Botany Manor - Release Date Trailer - Nintendo Switch 

Somerset - where them soy-der apples grows.

@@Paul2377 soiiiiiderrrrrr drinkkerrrrr 😂😂

I have family in Somerset. Visited in 2019 for my cousin’s wedding in Yeoville

Orright my luverly

my stepfather was born in somerset. he got no accent like a person from somerset though

Is the demo available on the switch?

You have to fight the plants they secretly rise up against you at the end of the game

The game over screen would be you getting consumed by the flower

Haha agreed but that's a lot of exclamation marks for a chill game

@@tornyu ah my mistake! still very excited though

Sure you are. And if you are, enjoy your kiddie short game.

@@sO_RoNerYAnd why do you care enough to be a dick on this person’s comment? Let people enjoy stuff.

Yeah

@@sO_RoNerYbro go play Fortnite or something this game is beautiful and artistic

@@mmullins2983literally that person is such a red flag

theyre not gonna tell you the date just because youre yelling at them in a random video bestie

1890

@@tinymangodragon ARRGHHGGNHSSHHDJSJS

We all want it. I don't get why they just didn't do it this week

@@tinymangodragon I know, I'm just bringing attention to this problem

Ah, RU-vid comments... Stay classy

Bro is committed 💀

Dear Nintendo, I am writing to you today regarding your Community Tournament Guidelines. Put simply, I am not a fan of them. While I do think that there is merit to the idea of having community tournament guidelines, I disagree with some of the restrictions you’ve included. Below are some of the issues I take with it, along with questions about it, and suggestions for ways to improve it. I hope whoever receives this letter will take the time to read through it, potentially pass it along to those in charge of these guidelines, and maybe respond back with answers to some of the questions. Firstly, the participant restriction. “Tournaments may include up to 200 Participants for in-person tournaments or up to 300 Participants for online tournaments.” Why limit the number of participants? I can sort of see a reason to limit the in-person number, what with COVID and all that, but I can’t think of a single reason why there should be a cap on the online number, at least on your end. On the end of tournament organizers, I could understand them capping it due to only wanting the tournament to run for a certain amount of time, or not having enough people available to moderate a tournament of large size, but I don’t see any reason why you’d want the number of participants capped. Additionally, the recently released Splatoon 3 Tournament Manager allows the amount of teams per tournament to be capped at 512, or up to 2048 individual players. Since the manager requires you to read and agree to the Community Tournament Guidelines before creating a tournament, this runs counter to the cap on participants that you yourself have put into the guidelines. If you could elaborate on A) why there is a participant cap, and B) why Splatoon 3’s Tournament Manager breaks it, it would be greatly appreciated. Alternatively, removing the online cap altogether and just letting the tournament organizers decide themselves would also work. Side note: the workaround described in Q12 of the Frequently Asked Questions is neat, but sometimes tournaments are only able to get a venue for a single day, making it entirely impossible for those tournaments to run. It would definitely be a better solution to just not have a cap in the first place. Next, disclosing accounting. “Organizers collecting fees must publicly disclose all accounting related to the costs of hosting the event promptly, including entry fees, admission fees, and prizes distributed by posting them on a website and/or on social media accessible to everyone.” This is a bit unclear. Do they just need to declare those three items, listed, or do they also need to declare other things such as amount they are paying the venue to be able to host the tournament there, or the costs of equipment like the systems or monitors they’re bringing, or the cost of gas for traveling to the venue? This part definitely needs a clearer definition. If it’s only the three things directly stated in the guidelines, I’m perfectly fine with it. If it requires you to disclose backend information, stuff participants likely wouldn’t normally be concerned with, I see no reason for it to stay that way. Following up on that point, sponsorships. “When hosting a Community Tournament, Organizers may not receive goods, services, money, etc., from third parties as sponsors.” Additionally, lower down in the guidelines, “Nintendo Games may not be used for Community Tournaments that…Have sponsors or that advertise or promote any entity, products or services”, and from Q3 in the Frequently Asked Questions, “Tournaments that are not permitted by these guidelines include but are not limited to…Tournaments that receive goods or money from third parties, such as sponsors.” I must again ask, why? What is the purpose of banning sponsorships outright? I’d understand requiring any sponsors to be disclosed, or requiring the sponsorship be used exclusively for covering the costs of organizing the tournament and towards prizing (and thus limiting it through the $10000 of cash prizes per year rule), but I don’t see any good reason to ban them completely. I’d suggest removing the ban and instead implementing limits on them. Something like what Capcom has for their “Street Fighter V Community License Agreement for the Americas” would work. “The sponsorship contributions must not exceed $6,000 USD per Event” and “The total sponsorship contributions within any given 12-month period must not exceed $30,000 USD” seem like reasonable limitations. These next 3 are relatively minor things, but I still wanted to cover them. First off, “The names of Community Tournaments may not contain Nintendo trademarks or IP, such as Nintendo’s company name, logo, product or service names such as game titles, names adopted from Nintendo Games such as character names . This includes any shortened or modified uses of Nintendo trademarks or IP.” This is restated again in Q6 of the Frequently Asked Questions, and Q2 even expands on it by stating “it is not permitted to use Nintendo game logos, character images, game images, music, or sound effects for community tournament promotions, venue decorations, or venue background music.” I do understand why this one is here, I’m just not a fan of it, especially the last part about shortened or modified uses. When the tournament doesn’t have multiple games from different franchises featured, using recognizable phrases or imagery related to the games featured is a quick and easy way to help people understand what is featured at the tournament. For example, there’s very few people who are familiar with the Super Smash Bros. series that wouldn’t immediately understand what the focus of Super Smash Con is. I’m not going to push too much on this one, I know Nintendo is very protective of its Intellectual Property, but please consider changing or removing this guideline. Secondly, I wanted to get a brief clarification regarding linking the guidelines. “The Organizer posts the following notices on-site and on tournament websites and other promotional materials: “Terms for participating in and viewing Community Tournaments using Nintendo Games” accompanied with [URL for Nintendo Support article on Community Tournament Guidelines]”. I don’t actually have a problem with this one, just two questions for clarification. Would a QR code work as a substitute for the URL? Would copying the contents of the article into the posts or printing out the article for physical materials work as a substitute for the URL? Not a major thing if the answer to either of those is “No”, but the clarity would be appreciated. Lastly, I wanted to cover the guidelines regarding sale of food, beverages, and merchandise. As stated in Q3 of the Frequently Asked Questions section, “Tournaments that are not permitted by these guidelines include but are not limited to…Tournaments involving the sale of food, beverages, or merchandise.” I’m confused by this one. Is it only banning the tournament organizers from selling these things themselves, or is it banning all sale of food, beverages, or merchandise on the premises? If the former, understandable. If the latter, why??? I get merchandise, in almost every case it’d either be resellers or unlicensed merchandise so I see the vision there, and I could understand a ban on alcohol, but all food and drinks? I know of many tournaments, including ones under your arbitrary participant cap, that regularly last from lunchtime to after dark. While it is usually fully possible to leave the venue and just grab some food from somewhere else, I don’t see any reason to ban people from selling food or drinks on the venue. Moving on to the final thing I wanted to cover, from Q16, “Tournaments that are illegal or could be viewed as offensive or otherwise inappropriate include, but are not limited to, tournaments that [include]…Use of game consoles, accessories, and software not licensed by Nintendo.” Consoles and software I can fully agree with, my one concern from this fall with “accessories”. Many competitors use 3rd party controllers, for reasons ranging from competitive advantage to comfort to accessibility. While I do agree that there should be some limitations on what can be used, I’d much prefer it to be in regards to what each controller can do - something like “no simultaneous horizontal inputs, no turbo buttons, no macro buttons” - rather than limiting controllers entirely. There are already some problems with inclusivity in competitive gaming, please don’t let this be another barrier for people. Now, I do understand that it is unlikely that I will receive a response to this letter. As stated on the guidelines, “Nintendo will not respond to individual inquiries regarding the guidelines or Q&A.” Despite this, I am still sending this to you, in hopes that someone will hear my questions and requests. After all, if I don’t send something there’s a 0% chance my questions or requests will get answered, while sending this at least has the chance that you, the person reading this, will disregard the above. Still, even if you don’t respond to my inquiry, I hope you are able to address my concerns moving forwards. Thank you for your time reading this. Sincerely, A concerned fan

@@Sompursone we need to get Nintendo to read this 🔥 💯

You are aware this won't do anything, right?

@@NuiYabuko I mean if he spams it towards Nintendo emails, they’ll have to notice a bit

Your first on like every Nintendo vid why?

Congratulations *EDIT:* I take it back, I just now realized that you're an immature kid!

​@@BowieBoy1212im actually not. This is my first time on Nintendo's chsnnel in days

@@SebastianGMSFB thanks

​@@CanadianBakin42O you're NOT welcome! 😡

Well too bad it’s not ready. Be patient or I’m gonna treat you like a four year old.

@Unknown_User174 Dude I don't care about you. They could've announced the direct this week it's not that difficult

@@kaneki18-d1t4 Are you being smart with me?😠 If you’re being smart with me and you’re talking back to me like that, It’s gonna get you in trouble.😠 Also that’s what you get for believing in rumors.

@@kaneki18-d1t4it absolutely is that difficult

@@Unknown_User174 These "rumors" you're speaking of were the previous dates of their Nintendo Directs. It's seriously not that difficult to go on their page and look when the previous Nintendo Directs were. All of them were in the first or second week of February. A few clicks or taps isn't as difficult as you think it is Also I could care less about your opinion. Just let me tell you that you're being absolutely ridiculous and obnoxious here It's more likely the case that you're still a minor and are using your parent's computer or phone to write your comments

Then why are you here?

@@NuiYabuko why shouldn’t I be here?

We still have exploitive slave labor today.

Ffs. Get a grip.

Any grand building in any location or time could be assumed to be built by slave labor. Even the clothes and toys and wears we use today may be created in such conditions. Then, is it ever ethical to consume art that depicts…almost anything man made? Would a simple statement from the studio saying, “in our creative vision, it wasnt built by slave labor”, save it from this criticism? Idk just seems kinda weird to me to even say this. What then is allowed to be considered wholesome? Is a game about, idk, gifting friends teddy bears wholesome, if we /could/ assume they were made by children in a teddy bear factory? Ya know what I mean? And to be clear, I believe all ppl should be treated and compensated fairly and rightly. I just question if we judge art in this way, can we even have it? And maybe not, idk

⁠@@k.d.656that is what tumblr does to people.

@BlackForager

?

The Witness 2: The Plantness

I was thinking the same thing before I even played the video. 😋

your username and profile picture makes this comment hilarious. even dungeon master tyrants like chill games, who wouldve thought

@@MARKHENSTROM lol even an Eldritch entity needs a break sometimes

Thought the same

i imagine something like the witness or edith finch, exploring in 3d with some camera-locked puzzle segments?

??? What are you even trying to say? This is a third-party game, not a first-party game.