Books that Didn't Make it into the Bible 

how do you find all this bible art?

Yay

Book of judas please! Would be quite interesting I think.

YES

Heck yeahhhhh

lmfao

Bible: into the multiverse.

I’d watch the shit out of that franchise🤣

Before Instructions Before Leaving Earth

BCU for the cinematic release

bruh was that a nicene creed reference

Who could forget Christ-Con.

@@gpliskin does anyone know where the panel is for True Christianity 101 ??

Lol

reminds me of the lovecraftian canon lol

I almost spit out my water

Disney acquired the bible when it's stock tanked after the children's inquisition.

Don't the Jews already own religion? THAT'S AN OFF-COLOR JOKE, 2021!

I hate you 🤣

Breaking News: Disney has acquired the Roman Catholic Church for $800,000,000 after the Catholic Church filed for bankruptcy due to it's debts

Have you watched Trey the Explainers “Changes to the Bible” miniseries? He expressed many similar feelings to what you have written and were really chill about it

@@UnironicallyToast actually, yeah I have. He’s super good at what he does. I really liked his stuff on the nephilim and Lilith. But also, the first time in like 6 months I clicked a trey the explainer video happened to be the moment I saw your comment telling me to watch him lol. That was a really weird coincidence

You still a Christian?

what is it

@@vincentmackinnon3601 what?

Makes me wonder if the writer was inspired by watching pigeons explode after eating too much rice lmao

Same here! Mythology never ceases to amaze.

I was damn near crying from laughter when I heard that part

It is more convincing than St George with his toothpick of a sword, and so much funnier!

I guess you must've been laughing, but, he fed the dragon cakes until it exploded.

Religion for Breakfast did a video on it. Of course you can find the full text online and many websites, like Wikipedia, will have a summary.

Fk no bAaBy

Inspiringphilosophy made a good video on it. It was scholarly. I recomend it.

Grab an Ethiopian Bible Nate, they preserved it.

Enoch 1 is canon to the Bible in many places

As someone currently playing Skyrim, this was exactly what I thought when I saw the thumbnail 😂

I unintentionally bought one such version on Google Play (didn't realize it had these missing books).

I mean as a commenter put it, the bible is literally just a bunch of fanfiction and eventually some people decided what was canon and what isn't. The bible is already a mess of plotholes and continuity errors in it of itself, but adding the other books would make it into an ungodly and impossible to understand amalgamation of weird stories. It would be cool to have a complete bible for historical purposes, but seeing how religious people put the bible on such a high pedestal, they probably wouldn't take a complete bible seriously and they'd say that it's blasphemy or something weird like that.

@@qwertydavid8070 yeah i agree w you and it really sucks. i wanna read the real bible

that’s exactly what i thought too lol

That’s exactly why it got hidden, stay woke👀

@Anonymous Person none of the gospels are... they’re oral tradition that was written down years and years later

@@akanji8285 greek bible is garbage

@@akanji8285 you forgot to include the Holy Spirit was with them the whole way writing it so they had a fair bit of help

@@Mulasign not a historical fact.

I feel like that woupd be Religion for Breakfast

Hey vsauce here

Let's Talk Religion is my favourite, but I would say Religion For Breakfast is the Vsauce

hopefully it wont disappear like vsauce

@@meesalikeu Vsauce is still going fine

Maybe that's why dark forces are all ways so hard on the children of our father in etheopia..God bless them

At that, they believe to be direct descendants of Christ. Or something along the lines. See the revolution, and Salassi

Ikr. Most people seems to prefer watching stupid tiktok videos and so on...

That would be a long ass series. Shepherd of Hermas, 1st and 2nd apocalypses of Peter, 2nd and 3rd apocalypses of John, Gospel of Judas, Gospel of Thomas, Infancy Gospel of Thomas. Those are just the ones that pop into my head from recent memory, I agree it'd be sick, but to do it justice he'd need to consult relevant scholars with respect to apocrypha, like John J. Collins for example. If he did that, I think it could be a gem of a series.

Yes please.

@@chaseharrison2064 better for the channel, more content

@@lenkngomez8451 But doing all the apocryphal literature is no mean feat, so he'd need to be diligent and consult scholars. Otherwise, I'm all for it.

Lol there are hundreds

Exactly The correct term is deuterocanonical. Tobit, Judith, Baruch, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, 1 & 2 Maccabees have been in the Bible since conception. Only Protestants have the Luther Canon which removed Scripture from the Bible. That said, the fact Irenaeus, disciple of Polycarp, disciple of John, disciple of Jesus Christ, is mentioned, and pronounced correctly, I give the film maker a pass on the Apocrypha confusion.

​@@harryallenpearce89 The term apocrypha was applied to the books by Jerome who died in AD420. He insisted that they were not scripture and did not want to include them in the Vulgate but was overruled. The disputation on these books does not originate with the reformation.

You're right. I'm Latin rite Catholic.

Dus Wil Jerome quoted those writings as Scripture later. You left that part out. And it was Martin Luther that moved those books to the center and titled the Apocrypha, declaring them to not be Scripture. Both Jerome and Luther were referring back to the Council of Jamnia. Not only was the Deuterocanonical books left out, Jesus Christ was also rejected as Messiah, and all NT writings were rejected. In Jerome’s defense, he didn’t know that canonization happened AFTER the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, which is why Jerome changed his opinion later, quoting those writings. Martin Luther doesn’t have that excuse.

@@harryallenpearce89 correct.

What the fuck do you mean "New Age Version"? Do you mean Christianity?

@@TomorrowWeLive oh boy here we go

You might like the work of Jonathan Pageau. He has a brilliant mind for symbolic/narrative patterns, especially in Christianity. ru-vid.com

Theology is so fun and interesting when you take away the 60 year old christians who tell women with tattoos that they're whores that'll burn in hell

@@TomorrowWeLive New Age Christianity is the religion as a system and practiced today. It really strays from core principles, and many sects of NAC still follow the old testament and its punishments. Too many people today claim to be Christian, and use it as a scape goat to hate people.

I imagine hochelaga will be the next kurzegast, but instead of science it'll be of religious texts .

I second this!!!!!! Both of your comments

true dat!

@@tufhgjfghfhgjfgh true dat!

@@AlejandroJMA true dat!

I was literally thinking that precise thought! Brilliant madness & mad brilliance!

Sameee now i cant stop watching these videos

same

I know right?? The replay value is insane

it just popped in to my recommended vids, it was about the biblically accurate angels. This channel is like those angels giving messages to humans.

It's not about "doing it wrong". It's about what benefits they will gain, remove the parts that are not for their benefits, so that the vatican has the highest power globally.

They weren’t editing the Bible, they were creating it. The early Church looked for consistency and eliminated the odd ones out.

. .

the only difference between mythology and religion is time

@@JoJoZaka true, at some point Judaism, Christianity, Islam etc along with every other religion will become mythology

@@estebanm8394 Ya, probably, but then I bet another religion will come along once we discover some weird star formation and people will think it's some great chaos god and get on their knees and start worshiping it.

@@estebanm8394 nooooooo

Rated R for increased violence

Never thought evil otto would get a yt account

Presented in black and white and with a 4:3 aspect ratio like God intended

never trust humans for answer, even if they are believer Bible is more trustworthy to get the answers, at least for me

plot twist: the Bible is writen by human capable of bullshit so take it with a grand of salt

@@makotomachiyuki Sorry to break it to you but the bible was written by humans. Humans from thousands of years ago whose knowledge was incredibly limited compared to all that we know now.

@@Rascarrr no shit it was written by humans you just stated the obvious it's a god inspired book exactly how god wanted it

@@murderonmarz1647 true

Not sure if you're aware of it but I refer you to the episodes of Red Dwarf called Waiting for God and Lemons.

I have read it & the main idea was that judas knew what he was doing was fulfilling the prophecy made by god & that he did it because of that

I wish I could remember the name of the documentary that basically said that Judas was the only one to actually understand the message Jesus was trying to explain....

@@phoneboxchicken4108 that was an awesome episode!

@@jefferygoldmann2643 so basically Judas is an misunderstood Hero or something

U can easily find the enoch book i got one.It talks about the nature or nephilims and how the world works.Its actually the first book that says earth is sphere and says how seasons works.

Enoch is interesting. I really, REALLY don't recommend looking into the Gnostic gospels. They're deeply occultic, and it'll be a test for your soul if you go down that route.

The Book of Adam and Eve, and the book of Jubilees>>>

Why don't you just buy the book? I have a copy. Is not difficult to find

Personally I found the First Book of Adam and Eve kinda funny. It really paints the picture of a parent and child relationship between God and Adam and Eve.

try to locate with search..

It's just about laws in the old testament

you can pay me if you like

You are paying him in a way. RU-vid pays him for views and subs

Meh... Chuck Missler above all.

It would change the image of both Jesus and Judas. I imagine that it says that "the betrayal" was actually part of the Plan, because how could it not have been?

@@straightupanarg6226 it’s a gnostic gospel and gnostics believe that a human could get a higher power of salvation the gospel is about some false conversations about Jesus and Judas were Jesus tells Judas that’s above them all and that he even could get Jesus place on the cross you see how it’s gnostic now? The cannonical gospels tells us that Judas died by suicide and the gnostic gospel of Judas says that he was stoned to death by the 11 disciples

I would care not, what the traitor has to contribute,

@@jacobsien1078 litterally written like 200 years after Judas died by gnostic people

It's definitely made up. It literally says Jesus lied about everything and he will only tell Judas the truth. It's also written in the third century, hundreds of years after Judas's suicide.

Only in the West. We use the Septuagint only which is Greek, written in Greek from before the time of Jesus. The New Testament was also written in Greek.

I didn't know Moses understood Greek ... Fascinating.

@@kevinyoung42 Greek was used by Jews outside of Palestine which was how the Septuagint came to be.

@@Katholikos78 Fascinating. And to think I always assumed the Old Testament was written in Hebrew, but today I have learned those ancient sheep herders were literate in Greek. Truly miraculous. Thank you for this wisdom.

@@kevinyoung42 then you’re not as intelligent as you thought because the Greek Septuagint was translated by Jews for Greek speaking Jews.🤦🏻‍♂️

Why?

@@davidtilley354 it goes into the nature of god and what god is in the esoteric metaphysical sense. Like how it describes life as an endless cycle of torture and that the only way to go towards the greater heaven is to reach some form of understanding.

@yes'nt Yeah, The god that Christians worship today is an evil and manipulative one and the true god doesn't want to be worshipped. All he wants is for mankind to reach deep understanding of the soul, the universe and the collective experience. The heavens and earth is actually hell. It's not where the true god resides. The true god wants mankind to break it's cycle of life, death, Reincarnation and enter his domain where the greater reality awaits. That's really what Jesus tried to convey judas.

Constantine: not Canonnnnnnnn!

@@pixelcount350 where can I read more on this?

A lot of them is in the internet. You can just search them

@@PeaceToTheUniverse proof

@@PeaceToTheUniverse wym people are dying for something they think is real so obviously there's at least some chance it's not real because there's no proof. There's also no proof that the "word of God" has been spoken, only people whom have claimed to have heard it

@@PeaceToTheUniverse are you Christian? If so then all the texts described are fiction to you.

@@PeaceToTheUniverse but you said this is not fiction. These books are not Christian canon and you can't believe in them. To you they are fiction. There is no evidence that the word he spoke was truth. In fact there is no evidence he even said half the stuff he is claimed to. Historically they only verifiable fact about Jesus was that he existed and people followed him, the rest could be hog wash.

Hold on to that peter ,he is all ways watching & loves you kido,

ayy

The Apocryphal books are only called that by protestants, they're canonical to Catholics and Eastern Orthodox. The Gnostic gospels are a different group of books which were excluded because they were, in fact, the secret property of certain christian groups. They weren't included in the Bible because they weren't common knowledge.

When we're talking about the Old Testament apocrypha, we have a bit of a problem. The person in the video is using wrong terminology, the books like Tobit, Judith and 1 and 2 Maccabees were in the Bible since 300 BC, but Luther thought they were made up stories, so protestants don't have them, but both the catholic and orthodox churches treat them like any other books. That's why they are called deuterocanonical books, not apocrypha. The real Old Testament apocrypha like Enoch or Jubilees are just books written by Bible scholars that were never really aiming to be in the Bible, they were just interesting teachings claiming to be written by some important Old Testament character to be more popular. So those were either obviously not trying to be in the Bible or they were gotten rid of by Luther. When it comes to New Testament apocrypha, the great majority are already too new to be in the Bible, being fifth-or-more-hand accounts of Jesus's life. Out of these you have those that simply collect tradition of questionable origin (Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew, Acts of Peter), those that are made up "fanfiction" (Acts of Paul and Thecla, Infancy Gospel of James, Questions of Bartholomew) and those made up by gnostics (Gospel of Philip, Gospel of Mary, Gospel of Judas) that all follow a single theme: a person Jesus knew is told the "actual truth" by him, the apostles don't believe them and so the gnostics are better because all of Jesus's teachings were fake and only that one person was told the truth and only they know it. They are so obviously fake it's absurd. None of those three types of New Testament apocrypha were trustworthy enough to be put in the Bible. And then there are just some letters by early scholars and popes that easily could have been in the Bible but people just decided that they were just written too late. Nothing controversial about them, they just had to draw the line somewhere. So no, no books were excluded because christians didn't like them.

@@rafexrafexowski4754 it's nice to get an educated answer! Thanks for the info.

Is that an anime?

@@authorbhattacharjee4957 Skyrim

Hey you, you're finally awake.

Scrolled through about 100 comments and I finally found a Skyrim reference

the comment that I was looking for

I agree! But, there are a LOT of apocrypha. BTW, the singular is *apocryphon* and the plural is *aprocrypha* (because it’s from Greek). So no need for the extra ‘s’ to refer to more than one. Just nitpicking, but I thought mayeb you’d like to know. I like to know that kind of stuff :-)

@@dukeon hell yeah, man. I'm glad I know now. The more apocrypha, the more possible content

That sounds horrifying for both sides

There's a Daniel story with a dragon too.

Have you read the books? There are actually 3, Enoch 1-3

If you're atheist, why are you interested?

@@rizkiramadhan9266 It's like being interested in the Lord of the Rings.

My brother was an atheist also at one time & nobody could get through without ( biblically 12 Steping him, so I made a weed rolling tray with the tini centerfold of hometown hotties from F.HM. STUFF MAGAZINE & SHOWED HIM 187 REASONS THAT GOD EXSISTED & HIS LIFES BEEN THE BETTER FOR IT

Just look around Giueppe,,, you couldn't possibly have m8ssed it, you where probably just preoccupied with important life troubles & overlooked it until now

You should read the cannonical Bible

But for Christians they don’t believe in those books because they are so far after the original books and are written with unknown authors they were deemed non canon to most theologians. I also believe they are non canon due to how long they came after the other books and by their authors

@@Arelius_02 many of the so called “apocryphal” were always part of Christianity because they were part of Judaism during Jesus' time. Some books like Maccabees do take place after, but that's because there's a period of centuries between the Old and New Testament in Protestant Bibles were nothing happens, Catholic and Orthodox Bibles fill this void, and these more historical focused books are no different than Chronicles for example, no real reason to exclude them.

@@adrian7856 yea their is because during Maliki the Old Testament was completed n anything between him and Jesus is non biblically cannon because the Old Testament was complete and anything after or during Jesus is the New Testament adding false books after the Old Testament is wrong an shouldn’t be put inside of the Bible the Jews didn’t except them themselves and in the Dead Sea scrolls none of those books where added because they weren’t expected because those books contradict other books of the Old Testament or show false beliefs

@@Arelius_02 You are wrong, there are literal books of the Dead Sea Scrolls like Sirach, Tobit and Baruch not found in Protestant Bibles or Jewish Tanakh, but they are found in Catholic and Orthodox Bibles. And who's Maliki?

@@adrian7856 sorry I meant Malachi stupid iPhone autocorrect who was the last of the minor prophets and is the last book of the Old Testament those apocrypha do not correlate with the rest of the Old Testament maccabees states you may pray for the dead while the Bible states Deuteronomy 18:9-12 states a consulter with familiar sports, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the lord Jews believed that the Bible doesn’t contradict itself and doesn’t have any contradictions inside of it either but adding those non biblical canon text contradicts the Bible after Malachi the Old Testament was complete and finished anything after between him and Jesus’s time is non canon because once Jesus is born the New Testament starts leaving no room for any other false texts

I believe in you bro

Sometimes that kind of memory is given to you by a messenger. That's what your memory sounds like. It's confusing to explain. People are shown things, they know they saw it or heard it or whatever but can't exactly remember how. Dream visions are cool too. You have to be careful about who the messenger is though. The fallen angels did this to me as a child. I saw truth through their eyes. It's not meant for humans to understand. I have biblical strength nightmares coming true these days and its not the way I expected at all. Like the giants that would chase me. I was scared sh.. to fall asleep every single night. It's real but I'm not going to be chased like they wanted me to think.

I'm really sorry about this, but this "gospel" is heresy. It was written in the third century, completely contradicts both the Old and New Testaments and was definitely made up by the author. Gnostics had a habit of taking random characters from the Bible and having Jesus tell them the "actual truth". The most common were Mary Magdalene and Judas.