Burberry | Spring Summer 2019 by Riccardo Tisci | Full Fashion Show in High Definition. (Widescreen - Exclusive Video/1080p - LFW/London Fashion Week) #FFLikedalot
I think we have to realize that when every designer is new at such an established house they have an obligation to the legacy and the clientele to maintain a certain semblance....I think people forget that fashion is much less about the show than it is about the consumer.
I cannot remember any menswear look he ever did at Givenchy. There were the sheer with feathers dresses for women but men I can't think of any. The new designers are actually better. I don't think his menswear will ever improve even if his womenswear does.
@@carey579 but then again lets be fair when was the last time a designer made a memorable menswear collection? Its hard to be innovative with menswear and putting that into consideration i think ricardos work isnt terrible and actually worth looking forward to.
@@inkumoon515 True but if you actually look through every menswear collection like some of us do you can clearly see which ones at least TRY to do something interesting. Ricardo is not one of them. Or maybe he just hasn't the talent/taste in menswear.
The first collection for a Brand new Designer at the head of big house is always challenging and difficult. Ricardo did a pretty nice job overall. He managed to introduce and mix some of his own codes with the ones of the house without being too literal or cliché. He's a brilliant Designer and he will for sure bring something else to the house. We'll see of course how things are gonna go and if the client is going to follow but for a first try, it's not bad.
Riccardo showed up with utmost reverence for the codes of Burberry: khaki, gabardine, check, trench, scarf. We forget that the house not only pioneered some of these signature pieces, they invented them, so the pressure was high to establish that before Riccardo's voice comes down the runway, Burberry needs to be clear. We as spectators need to understand that and recognize his abundant sense of respect for that. Now.....one of the problems I've been having with many of the shows this season, and this falls into the category, is there's no buoyancy to the clothes. They're light, but they're a little sad. The color palette can't be counted on to bring and exuberance to the look (except for that piercing red), so there needs to be something else to lift it. I feel very apathetic looking at this collection and coming from someone like Riccardo Tisci, someone who has experience in enigmatic provocation, it makes it even sadder. Some gorgeous pieces: the pistachio sweater with the matching pleated skirt, the slick leather pencil skirts and coats, that GORGEOUS tweed coat on Catherine McNeil, the feather appliqué. I didn't mind the menswear as much as some of you did, but that comes from the value of the individual pieces vs. their spirit as complete looks. And that's where this collection excels....Tisci gave the buyers pieces they can sell, even if that meant at the expense of editorial appeal.
It is pretty obvious that he new burberry is stepping up to brands like Louis Vuitton and Salvatore Ferragamo.... chic but commercial. It is simply a business strategy. You can clearly see Burberry wants the same clients from the other two brands.
This is my first time watching a Burberry collection... I suddenly realize... I am a "Burberry Girl"!.... I love all this kind of clothing and the colours! Oh yes! Wonderful!
If you are looking for "whimsy" or "novelty" then you've obviously come to the wrong place. These clothes serve the purpose of being worn, nothing more or less. The mechanism of Burberry as a brand has more to do with saleablity than the avant-garde. I have no qualms with this collection. The clothes are timeless and they translate on an international clientele.
Not being rude at all but just trying to shed light. We have to remember that fashion is a business as well and unfortunately as a brand Burberry was falling very short and fading so it was broken. Their leather goods business is basically nonexistent and they dont carry things that ppl are dying to own anymore. What Riccardo is trying to do is make it a real fashion force again and what he did that was brilliant was merge the brand's current audience with his. Starting the show with revamped and reworked archive pieces which will directly elevate the more mature or core audience without alienating them. From there we move into modernized Burberry with the mens suiting as well as more women's pieces still in that classic color palette but making it more current. After that first white dress we start to see Riccardo's take on the brand even more through his eyes and his usual; somewhat goth references start to shine. He also goes into streetwear which is something Burberry was already trying to do but only a few pieces were sticking. To be sure that the streetwear would sell...he directly related it to his audience from Givenchy giving us items with apes, bambi, and even something reminiscent of the tribal print he's done before. Also the person buying streetwear is not the customer buying the trench coats. He even paid homage to the death of his iconic Bambi design with "WHY DID THEY KILL BAMBI". I could go on BUT my point is that theres something here for everyone that was already a fan of the brand but they also gained a new audience and thats what the show reflected. I think thats why the collection is also titled "Kingdom".
Not being rude at all but just trying to shed light. We have to remember that fashion is a business as well and unfortunately as a brand Burberry was falling very short and fading so it was broken. Their leather goods business is basically nonexistent and they dont carry things that ppl are dying to own anymore. What Riccardo is trying to do is make it a real fashion force again and what he did that was brilliant was merge the brand's current audience with his. Starting the show with revamped and reworked archive pieces which will directly elevate the more mature or core audience without alienating them. From there we move into modernized Burberry with the mens suiting as well as more women's pieces still in that classic color palette but making it more current. After that first white dress we start to see Riccardo's take on the brand even more through his eyes and his usual; somewhat goth references start to shine. He also goes into streetwear which is something Burberry was already trying to do but only a few pieces were sticking. To be sure that the streetwear would sell...he directly related it to his audience from Givenchy giving us items with apes, bambi, and even something reminiscent of the tribal print he's done before. Also the person buying streetwear is not the customer buying the trench coats. He even paid homage to the death of his iconic Bambi design with "WHY DID THEY KILL BAMBI". I could go on BUT my point is that theres something here for everyone that was already a fan of the brand but they also gained a new audience and thats what the show reflected. I think thats why the collection is also titled "Kingdom".
Mariacarla & Natalia looked amazing! this collection is so simple and wearable, the colors come together so well, nothing crazy at all. and i think that’s why i like it.
Loved the collection, he's just getting started. But I love Maria Carla Bosconos hair color looked good on her, I know it's for show and also I know alot will disagree but my opinion but Kendall always is striking to me.
I was expecting more from Ricardo and think that there were too many looks and they were not cohesive as a whole although I did like some of the pieces and the trench coats. Nevertheless, this collection will probably sell well.
Not a big fan of Burberry but now I'm starting to like it. I love Ricardo and it's a big plus for him that he included veteran models!!!! Thanks god! For a second i was confused about mariacarla cause she never did Burberry (as long as i know ) then i remembered who's the new creative director 😁😁😁🤗🤗🤗🤗 love this queen!! And her new red hair
No, no, no. I miss Christopher Bailey 😭 These clothes are too Italian inspired which would make sense because Tisci is Italian. What was so great about Chris, was that he captured the sophistication and somewhat innocent and reserved manner of a classic, English woman.
Doesn't look like Burberry to me. I miss the british models, the british live music. But I do like Ricardo and believe in him. He's making Burberry cool again.
the problem is not that the clothes are ugly or badly dosed, the problem is that all those designs are basic, we have seen them 1 million times everywhere, when a designer debuts in a brand especially in a brand with immense trajectory we hope that be designs with a brand of the designer, leave you wanting to see more, but this collection can find it around the corner much cheaper.
lol facts. Theyre the ones who probably find raf simmoms for ck so groundbreaking. I'm betting this collection can easily be sold and hoarded in a weeks by a wider demographic
I like the collection but the videography here could have been better... I was waiting for the full frontal shots to see each ensemble in its entirety and it never happened.. so really just quick flashes of each piece
amazing collection debut It was the perfect mix between CLASIC BRITISH TRENCH COAT LUXYCHIC & RELAX STYLE , the color palette in Camel & Beiges, preserving the classic Burberry british tartan and the inevitable gabardine/ trench in crocodile leather , and satin silk , those retro 40'S glam blouses and in vintage silk scarves, those glamorous SKIRTS PLIZED Aand leather skirts are just WOW!!!! This is the beginning of a new era of style and elegance in Burberry. congrats Riccardo Tisci ... ignorants haters gona hate , the people who criticize it do not know anything about fashion and only criticize it because it is Riccardo , this collection looks like classic burberry style , not like givenchy. and Christopher Bailey was a shit , for example his LGTB collecction... what a mess
Um retrô vanguarda moderno e comercial.amei o cenário tudo o corte das tecidoa também o son bo ponto certo as escadarias tava bacana astral eu amo Burberry bravo .👏👏👏👏👏👏🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😄
Depends on the brand so I've made a list: LVMH: Feminism, Futurism, Extreme Minimalism and a dropped accent Kering: Failed Edgyness, Satanism, Drugs and a dropped 'Yves'
It was meant to be a joke. But I disagree slightly, LVMH is hiring the wrong people for each house. Most of the designers are burnt out and are closer to 70 than 20. They need to do what Kering is doing and get some fresh blood.
- A giant collection, i guess that will be so much better if only woman. - Can not understand a thousand of pieces, it semmed disconnected from the rest. - Very poor use of the Burberry's tartan. - Poorly acessories. - Off-White effect take over. I was expecting so much more.
I think his vision was lost in the second half of the collection, yet all the pieces did appeal to all audiences and i thought overall it was a good collection.
Thank you for showing more of the layout of the space, than focusing on the actual clothing!!! There were so many angles being shot, til the focus was taken off the clothing!!! Too busy trying to play "Catch Up"!!! Doesn't anyone shoot shows normally anymore?
This felt like three different shows in one. I loved the first camel and beige section. Those were the money makers. He is differently going after the older LV and Hermes crowd. The second section was very Helmut Lang in the early 2000's. Which was ok but not executed that well. My problem was with the last section. It didn't blend with the other looks. It was for the young hypebeast crowd and reminded more of Hood By Air than Burberry. Kids who dress like that are not going to suddenly start wearing Burberry and they are a very niche market.
First part of the womenswear - old Burberry when Angela and Christopher were at their peak. Second part of the womenswear - WTF? Since when did Burberry do a diffusion range? You could just imagine the board saying to Riccardo... Don't forget the young Chinese customers, they bring the money.
