Catholicism Isn't a Cult... But I Have Serious Concerns 

Here’s what’s next. A Roman Catholic apologist named Trent Horn has done over 8 hours of video content to refute me on what I’ve said about to Roman Catholicism. On Monday I’m going to be responding to his claims. Here’s a link to the video where you can watch live. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hIAVbck93pc.html

Hey Mike, would love to have you and Trent on my show to debate whatever aspect of Catholicism you'd like. Let me know if you're interested.

When a Catholic said that no early Church Father believed in Grace by Faith alone, I decided to research and read up about it and realized what that person claimed wasn't true. I feel a lot of Catholics think that "if only you'd read more ancient texts, Protestants wouldn't be so ignorant", but if you do read it, it doesn't say what they so confidently claimed.

Going through trying to get my very Catholic family to accept that I no longer can believe in being Catholic. I have been very respectful in sharing why and my reasoning behind it. My father is still trying to tell me to come back or I’m doing a disservice to my children and am a bad mother for not “coming home”. It never felt like home. Just gave me a hollow, anxious heavy feeling like I was never good enough and guilted into still believing. Please pray for my husband and I and our children. I very much believe in God and have been working hard on my relationship with Jesus. That’s all I want for my children and they are taking interest into following my footsteps. I can’t really ask for more. Just guidance on how to deal with family who doesn’t like my decision.

You can't earn the gift of Grace. It is freely given.

Excellent presentation. Former Catholic here. It's so simple yet my family and rabid catholics won't see the error of adding works to their salvation. It's a slap in the face to what Christ did on the cross and that's only one doctrine that blatently goes against Scripture. Catholicism teaches the Bible isn't the only thing to determine doctrine. They rely on what their former leaders have said is truth. So many other things but like i said they won't listen.

"Paying for your sins in purgatory" shouldn't just "freak you out", it should be abominable to you as I'm sure it is to God. It is spitting in the face of Jesus.

Plz pray for me I am so messed up

I was led to a Bible by the Lord and l opened the Bible and read the Gospel of John. I was saved..."born again" after hearing the Word of truth, the Gospel of my salvation exactly like Ephesians 1:13-14 says. I trusted and believed. Just like Paul did not command Gentiles to become Jews and under go circumcision...We Are not required to become Catholic. My Authority is the Holy Spirit inspired Scripture....not the church Father's...that can not agree with one another...nor did the Holy Spirit add them to the inspired scripture. 📜 Shouldn't a man or woman be able to pick up a Bible...hear the good news of Jesus Christ and come to faith? Satan is a liar... Ecumenism is not in the Bible. The Pope is saying all religions can come together. He has been speaking falsely for some time. As Jesus and Paul said..."Let no man deceive you." The Bible clearly says that Salvation is by Faith alone without works and if you add works...you've fallen from Grace. Galatians 1:8... Let them be accursed...🔥🔥🔥

What the?!?!? Which Catholics do you talk to that says purgatory is a character change and happens in an instant?!?! I believe the is a gross misrepresentation. I seriously doubt that any Catholic says this, not even the one that doesn't know anything.

The pray to Mary and ask men to pronounce the required amount of repetitious prayers required for forgiveness of their sin. None of that is biblical. None of it.

Mike from what I noticed you like to preach to the choir a lot, I've heard a lot of Catholics that would like to engage you and have a discussion but you seem to be ignoring all of them, that kind of sounds cowardly almost like you're afraid in some way to be corrected. A sign of true confidence in the doctrines that you hold to and especially when you criticize other faiths or Christian traditions you need to step up to the game by engaging the ones you criticize.

Next video: calvinism isn't a cult... but I have serious concerns

The standard evangelical definition of a cult is, "Any religious group that claims to be Christian, yet denies one or more of the essential doctrines thereof." I feel like most Christians would agree that the doctrine of Justification by Faith Alone is about as essential as it gets and Catholicism vehemently denies that. So on that basis alone, wouldn't we be correct in calling Roman Catholicism a cult? Another mark of a cult is that they add something to the Bible. In some cases it's entirely extra books like the Book of Mormon, or in other cases it's the supposed "infallible" interpretations of the Bible like what's claimed for the Watchtower magazines by Jehovah's Witnesses. But in Catholicism, they have added both. They added uninspired books to the Old Testament called the apocrypha and they've added their own supposed infallible traditions as well. All of which are said to be equal in authority as Scripture and in actual practice, end up trumping Scripture. (For proof: anytime you find a verse in the Bible that contradicts what Catholic Tradition says, the Tradition wins) Yet a third mark of a cult is that there's almost always some supreme leader that exercises complete authority over the doctrine and practice of the entire Church and can make absolutely-binding alterations as needed/desired. Mormons have their "Living Prophet", JW's have their current "Governing Body", etc. Obviously Catholics have this type of person too, whom they refer to as the Pope. Fourth, almost every cult will try to step in between you and Jesus in some way. In other words, they'll say something to the effect of, "You can't just go off and have your own relationship with God- you have to go through us first." And the Catholic Church has literally made a career saying that. If you want Christ in Catholicism, you have to attend Mass and you can't get Mass anywhere else. And finally, related to the second point, most cults will subtly (or sometimes not so subtly) discourage their members from reading the Bible independently. Catholic websites to this day will still sometimes talk about how dangerous it is for Catholics to attend Protestant Bible study groups or any other group that encourages them to read the Bible by themselves. Consequently, nearly every Catholic I've ever met has been woefully ignorant of the Bible. And I'm not just talking about Protestant convictions- I'm talking about basic stories. Eg. Moses, Noah, Joshua, etc. And it's not surprising. They're told they can't understand the Bible on their own, so why would they read it on their own? A huge mark of a cult. I think the only reason Catholicism gets a "pass" here is because they believe in the Trinity and they've been around a lot longer than the others. But in my opinion, that's not enough to avoid earning the title, "cult". We should call a spade a spade. An old cult is still a cult, even if a billion people follow it. Cheers.

Isn't any religion that believes in a false gospel or salvation by any means other than through Christ alone a cult by definition?

Mary being sinless seems to be the biggest issue to me. In 2Tim 2:18-26, we see Paul scolding those that say the resurrection is past as devils, how much more so someone claiming a human lived a sinless life other than Christ.

Does anyone knows which software do they use for this, looks pretty clean and would like to use it for my meetings and teachings.

Love the idea of you two together!!! ❤️

I am here because David Wood recommend it to us, ready to learn from you my brother!!!

How is it not a cult when everything they do and teach has all the earmarks of a cult??

Idk about that, the Pope is essentially a cult leader, I think Paul and Peter would have STRONG words against Catholicism. Catholicism is the doctrine of Balaam The Pope recently told a young boy that his deceased father(who was atheist) was in heaven because he was a "good person", pretty much every Catholic has wildly unbiblical beliefs and you can usually get to it by fishing around.

If you add anything to the plan of salvation, salvation is not possible. You must put your trust in Christ, and Christ alone in order to be saved. He paid for your sins in full. You owe nothing. Catholics will pay for some of their sins in purgatory. This makes themselves co-redeemer with Christ. They actually call Mary the co-redemptrix. They trust in Mary for part of their salvation. They trust in "the keys of heaven" that are given to the Pope. And this is just the tip of a massive iceberg. It doesn't matter of your view of Christ is correct if you get EVERYTHING else wrong.

Mike wasn't addressing the blatant heretic doctrines of the Roman Catholic church, too soft, too hesitant for no reason, but Allan didn't hold back! That's what we need.

Hi Mike and Allen, This may have already been mentioned elsewhere, but I'm wondering if you're working with the same definitions of "grace" and "salvation" as Roman (and Eastern) Catholics. It might be worth looking into or addressing that. (Similarly, with regard to the reference to "punishment" in the text you mentioned, I'd be interested in what evidence we have for how "punishment" was understood in that time and that particular context and whether it was defined and understood in the same way that it is now.)

There's a lot of Catholic hate in the comments. This is not the way a Christian should behave.

Perhaps it should be called The Roman Galatian Church, as you pointed out. But seriously, when a church seriously departs from Scriptural teaching (even if they profess reverence for Scripture), I would have serious reservations calling it an orthodox church. (I was originally RC.)

Thank you Mike and Allen for the hard work you do.

Really great content. Thank you for posting, pastor Mike.

Thank you, Mike for being sooo thorough and respectful in your explanations when talking about other religions. I learn so much with your videos

I love seeing Allen Parr in these videos just nod his head the entire time

Mike Winger: I just bought this book that you suggested on Amazon, still waiting for it to come in. Question does this book also have Polycarp the disciple of the apostle John in it? If not, then can you suggest a good book on the writings of him and the lineage of the apostle John, and then Polycarp and them who followed after the apostle John and Polycarp?

@fantasia55 *You are talking about latter deviations. Not the Earliest Christianity. Earliest Christianity from Jesus, APostles and NT Church said nothing of Romanct Mass (sacrificing Jesus on the altar back to God). Neither Romanct transubstantiation (elements transforms into Jesus). Neither Roman ct "praying and receiving prayers from Romanct canonised saints". Neither Primacy of Rome or Romanct man made doctrine of papacy.* you said Early Christianity was very Catholic - all about the Mass and the Communion of Saints and the authority of bishops.

In my (still very limited) understanding I got the impression that Mike may take the challenges of staying in the state of grace a bit too lightly. It might be helpful to provide a video with reading a random letter of the apostles from the first to the last verse and to explain how the plentitude of very serious admonitions regarding the question of how to conduct in daily life is to interprete. By the way, I'm not a Catholic, but a Protestant (Lutherian). Finally, apologies for my poor English. Anyway, hope I got my point across.

purgatory is not in the Bible! Hebrews 9:26-28!

Mike! I love your videos man. Very graceful and I do learn a lot.

​ @snappyjo4642 *Answer my simple question: Why would Church of Rome (a local church) be the Universal Church/Church (which meant all local churches + all believers)? Since when this Church of Rome became the Universal Church? Which year was that?* *Answer that!*

Pints with Aquinas openly invited you to debate on his channel. I know us Catholics would love to see you debate one of our guys. :)

I was raised Catholic but left church more than 25yrs ago. My family is still Catholic and I have been using what I have learnt from Pt. Mike to get them out. I was surprised to learnt that they do not even know what they believe. I mentioned purgatory and my mom in all her 70yrs in the church did not know about it. Separating them from Mary will need a chain saw! Thankfully, I have it....prayer!

Mike i love your teaching. Thanks for making since of all the questions we have. But im dieing to know. What is in that jar under your guitar? And why is it always full?

I’ve seen 2 TikToks today that list you in a long list of trusted theologians. I’ve subscribed to you for about a year now but I never commented. I just wanted to jump on here and encourage you and Thankyou for being a voice of truth in this lost world. God Bless you and your family. -Luke

What I don't quite understand is, if Christians believe Jesus paid for their sins when they beieve in Him, why do Catholics believe they need to pay for their own sins in purgatory? Where does Jesus fit into the Catholic view of Christianity?

Being raised as a catholic I can say u don't have to go back near as far to remember NOT being encouraged to read ur bible. Obviously no longer catholic

Thank you so much, Allen and Mike!

What evil being would want you to think that you can't do what the Bible says? How helpless we would be if we had to get on a waiting list for a certain church to do an exorcism, or go to a building to have our sins forgiven. What about if we were tricked into thinking that what Jesus did was not enough and we might have to go to a man made place called "purgatory" to suffer for our sins? What if there was a lock down, we would have to hang up our religion next to our coat until nonbelievers said it was time to take it up again.

Very Well Presented Mike!

Please pray for my mom's side of the family, my mom is the only non-Catholic on her side, and I worry that the various unbiblical teachings of the Catholic church, especially from the current Pope, will confuse their faith and lead them further astray from God.

I’m so thankful to God that there are biblical teachers like this explaining certain things more in depth. I have learned so much and I’m extremely grateful for people like this! Thank you 🙏🏽

I love and appreciate your gentle demeanor and diligence to research, Mike! God Almighty bless & keep you & yours!!! 😃

Mike I would love to here your thoughts on Orthodoxy vs your beliefs! Thanks for what you do!

Quiet down, Alan!

Hi Mike! I love your videos! I also wanted to comment: the graphics and animation you use for your logo is super clean and cool! Who is the artist that made it?

So, you’re basically saying that the Church was founded 500 odd years ago by Martin Luther?😂 Who BTW, was an ordained Catholic Priest…

But the Bible was written by Catholic Church. As a matter of fact the Catholic church existed before the Bible did. The church fathers, tradition ... was before the Bible was written. And protestants also removed some books from the Bible.

I haven’t been plugged in lately, I’m glad to be back hearing truth.

Its a mistake for Mike to say that Catholics deny Jesus is both sufficient and necessary for salvation. But we believe that faith is justifiably seen in good works.

Different Gospel.

I have a question for you Mike....why do protestants have many denominations in 40 to 50000........

It is a cult behind closed doors snd it is pagan related in many ways.

Thank you for that book recommendation!!! Been looking for content like that!!

@snappyjo4642 *You poor soul. Bible and real history did not say Roman Church = the Christ's Church or Universal Church. Neither does Bible teach Roman Mass (sacrificing Jesus on the altar back to God). So where did Roman Church get all your ns?* you said one who actually left the Church who knew much about the Catholic Church, especially the Mass. the Church Christ built.

Usually Catholics are really guarded in conversations about faith. When I start conversations about Jesus the top 3 rejections are: "I'm Jewish" "I believe in science" or "I'm Catholic".

Yay my favorite paring ❤️ God bless you both. Thanks for your work.

But there were Christian's before the new testament especially when you read luke 1..... in acts when the council make a decision on what is binding to the gentiles what bible were they reading to make that decision? Before the reformation most Christians had more than 66 books so by what authority do us protestants use to say we only going to follow these 66 books? Was that from the bible or outside the bible?

Mike were you ever a member of the Roman Catholic Church?

In order to understand the Papacy, it is important to understand it in the context of the Davidic Kingdom, as Jesus, as the Son of David, establishes His Church in accordance with the Davidic Kingdom. In 1 Kings 4:7, King Solomon had 12 officers to rule over Israel. Jesus had 12 Apostles which were picked by him to rule over His Church after He ascended into heaven. The Davidic Kingdom also had a prime minister who had the absolute authority of the King. In Isaiah 22:15-24 God is angry with his prime minister Shebna, and will replace him with Eliakim, who will be given the keys to the Kingdom, and will have the power to open and shut, who will be a father figure to his people, and who will be a sure peg on a throne of honor to his father. The whole weight of his father’s house shall rest on him. Jesus gave Peter the keys to the Kingdom of God (Mathew 16:18-19), a symbol of authority prefigured by Eliakim in the OT. Peter and his successors have the power to bind and loose (open and shut) in the name of Jesus, from Matthew 18:18. The entire weight of the Catholic Church rests on the Pope and his teachings, just like the entire weight of David's house rested on Eliakim. There Mike, you have the Papacy by using the scriptures alone.

On the issue of Authority, I approach the subject this way: In Whose Authority? Who gave the priests authority to --blank-- And who gave them their authority? And who gave the cardinals their authority? And who gave the pope his authority? And Who gave Peter authority? And Jesus? Where did Jesus get his authority? And why then should I trust in man when God is the authority on scripture?

I'm an Evangelical Catholic, and I don't believe that works save us at all. We are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. . Jesus, I trust in You! ✝️

@Mike Winger This is one place where we would differ and perhaps only out of kindness on your part. I differ with the late Dr. Walter Martin on this as well and knowingly. The problem I have is definitional. Why? Look at the way Martin himself defined what a cult is. And then look at what the cults do with language. In this case, Catholicism, changes the meaning of Christian terms. What is the net effect - to differ with Christianity on major points of the Gospel by redefinition of terms. They use our language; but, in redefining the terms, we're not talking about the same things or meaning the same things in the talking. Who is Jesus in Catholicism? If you understand the use of the Rosary and the language in regard to Mary, Jesus is a thoroughly angry guy that is too angry for you to go to directly, therefore you must approach through a priest or through Mary who can calm his anger and "mediate" on your behalf. There is no office of priesthood in the Christian church.. They have priests and they are sacrificing on an alter as if they were under law. Bit by bit, they sound like us; but, they speak a different language using the same words and they deny the Christ of the Scriptures by redefining who he is and how we are saved. By Dr. Martin's own standard measure, they are a cult by definition. So I don't shrink from using the term appropriately and as defined. Some sow seed, some water.. God gives the increase.. yes? What do you do before planting? Plow the ground. If you don't, the seed isn't going to have much more use than throwing it on the rocks for the birds. Grace & Peace, brother.

Allen is a good listener.

Pastor Mike, when you take shots at the Holy Apostolic Church of Rome, but then decline whenever Catholic Apologists invite you to speak to them, it leaves a negative image that isn't very genuine.

Catholicism isn't a cult? Anyone who would make the claim that Catholicism isn't a cult either has zero understanding of Catholic doctrine or they have no knowledge of the gospel of Jesus Christ...or both. I was born into Catholicism and was saved by the grace of God as a thirty year old married father of three. I've studied the doctrines and traditions of the Catholic church and can say without any reservation that it has no chance of being mistaken for the truth.

Thanks for sharing this 👍

I have never heard Catholics use such derogatory terms against other Christians (or other people by the way) as many of you use against us; that make me think that something is so wrong...

Mike: *ABCDEFGHIJKLMN...* Allen: nod

​ @snappyjo4642 *More tales. If Mary was sinless (which Romanct claimed she was conceived immaculately), she would not have any "birth pangs" would she? Since birth pang came from the curse on Eve in Genesis due to sin.* you said these “birth pangs” could refer to Mary’s trials before the birth of Jesus, the pain she felt at the Cross,

Wait was his newest video taken down?

The question is whether your salvation is based on Christ or being obedient to a church. Catholics weasel on this by saying "well, the Church gets its authority from Christ so it's the same thing." But whenever they disagree with the Bible, or tradition, or the apostles, they always revert to "listen to the Church." Even when they change/invent doctrines. This is the same as the Mormon Church does and every other cult.

Bible can be interpreted in infinite, varying ways. It's _why_ we have different denominations, it's _why_ we put _effort_ into trying to convince others of their errors. EVERYONE thinks that they have it right, but we have so many different beliefs that CAN be supported by a written document. It's why we have judges and juries and not ONLY the Constitution.

​ @snappyjo4642 *Bible and real history did not say "Roman Church = Christ's Church or the Universal Church". You are just regurgitating the self claims of Roman ct. So where is your proof that it was so?? Still waiting ...* you said yes the Catholic/Universal Church is and was and will always be the universal Church as you said.

Thank you for your work! God bless!

I find Catholicism and Judaism actually have a whole lot in common (except of course theology). I love both groups, and consider both as being the people of God (Jews are the nation of God, and Catholics are part of the Church of God). But they are both heavily driven by dogmatic propaganda that is composed of thousands of years of traditions that is rooted off of somebody's interpretation of scripture, rather than what scripture actually says. Both groups encourage the reading of scripture, but discourage the individual interpretation of scripture. Rather, you must solely rely on what your rabbi/priest tells you the scripture means. And most of the time, the rabbi's/priest's interpretation of the passage is to confirm a preconceived theological position, which the passage may actually contradict. (Protestants can have a tendency to do this too.) Both groups have an oral tradition which is said to be of equal authority to the scriptures, but actually gets treated with more authority than the scriptures. For the Jews that's the Oral Torah; I forget what the Catholics call theirs (something to do with the authority of the church/papestry). Both groups are more studied in history/other writings than scripture. Talmudic Judaism is named after their intense study of the Talmud, which is a commentary of the Mishna, which is a commentary (sort of) of the scriptures. The Jews also have many other writings. The Catholics have the church fathers, whom they study extensively. Study is always good, and I enjoy extra biblical sources, but we need to be careful not to let those extra biblical sources take priority over the biblical sources, which tends to happen. Both groups are heavily lead by tradition which has been developed over time. Of course, tradition is a good thing, but tradition is meant to preserve culture not establish theology; when it gets in the way of the Word of God, then it becomes problematic. This is what Jesus Himself warned about in Mark 7:6-13. P.S. An example of Jews in tradition would be the interpretation of Exodus 23:19b, where the Jews are commanded not to cook a calf/young goat in the milk of its mother. From this short passage, Jews have interpreted that you cannot have meat and dairy together. Nor can they be on the same dish. Rather, you must have two separate sets of dishes: one for eating meals with meat, and the other for eating meals with dairy. The meat dishes can never have dairy touch them, or they become unkosher, nor can the dairy dishes have meat touch them. You also cannot eat/drink dairy for 6 hours after eating meat, nor eat meat for 6 hours after having dairy. All these traditions of man taken from "Do not cook a young goat/calf in its mother's milk." On the flip side, a good means of using this tradition is how the Jews have added to the kosher laws from being the kind of animal that can be eaten, to include restrictions on the kind of killing the animal undergoes. Thus, the Jews have been able to refrain a kosher label on cruel killings of animals, and thus practice the most humane and pain-free methods of slaughtering animals for food. The ultimate point is that tradition can be used for good, or it can be dogmatic and overboard.

Yes Catholicism is one any religion that follows a leader other than jesus is one.

What is the apostolic lineage for Protestant? I'm referring to the lineage Orthodox and Catholic churches have tracing back to Jesus.

At 15:20. It is not so much that only priests are allowed to interpret the bible, but rather that interpretations which are incompatible with magisterial doctrine are heretical. The magisterium exerts essentially what amounts to a veto power with respect to which interpretations can be considered orthodox. Anyone can make an interpretation, but not all interpretations are orthodox, and faithful catholics should pay attention to catholic doctrine to ensure they do not endorse a heretical interpretation. This doesn't mean that the current living magisterium can just invent doctrine, it is bound by consistency with previous magisterium, which explains what Saint Paul says, that even if he himself contradicts what he has said before he should not be listened to. But it is very interesting that in the quoted passage of scripture Saint Paul mentions that Christians have to be bound by the authority of what he *preached* to them, and not specifically by any text; specially since at this particular time in history the new testament did not exist as such, as the canon wasn't defined, and even the Pauline letters were not yet all written (obviously there is the further problem that most people that he preached to could not read, but would receive notice of his letters by a disciple of Paul who could read; so it hardly made any sense that people should be bound by the authority of a text they couldn't read rather than by the authority of a man). Paul was a bishop in the catholic church, and as a bishop he exercised his teaching authority and confirmed his brethren into the faith. By his authority received through Christ his teaching to them became authoritative, and so binding, in such a manner that any who defied his magisterium became heretics; exactly the same relation holding between catholics and the magisterium today, as the bishops are the sucessors of the apostles. Obviously, he himself could not contradict what he once taught with the same authority since there is no authority in contradiction, nor in anything illogical or not bound by the truth.

Mike you should have a Catholic come on to discuss what the Catholic Church believes. It only makes sense, right?

Hey Mike, invite dr Pitre Brant to explain to you about catholicism because you are very biased and don't know anything about our faith

This is why I think Mike Winger is why worng on. Baptism is required to be saved. 4:03

​ @fantasia55 *Your lack of knowledge is hilarious. Scriptures was 2000 years old. 180+ verses spoke of Jesus, APostles and NT Church appealing to Scriptures Only for doctrines (Sola Scriptura). Two third of NT says Salvation is NOT by Works (Sola Fide). Early writings spoke of exact words Scripture Alone and Salvation Not By Works. So why would they be latter deviations? Please explain intelligently.* you said Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide are later deviations,

Ironically I was led on a long journey by the Spirit through many evangelicals and a Bible in a year read back to the Catholic Church. Even more ironically it was in large part due to something pastor John McCarther said in an interview where he said basically that the Church had the Eucharist wrong since the first century. I had to really sit and ponder that. Am I to believe that Jesus died and was brought to glory by the Father only to have his beloved church fall into error barely a generation removed from the Him and the Apostles? And I mean you have to really look at the history and think about this. This isn’t some corruption that happened in the Middle Ages. This was Church Fathers. The very beginning.

How would they know when they have done enough good works.

good one thanks for this

Pastor Mike, you are obviously a functional adult, and I apologize if you’ve already covered this topic, but could you do a video on true biblical money principles?

As a christian who had to go through a catholic High school. I would say this is very insightful and accurate (Cause It does reflect the battles I had back then).

It would be a better format to have more of a natural conversation style tbh. I'm over half way through and so far it looks like one of those awkward tiktoks where someone just looks at the screen when they share someone's video

Could you do a video on the "apocrypha", "deuterocanonical", "protocanonical", "intertestamental" books? A wikipedia reading is very confusing and contradicting (even within the same paragraph).

Pastor Mike, what denomination are you. I was catholic most my life, dabbled a bit into Mormonism n eastern orthodoxy in my youth was Lutheran. I'm trying to repent n have sorrow from my life sins. I'm very sick mentally n physically. Please pray for me, when was catholic did not believe in it all nor in wacky Mormonism. As ill person am highly confused. But I do believe we are saved through faith in Christ alone. Y'all talk about catholic a lot, what about eastern orthodoxy n oriental orthodox. Happy thanksgiving wishes.

How can the most idolatrous, Prideful pagan and apostate denomination on the planet not be called a cult? Is it to big? Too powerful? The title of your video and your reluctance to call it out as much as you do other non-evangelical denominations corrodes and undermines your apologetic credentials Mike and Allan

Check Dr Pitre Brant for purgatory

I am so confused I've been on catholic schools all my life and I've never heard any of this, is this a regional thing or something

So where would I go in the Bible to read that it is the authority?