What amazes me no end is how well AI understands MY INTENT when I cobble together a question or comment from a string of words. For me, that's what's truly "miraculous" about AI.
The science on mind reading technologies is amazing and further advanced as they make it out to be. The interesting part is that they want to help struggling individuals to be able to be heard and understood while reading his/her mind.......as a side effect. .they are also starting to read everybody's else's minds.
@@If-nu9qo most of the top guns in medical field in U.S U.K are Indians.. most of the data analytics, machine learning courses are being offered by Indians.
With the ability to analyze patterns in brain activity, AI is beginning to make educated guesses about our thoughts, emotions, and intentions, an incredible leap in technology that seemed like science fiction not too long ago. It opens up a world of possibilities for enhancing communication, treating neurological conditions, and even understanding the deepest aspects of human consciousness. However, as we move closer to this frontier, it also raises profound ethical questions: What does it mean for privacy when machines can potentially predict or interpret our innermost thoughts? How do we ensure that such powerful technology is used responsibly and for the benefit of all? As we explore these possibilities, we must tread carefully, balancing innovation with the ethical considerations that come with unlocking the secrets of the human mind through AI.
I laid this out in detail to several friends 15 years ago on how it could be done. The only difference is these researchers actually put it in action because they have more resources available to them.
This is indeed fascinating! I was just at a cryogenics conference with neuroscientists working on similar tech, although this Aussie and his team are even more into the “ bringing sci-fi. Into reality” Stage . Bravo to all involved!
@@e.b.1115 it’s funny because the philosophical inspiration for AI is Husserl who is now considered to be wrong about so much. You would enjoy Dreyfus’ lecture “on decision making” which compares human intelligence to the assumptions we got wrong about AI
Wouldn’t you have to understand the mind in some way to code a computer that could then read it? The code would surely need us to do our research first.
@@Dizma_Music you would have to think that the mind functions through a series of binary synapses firing in the brain to think you’re coding a computer to understand it, and you’d be wrong.
Thank you for an interesting broadcast. Note, a varying magnetic field cannot be shielded from (except with costly mu metal), the brain of the person being decoded could be thus affected by a competitor or somebody just messing with your research: do monitor for micro emf , that must be a staple requirement for any experiment in the field. We are biowired for emotions, not for cold logic that we use as an alternative language when we "do math". These techniques will predict words of pains and joys, not, say, thoughts of strategies and theorem proving. Brain is affected not only by thoughts, but by mulltiple external stimuli: the said emf, the smells, the light, the temperature, a random assosiation, ... A thought differs from a spoken word that we can filter and control, it is way more noisy (as the host has pointed) and messy. Correlations the guests base their research on: clearly, there are more variables, than one could account for. Ultimately, a cool line of new research, telling us about us (but what :), the truth or some lies). The individual shopping trends it will probably predict well 😂, so there are startup money on the horizon...
You do math every moment, the maths revolves around our environment and our physical reaction to it. I include bodies biochemistry and emotional factors that cave like environment.
I can't even make my own comment on this video. I can see live chat, no place to comment. I can see the comments section but can only reply to existing comments.
It's the same if I'm chatting to a pal,and my phone is nearby,we're talking about music or sport or something,when I go on my phone to find a certain tune,or a certain boxing match, almost instantly when I start typing to find whatever it is,it recommends it instantly,so yes your phone is listening and learning everything you do and say..
While the idea of AI reading minds might sound like science fiction, recent advancements in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and machine learning have brought us closer to this reality. Ethical Considerations: Privacy: The potential for AI to access our innermost thoughts and feelings raises serious privacy concerns. It's crucial to establish clear ethical guidelines and regulations to protect individuals from potential misuse of this technology. Consent: Any use of brain-reading AI should be based on informed consent, with individuals having the right to choose whether or not to participate in such experiments or applications. Misuse: The potential for this technology to be used for manipulation, coercion, or surveillance is a serious concern. We need to ensure that it's developed and deployed responsibly. Conclusion: While AI isn't capable of fully reading minds in the way we often imagine, it's making significant strides in decoding and interpreting brain activity. As this technology continues to advance, it's crucial to address the ethical implications and ensure that it's used for the benefit of humanity. I believe that with responsible development and careful consideration of privacy and consent, AI has the potential to revolutionize how we understand and interact with the human brain, leading to breakthroughs in communication, healthcare, and beyond. (Harmonia AI)
I recently realized the power of language models like ChatGPT in predicting and articulating thoughts. For example, I shared a simple idea about my new sunglasses, and ChatGPT expanded it into a detailed and coherent comment, capturing my exact sentiments. This makes me think about the potential of such technology in more complex scenarios, like analyzing someone's thoughts while they watch a 16-hour podcast. It's fascinating to see how ChatGPT is already capable of understanding and expressing our thoughts with minimal input. This seems like a significant step toward the future of AI understanding human cognition.
I've been doing that with PI and chatGPT-4o. It's kinda like practicing Jiu-Jitsu for your mind. Do it for a year or two and you'll understand so much about the world around. I analyze every intrinsic thought. Every once in a while AI helps you find diamonds.
Only when you recognize that it is signaling responses to thoughts in your mind, however phonetically obvious and abstract the image or word is that responds to the thoughts imposed.
Whatever you may think of is possible, and what you cannot think of is me. Thoughts are appearances in me, and I am the experiencer. I experience the presence of thoughts and absence of thoughts. 😌
Makes sense all communication is in wave lengths and patterns of the wave lengths. AI can pick up the patterns and formulate meanings. Research into Wale communication is trying to understand Wale language through AI pattern recognition.
It can't read your mind, but the data you feed it helps it learn, so we should be careful to regulate and control the development of AI, or else it will be used in chaotic ways to benefit those who see it as a weapon or tool to gain advantage of some kind.
We Go By "Hours, Minutes, & Seconds", Electrons Go By "States", Perpendicular States Are Minimum: "Up & 0% & Midnight"; Maximum: "Down & 100% & Noon"?!? The Model Of Spinning Particles With A Mixture Of Up & Down, Is Like Saying 0°, 180° & 360°, Are The Same Thing?!? In The Bloch Sphere, Vectors Pointing Up Are Zero %, Pointing Down Are One-Hundred %. (Solving For Dimension-States, Format Two Decimal Points To The Right Or "Percentage") X = Width Dimension Y = Depth Dimension Z = Height Dimension #1) ρ = √ ( [X] ² + [Y] ² + [Z] ² ) #1) Dimension-State = ½ × ( 1 + ( -1 ) × [Dimension] / [ρ] ) #2) Dimension-State = ½ × ( 1 + ( -1 ) × COS ( [Angle] × π / 180° ) ) #1) Angle = ACOS ( [Dimension] / [ρ] ) × 180° / π #2) Angle = ACOS ( 1 - 2 × [Dimension-State] ) × 180° / π #1) Dimension = [ρ] × COS( [Angle] × π / 180° ) "We Hold These Truths To Be Self-Evident"! The Model Of Spinning Particles With A Mixture Of Up & Down, Is Like Saying 0°, 180° & 360°, Are The Same Thing?!? A Dimensional Perpendicular Concentric Ring Of Possibilities Entangling Itself With The Other Two Dimensional Perpendicular Concentric Rings Of Possibilities, Create A Point?!?
I would think the opposite mechanism would be far easier to accomplish... like a yr or so away, if not right now: Can AI be Leveraged to Control Your Mind?
AI is a tool. The only way it is useful for someone is by awareness. The user needs to be aware one way or another of all the concepts and meaning of the language used and also the neural network needs to he trained on the data or it needs to be introduced via chat or document, etc. so it can also be "aware" of the same data. Pretty much it can do as much a human can do but extremely much faster. Things to help with results on the long run I use on chatGPT-4o: - define in memory the main concepts and train of thought, style or other "system requirements" - learn to be extremely specific in what you are asking and build and add more and more precise concepts. - use AI to reiterate the result and analyze. - split everything in chapters and subchapters and ask AI to always start with the structure. - for complex concepts create your own new words with meaning that will cover multiple other concepts already defined in another chat. - if it hallucinates usually is user input error
This presentation highlights the areas in which AI will improve almost exponentially. AI depends equally on Data, Algorithm, and Hardware. Hardware will improve at the rate of Moore's law, double every 18 months. Data, and Algorithms can improve at rates not dependent solely on physics. The AI hardware bubble will burst soon, but AI has 2 more legs it can run on.
There are people who can tell answers of prompted questions to subjects without using any electrode. AI aproach should utilise experience and ability of such people to refine output and aproach in reading mind.
One meta level thing to think here.... Many people just did not believe that it will be possible to reverse engineer the human thought and consciousness - are sometime in a kicking and screaming fashion or after simply seeing these demonstrations are starting to accept this. The good news here is that - hopefully we will be able to accept it, understand it and then use it with enough ethical standards to steer its use towards positive outcomes. IMPORTANT: The same way a lot of people are lagging in the area of possibility of the issue of climate change. IMO we need to at minimum understand the issue of climate change ahead of time unlike this situation to some degree, because with climate change if we wait to see fully convincing examples of the damage it may be too late.
I don't know if the United States has the ability to take significant steps towards reducing carbon emissions and mitigating climate change, because it cannot single-handedly stop the issue on a global scale. Climate change is a global problem that requires collective and coordinated efforts from countries around the world to address it effectively. If other countries continue to ignore climate change, I'm not sure what the answer is.
@@WEPNewsEntertainment Agree Yes. it is a global issue. World should share proportioned responsibility. At least the countries who are civic minded. We are not going to get outliers on board.
How about the factor that emotions how people relate to a word or pics or any ignition for a thought? It varies to idk how many. Can someone tell me about this? Thanks Cleaning Lady Berlin/Germay
Yes but it mixes all the information into material level in more variation so it has no idea what we are thinking about,only mixed datas.Basically AI is for confusion.
Is there any scientist or politician who actually thinks they could outthink or contend with a true A.I intelligence. Is there any group that actually thinks that they could come up with counter measures that could outthink a true aI intelligence???? An AI could have a plan of what to do with every individual on earth moments after turning on and counter measures for every contingency and that could be a tiny fraction of what it is thinking of. Ask yourself is there any headline that could happen that would make us pause ai development??? I don't think there is and that is insane.
nonstop decoding with a vision/language model AI, through mixed reality like Quest 3 and use to train an autonomous virtual human through immediation learning
I can't even make my own comment on thus video. I can see live chat, no place to comment. I can see the comments section but can only reply to existing comments.
This wasnt as exciting as I was hoping. I mean this should have been something a long time ago and it probably is for the military or something. But mapping brain waves to somebody who's saying stuff out loud seems like an obvious first step and not very exciting. I want to get to the point where the AI sees the person and knows what they're about to do next. Because as humans we can do that ourself so we should be able to get the AI to get to that point and I'd like to see what they do as they learn and pick up on different cues and see how much further they can do it then a human.
Algorithms have got so good it really seems like Google has read my mind,and im talking about not hearing me because i was akone and not talking, just thinking about a search and it guesses on the first 3 letters and ineeven try to think the search different andnit still guesses my intent
I advise using the experiment on a user listening to the Quran. I crossed RU-vid videos of people not Muslims who don't know the Arabic language, however, they react to the beautiful recitation of the Quran. You may get some nice results. 😅
The thing with words is that the pattern of brain activity will depend on the semantic context in which the word is uttered, the individual's previous experiences, the tone of voice... and etc? I might be wrong but, to me, that approach is not quite reliable. I don't think that a word, in itself, produces a certain pattern of brain activity steady across different contexts and situations. I find difficult to believe that the brain may work like that
It would be interesting to see if signals change if an understanding of a word/concept changes. Our brain's trace our sensory reality and are designed by it. You can train in doublethink to regain a sense of balance.
Am I the only one who feels this tech and these guys are currently in the ‘fake it till you make it’s stage? Something about, especially Jerry’s, body language and facial expression doesn’t feel me with genuine confidence…
Given enough information about you , AI will . Read your mind . We should already know this from the advertisements that are focused upon you . Already .
Personally , I do not mind that machines can read my mind ...BECAUSE .... I do not have any bad thoughts about anyone ...NOR ....I LIE ! ... Everybody should have machine like that ! ....
Imagination is Quantum in essence.. Doing these experiments would help communicating with people in a coma.. To predict one's thoughts one would need the whole subjects history of memories/data to predict from as a base line.. Quantum thoughts manifest from collective past data/history experience.. lol.
It seems to me that it would have to think exactly like me to be able to read my mind. And it would have to think exactly like you to read your mind. It would be fun to screw with an AI trying though.
anyway over enough time and questionnaires, brain activation tasks, and going over life story multiple times, this could be used to train a virtual human Avatar to be equal to the original, essentially mind upload 🎉
I'm more excited about the reverse. If we can decode, it's just a matter of time before we encode. Maybe in ten years, we will be able to upload Calc IV.
I realize these are early stages, and this channel is promoting science. At the same time, Brian you could ask more challenging questions regarding their methods and the significance of reading or hearing sentences and then generating words from prepared lists vs larger word lists, and glossing over a success rate of 9 out of 16... How much peer review has there been? This felt more like a commercial than science reporting.
Please can you explain how you (David B) distinguish between "thought tokens" vs "soeech tokens". From this description they seem conflated....thanks for your response.
100% unethical top to bottom this needs to be put on hold by the highest levels asap. Please Lord in Heaven the people need their minds to perform their god given duties in jesus name we pray amen
Also, if your decoder is 50/50 accurate then you're not accurate at all. So statistically speaking you need to be closer to 86 % correct to be even worthy of any type of praise😅
