@@epicchess2021 not at all! You did a good job of balancing the analysis of the game and keeping it moving forward. There were a lot of moves in this game and you covered it fairly quickly, while I still feel like I learned some things that I can improve my game with. Subscribed!
You are quite instructive. Thank you for not butterflying into too many lines. you stayed congruent with each line and kept it all tight and glued together. Well taught. I learned a lot from your review of the game, esp how to move the king more effectively during the endgame.
this truly is epic! the way Magnus manuevers these endgames is impressive. I like how he finds these unintuitive moves so quickly during timepressure but i guess it comes to him almost naturally. Theres an interesting video where Magnus goes through different endgames with John Bartholomew and he says he doesnt even know the rules of the endgame but their just obvious for him. What a talent!
@Karl with a K you mean to tell me that Magnus Is not talented? Why doesn't anyone practice as hard as Magnus then and be just as good. I'm not saying that he doesn't practice, quite opposite, he practices as much as anyone but he's certainly a gifted individual
magnus is insane at endgames. The way he converts draws to winning endgames against literal super grandmasters is unbelievable. Also I love your commentary man, really educational and easy to understand.
Truly impressive. And here I am failing sub master rated endgame tactics after staring at them for a couple minutes. I feel like Magnus has such a clear vision of the state of the board which allows him to do such precise movement during time pressure, all result of a crazy combo of talent, hard work, resolve and love for the game. Genius!
I feel like g5 at 8:40 should be routine for a world-class player. I didn't spot it, but in hindsight it's pretty obvious. What's interesting is that Carlsen missed the most direct win, which was 1. g5 hxg5 2. Bxg5 Bd8 3. h6! immediately (thanks to the engine for that). ...Kd6 at 9:46 is a blunder; Caruana should hold with ...Be7.
According to the 7-piece tablebase, the position at 11:56 is a draw with perfect play. From there, Ke3, Ke6, and Kd3 are all correct but, at 12:05, Caruana plays the losing move Be5. Instead, the only two drawish moves would have been Be1 or Be2.
At the point where the commenter says that the engine says that the position is even, and then Caruana plays Ke5 giving up the c5 pawn, it seems that almost any other move is better. White needs to show a plan for progress if Black just keeps the Bishop on the a1-h8 diagonal and moves the King around d6-c6 protecting the c5 pawn.
The first GM I ever beat was Jan Gustaffsson in a simul some months ago, and if he had played on in the endgame, despite being down the exchange, I was sure I would've lost that position due to the gulf between us in experience. When the time ran out the position showed -2 for black but there was no clear way forward. Great feeling to beat a GM but if he had time I'm sure he could've salvaged it in the endgame
@@orendafni iMs and GMs host these simuls on Lichess and occasionally you can get a game against a titled player by looking for them in a simul like this, we played along with maybe 11 others.
@@epicchess2021 You can find titlerd players hosting simuls on Lichess quite often, there is no greater feeling than the first time you realize you've beaten a titled player, like the first IM or 2400 level player, it is almost enough to make a man change careers haha, nah, couldn't do that, i want it to remain enjoyable and the moment it becomes a job, i feel like it would be much like writing is to me now, just what i do to make a living, put my son through college and pay my bills. It's not the same kind of passion when you're 38 and have been doing that-thing-you're-doing for 21 years. I started playing chess in 2017 after I was in a serious car accident, and while I did physical therapy I would play chess with my physical therapist and gradually realized I had a pretty intuitive feel for the game, after all it is just math with extra steps :P cheers man, thanks for being cool enough to talk to your viewers in the comments. It's something I've always tried to do over at our channel - it's some real nerdy shit haha, cheers man, love ya vids. I wish you would evaluate user submissions, I have some absolutely mind-melting drunken-ninja master tactics at my best, very interesting stuff, I hope you're well mate
This is an idea from a smyslov study from the 1950s, Hikaru used a similar idea in 2012. This double pawn sac is nothing new (reference, Johan Hellsten’s “Mastering Endgame Strategy”) So Magnus was probably looking at this idea the whole time
Very awesome video. I love chess but have few friends that enjoy playing it. Love seeing the grandmasters slowed down game and explained like this. Great game
Thanks very much! Glad you enjoyed and cheers for you watching. At least you can play people online really easily even though not many of your friends play
Nice analysis. Wrt …Engine analysis after King takes e4 pawn… If you analyze it with Lc0 engine, it correctly shows that as soon as King gets to h5 square it has an 83-17 advantage. White maintains this advantage as the King moves to g4.. f4 and then captures the pawn on e4.
what was supposed to be blacks move after bxg5 at 9:25 ? u can see the eval bar drop for white after that capture so guessing it was a blunder to the computer but fabi didn't find i guess
Nah, it's just the usual engine-time. You put in a move, the engine starts to evaluate every move, and first thinks "oh, I can take, I'm up 2 pawns" - then it continues with this line, sees that five, six, seven moves later the pawn will advance to a queen and you're down material. It's not like there is a winning move for black, it's just that the engine takes some time to evaluate/calculate the position. A really, really short time, but for a quick second the eval bar changes.
You would have to give a time stamp, the knight and pawn were in those positions for like the first 4 minutes of the video. If you're talking about the very beginning, before it was defended, 1:09 until the a and d pawns began to move, i can't tell you why Fabi didn't take it, I would assume he just didn't want to go with that line. But its not a bad move at all as far as I know. Computer seems to think its fine, but not one of the best moves. My guess is that the knight is just in a vulnerable position there with no defenders. There's really not a piece on the board the can go to defend it, (the d pawn would be hanging, and the f pawn would open up the diagonal for checks and is normally a horrible idea to move early in the game before you have castled. So it can be easily kicked out by white just continuing his development, meaning fabi just has to move the knight again at the cost of developing another piece. Really the only thing I can think of, but im not that good either, so if there is a tactic im missing, someone should feel free to share
@@griffinq8003 Thank you so much for your comment. That makes total sense. I was, as you guessed correctly, referring to the beginning of the game before the pawn was defended. I think the extra move with the knight, and falling down on development against Magnus isn't the best way to go. As a novice I tend to take too many pawns that are 'presented' to me without thinking about the consequences.
I think it is because at high level u play after already established routines quite often, especially in the first half of the game and hope that the opponent doesn't remember the or figure out what u are going for, in such games 2 moves for just 1 pawn isn't worth it when u are giving the opponent 2 extra movements to get pieces into important positions, white would immediately move a pawn forward to threaten the knight which would have to move back and then white has another move to get ahead of movements for the usual tactics I would probably go for the pawn since I am an intuitive player and just having the advantage of one less pawn for a diamond formation always makes it more interesting to see how the game developes from there 🙂
All pieces other than the king are female. Because a pawn can promote to a queen, pawns are female. And because pawns can be promoted to every other piece except a king, all the other pieces are also female.
Yeah you are right with it all if the white pawn starts running but if black plays fxg5 and you therefore start running the white f pawn, the black king can get back just in time
Nice awesome match! During White opening, I don’t understand the logic of 3rd move white bishop to b5, threatening the knight-I always do that also by the way 😂 but 100% of my game that black a6 pawn steps forward so bishop retreats. That I don’t understand the essence other than that fact that bishop was able to roam.
Right, so /each/ player has a clock of their own, which records the amount of time they have left. Each clock starts at 3m and ticks down, with 1s added to a player's clock every time that player makes a move. Only one player can lose on time. It's not like, say, basketball. So if you bleed down your clock, you're only disadvantaging yourself, and you could even lose. Make sense?
As Sheryl says, but if you have no pieces left and your opponent has enough pieces with the capability to checkmate (e.g. a rook or a pawn that might promote) and your opponent loses on time, it is a draw.
Man this Danny guy... I feel like a internet troll for saying this. But everytime i see something with him, he says something really arrogant. "Danny finally doest know what to say"
Naaah man, I played a game in my first tournament against a 1730 FIDE rated player as black without opening prep and the position after the opening was almost identical to 2:55, I feel smart now
The most wonderful move in a bishops & pawns endgame was made by Alexey Shirov against Topalov in Linares’1998. When you see that unreal Ah3 (!!!) you realize how magic is chess. This endgame by Carlsen was very good but nothing extraordinary compared with many other endgames played by him along his succesful career
Levy ruined chess videos for me... I saw the thumbnail and thought "oh look, more clickbait" until i realized it wasnt a gotham chess video. Lol. Pleasantly surprised
You do know that Goats feeds on actors and legends right? Norris wouldn't stand a chance. Steven Seagal on the other hand, you only see a glimmer and you're gone.
Loses if White takes Black bishop as recapturing pawn promotes. If Black takes King has to go to a5 and takes 10 moves to promote a pawn, but in that time White gets a Queen in 6 moves by taking on f6 and promoting, so White gets the Queen first.
Niemann’s been suspected of cheating by many masters before that scandal even happened lol. Don’t know how a guy who has a history of cheating being called a cheater is “atrocious”? like no one cares about that old drama anymore
Awful video btw.. the whole premise of the video is the move and u start the video from the very beginning, give no type of explanation on the move, no idea of when the move should be expected.. no reason to watch this entire video..
If your title is "GOAT Move", then what is the point making a 13:22 long video? Doesn't make any sense. Your videos in most cases are unreasonably long and the way you present them is extremely boring. Sorry to say that, it's just a personal opinion of mine, no offence.
No offence taken I always appreciate the feedback! Yeah I do do some shorts as well at times just literally showing the move. With longer ones I’ll always be showing the whole game really. Thanks for watching anyway tho
@@epicchess2021 Thanks for your reply! I assume as a youtuber your goal is to increase the number of your subscribers. If that is the case, I think you should put some serious effort in making your content much more entertaining. Reaching out to those viewers too, who are interested about chess as a game in general, but not necessarily want to watch you analizing chess moves straight for 13 minutes in the exact same tone. I wish you the best.
This is mentioned help you. 3000 visit your site, only a couple hundred stayed,change your speaking style. Use periods,don't sing-song your voice. You got great content,lots of experience.
Oh thanks a lot! I’ll have a think about that, one of the trickiest things is adjusting what comes naturally but always appreciate when people give me these little tips, cheers for watching
Boring, but effective! Most of his opponents try to play as solid as possible against him, and he can patiently outplay them all by maintaining a tempo advantage and consistently testing them throughout the game. Even if he loses tempo or even the advantage, he still finds a way to force his opponents to find 1 or 2 precise moves in most positions and earn their victory the hard way. Magnus takes what his opponent offers in big tournaments, so if you watch him and Hikaru, you will see many tactical games and exciting/creative moves. If you want creativity and excitement, watch his less serious games he plays while streaming. You can’t fault the man for playing winning chess! If he plays too creatively, he leaves the door open for these super GMs to get a distinct advantage. He’s playing Fabi in this game, do you expect him to open with H4?
@@kennethkretschmer1027 if i want to see someone consistenly and boringly destroying opponent i would watch stockfish or alfa zero. magnus is nowhere near them. but chess is a game, and first of all its value in its beauty. carlsen is not capable of those, so...
