Thank you for making this comparison video. Though the true result is may take a few retakes to see the difference for me due this vehicle already has protection applied to help to repel the water; however, after turning off the audio to avoid the distraction I was able to see the advantage 765CFM has over others. Well done.
Our takeaway is that all four blowers get the job done - the EGO 765 and 650 just do it a bit faster. The vehicle shown in this video was just recently wrapped in vinyl and does not have any hydrophobic products applied to it yet (e.g. ceramic, wax, sealant, etc.).
Bought the 765. Buy once cry once. Got a new Supra and its ceramic coated. Gona wash my car outside then drive it into my garage while its freshly wet and blow dry in there. Will pick up stubby nozzle for sure.
Man, I got one of those M18 blowers cheap in a bundle deal... but the EGOs make it look like one of those hand fans you use to buy at the dollar shop near the beach.
I feel like the 650 is better....I finally take the 650....as per some review I seen, Turbo is 3-4 minutes more than the 765 (~16min vs 13min) and High is ~27min vs ~22min....this is something to take in consideration...the CFM difference is negligible.
Looks about 12-14 seconds for the slower blowers and about 10 or so for the 765. Large SUV or truck in the sun w hard water could make a difference. Thanks for video
ive been questioning wheather this would help enough on my ego 530 to be worthwhile. answered well with the video. yes, it wont be as fast as the higher powered ones....but i already have the 530 :) ordering stubby tomorrow and some of the 3/8ths hose caps. hope he starts making some m22's too. heard some people complained about them breaking. might just need to use a softer plastic for the caps, its not like those are a stress failure point.
Great comparison video. Looks like you're using the turbo button on the EGO blowers, how long would you say is the battery life when using the turbo button on the EGO 650?
Thanks! The EGO 650 w/ a 5Ah battery will run for 12:49 with the stock tube or 13:30 with a STUBBY nozzle (in Turbo mode). Check out my blower comparison test results linked below for full details. stubbynozzles.com/pages/leaf-blower-comparison
I timed it. I this video it took the same amount of time to dry off the hood with both the 765 and 650.. Not really sure if the 765 is worth the extra money for car drying purposes... It's maybe milliseconds faster at drying the car
@@CyberSkunk90 the 765 has a nicer base/handle and is a bit quieter but, you are correct, they are comparable in blowing performance. Check out my blower comparison video for full details. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-l-JSXL91KZs.htmlsi=kipkElXToGFna_Ve
It works fantastic on grilles, side mirrors, door handles, wheel lugs, etc. Check out this video! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qQI7qXMSNAc.html
The 765 just sound louder to me. I even timed it several times and the 650 blew the water off the car in 14.66 seconds and the 765 took 15.37 seconds to get the water off the car.
The 765 and 650 were almost identical from our testing. The difference in time is likely just due to how quickly the operator was moving the blowers. The 765 is definitely quieter than the 650 but you can also feel a small increase in power.
I just got the Craftsman 340 CFM/90 MPH... it seems alright - but the battery wasn't charged up and I think I need a good detail. I thought this would be enough... but not sure yet. 90 day return window. If I need to spend more I will just like that I can use my 2 other batteries from my power drill on this bad boy. But if the specs aren't enough please guide me... Is this tool powerful enough? Or should I return it and spend more? Any advice is appreciated!
@@StubbyNozzleCo Thanks. I already own one of your stubby nozzles and just ordered the 765 to replace my 650 which I will sell as soon as it arrives. I agree, the 650 screams like a banshee, I always put on hearing protection prior to using it.
I just timed the video to compare and the difference was only a second or two between them so for a whole car the difference would be minimal. The 530 has the longest run time, is the lightest and least expensive. Just wondering if the 765 not on boost would do the job as quickly as the 530 with boost but last longer because of no boost. Any thoughts please?
I don’t think you can extrapolate what’s shown in this video to a whole car. I haven’t done a video comparison showing these blowers drying off an entire car. However, from my experience, the EGO 765 dries off my cars faster and more effectively than the EGO 530.
Many thanks for your quick reply and info. I forgot to say earlier that I’m very envious of your car, wow so beautiful. (I was wondering if the 765 would be faster on longer lengths of bodywork as it’s more powerful and could possibly shoot the water off further than off the end of a hood). Unfortunately the 765 doesn’t have published m3 airflow rates for High and low speeds but using the same ratio as that published for the 530, the 765 would move 975 m3/hr on High which is more than the 900 m3/hr for 530 on Boost. So if my assumption is correct the 765 could be used on High for small sections like the hood, wheels etc and Boost for the rest thus prolonging the battery charge. I’m conscious of the weight and cost of batteries. What do you think is the smallest battery I could ‘get away with’ on the 765 for drying two cars please?
@@christianpetersen1782 I personally run my EGO 765 in Turbo mode 100% of the time. According to my testing (linked below), the runtime of an EGO 530 w/ a 2.5 Ah battery is 5:10 with a STUBBY vs the runtime of an EG 765 w/ a 5 Ah battery is 13:30. It takes me about 4 minute to dry off a car so I would recommend you get either a 4 Ah or 5 Ah battery if drying 2 cars back-to-back.
Any blower with at least 400 CFM of output should be able to dry your car but the higher the CFM rating, the faster it will get the job done, generally speaking.
honestly I just got the 650 and already had the 530. I was expecting a bigger boost in power from the 650 but it's not as big as people talk it up to be. Really it depends on how much you're willing to spend. Don't get the 650 if the price shocks you. The 530 can handle most things and is much much cheaper.
Well it's only $300 but hey, there are lazy people in this world, like me. I love and hate washing my car, love the results but hate doing it so always looking for easier ways 🙂
The blower is to avoid touching the car. The more you touch it, the higher the chances of scratching. It’s not about speed because with a Griot’s PFM I can dry faster than with the blower.
In our opinion, the power difference between the 765 and 650 is minimal. However, the 765 is quieter, runs longer (more efficient motor), and has a better base which makes it easier to handle for car drying.
@@StubbyNozzleCo Did you make a runtime test? In some review I seen the 650 at 16 mins on Turbo vs 13 Mins for the 765 and 22mins vs 26 mins on high...
