@@GlobalWave1and that’s why they use a CPU architecture that was created by another company and produce them in Taiwan because they’re so innovative right
@@TheAlaskanBullW02you want apple to not use ARM64? like why? innovation doesnt mean making everything yourself, it means doing what others cannot, or may have done but you do it better. also only samsung and intel are the only companies that have their own silicon fabs, and both of them are way behind TSMC. so why not just go tsmc? your logic is flawed.
Old school keynotes were just better. It was the showmanship. The “Let me show you why you need this brand new product in your life.” It was the awkwardness of some of the team leaders getting onstage and demonstrating their contribution to either software or hardware, or both in some cases. It was raw, and yet refined at the same time. I don’t think they’ll ever do them like this again, but man I sure wish they would.
@@spextrekid9410 a real time live reaction to features and new products. It’s unrehearsed. Those wow moments; the iconic “One More Thing.” It’s just not the same as a recorded production.
They had great highs, but also risked awful lows if things didn't go to plan. Their marketing algorithms probably told them the benefits didn't outweigh the risks.
I 100% agree. The keynotes brought the humanity of the products and the people out. It was perfect because it wasn’t scripted to be perfect. Really miss those times.😢
Well yes it was much better, but still they were training the gig. Steve was doing it also even though it felt like improvisation. Now many of them sound like just reading the prompt.
his pose, his facial expression of "now you see it" while everyone's cheering reminds me of Colonel Rhodey Rodes in The Avengers : Age of Ultron when he told guests at the party "so i said "BOOM! Are you looking for this?" " and they laugh. same facial expression.
It would certainly be a more aesthetically interesting design for an Apple Silicon machine than most of what they’ve been making, which is pretty meh (at least we have color choice on the iMac).
Makes more sense to keep the current Mac Pro design imo, for expansion cards and such. Add-on RAM would be nice if they could figure out how, for audio guys.
@@keaton718 As is all the expansion that is offered can be done well enough by Thunderbolt enclosures, and for far cheaper than the $3k premium over the Mac Studio. So the larger enlosure is redundant unless they figure out ram expansions or improved GPUs.
iphone X vs iphone shatever it is pro max plus 3d 64 definitive edition featuring dante from the devil may cry series. no difference. Galaxy S8 vs Galaxy Z Fold 5. all the difference.
I would really like to see all the comments, that quoted him on this after the absolute success, that was this trash can, that I never even knew about beforehand. I guess, they innovated the most befitting place, to put all their great innovations in.
@@johnmartinez7440 It was one of the worst Apple-products. The cooling didn't work and it wasn't upgradable so it didn't function as a pro machine. And it was as most Apple products expensive. It was a machine that traded form over function. That can work for consumer products, but not for machines needed to do your work. The base price was 3000$ in 2013 so it wasnt't even something a consumer would concider. If you wanted something for browing you could buy a cheaper an smaller Mac Mini or iMac.
This was followed this model being reviled by enthusiasts as well as a terrible era for macintoshes in general before they finally got their shit together with M series where they actually truly innovated
I saw PCs with round shape, heart shape, Mickey Mouse shape.. it's not the about the shape dude. It's about the technology inside and the way you fill the shape, the noise, the amount of power in the small size, There is nothing like that outside.
apple silicon would work in this form factor same with 12 inch macbook that should be rebranded as the air while the air lineup gets rebranded as the macbook
They really have been. Maybe not to the level we would like them to be, but it's thanks to Apple that there are higher standards for what phones should have today. Otherwise, we would've been stuck with Nokias and Blackberrys. iPhone, iPad, MacBook (especially the M Silicon line), Vision Pro. Software and security updates that last 7-8 years. Plenty to fault Apple for - their anti-repair stances are atrocious, and their moat ecosystem is petty - but they've upped the standards.
FUNNY GUY ALERT! BTW I have a custom built rig. 3930k, 2 840 Pro SSD's, H100 liquid cooler, GTX 680 etc., which is not crap. It does though make your mac look like crap. BOOM!
Ok, so putting some hardware inside a trash can is now considered innovation? The only slight "innovation" Apple has done since Steve Job's passing was the Apple Watch, which was decent enough although hardly revolutionary. A trash can with some hardware in it is not innovation. All the "my ass"-comments in the world won't change that fact. Steve Jobs was Apple. Without him it's a completely different company, unfortunately.
THey still can't innovate. The iPad 5th and iPad mini 2 still looks the same. Oh, and no flash, STILL. And that looks like a garbage can. Actually, it IS a garbage can.
Lol my pc has a quad core intel i7 4770K overclocked past 4ghz with a GTX Titan 6Gb DDR5 ram along with 16gb of system ram. Yeah so don't brag about your specs mofos
