Buying a Used SKX was the BEST Decision 

that new superman S logo seiko has is awful. ruins all their watches for me. glad i got my dad an skx before discontinue.

It certainly is Inspector! Proud to have these despite having new dive watches. They are just appealing.

That’s a great deal during these trying times. Discontinued skx’s are rising. Glad to know you restored it back to life. Thanks for watching!

I concur

Thanks man! Will do. Coming all the way here. Appreciate it!

The GMT batman? I believe Seiko PH has an online store.

No

So far I have only seen Arabic/english on JDM versions.

I have a K version with Arabic datewheel.

@@ivanmejia6843 maybe your skx was made in 2017-2018 right before skx was discontinued.No worries it an genuine piece.

I have never seen one yet. But that one is a legend!

@KirbyYoung They are! Not super rare, so worth looking. I've had one for abt 3 years now.👍

And yet the most bought and sought after diver of all time.

God tier watch 👍

I think it’s mainly the design heritage of the watch, a lot of the older Seiko divers weren’t exactly great either (such as the 6309 turtle being a budget option back in the day). Just a no nonsense divers watch with a design language from decades of experience in the dive watch market. It’s definitely a piece of crap when compared to modern divers of the same price, but it was never meant to be a luxury product like watches are these days. The fact it’s the final Seiko dive watch design before the prospex line full of reissues also has its appeal.

@@PlatiLum I agree on "Heritage", Seiko are very capable, despite being a Japanese Multinational Electronics company, and not a dedicated watch manufacturer. They have made some truly innovative watches in the past, for example, the legendary 6139 chronograph, developed in the 60s. It was years ahead of it's time, and not only the best Seiko chronograph ever, it's one of the greatest chronographs ever made by anyone. The SKX despite it's faults, was definitely a bang for bucks offering, but it was never a credible dive watch. Yes it was good for a little snorkeling, but I very much doubt that any professional diver would have taken it seriously.

@@johnwheat5199I don’t get how it’s not a credible dive watch? I guess you listed some points but they don’t make a ton of sense. I’m sure people used these diving in the late 90’s/early 2000’s.

@@NexDim. Thanks for your response. I can assure you with some certainty as a former navy diver, I never encountered anyone within the profession that chose an SKX as a utilitarian timepiece.

Solid collection you have there. Sounds like the SKX is going to be worn more.