This whole campaign was hopefully a very eye opening experience for people. I'm hoping 5% of people who didn't know anything about this and do their own research and that helps drag a bunch of people into realizing how politics in the US is. I'm probably delusional but eh.
The Lore Lodge did a video a few months back on Marv Heemeyer and how we were lied to about the whole situation. Very good and well researched. Dude took all of Marv's tapes and had them transcribed to see what he was talking about. Then he cross referenced them against what was said in the movie Tread and in the book Killdozer. I'd highly recommend you see it. Don't need to do a react video if you don't want to jump down that political rabbit hole. But it definitely brought up a lot of things and how small town corruption is a thing.
What is freedom of speech if it doesn’t protect the individual from the consequences of their expression? Was freedom of speech not created for this purpose to prevent the legal suppression of the people?
I really enjoy have the pepperbox specifically for the fact that anyone with a brain knows YT hides things. One of my fav channels almost quit because he got enough hits that they dropped him from the notifications... if you watch swords and history content you know him... but even with the bell icon on I was not seeing him. The whole thing is a mess.
Kip, you are SO wrong! The person he ran against does NOT feel bad. You are attributing your morals and feelings to the Enemy. The US has a long history of doing that. We ham string either overtly or mentally our fighting men because there are things we will not do. Our enimies often do not share our sensabilities.
Kip: journalistic integrity doesn't exist anymore Me: wrong it does you'll just never see it as any journalist with journalistic integrity is working for agencies like the onion now mainstream yes its long gone but it still exists
If I recall correctly a lot of people also just use RU-vid not signed in or under the guest profile which still to a certain degree curates content but if a video gets age restricted you have to have a RU-vid account that's 18 and over for it to push it to anybody if your account is under 18 or if you don't have an account or using guest none of those people will be able to watch the video where know it was uploaded
yeah you just gotta divulge personal fucking information to be older than 18 to google, even IF at some point ion the future your email became 18 years old, they'd still want ID or your fucking bank card
Hey Kip, I don’t typically recommend stuff, but I think you should check out Tactical turtleneck’s dungeons and day jobs series, and his cryptid creators series. They seem like they would be up your alley.
Some of the worst takes and lack of ethics also push very radical extreme talking points on the field of journalism is gaming journalist that have done misleading, dehumanizing and most of all harassment
I have a hard time even connecting with other vtubers. I think I'm too controversial or seen as a brand risk to a lot of them. So a range day at this time isn't something that I feel would happen.
Kip, my favorite content creators are the ones that that start off not showing their faces. Then they never do. Please don't ever show your face. I like the illusion of not knowing your true face. Please don't
I f around dependon the topic and no one has challenged me on a factual standpoint, it's always emotional and I dismiss those immediately, come at me with facts and not emotions is where I stand.and censoring americans citizen for what they say in a video or in a comment is a violation of the the U.S constitution. I should be able to say whatever tf I wanna say and if anyone has an issue they can meet me in person as voice their opposition amd we can discuss it like adults or go at each one another like neanderthals like nature intended and the only people allowed to have a problem are the ones directly involved, meaning, take a number I'll get to you in a minute if you are intelligent enough to acknowledge
20:35 The Unsubscribers and you are both very objectively wrong. Freedom of speech IS freedom from consequences. If it's not, then it isn't real. The entire point of the 2nd Amendment was because the Founding Fathers believed in the rights of a man to say whatever he wanted, even controversial or inappropriate things, without repercussion. It ensures your right to, for instance, criticize the government and politicians without fear of reprisal. By saying "it's not freedom from consequences," you are directly invalidating that. You no longer have a moral or ethical right to say that it's wrong for a king or president to order people killed for criticizing them. Hey, it's not freedom from consequences, right? Yes it is. It always was. That's the whole point.
No, freedom of speech only protects you from the government. The amendments are restrictions on the government, not the people. If people don't like what you say, there can be consequences from them.
No you are completely wrong. Public opinion is a consequence and your right to say something is not affected by that. You can not legislate people's reaction or thoughts of what you say. Legal reprocusions are specificly what is absent in freedom of speech. Also your freedoms end when they impact someone else's.....thus slander and lible laws. Your reactions to speech are also limited .....by laws . You can not say I do not agree with a viewpoint so I am free to punch him...... your whole point is childish and inane