Can I Get To Plat 1 With Master Duel's WORST Deck??? 

Edit: this comment made more sense before Farfa updated his. Are you trying to tell us that if this ad gets a bunch of engagement, you'll make *fewer* bad deck videos? I'm pretty that's the opposite of how that works.

I think this was meant for the video you posted earlier for table 500. Speaking of that, where did your video go? I saw you privated it a few hours after posting it, are you reuploading it?

You are a freaking moron

Truly, but you missed one thing. Floodgate Turbo set pass 10 turn game.

dude i'm literally dueling against branded despia in gold V and they always get called by on their first hand , i sweaar to god called by has to go to 0

Every guy i go against ash and imperm first turn

@@anon2447 Maxx C gotta go first though

@@ashikjaman1940 no it doesnt, the whole point of that is to be able to do something against decks that end up in 4 negs first turn after you sit for 20 mins, called by literally takes away your answer to not going first, called by has to go, maxx c doesn't

ah yes the afk and or bricked hand match up a classic

Beetroopers weren't half bad

Gold Pride is no where bad

Beetrooper had a format

​@@userzero6555 beetroopers were just dpe turbo

I used to think this way too, but then I started thinking about all the awful pack filler archetypes that come out of the OCG, and realized that the TCG and OCG have about the same percentage of good and awful archetypes that come out of them.

Branded? More like Braindead.

I think the opponent wanted to give farfa the win, he was playing war rocks .... If it was me, I'd go easy on them too, I might do mistakes on "accidents"

@@Ragnarok540what’s the difference?

Does the branded player want to synchro summoning first before activate branded fusion? Lol

RU-vid Branded players are something else man lol

Glads flip one waboku and its over.

@PharoTalon there’s also a video of war rock beating full power tear

@PharoTalon No, the Tear player was playing perfectly fine. Just didn't understand how the Battle Phase worked outside "beat things to death". I've seen the video Galli is referring to, and it's just... interesting. It's a deck that can beat top tier stuff, while losing to rogue shit. It's weird.

@@Practitioner_of_Diogenes Do you know what the video is called? (Also sure the goat deck beating war rock is from farfa...unless that was a different one)

@@Practitioner_of_Diogenes That's commonly known as an ANTI-META deck.

The salt on the wound is that there's an archetype that shows what War Rock could've been and that is the Ancient Warriors archetype.

​@@Tokumastu1no. The salt on the wound is War Rocks could've been released 10 years ago and still lose consistently.

mfw fucking labrynth has better beatsticks than war rocks

Just make war rock beast warriors 10x better

I'm one of the three fans, I'm having fun with them to be honest ! I know it's not the best deck out there, but for a beginner like me, it help me to start this game

Lair can be really annoying if you're not prepared or know what it does.

It has functions sure but those are majorly crippled. War rock is like a person with down syndrome.

Its definitely not the worst archetype to be ever made(I think that title goes to either steelswarms or genex or iron chains)it's just what were they smoking recently to make it? Battle archetypes have almost never been successful(anybody remember battle wasp other then it's tech ins with beetroopers?) They keep thinking it will be successful or something even though they almost never really innovate for it, I mean a searcher is cool in battle phase(because the great thing about that is it can't actually be negated) and other things the rocks have going for them but there still lies the problem that the earth warrior instead of "war rock" and other things mess the deck up. And the only one I can think of right now that innovated on in anyway was super heavy samurai, attacking in defence is literally THE BIGGEST we've gotten and literally NO super heavy deck uses not a lot of those synchros right now unless it's a pure build because of the new monsters and also even then I wouldn't consider that archetype particularly battle focused. Like I really feel like battle archetypes are stuck in the past, they don't bother to innovate battle archetypes and that bothers me, once again I ask why not a single battle archetype can treat every phase as a pseudo battle phase and gain effects based on the phases they attack in. It can even be lunar themed so battle phase is full moon where they're their most strongest but you still have to find time to strategically attack during other phases to get the most out of em and they can't attack in any other phase that turn(unless conditions apply to permit them to do so) or they all can have different phases their strong in. Why no battle archetypes have gem-knight citrine's effect for every monster above a certain level and also are particularly hard to get rid of because a card also has to outdo it in attack before it can be destroyed or banished by card effects of monsters, spells, or traps(unless it's a trap monster all spells and traps count as 0/0.) It would make the archetype a bit annoying to deal with but I think this having a big ass monster that has this so it can say HAHA to most board wipe monsters, spells, and traps could be interesting. I would also say make the biggest boss gain attack and shit to make it harder but I think that would be too hard to get rid of, let's not do it too much. Those are the ideas I have but Konami is unironically unkonami when coming up with battle archetypes and it SHOWS. They're all fuckin balanced and the fact that none have been broken since the past is my reasoning. Konami can make some cool shit when they can come up with it, but it's either busted out the ass, really unique, or ass even if it is unique. Like c'mon Konami, give us a good battle archetype PLEASE. It won't fucking kill you to make it good either.

Among LotW decks that didn't get support like Meklord and Nordic, Arcana Force is still unplayably bad, hopefully LIGHT Duelist Pack swoops in for it, Ally of Justice just isn't a deck; even Catastor fell off for modern game. Early Duel Terminal was experimental even for 5D's era, and I'm sure War Rocks is leagues beyond the decks of that time.

​@@chucklesdeclown8819 Steelswarms are obviously just worse Monarch but that's not too bad They are way above Genex and Iron Chains because they are part of the lswarm archetype meaning they have access to Evilswarm stuff, ignoring Evilswarm is like ignoring Double X Saber when you are talking about X Saber

When did we allowed hate for cool designed cards that are warrior be and not to the current cancerous meta deck.

Triamid, yes this is an actual deck.

Or Worms.

Chemi Critters sweep war rocks easy

Remember that Guardian were supposed to be an actual deck that got a Flip searcher...

Or Ally of Justice

To the moon!

Even now they're decent rogue deck. I did easy dlvl climb in kc cup last time with them. One of decks that goes well with Balance. Gonna be harder this time because popular decks like DM, PK counter them. On flipside they shit on Timelords if that annoying deck gets played a lot.

Its not full power yet, it doesn't have skill drain unlike mekk-knight

Honestly, I agree. The fact that both the newly added Witchcrafter cards are UR is wack.

Bruh aint no way we having a professional War Rock player right here 💀

@@keranendy9713 Absolutely not. Some of what I mentioned is for the memes and silliness of it. I mean, seriously, Terminal World?

I ran a War rock deck with Goyo King and Warrior it was so bad and somehow I still won a couple

Cool, how many of those matches were people not reading?

​@@chucklesdeclown8819 i mean, Endymion's most powerful effect is the fact that nobody reads the effect.

Lol War Rocks can freaking OTK you,. they not even using Rookie Warrior Lady which is a freaking UR.. And people don't even get the point of War Rock medium. It's not just a searcher but a freaking skill drain, they just need to prioritize special summoning Meteoragon and Bashelious.

Galatea? You can get it from story/solo mode

Please tell me you don't use floodgates for weather painters

@@Honest-King Only Skill Drain, no macro or rivalry.

Hah same.. I don't even use floodgates on Myutants and commonly I reach Plat to Dia V regularly.. I only played 4 to 5 duels a day.

@@naknampucha5236 I also don't play floodgates in Myutant, deck's already bricky enough.

@@tongatapu7325 Oh, well better to replace it before it gets banned.

Aye. Mammud at zero or one. Don't use Orpis at all (though, that can be debated because of Rookie and Spirit). If you're using Bashileos, just use him for Aussa's Channeler version for the discard cost, otherwise don't run either.