vs small electronics

Because CV90 is such a poor ass IFV that has no laser detection system and no APS for that matter. As well, as it is never covered and backed up with the troopers it just carried near by and desanted 15 min. ago. What an idiot...

@master mariner You first, ya silly goose.

It'll likely pen. That APDS is a hell of a shot for such a small round.

Yes. What's wrong with that? This is a demonstration of ammunition efficiency and efficacy, not of targeting systems. The target finding and tracking ability is already integrated as part of the vehicles that carry this system.

@Ben Ghazi Sorry what do you mean by that?

yes, but the swedish version (stridsvagn 102)

When you get a artillery order you want the rounds to rain down asap incase the target moves away from there :) I guess

@@PontraX Makes sense.

it has to with the time it takes for the enemy (in Sweden's case Russia) to track the round and retaliate on the howitzer's position. the fh77b is an old system but for it's time it was very mobile.

Infantry finds cover in 10-15 seconds, the first few rounds are much more effective. Counterbattery fire takes several minutes at best

@@yarpen9016 in Sweden's case Russia?? You do realise Sweden doesnt border Russia? If ever Russia decides to try to invade a northen country, it will be Finland and like the old saying goes "Sweden will fight to the last Finn"..

Bx2you

True future wars will be a bunch of guided missiles hurled at each other

Its still dead

It's been used in war and successfully so.

BEN NILSSON Japp, men nu har vi en ÖB som tycker att det största hotet mot Sverige är "främlingsfientlighet". Så räkna med att försvaret av Sverige i framtiden kommer att ske digitalt för att censurera obekväma åsikter. Soldater och officerare kommer du endast att se när dom går i pride paraderna.

@@Hasse479 Bra sagt.

Sweden had conscripts back then , unpaid workers -Im not supprised all targets looks shoddy - and it was 3 th company in any regement who did the unpaid work and were chosen because they didnt fullfill army standards , they had disabilites ,were alcoholics under investigation ,retards, bad backs , criminal activity durin gyouth and so on , even one eyed guys.

Wait untill he gets you, wonder who´s gonna be the nerd then! ;)

A killer bucktoothed nerd. Your worst nightmare in the flesh.

Indirect fire weapons using gps are subject to US control of the satellite system also do they know the composition of chobham to test on ? How does it work on era?

Who happen to use mostly men to do it.

@herauthon four Note: most who are killed by these weapon are... men..

Note: most who make troubles and create conflicts: ´´XXXXX´´ ...