Brand New Chess Cheating Drama Intensifies 

I gotta pin this one, genuinely curious if this is true. Crazy if so

Do you also lie and steal because you haven't been caught?

You're not running an "experiment" as you put it - you are cheating. And you seem proud of it - this confirms you are also an asshole.

I have sneaking suspicion that you lie even about your lie.. Kram at least tries to corroborate it with his ridiculous "stats", you - just empty talk

@@AlRask-j3byours is just as empty. your accusation is based on a presupposition

That is tremendous accuracy. Probably he is cheating with Martin?

@@u.v.s.5583 😂

Probably bigger than his nice list as well

@@andrewsears16 I don't think anybody ever on the planet would be on his Nice list actually. HIs Nice list is probably empty.

Damn dude, here you are ready to cast everyone's first stone. I feel like you have lost your faith in humanity. A bad choice doesn't make a person bad, but rather making a choice with the intention of its consequences does. People aren't bad, they are ignorant and oblivious to the harm their choices will cause as a result and that is not worthy of the level of devaluation you've placed upon people in general. We have flaws, we make flawed choices but that's called being human.

@@andrewsears16 It's a miracle that this planet is barely holding on, but it won't for long.

@@WintermintP that's not very nice

Kramnik, looking in the mirror: "And I'm keeping a close eye on *you* as well. Don't get any funny ideas..."

@hoi-polloi1863 Funny comment

@@hoi-polloi1863 This is brilliant. I laughed and laughed, until my Mrs. threatened to have me institutionalized.

Double exclam. Brilliancy

Kramnik would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark.

he will say it's remotely controlled by CIA

someone burst into his bathroom and destroyed his toy ships

He's not wrong though

In the same title Tuesday kramnik destroyed Fabiano ... Watch his stream

Unfortunately, the puppy eventually will be accused of cheating.

The knight , with its manoeuvres, was completing some distance.

Its also a time

​@@GrabnarMyers nope it's the distance travelled by light in one year.

@@maxytwist read the last part of your statement again

No, it is a distance measuring unit.

true,the endgame was so winning for white that every move was best or excellent moves..therefore high accuracy

Yes there is a lot you two could teach Kramnik

@@henrylee4856lol

3100 gm bu cheating or by talent is the question

@@abidadar2217 Very obviously talent lol, Jospem is one of the most active blitz players on the planet, has competed in rapid tournaments with anti cheating measures and is equally good at bullet chess which is too quick to cheat in

You can cheat in bullet there are programs they can make moves for you

@sHaterred-vh7cs hans niemann admitted he cheated. Otherwise he also plays rapid and blitz tournaments with anti cheating measures and probably won a lot of tournaments. That doesn't mean he doesn't cheat online time to time

@@abidadar2217jospem is hans niemann clone?

Sus🤨

I am a below 1000 amateur and I can hit a 95 like once a month.

Im 1300 and get 100% games sometimes. Its not that hard although not for this many moves.

@@bradspaugh9827 100% for a 1300 would surely give me pause...or do you usually resign after three moves?

Is everybody here thinking, nobody cheats online?:))) or above certain rating all are gentlemen who would never cheat, especially not with money prices…. Yeah, sounds like a realistic assesement of human nature

Kramnik beating Caruana, Dubov and other known GM's, but this online Jospem guy is ofcourse way stronger ..

​@@kohnr3381 blitz is different from classical. You can be really good at classical and not so good at blitz, and the other way around

what has it to do with blitz or classical if he won against them on the same titled tuesday? Also the strongest offline player in blitz are strong in classic. This is another lie you guys keep on repeating.@@spanishcrab

@@kohnr3381I hate how people refuse to even be suspicious of Jospem. Clearly something strange is going on, the mere suggestion that he may be cheating is a crime.

@@kohnr3381 caruana isn't the strongest at blitz, jospem is quite strong, it is his specialty

Kramnik is the old guy driving the wrong way while listening to a radio warning that a ghost driver is on its way and he screams " One Ghost driver?there are thousands"

True in track and field too. A few years ago the famous American Olympian Jesse Owen's track record from the 1930s was broken by a high school athlete.

FORMER world champion, in this case meaning out of form, as one could only hope for Kramnik.

Kramnik is a multi reigning consecutive world champion with his entire life of experience playing against the best to ever sit at a chess board. While he might accuse many of foul play, this is not a strong argument against him. I’m not entirely defending Kramnik, but nobody knows for certain what percentage of his claims are true or not. There may very well be some times he is correct and others where he is not.

@@paulbloemen7256Titles in chess don’t work like that. This is only semantics. Once you achieve a title, it stays with you for life. Grandmasters are never former grandmasters. World champion is the highest title you can achieve in the game and is a valid reference.

@@Dakodi_ I wasn’t really talking about titles, used the word play that his current playing strength may well be below the one he had while being world champion: a former world champion is about the past, not about the present, and many if not all players lost a lot of their power when hitting 50 (age). Some deal with it graciously, others, maybe Kramnik too, try to still be what they were, but apparently are not. AI helps anyone in the world to achieve his maximum potential at a very young age nowadays, which was unthinkable even a few years ago: you had to live in a country with good players around you or you were hopelessly lost. Kramnik was a good player, he apparently is not that good anymore. I feel he cannot quite cope with that. To me, that is all very distant, and kind of amusing.

Exactly. Given that dominating setup, even I would have elicited a resignation (an an accusation of cheating) from Kramnik. I can't see how it's possible for anyone over 1500 to lose that endgame.

Yes, unfortunately. I've spent much time around people with mental illness, and I definitely see the signs that's beginning here. One is that he doesn't understand, or care, how he is humiliating himself before all his peers. Another is his inability to accept his natural decline, as should be expected. Another is his nonsense interpretation of what the %accuracy measure means. He well knows it is deeply affected by BOTH players, (if you give your opponent obvious moves he will score high) but blindly ignores this fact he knows well to justify his own failings as "cheating" by someone else.

No, this is just a mob mentality where majority of chess fans are Hikaru supporters or watch their favorite Twitch or RU-vid chess content creator repeat the same talking points about Kramnik and it becomes a massive echo chamber. He may accuse many of foul play however nobody knows with certainty that his allegations are untrue. There may be a portion that are true. Unfortunately with chess these things are extremely difficult to prove, even the best player of all time to some and world champion Magnus Carlsen could not have his foul play accusations credited in a court of law. It (being the truth) really then only has one option which is to slander those accusing others of foul play because unless it’s ever proven (which is highly unlikely), any narrative or opinion that gets traction becomes the “truth” when it may very well not be. However, I guarantee if Magnus continued to accuse others like this, the narrative would be entirely different than that surrounding Kramnik because people like Magnus. I’m not entirely defending Kramnik here, but there are massive rose tinted glasses on this issue and not as much objectivity as there needs to be. I simply think Kramnik has earned the right to be taken seriously as his expertise and mastery in the field of chess is unprecedented compared to anyone commenting here on these videos.

@@Dakodi_ I have played OTB Opens were other players are openly cheating asking better players for advice, using cell phones and what not... My online rating is mysteriously 700 lower than my offline rating... Still I would never miss an opportunity to play these abusive players again only to whoop their sorry behinds... ;)

@@Grrrnthumb Thank you. I have a hard time comprehending Mr Kramnik.

He makes outlandish claims like he invented the question mark!

Why are you so outrageous? He was 5 times WOrld Champ- he ended Kasparov’s winning streak of winning world championships

If you live long enough then you eventually grow back down.

but they may be the same thing ultimately

​@@QueekHeadtakerno

@@QueekHeadtaker one is a unit of length, the other is a unit of time. They're not the same thing.

A light year takes an exact amount of time. A very precise measurement of time, as well as distance

@@KF1 It's still just a measurement of distance. What you say would be like saying "kilometers per hour" is not just a measurement of speed, but also of time because there "an hour" in there, which doesn't make sense.

Good analogy. What if he's simply playing BAD CHESS? Has it occurred to him I wonder?

Someone better tells him Fritz3 is an old engine, not some magical tool

Yes. According to changes in the evaluation bar through the game, Kramnik's position deteriorated at three points of the game. The first two were when Kramnik initiated the exchange of queens and then again with the exchange of rooks. He was already lost, but the third was when he allowed a fork so White could exchange his knight for a bishop.

@@rossmurray6849 Yes, Kramnik traded down to an endgame I'd expect almost all GMs on the White side to win, and played more bad endgame moves to accelerate the finish.

Was looking for this comment

A light year means the distance covered by light in one year. Time is involved.it is just a way of saying.

Not correct. Both time and distance are measured in a lightyear. Therefore it is a distance with a time indication.

@@wolfgangdevries127 time is not measured in light years, only distance. Regards, a physicist.

@@BerndThomasSchuller funny, according to a physicist a year is no measure of time..

one more: you lost but cheated bc didn't lose soon enough

@@AlRask-j3b Exactly

Chuck Liddell never accused his opponents of loading their gloves after his reign ended, he just accepted that he was past his prime.

@@davidschneide5422 Exactly, but that's the reality of being hit so hard you get knocked out.

How about a powerslap match. MMA would be kind of boring between two chess players who don't know how to fight and are afraid to get hit.

Eric Hansen and Hikaru Nikamaru had a wrestling match on Yasser Sierewan's front lawn

Lol imagine how that would work.

...I thought it was 365 days?

1 year is time. It's the exact 'distance of time' between your 2 consecutive birthdays! hope that helps :3

@@emmanuelhoule8070 'Light year' and 'year' are distinct units of measurement. When someone says 'light year', even though some do use it as a way of saying "a long time", it actually means "a long distance". I will out nerd you with ease, don't try me ;)

@@hulkslayer626 'Light year' and 'year' are distinct units of measurement. When someone says 'light year', even though some do use it as a way of saying "a long time", it actually means "a long distance". Funny I commented almost the exact same things twice... I may be boring lol

@yaa40 I understand that "light year" is a unit of measurement for distance. Specifically, the distance that Light can travel in a year. It is used when Astronomical Units (the average distance between the Sun and the Earth) are no longer sufficient. The first sentence of your comment explains as much. It's the 2nd sentence I was remarking on. Saying it isn't a long time and that it is not time at all. Which it is. It is a unit of measurement using both time (a year) and light speed (the speed at which light travels) to determine a distance. So while Light Year isn't used to measure time, Time is most definitely involved. Hope this helped clarify my comments meaning.

Only if you are traveling at the speed of light.

A light year is the distance light travels in an earth year. It’s not a time increment.

Nice catch😄

Bzzt

if the match is streamed live then it is still possible

This Jospem cheater wont ever play in a strong GM tournament, he is a fool.

@@ianstopher9111why did I read that "bzzt" as a vibrating noise....

​@@asiamies9153You can stream and still cheat though

Ruy López ;)

Still more otb games from Kramnik in the last year than Jospem cheater. Jospem will avoid all tournaments with top GM's

Alireza and Pragg are playing in top level tournaments, why isn't Jospem if he is as good and talented as they are, why does Jospem only play online?