No video :(

CARTA presents Anthropogeny: The Perspective from Africa - Lyn Wadley Sarah Wurz Judith Sealy

University of California Television (UCTV)

Подписаться 1,3 млн

Просмотров 37 тыс.

50% 1

1:39 - The origin and development of fire technology in Africa - Lyn Wadley
17:37 - Klasies River as a 120,000-year-old archive of human behavior in South Africa - Sarah Wurz
33:37 - Behavior and settlement patterns in coastal stone age communities - evidence from stable isotopes - Judith Sealy
This CARTA symposium focuses on the contributions of scientists and scholars of anthropogeny who live and work in Africa. In this episode: Lyn Wadley, University of the Witwatersrand, The Origin and Development of Fire Technology in Africa; Sarah Wurz, University of the Witwatersrand, Klasies River as a 120,000-Year-Old Archive of Human Behavior in South Africa; Judith Sealy, University of Cape Town, Behavior and Settlement Patterns in Coastal Stone Age Communities - Evidence from Stable Isotopes.
Recorded on 05/31/2019. [8/2019] [Show ID: 34981]
Anthropogeny: The Perspective from Africa
(www.uctv.tv/ca...)
Explore More Science & Technology on UCTV
(www.uctv.tv/sc...)
Science and technology continue to change our lives. University of California scientists are tackling the important questions like climate change, evolution, oceanography, neuroscience and the potential of stem cells.
UCTV is the broadcast and online media platform of the University of California, featuring programming from its ten campuses, three national labs and affiliated research institutions. UCTV explores a broad spectrum of subjects for a general audience, including science, health and medicine, public affairs, humanities, arts and music, business, education, and agriculture. Launched in January 2000, UCTV embraces the core missions of the University of California -- teaching, research, and public service - by providing quality, in-depth television far beyond the campus borders to inquisitive viewers around the world.
(www.uctv.tv)

Опубликовано:

5 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 23

@gooner72 2 года назад

This is an absolutely fascinating series, it really is... thank you for posting this collection of videos!!!!

@AWildBard 3 года назад

I love these CARTA videos.

@conorzayden8183 3 года назад

You prolly dont give a shit but if you are stoned like me during the covid times you can watch all the latest series on InstaFlixxer. I've been binge watching with my brother these days :)

@holdenhoward4206 3 года назад

@Conor Zayden Definitely, been watching on instaflixxer for since december myself :)

@richb2229 Год назад

Controlled fire by homo Naledi 230,000 to 320000 years ago changes a lot of this presentation.

@Rico-Suave_ 3 года назад

Excellent video, experts of our era, thank you very much for expanding our understanding

@americalost5100 3 года назад

Excellent speakers. Thank you.

@hhwippedcream 2 года назад

Thank you for posting and sharing, concerning some of the scapular/roughened bone frags, I believe they said probable Eland - that form is sometimes used in rendering fiber from plant material or in fish scalers; associated with the pigment/dye industry at the site, fiber production? Love to speculate from afar. Thanks again!

@69nereis 4 года назад

Excellent!

@antoniescargo2954 2 года назад

Slaapverwekkende video.

@rocroc 2 года назад

I am not an archeologist but when it comes to the use of fire, I look at it a little differently. Homo erectus was a well traveled and very successful species. Whether we evolved from them is yet to be satisfactorily determined but it is likely we did. If H. erectus used fire a million years ago, you can bet we used it as well. Use of fire gave H. erectus a far greater advantage to control their environment throughout the world in which they lived. Once the importance of fire was known, I doubt it took long to learn how to control and start a fire. Did it take a month or so or a year or two or ten years? I can tell you it didn't take a couple of thousand years. Of course, the problem is that we may not have archeological evidence. It is an exciting time in archeology and we may have better proof as time goes on and technology improves even more. As to harvesting "seafood", if you are an early hominid living in Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) 315,000 years ago, you ate seafood and gazelle when you weren't eating each other. I would say it would be fair to report that any hominid living on a waterway ate "seafood" and coastal resources. Period the end.

@henryottis295 4 месяца назад

I would say that Adam and Eve had fire from the very beginning, being perfectly formed with better brains and intelligence than we currently have, given that our DNA has degraded significantly since the first humans walked the earth. Our DNA is degrading with each successive generation, and with it our intelligence. Case in point; We still don't really no how the Egyptians made the pyramids...... theories abound, and yet we probably couldn't recreate them today. They lived thousands of years ago..... stone age basically, yet people today think they are superior to people who lived then.

@gooner72 2 года назад

To be honest, I'm surprised that fire wasn't "invented" in Australia...... any excuse for a barbecue!!!

@tranjavanadbia123 3 года назад

MAN REVOLUTION !!!!

@alexburke1899 2 года назад

Kind of a tangent but the location of Border cave is set way back and up the hill compared to most cave sites we see highlighted. Obviously they don’t get to pick where the caves form but the reason I mention it is because it seems like a location where it would make natural sense to have a satellite site at the bottom of the hill to maybe lighten their load before hiking up to the cave, meetup with others etc.. Maybe they would do some butchering down there at the forest/plain line to avoid dragging a whole carcass a mile up the hill, I mean that’s what I’d do lol.

@lisavasilatos9867 3 года назад

marrying???

@aaron.aaron.v.b.9448 3 года назад

Good point. However, she is speaking about rather recent populations, so one might assume that there was at least some concept of sexual exclusivity. Ethnographic evidence to the contrary is fairly sparse. Nevertheless, sexual partners would be more correct.