Broken Visual With Object Level Security ? - NOT A PROBLEM ANY MORE ✨ OLS + Field Parameter MAGIC🎩

Подписаться 11 тыс.

Просмотров 3,9 тыс.

50% 1

While Applying Object level security in Power BI, We need to create separate visual or pages for different objects, but that is not required any more. Check out this amazing implementation which will not only save the efforts, but it will also improve performance
Get Answer for below questions -
- Object level Security and field Parameter
- How do you implement column level security?
Get Help into Questions Related to #powerbi , #dax , #powerquery Power BI #datamodeling , #analysisservices and #powerbiservice
Check out our website www.powerbihelpline.com and blog-post. for end-to-end power BI solutions, Power BI templates, or any kind of Power BI questions like Power query errors, Authoring and optimizing DAX codes for complex business logic.
Follow us on LinkedIn
/ power-bi-helpline-22a2...
Email- info@pbihelpline.com
@POWERBIHELPLINE

Опубликовано:

7 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 21

@Jennifer-k2x 18 дней назад

This is very interesting, thank you! I replicated it and it worked when testing it in PowerBI Desktop. However, in the PowerBI service the visuals still break. Do you experience the same and do you have a workaround?

@VictorHugoEspino Год назад

This is gold. Thanks so much for sharing with us.

@PowerBIHelpline Год назад

Thank you so much for the feedback. Glad to know it is so useful.

@SamWanderlust 9 месяцев назад

OMG, give this guy a Nobel Price! Thanks a lot for sharing, this is awesome

@PowerBIHelpline 9 месяцев назад

Wow, thanks!

@MuralidharMohapatra 2 месяца назад

This video is awesome. Thank you so much for sharing. Could you please let us know can we use AD group to capture login user. Our CEO does not want to see few fields but other employee need to see all the fields. Please suggest with this example.

@PowerBIHelpline 2 месяца назад

Yes you can use AD groups to assign the roles under dataset security setting in Power BI service

@kevthebandit Год назад

Beautifully Shared!

@PowerBIHelpline Год назад

Thank you so much Kevin

@mirrrvelll5164 7 месяцев назад

Good one! Useful!

@PowerBIHelpline 7 месяцев назад

Glad to hear that!

@rhythambajaj5515 Месяц назад

Hi Can you please share this dataset. I have mailed you yesterday

@ashishmohan4707 Год назад

amazing! I like the way you handle performance topics. Very educational!!! If possible can you please share this pbix file and data which you are using Thanks in advance

@PowerBIHelpline Год назад

Thank you so much for the feedback. Please send an email to info@pbihelpline.com to get the PBIX file used in above video.

@ashishmohan4707 Год назад

@@PowerBIHelpline Please check i have sent you mail

@ashishmohan4707 Год назад

Thank you

@PowerBIHelpline Год назад

@@ashishmohan4707 Yes. Please check your inbox. you will get the PBIX file

@tdogg31212 Год назад

This looks like it is exactly what I need!! However, is there a way to create the field access based on another value other than email address? I have a long list of employees (over 1000) and the access level is based on their job position in Azure groups. If an employee changes positions, they will lose access to my current reports but the position that person had will still have access to the reports, so when a new employee takes that position, they will automatically have access to my reports.

@PowerBIHelpline Год назад

You can Use an AD Group for the same, which needs to be maintained. So People are part of that AD group will automatically have access to the relevant contents.

@tdogg31212 Год назад

@@PowerBIHelpline I am able to connect BI to Azure Active Directory and I was able to see groups but I cannot find the Dynamic Security groups in the groups table. Is there another table or object I should be looking in?

@kieranwhite5175 Год назад

@@PowerBIHelpline Can you explain this more? I'm trying to implement this workaround into a report for AD Groups but not sure on the changes that need to be made compared to your method here