Canon R6 Photography Review: It. Just. Works. 

Thank you for focusing on photography instead of video quality!

The R6 is so underrated. The low light performance is so good. The fact that it is 20 MP is a selling point for me. Big sensor sites equals great image quality.

Such a fun and informative video! I have been in LOVE with the RF 85mm1.2 for many months now. You didn't hurt that "affair" in my heart! One fine day...I will move up from my 6D to R6 and the 85 and smile a lot! Thanks for a helpful and upbeat video :)!! Excellent!

The R6 is on my shopping list for shooting live music. I’m currently using a 6D and 6D Mk2, and 20 Mp is plenty, especially for low light. Wish I could have had the 800mm in my surfing photography days. I used an 800mm f/8 with Kodachrome 64 and it was plenty fast enough so f/11 would be perfect with the R6.

Was waiting for this review..😀 this is perfect as an all rounder camera.

Amazing review, I really enjoy your reviews

Great job,thanks for reviewing for photography

Love your videos. Thank you for your review. Brilliant.

I am looking forward to have this camera and lens combo in the future, the R6 and the 85mm 1.2 would be perfect. Currently im using Canon 450D with the 50mm f/1.8

Great video - buying my R6 this week. The ONE thing which everyone seems to agree is that even if Canon bumped the R6 to 24 MP, it would have looked better in comparison to its competition. However, we have what we have. The fact that Z6 II doesnt have flip screen also may help some people steer away to R6.

Love my R6 and your reviews mate

I like how the shutter button on Canon cameras is pitched forward vs being square on the top of the camera body like other brands. Such a small detail makes holding and handling different in such a positive way.

I just upgraded from my DLSR to the R6 a few days ago. How is the eye tracking for more than one subject/model? Have you had any issues with the tracking focusing and getting tack sharp images on more than one person/group at a time?

Did you guys ever cover the 28-70mm f2? Can't seem to find it from your channel. Either way great video as always, keep at it!

The R 6 has the sensor and the processor of the $6500. Dollar 1Dx mk III. The R6 has the ergonomics and controls also the IBIS and focusing system of the $3900. Dollar R5. I don’t have a problem with the price. I can make excellent 20 x 30 prints from 20 mp sensor. I’ve been making prints for 40 yrs. So to me this camera is a no brained for someone invested in the Canon system.

Bobby, Booby the camera works It just works. Yas - your content - next level

"This takes great photo". That is what I wanted to hear about. I don't know why a lot of reviews just focus on video capability.

sir i need your advice in buying cameras we were looking to upgrade from mid range camera to full frame with in the budget for studio, wedding and other short videos... even though we use shoot both photos and video mostly , a little higher preference for quality photos. one of our senior suggested us to go for mirrorless in canon or sony both for video and photo shoot.. when i compared the difference inbetween 5D mark -iv, eos R and eos R5... mainly i observed that the number of focus points varies from camera to camera... where eos R have 5655 focus points 5D mark -vi have 61 focus points and eos R5 have 1053 focus points I dont know how far having more focus points plays key role irrespective of having 15 mega pixel lesser than eos R5 After watching your video is it right to got for eos R rather than going to eos R6 or eos R6 or need to look at Sony a7R IV pls give us your valuable opinion which can help us ...

Love to see photographic reviews of the R6!

Does the a7iii have a better dynamic range than the r6?

You're absolutely right about the price point. Whenever I think about adding a R6 body to my Canon kit to complement my R5, the first thought is always this: "I'm much better off buying a Z6II for below 3k dollars/almost a thousand dollar less without much stripping off(I have multiple systems for different type of work.) When you buy a R6 at almost 4 thousand dollar, you'll be reminded about things I hate about Canon. Stripped off so much stuff and price it higher so the early adopters are reaped off good by Canon. While that Z6II has most of the stuff just like a Z7II and even a bit extra. The Z lens s line 2.8 zooms are top notch, absolute performer in optical resolution, and treats CA magically to almost eliminating them. They just need the s sytem to complete so they can cater to more DSLR shooters to move over.

Which Camera’s in the Canon line do you recommend for weddings?

that low light picture with the 800 mm of the kid at 20.000 iso looks similar to a picture I take with my 6D at 800-1600 iso... this camera is amazing

Its Achilles heel is how it flips from photo to video. I've watched a few reviews that mention it.

awesome review once again. I am a bit puzzled what we are getting for the extra $1500 over the eos R? Better tracking and better low light? Maybe better ergonomics? Or is it all about the video features?

I'm close to buying, yay or nay??? Mainly for photos but the amazing video quality I'm sure will come in handy eventually

Count me among those dissing the new 600 and 800 of Canon when it first came out. I'm quite impressed with the shots you managed while shooting them handheld. They are definitely not lacking in detail. I'm not the biggest fan of the bokeh but, it's actually not bad given what you're paying for it. The key there, though, is the AF speed and accuracy of this combo. And looking at the eyes, it locks on well. How quickly does it grab focus in dim/low lighting? Would this be a good combo for the Singapore night safari? Or would that be too dark?

I agree with you on pricing . I think $3200 Canadian is too high imo, but unfortunately I’m not into waiting . I also wish it was a 30 megapixel sensor for cropping , even a 24 would have made me feel better about it at this price point . I would like to do landscape photography and be able to print poster size prints , but the R5 is over 5K here, so that was a hard pill to swallow , plus I don’t care for the upper lcd and prefer the knob . I’m hoping their next release of the R5 goes back to a knob and a 75 megapixel sensor , then I’ll justify the price for the R5 . One can always dream I guess

Great review and GREAT PHOTOS man! Appreciate the effort. Waiting on 85 f2 with r6!

Great review! Have you done a review of the R6 using the adapter? I have most of the L series EF lenses and just can’t afford to buy RF at this stage, plus I’ll keep them for my dslr. Cameras and lenses are ver expensive in Australia due to the fact that we have the Pacific Peso.

the video looks sweet btw, what gear is it shot with?

I have the R6 since its first day it came out and it is expensive. But to me the R5 is way more expensive especially if you don’t use the 8k capabilities. For an extra CAD$1500 to upgrade to 45 mp I felt it wasn’t worth it at this time. It’s a great nifty camera and people using it will be happy. Great review spot on especially with your comment about 20 mp. I agree 24 or 30 would be great but 20 mp also (miraculously) works too.

So do you think the R6 is good enough for indoor sports (high ISO, fast shutter speed)? With my Canon 5D mark IV i usually shoot on ISO 6400, 1/800 and f/2.8.

Are there any focusing issues using the teleconverter? Would like to use one on my R6 with my 70-200 II.

Could you do a comparison video between the R6 and the Panasonic S1?

Yes it seemed that 24megapixels was the full frame standard now and at $2500 you would expect that from this camera especially with the new super expensive RF prime lenses to go with it..I wanna see what the 2nd Gen Nikon Z6 looks like first

In terms of overall image quality, do you get the same IQ when using EF glass (Canon L series glass) with an adapter as you do with the new RF glass? Thank you!

What do think about the R6 vs the A7iii strictly for photography?

“Sell the kidney” canon now that...😂😂😂😂

Your thoughts on the comparison between the RP & R6?

Which one better for Photography picture quality wise Canon EOS Mark4 or R6???

i was Fuji X series for 5 years. Earlier this year i bought a Canon 5D mk iv. Big mistake. Not only were the EF lenses softer but the body created more camera blur at lower shutter speeds (accepting this could be my hand steadiness more than the equipment) but the results were poor compared to Fuji. i was about to switch back then the R6 came out. Bought this and so far been using with the RF 50mm f1.8 stm lens. Wow!!! not only is it a beautiful camera to use and navigate around; it simply produces pin sharp and perfect images. it is simply perfect i would argue for anyone except very specialised professionals who's clients expect very large prints. My clients will be completely satisfied with the images even from this RF lens so the other lenses must be more than anyone would require. The body is small and light; without it seeming greatly smaller than the 5d mk iv. Anyone who is wrecking their head deciding if to switch. Just do it. the R6 is brilliant. ps i thought i would miss the top screen but i haven't at all. looking at the back screen is so easy and probably quicker than using the top screen on the 5D mk iv I hope i can inspire anyone to get this camera body as it will bring a lot of satisfaction and confidence, which without, photography is a nightmare

Been enjoying mine. Nice for confirmation. Waiting on 85 F2

I wonder if the EOS R will get an update for animal AF and be almost on the same level... without the IBIS of course.

One small question and it might sound odd,but do you still get face/eye tracking through the viewfinder.

Canon eos R or R6 for photography?

How do you think the AF compares to the Sony a9 (II). The Sony should be slightly better as it's optimised for sport, however if you have used the Sony, your comments would be interesting.

He's not kidding about that 800mm RF, that lens is super sharp and light

Where do you get your V-necks

Just curious with 20mp what would be the largest print size.

Great review as always, but 20mp for wildlife is too low for cropping. 30mp would have been a sweet spot and would have replaced the 7D MKII. Stay Safe

Hope to hear more about the 20mp sensor.

5:27 A Canon official actually said that the sensors resolution equals that of a standard 24 MP sensor due to the newly designed low pass filter (introduced in the 1DX iii). But of course, you need a lens that allows for high resolution indeed :)

Review fuji xs10

this just shows you that all of the RU-vid pixel peepers are full of crap when they downplay the performance of the R6. Using quality glass is what really matters. The images are great from this camera. The f11 super telephotos though.. meh I'd prefer an EF f/4 over the RF f/11. They are sharp but I think f/11 doesn't give the same quality go bokeh that you get when you sell a kidney haha. Also I totally agree on the film grain look from the higher ISO images. Way more usable than a bunch of digital noise.

What ur opinion for wildlife photography R5 or R6 ?

With this and the R5, I feel that the original R is a bit obsolete. What do you guys think?

Out of the EOS R or the R6 what’s better for image quality and photography?

Did you took this pics in isle of man

It’s hard not to view 20mp as a downgraded R5, but I know many pros who swear by the legendary 12mp Nikon D700, there’s the 16mp Fuji XT1 after which they went a little down hill, Nikon DF 16mp all of which have been fantastic, I agree about the high price ,but all tech companies are doing that now, just look at iPhone 12. However I’m on the fence a little on the omission of cfexpress as it’s not so cheap.

Aperture 11 is just not good enough for me, but it's also strange that an aperture 1.2 lens is praised to the clouds when the same thing happens with two aperture 11 lenses, but make no mistake, because the Canon R6 and Canon RF 85mm.f.1.2 are probably really good, but the excitement can sometimes be a tad too much when two lenses with aperture 11 are praised so much. It is otherwise a really good review as usual with many good arguments, so do not misunderstand my criticism!

But I have to say although tempting ... don’t has the a7riii for under 2grand which is honestly the better buy... even the Sony a7iii with a bad ass dual lens kit for under 2400 bucks is a steal and still a tiny bit better than the r6 when it comes to photo and has dual memory cards and more glass and cheaper glass too for all budgets

So the Canon 1DX MK III at 20MP is the top end mirrored Canon for professional photographers. But 20MP on this camera means it's for social media and web? I've seen similar comments on some other reviews. I find this strange.

you were right! I did end up getting it on a deal, a great one too! 😜🤓👍🏼 #happycamper

Is it a review on R6 or R5? Or different lenses ?!?!😶

Who’s Frank? , seriously though, great review.

Put the camera on a tripod and try some cityscape shots at night with the 800mm with a slow shutter speed to avoid the noise then see what you get👍 @bobbyfingers

Canon understands kidneys are Valuable 🤣🤣🤣🤣

I started with Canon and still have my original and ancient Canon 50D which I will never give up. Canons have some of the best color science. Their sensors tend to be behind in technology to the competition but they make it up with the color science. Images just look so good. $2500 American.... I think that's an 'Ok' price. In 2012, I bought a new Canon 5D MKII for $2k. So it was already 4 years old and a good deal discounted. That had a 21MP sensor. That camera was used in all sorts of professional fashion work in the industry for like 10 years. The camera is legendary. I have plenty of photography from it in my current portfolio. Sharp and excellent color. Now, the R6... 20MP... Totally fine for magazine-print work. Superior AF. Superior ISO. Superior DR, Superior and flip screen. Probably superior video functions. EVF. Dual card slots. The only thing the R6 doesn't have is a top LCD. So, the R6 is actually a pretty darn good professional-level camera. The only camera I can compare the R6 to is the Panasonic S5 which shares many similar features and is price $500 lower than the R6. Or the fantastic S1 which may be superior to the R6 for the same price. Well, except maybe for the AF. But wait a year and wait for the price drop to $2000. At that price, if I was a Canon user, I'd be all over the R6.

Excellent video, sir. I'm wondering if the R6 is able to Autofocus with the 800 f/11 + 2x extender attached? I was thinking that lens would not be AF'able (?) with a 1.4x or 2x attached due to the aperture. Thank you. New subscriber. :)

Another great review. It is overpriced, but at least this gives a chance to the competitors. Those f11 lenses did not convince me...

Maybe im mistaken but the portraits you were showing as sharp did not look sharp AT ALL! You should check your images before you go on your next assignment.

Would you be happy with 20 mp or always wishing it was more?

Good video but overall focus was more on lenses rather than on R6.

You have the best Canon R6 review on RU-vid. Cheers have a great week end

I have no interest in video so thanks for your videoless review . I held a Nikon Z 6ii and Z 7ii before I purchased the canon R6 . The ergonomics beat the Nikon hands down, and felt so natural in my hand , so it swayed me to the canon . I previously owned a Nikon D800 , and have no regrets going to canon

Comparing the R6 against the Sony A74 may make is seem like nothing special, but I've also seen it compared to the A9 and A9ii, and it did very well, with most wildlife shooters calling it a tie. Considering the price of those cameras, the R6 suddenly seems like a bargain.

If Keanu Reaves and Ricky Martin had a kid.

I would say this is a mirrorless version of the 1DX II with awesome AF and IBIS.

I think its too overpriced, because every competition (panasonic, nikon, and mainly sony) do these things better for a lower price. And i am saying that as a long time canon shooter... i just think that plasticky body, less resolution sensor and viewfinder, and other things they crippled on it are not worth 2500 dollars at all...i hope they will come out with something better next time

But f11 was still a damn mistake. U have to sacrifice iso so much cus of the focal length and the aperture

This is the Canon R6 real review.

Is ist bettet than the Sony a7iii?

I appreciate this review as it is well done. This camera has a psychological barrier around it. It’s the lowest MP R camera made. It’s not really a good value. I feel like I’m rewarding Canon for something that is a little inferior. The 20 MP just bugs me a bit. I guess as a system being able to put a 800mm lens on it makes up for some of that high price.

I want the r6 cause its affordabel...but its those drop in filters that got me sold on grtting into the canon R system!!...i no longer have to under expose 2 to 4 stops just drop the nutral density filter in!!..(i been checking into BREAKTHROUGHPHOTAGRAPHY drop in filters)...the ability to shot wide open on a harsh light mid day is just gonna oprn up alot of new shootng possibality..PLUS..EF GLASS AND 3RD PARTY LENS WORK WITH THE DROP IN FILTER ADAPTER..VARY WELL FROM WHAT I HEAR ON RU-vid!!...awsome autofocuse gezzzz....20 mp sensor....SO WHAT...dont crop in...it has an EVF..."you see the exposer before you take it"....WELL THEN FRAME THE DANG PICTURE THE WAY YOU WANT IT AND TAKE THE PICTURE...My goodness....walk closer to the subject..gezzzz...

The R6 is a great camera and is $1400.00 less than the R5.