CAT BACK STAINLESS EXHAUST - FORD RANGER RAPTOR 2.0L BI-TURBO FREE HORSEPOWER HACK TUNING CHIP NEXT 

Customer truck, but yes...it's cool. Next is a tuning chip. Expecting delivery in about 10 days or so. ;-) Next video! How are you doing?

Yes...I agree. Just absolutely NO dyno that I'm aware of on this island. Thanks for the calculation and information. When you see it in these numbers, it shows a far greater difference that simply 1.5" to 2.5". Absolutely right! I have a friend with the 3.2 liter and trying to convince him it's also worth having a look.

Thanks Bro! I returned the favor. Looks like you have adventures too! ;-)

@@offgridislandfamily Not really, just random vids from my dashcam. You don’t have to but thanks a heaps anyway bro! Drive safely with your family. Cheers!

@@bugoynatural8159 I'm waiting for a custom programmed chip from Belgium. Should be to me within 10 days or so. Next Raptor video.

This brought up an interesting question. Does your pajero have a cat? My 95 NJ pajero was not equipped from factory with a cat . My next project is moving the intercooler. I am thinking to go front mount but need to think that through I seen a mod done but the have to cut through for pipes

Me too. And I'm waiting to have the money for it...SPONSORS GLADLY ACCEPTED! ;-)

Thanks for that! You are 100% correct! I will fix this. This is a customer's car. I still have the Pajero and all good, but the rubber inside the crankshaft pulley (harmonizer) just fell out. So...next video will be THIS. ;-)

That's on the crank pulley isn't it? Thankfully that should not be a bad job. I keep thinking of silly projects out of boredom . 2.8 Cummins ISF swap was a thought. I wish there were some mods for this. That intercooler should have an engineered upgrade available. Not finding anything.

I'm sure they are all the same and it's a kind of gimmick. For example, you pay a couple thousand for a 'performance package' and all they have to do is remove this restricter and charge the customer.

@@offgridislandfamily And do you know how many Cv and NM increase in the raptor removing the restricter? . Thank you very much!

@@ignacioaldao3293 Just by seat of the ass...I would guess around 20hp. It's very noticeable.

This sounds SPOT ON TARGET for the world we live in today! ;-) Thanks for commenting

I would also liked to have tested on a dyno, but I really doubt there is one on this island. The turbo outlet where it bolts to the exhaust flange is slightly smaller than 2.5"...guessing 2.4", so no point for any larger and in terms of space underneath, no reason to make things tight fitting. The biggest power gain was simply taking a grinder to the stock gasket. As we installed a straight, one-piece pipe, I didn't bother looking at the other gaskets, but they were probably the same. We didn't mess with anything above the exhaust / turbo meeting flange area. These engines are SUPER temperamental to system modification. Thanks for the terrific questions! I'll take a peek at the original exhaust for those other flange gaskets.

@@offgridislandfamily Thanks for your great response too. And yes it wouldn't be more than logic that both seals (in and out of DPF/Cat are the same. By the way. There are also way to calculate real rear wheel performances. By just measuring weight and time. Just find most flat track and average both way results. No direct Dyno measurements needed. I actually prefer real road values. As dynos more often then none also use correction factors.

@@henriwolbrink Well...again. I did probably 30 test runs as I was also testing a tuning chip. However, the fact is that 0-100km/h time was reduced from 11+ seconds to right on 9 seconds.

@@offgridislandfamily Perfect. Tools like DashCommand can give you a good insight. Never exact performance. But great to calculate before and after difference in percentages. Still curious about DPF seal on intake. But as you mentioned. It's more logical that it's the same than that it would be different.

@@henriwolbrink Can you describe more the DPF? If it doesn't look like a major risk to any super-sensitive looking system, then maybe I will crack it open and do a video on that. Maybe you already know a RU-vid video on this? Cheers!

ABSOLUTELY! I'm guessing it's intended to make a larger performance difference between the 2.0 and 3.2 engines. They don't want it to be close. Maybe...

@@offgridislandfamily The 3.2 straight 5 sounds really good with pipes opened up !

@@geoffbell166 TOTALLY different truck. So much more low end turbo boost and torque through all engine range.

The 3.2 has got the restrictor plate aswell. I think its to cheat co2 emissions.

You want the exhaust system shipped to Cebu? Is that correct? Do you need an enlarged gasket, or will you modify your current one, just as we did in this video? If you have Instagram, please send me a PM there. If not, my email is: lotuselise73@hotmail.com. Thank you!

It's a straight 3-inch pipe from the turbo on back.

Clearly you missed the part about enlarging the restrictive manifold gasket. It certainly has more than 201 hp now.

Who cares you ain’t paying the bill 🤷🏾‍♂️