BREAKING: New Phase of Matter 

Sending my condolences to you. ❤🙏❤🙏

The learning and study wasn't a waste, it was his time spent and his purpose, what a great way to spend an unfairly short time, you must have been really proud of him

sorry for your loss hope youre well

having just lost my father I whole heartedly understand losing someone to cancer.

With all due respect and my upmost sincere condolences, might I add that it seems that could've been the other way around. It is said that when someone caring, brave and passionate goes down the road of their dreams they bring light to the world. Some people are so great that within archiving their own dreams they inspire others to join the rightful way, which is then they the ones bringing justice in an unjust world.

I read about that, but I don't think it flipped back and forth "through time". If I recall correctly, both "ends" flipped at the same time without any lag/latency. And no energy consumption either, as you said.

Look up intermediate axis theory

It's so obvious that the Mandela / Quantum Effect was done using this method. I don't care what anyone says that wants to "argue" with me about it. It won't work; I'm convinced and I will always believe that.

So it’s more like a ping-pong cycling of arrangements of information that the particles are holding onto, rather than the arrangement of particles of an object. Obviously the electrons are changing their arrangements, but this isn’t like a traditional phase you can “hold” is the point i’m getting at.

@@kevinpaap2890 there are no electrons

That's not what the professors are for these days. Best thing you can get from college is the value of research. That's your avenue to learning. Not someone telling you. It's you, finding it, the journey to find it, and the ability you gain to use critical thinking. When you research something, you truly learn it. Not just memorize what someone said.

@@starbattles1 so by that logic there should be no teachers ? Everything should be self taught?

@@swadjo1149 All college classes require research papers to graduate. No professor stands up there and gives the answers to memorize and repeat on a test. They give a lecture, then assign a research topic. They are there to assess and grade those research papers. To guide them in their research journey. You twist words and topics in your mind and it keeps your IQ very low. Are there no teachers in college? Yet ALL classes require research papers. At your IQ level you took what I said to mean no teachers. Very narrow minded short sighted, uninformed comment.

@@starbattles1 you can research on your own physics .. yes, professors are to guide students on a pathway that makes sense -- if they can't then why need a professor ? Salaries are big and they are to earn it through guiding their students with knowledge ..

​@@swadjo1149privacy is what you lack yes hmmmm

Duh

If you want look into "single atom transistors", its definitely a problem that they can hopefully solve lol. What a time to be alive

I mean... Aren't transistors only possible because quantum tunneling is a thing?

@@allan710 no, because they are semi-conductors.

@@allan710 yeah, quantum computers are actually quantumer computers Edit for clarity: Because regular computers feature usually undesired quantum effects, while actual quantum computers do use quantum phenomena in order to work. That's the joke.

I don't know why but I bet you're a pretty dope granny.

You went to college when you were 15 or something?

@@VEE727 no, probably 18 or something

@@VEE727 apparently this is a bot comment, theres a few more exactly the same from different accounts.

I appreciate your tenacity to stick with chemistry even though it was difficult for you! Too often we are discouraged from doing things we're not immediately good at.

This 1000000% this. I feel the same way I love learning from creators like this..

Same.. At first, we had a meh physics teacher and i genuinely thought i just don't like the subject. But all of my teachers after that were super enthusiastic and great at explaining in an easily digestible way and it became one of my favorite subjects all throughout high school and college.. A great teacher makes all the difference

Buhl, Idaho... decades ago.... graduating class: 100... physics students: occasional. Me and one other kid. We sat in the back of chemistry class and worked through a physics curriculum, more or less. The teacher spent his personal time coming up with it, and keeping us going. The administration basically invented a class they didn't really offer and made it work. "Takes a village" kind of thing. We never appreciated it at the time. But it got me in a spin-up state that maintained through college and set the course of my life. Thanks, Charles Humphries.

Condecends to learn lololol. And I like that channel.

What does "condescends to learn" mean? I like Smarter Every Day for the same reason I like Physics Girl...they are endlessly curious!

@@chrisb8154 while he probably understands more than he initially lets on, he brings it down to an entry level any casual viewer can understand. From there, he learns right along with us, and shares what he’s learning. I meant “condescend” in a positive way

Brady Haran (of Periodic Videos, Computerphile, Numberphile, etc.) makes videos with a similar format.

@@Aethenthebored I meant definition 3 from www.dictionary.com/browse/condescend but maybe that meaning is falling out of usage. It must be, because the first two sites I checked didn’t have that meaning. Also it must be, because I obviously didn’t really convey what I meant to lol

LMAO

Honestly explains why I feel so engaged with the video

Exactly. She must have done some training, or is just incredibly talented, to break such complex ideas down so neatly. Einstein said if you can’t explain something to a six year old you don’t understand it yourself.

SHE IS BEING CONDESCENDING, IT'S JUST THAT SHE HERSELF IS CONVINCING HERSELF SHE HAS FOUND SOMETHING NEW, SHE HAS NOT, "TIME & SPACE" OR THE 4TH & 5TH DIMMENSION HAVE EXISTED SINCE THE BIG BANG. HOW DARE SHE TAKE THIS CREDIT? DID SHE WIN A NOBEL PRIZE? GET REAL, QUARTZ WATCHES HAVE BEEN USING CRYSTALS TO USE THIS ALLEGED "NEW" MATTTER WHICH IS TIME. DUH.

@Rosetta Stoned I don't really understand what makes this comment pretentious can you explain?

@Rosetta Stoned - Yup! Love it!

Repent to Jesus Christ “For I am the Lord your God who takes hold of your right hand and says to you, Do not fear; I will help you.” ‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭41:13‬ ‭NIV‬‬

@@repentandbelieveinjesuschr9495 I just don't get how these bots pick videos.. I mean ignoring that this is a scientific video I honestly don't get why it'd pick this video.

Interesting man

wow nice, interesting!🧐

Big Bang? Didn't we prove that didn't happen yet? I wrote a paper in University that proved the Big Bang likely didn't happen and the big crunch will not happen for sure. I was later proven right and asked the professor to revise my grade since I got a C for being a crack pot and he told me to get stuffed. Just an analysis of superstructures of galaxies it is impossible for the Big Bang to be responsible for them.

We think alike.

What’s up chef It’s nice to see a fellow servant of the flame

She wants me to cook for her. I would as long as she talked over wine and appetizers.

I don't know what an integer is.

The interviewer seemed surprisingly clueless however. She should have a 5th grader interview her to make it more understandable.

@@BuddyLee23 I think it was her producer, not himself a scientist based on the available evidence.

bruv, I heard your mum gifts her audiences with one on one interaction, and that she works to make things hard. I heard she does this kind of work by the bins in the bin alley between the shops on the main road, at night time. I also heard she likes animals too. and she welcomes cripples and spastics too.

I love this comment. Apart from the word "manor". In this instance, you would use "manner" :)

@@winstonsmith11 🤓

I love this comment. I agree 100%. And I don’t care which manor she was in when she explained it.. @Winsten Smith.

Well it’s a fake video with no sources so..

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-29Tlzf8f1FQ.html

Scientist ?

No

The time crystal moving a few seconds back in time would look like a violation of the second law of thermodynamics because the glass would be "repaired" . But then it would oscillate forward in time a few seconds later and it would be broken.

I agree. I also think that modality is an invaluable, even integral lens to use for observation, learning, and imagination - one that any field of study can benefit from especially because it can lead to questions, connections, and ideas that have not ever surfaced before. Sincerely, from one ADHD brain to another : )

@@Chris-cf2kp Show me one verified scientific hypothesis constructed in the entire history of cosmology, astronomy or astrophysics.

same 😊

Crystals that brings you ro the 4th dimension.

@@SilhSe Can it bring us to Narnia also?

That is incredible, and so fascinating! I need to know more 😭

That's less of spin flipping and more of the weird phenomenon of nature occasionally (and irrationally) tending toward order rather than entropy when entropy is the path of least resistance.

But spin up or down are the same magnitude vector but with an opposite direction.

That is an amazing thought. I always wondered what decided or designed what life decides to be or what tells it to be that thing. Would that mean you could possibly create life with a quantum computer? I mean proteins are matter too, That's mind blowing to think about.

I'm a chemist. The spontaneous peptide folding is a result of intramolecular forces that lower the overall energy of the system and as the folding proceeds the peptide loses energy.

Conservatives are on a giant Anti-Trans-Campaign right-now.Professor Dave, Planarwalk and other Science-RU-vidrs and Atheist-Channel try to oppose them, but oh wow, Fox-News, Shapiro, everyone is in-it.

But glass is amorphous. Would that mean that the change is not between two states but between random states? Have you discovered quantumrand(); ?

@@vladyslavkorenyak872 there is indeed no crystal structure, but what makes it a time material is that it periodically switches from a liquid to a glass phase and back

@@robin111v hang on, is the glass phase consistent with previous states? either way, that is awesome!

@@robin111v why despite appreciating how truly bonkers and cool this is, all i’m thinking is “who’s going to tell them its a memory leak, from a intern a few years ago that ran the “game of life” on one of the quantum adjacent systems and forgot to shut it down hen he left. And now its making time crystals over and above the gliders and other known forms in the game. The mind on this side never seems to grow 🤦

@@jockbw well it is not just one experiment, there are many things happening in parallel all over the world ;)

Nah bud, this ain’t it

Ahh yes!, Now if I could somehow figure out how to use those time crystal's go back in time just to teach my younger self what mistakes not to make and teach myself everything I've learnt about real estate and investing into Apple before the iphone came out and to teach myself to buy up All the cheap bitcoin I could get my hands on!, I would be one very rich man by now!..... Would've could've should've, LOL!

Bold of you to assume we are reasonable people for wanting to learn about time crystals

what about the entropy of the system? wouldn't the time crystal increase the photons' entropy from the laser?

Love your explanations as well!

Probably the best way to explain is, well, interaction. Puns probably intended.

Difficult to say "well explain..." considering ALL. ... and difficult to say "New phase of matter...." very difficult at least.

me after reading something on wikipedia be like:

Precisely my thoughts! Thank you. Thinking of you daily, Diana! RL

We need more people that can understand this on an engineering level

It's like the old saying" How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" As it turns out. This many. We have the maximum level of angels right here. That is to say, the math is so perfect we can now slide on the moment. The Tick to the universes tock. Maximum lever and fulcrum.

Ask Tesla. Or the Bible. Genesis 1. 'God said' has more packed into it than you realize.

We already know that sound is a state of matter. Or rather, the displacement and reordering of matter, and the inherent effects of it. I.e. acoustics, wavelengths, etc.

It's Kabbalahistic psudoscience. This girl is pure nonsense.

I always think of Heinlein. If there are three spatial dimensions, why would we conclude there's only one time dimension?

@@JohnJ469 interesting thought that I have no idea how to comprehend.

@@MarioMonte13 Me either. He used the idea in "The Number of the Beast". If there were 3 time dimensions and you could move to different universes by swapping them around, then the number of possible Universes becomes 6 to the 6th to the 6th. But also, when you think about it, why should there only be one time dimension?

100% I wonder what their job description looks like.

Yes! Levi does so well representing us

Thank you too for reflecting and sharing our thoughts about the excellent relatable editor! I was just gonna say!

Thank you! I was just coming into the comments to ask what the implications of the symmetry-breaking were, from Noether's Theorem.

Local symmetry breaking vs global symmetry breaking. - fields during local symmetry breaking are conserved by the appearance of goldstone modes/bosons, i.e. in the spatial translational setting that's phonons. Are we actually getting some kind of goldstone mode/boson from time-crystals? Are the associated long-wavelength excitations measurable? *I haven't delved into time-crystals yet, but these are the big questions that for sure would be in the back of my mind.

There is a video by youtuber science asylum where he says that the expansion of the universe breaks conversation of energy. His reasoning is that the red shift we see in the CMB is caused by the expansion of the universe. That energy loss that caused the light to red shift is just gone now. But I don't know if this counts as breaking time-translation symmetry because in principle that light could travel through contracting space and blue shift.

@@thedagit it's not the loss of energy, but the loss of energy density. We have the same amount, just in a larger system.

@@theresalwaysanotherway3996 this is correct. An equivalent discussion is around non-Hermitian sub-system imbedded inside a Hermitian system. Everything is relative as it turns out, but I think most physicists believe/agree that the universe must be manifestly Hermitian.

You don't really need perfect math to understand complex things tho. I mean, think about it: A French guy and an Japanese guy walk in to a bar. Do you think they can't communicate just because the two languages differ? If math is a language, and this higher math is saying something you don't understand... then what you need to do to understand it is to change your frame of reference. Don't focus on the "words" focus on the odd movements of the Japanese guy's hands. You'll eventually get that he's just trying to share a drink.

Nothing like a little bit of bias-confirmation lol

🏆

the annoying part would be as mentions trying to return the system to a null-state, it would require a constant reading system to check that it "flipped" back to a null-state.

Not just locking in on a piece of history but we will be able to interact with our parallel counterparts that made different decisions then us.

@@melinaathena how did you dervive that?

@@kepler-444f3 I keep replying to this and my comments keep getting deleted because I posted a few scientific articles and my comments get removed. So basically to answer your question, an atom has a twin and one twin remains in place or a set time while it’s counterpart can go in the past or future and at sometime they meet up and from there they can exchange information. This is according to what Einstein had said. However, this is not entirely true that an atom has a twin but it is not the best way to describe it. It is known as the atom paradox. In reality, the atom depending on how you look at it wavelength which is one color or spectrum at a time you can identify where it is at a certain location. However if you look at at at a different part of the same wavelength it can be somewhere else at the same time you looked at it with the other frequency. Basically at Stanford, they did this and identified the same atom in two different locations at the same time. They determined that an atom can have many superpositions at the same time and be everywhere at the same time. This is called quantum superposition. So if one atom can be in two places at once it maybe possible one day to identify all of the frequencies and determine the past, present, and future of an atom and this can be used to see parallel universes as well as we will be able to see all of the possibilities of what the atom can do based on looking at its wave frequency and a quantum computer maybe able to determine and map the possibilities for this. So in that regard we may be able to interact with our parallel self’s one day.

What a shame the teacher didn't use your natural curiosity as a spring-board, and leverage that into further inspiration for you and your classmates. Even if there were things "worthy" of slamming down, a good teacher will not "dress down" a student and show off his/her expertise, but recognize it as an opportunity to inspire with a good explanation.

Probably the motion of objects in space, which is almost a vacuum and has no resistance to slow the motion of a spinning object. That could be perpetual motion. Just guessing. In the atmosphere, there is air pressure to slow down movement. Or the movement of electrons around a mucleus seems to be perpetual motion with no end.

Or maybe the self-organizing universe? Because, as she mentions in the video, entropy should not allow a self starting explosion like the big bang, or the increasingly orderly assembly of structured matter that followed. As physicists say, "Allow us one miracle and we'll explain the rest." That one miracle kind of overshadows all the other supposed limitations of physical laws as we understand them; so perhaps your old professor was mistaken.

@@jamesstuartbrice420 it still won't be perpetual because just like how our planets spin they're actually slowing down, ever so little by little, due to other things pulling on it and it's even more of a problem to cause something to spin without gravity interfering with the spinning

@@jamesstuartbrice420 keep thinking though

I LOVE SCIENCE, so i wanna ask if you want Recommendations, but asking that repeatedly (to reach more people) is of course automatically risking that i seem like a robot, which makes people decline. A Risk, a Risk.

hHAHAHAHA

You don't need to understand it to know about it

hi

Hey Neil 🙋🏿‍♀️

@@missbstuurman or Chuck 😅

the collab we all need!!

love your episodes!

regardless if it's a simulation or not, which a debate I'm gonna skip for now, we are discovering more of how our universe works which is really exciting.

It's not too late! The maths of quantum mechanics is less daunting than it looks, and you can get there starting with classical models. I collected a lot of resources for my electronics degree, would you be interested in them? What sort of level are you at? (I was a high school dropout who didn't take any maths, physics or chemistry, then started uni in my 30s... so I had to catch up on the fly with stuff the kids learned at 16. 😵 Still-- I've got loads of links!)

I think the simulation theory is interesting. I’ve definitely see some stuff while I’ve been tripping that would back it up if I believed in it. I think the universe is just chaos and chaos finds order eventually through trial and error. It begins at the subatomic level and spirals outwards. Maybe that’s just the programming learning as it goes. I don’t think anybody will really ever know.

There's exciting physics experiments in the works with the intention of adding credence to the idea of our universe being a "simulation". I think the word simulation give people the wrong idea at times (i.e., people think we're being simulated by aliens or advanced human or something which I don't believe to be the case), but quantum physics and experiments like the double slit have lent validity to simulation theory for so long. Slowly the physics community will have no option but to start embracing the idea as all signs point to it being true.

@@alienassasin1234 The double slit experiment is great. WTF is going on?

There's no proof dark matter even exists because they haven't been able to figure out how to test for it. What you are talking about is speculation that hasn't yet been proven one way or another.

really cool thoughts and ideas here

I pray to the Quanta and He gives me the answers.

Read Stephen Hawking. A brief history of time. “Spin” is a property of quarks which give rise the forces between matter.

It’s kind of like orbitals around an atom. We really don’t have words to truly visualize what’s happening in physics.

Any chance you could find it in our heart to explain here what spin is? I wish I understood it after watching this but all I got was "so it's not actually spinning, but it's this inherent property."

Show me one verified scientific hypothesis constructed in the entire history of cosmology, astronomy or astrophysics. There isn't one. That's because it's not science.

@@slow-mo_moonbuggy Clocks run slower at the bottom of a mountain than they do at the top. The allowance GPS satellites have to make for the time difference between their orbit and the ground. Gravity attracting photons that have no mass.

yes but you cannot 'extract' any energy because the energy movement is neutral. many can't grasp this. it's easier to understand if you think of a magnet. a permanent magnet via the 'magnetic flux field' can 'defeat the energy of gravity' and stay stuck to the fridge.. however there is 'no surplus energy' to extract. think of a photon, as soon as you 'capture' the energy the photon is destroyed. this is the same thing there is no energy to capture without destroying the movement' you can only 'read' the energy..don't let anyone mess with your understanding of science unless you like the 'pop science' world of sensational (misleading) theories. cheers

Look up Fact Fiend, great channel, solely based off of one friend telling another friend about such and such trivia

Another defining feature of a quantum computer is that as Diana mentioned "ones" and "zeros", these are the "Yes" or "No" states of the information on the regular computer, but on quantum computer one state can be both "one" and "zero"...

@@alesolasz6956 - As I understand it, that's not a great way of thinking about it. It's more accurate to think of the state as being a point on a sphere. It's just that when you read it, you only get a one (north pole of the sphere) or a zero (south pole of the sphere) out.

Agreed, this style conversation was superb. I will retain this info better due to its delivery

@@alesolasz6956 Sabine Hossenfelder has a video called "Can one particle be in two places at once?", I would advise you to have a look at that to help elaborate the point that Omnifarious was making.

Cool. That's sounds pretty feasible.

Dianna: "Wait, he does what?"

@@serversurfer6169 Levi gets to poke fun at Dianna, and Dianna gets to force him to pay attention to a cool new physics concept. That's their deal.

It certainly doesn’t come from HER sense of humor…

We are aspects OF existence, therefore we can learn something valuable about ourselves.. spaceandmotion

Yeah . . . . I k n o w .

I LOVE SCIENCE, so i wanna ask if you want Recommendations, but asking that repeatedly (to reach more people) is of course automatically risking that i seem like a robot, which makes people decline.

The more we know, the more we know that we don't know. I love that statement, and it's very apt.

@@tomkudleq it’s an illuminati conspiracy

I feel the same way! I think this video helped me a LOT. Just don't move on in the video unless you fully understand what you just watched. I found myself rewinding a lot but eventually got it lol ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DxQK1WDYI_k.html

Honestly, I didn't even know "grok" was a word, but it is and this is the first time I've ever read it.

I’m showing my age here, but those of us reading science fiction in the 70s well remember Robert Heinlein and his classic Stranger in a Strange Land. I believe that was the first mention of “grok”.

@@MrTree-tr7pu Not just a real word. It is a real fake Martian word. It means "to drink". Unfortunately Jeff here is using it wrong. If you grok something, it means you understand it so well that the borders between it and yourself have blurred. Like how when you drink water, the water becomes part of you.

@@DampeS8N Good call. While that IS the literal definition of it, as a fictitious word, it's entered RW parlance to mean 'getting' a concept to a lesser degree than originally intended, but stronger than just merely understanding it, which is how I used it. I've understood the basic concept of Time Crystals for a little while, but this video has led it to much more strongly gel in my mind, with PG's fantastic explanation.

fascinating

that is so interesting to think about

If you glue a weight to the bar is it taking energy to hold it. Energy is used only if the mass moves and when stuck or at rest it is zero even when upside down. The magnet force is the glue.

That is what true science is!!!! I hope every child could watch these videos! Please parents share with your children and push schools to show these!!!

@yuitr loing I LOVE SCIENCE, so i wanna ask if you want Recommendations, but asking that repeatedly (to reach more people) is of course automatically risking that i seem like a robot, which makes people decline. A Risk, a Risk.

@@slevinchannel7589 My guess is that you are a bot.

@@kimbeach7185 You effectively guessed wrong. Hope you learn to not negatively-assume.

*she is so GOOD at informing the audience. In general use WELL to describe an activity or health and GOOD to describe a person, place, or thing. In the example above GOOD is being used to describe the content creator even though you may think you're using it to describe her action. If you want to use WELL, say this: She informs her audience WELL.

shes a youtuber you dofus 🤣

Wouldn't the time crystal technically only exist because we are observing it? The superposition states shouldn't have collapsed otherwise?

They did observe it but this is already a constant and not changing. The variable of which is changed is the laser that interacted with the material (crystal). The fact that it has "memory" state and doesn't interact with laser in pure physics/energy perspective is the new discovery. There are additional elements which creates this "memory", of which is the 4th dimension, ie time.

@@IHateUniqueUsernames observing does not mean being seen or watched, anytime a measurement is taken it interacts with the system that is in an unknown state, after the measurement is made the system is at a lower state after the interaction as all energy and information is conserved.

@@IHateUniqueUsernames want to specify that is doesn't have to be a lower after taken a measurement, the state could be higher than before measurement being made.

Also what comes to mind is monoatomic elements like monoatomic gold where a pile of monoatomic dust can appear and disappear or become lighter or heavier on a whim, and if you stick something like a pencil in it, it can disappear and then reappear again into/out of dimensions... Is this just matter traveling not elsewhere other than simply traveling in TIME itself?

Would it be appropriate to say you were Wright?

@@carl-henrikkristoffersen2313 But his brother is Wright as well

@@mikael1997 I hope their nicknames are Wilbur and Orville...

Perpetual motion in a system with factors of resistance is impossible, on the scale of an electron "spinning" around an atom there is no friction to lower motion. Perpetual motion ≠ perpetual motion machine In these systems it is worth noting that it is also impossible to have particles exist between fully transitioned states of energy and through various forms of energy decay there is a probability of an orbiting electron entering a lower energy state with no sign of it happening beforehand. (Also atomic decay exists) If you want to know what would happen to a atomic or subatomic particle that seems to always have motion or angular momentum at the very least I can give a theory or two, such as: If a low energy particle were to be forced to an even lower state than they are known to be able to rest at it would either be impossible to induce that kind of change either at all or without accidentally exciting the particle into a higher state of energy if not outright destroying it and causing it to essentially turn into a energy wave with similar or identical energy to that of the particle's wave function and possibly +/- some factor of what you used to cause that depending of what's used. Essentially if it does work all you're doing is finding a lower state of energy for a particle and then you have to ask the question and do the test again as hard as it may be or you're failing at getting the particle to do what you want in a myriad of ways likely including the above mentioned.

Perpetual motion in itself is perfectly possible. Just spin an object in a zero friction environment, or give a push or whatever. You just can't get more energy out of it than you put in. Also, electron spin is not motion, it's a quantum property. I always imagine it like this, but I don't know if it makes sense or if that's the way it works: if you spin an object (say, a disc) it gains angular momentum. You can measure it by looking at some point on the rim of the disc and seeing how much distance it travels each second. Then you take the disc's mass, do some math and voila, angular momentum. If you take a point somewhere closer to the middle of the disc, the result is the same, but if you look at the center of the disc, you can't measure distance anymore. I always imagine the spin of an electron to be like that.

When we talk about something like an electron having spin, we aren't really meaning it's spinning just that it has intrinsic angular momentum. As far as we know, electrons are point particles meaning that they have no size. It doesn't really make sense for a particle with no size to be spinning, but we can measure intrinsic angular momentum which is what we refer to as the quantum spin state.

@@RussellSpjut "electrons are point particles meaning that they have no size" everything thats a "thing" has a size so what do you mean it doesnt?

@@johndor7793 Once you get into quantum particles (and electrons are quantum particles), you basically have to throw out your intuitive understanding of the world around us. In the quantum model, point particles don't have size, but as they interact, they can build larger items like atoms that do have size. Some of this is just mathematic modeling. I'll see if I can find a video or article that explains it in more depth.

What is a time Crystal.. plz explain

🖖hope she get well sone🙏