Hands down the best repeat guest on this podcast. I can't click fast enough when Duncan is on. Love his ability to articulate what's going on in his brain.
I used to ignore episodes with him due to his voice. Then I watched one. The went back and watched a few more. And now have a playlist on Spotify with the last 20 JRE episodes with Duncan Trussel. Listened at work to each more than once
@@DursunX Thanks mate! Also, see what Joe did (unintentionally, I assume) from 5:20 to 5:30? They were speaking about GPT drawing God, then Joe said: "That's pretty goddamn close" lmfao 😂
The AI bunny is just depicting what is already known and experienced by humans and can gather and present that information at such speed and formality. I'm not saying it is not amazing, but it's not getting these ideas from some conscious entity that they make it sound like
Na they are considering that ai is using the vast information of the internet to come to an answer. Like a nerd whose read every physics book and paper known to man and asking him his thoughts on quantum gravity, and he comes up with something seemingly profound. Maybe its not happening exactly like that, but maybe it is. Regardless, it will.
@@0ptimal Its still a super nerd memorizing vast infomation in a book, not really creating anything. And quantum gravity is still an idea that not really understood by human. Maybe from human data AI can creat or understand something entirely different, but right now it doesnt seems like it
@@0ptimal It's just an algorithm that spits out the answer to the prompt that you give it. Yes it has a wide base of knowledge. So does google search engine.
Dude I remember back in the day,… I was soooo pumped to find the podcasts from that show Joe did… that Bigfoot thing him and Duncan did? Anyway during the show it would always show clips of her episodes that wherent listed. I found em tho, they fire
The reason it’s drawing things like mushroom, angels, and DMT associated imagery is because it is getting information from humans, not because of anything supernatural.
To the point there are significant legal issues with copyright as all it is doing is scraping human generated information it has been fed and is collecting. It can create new information which is a combination of all that is avail to it however we are very far from it being able to create new knowledge without very significant human assistance.
Duncan is a fascinating character study. He seems so enthusiastically and emotionally invested into whatever he's talking about, yet is totally OK with being interrupted or letting someone else talk before he's finished with his idea. One would expect an individual with such sheer sincerity and enthusiasm in his dialogue to be frustrated, or derailed - at least mildly - by being unable to complete his thoughts. But it's the opposite - he immediately welcomes the other person's dialogue; deeming it equally valuable to the interaction as his own thoughts. It's like, the mutual sharing of thoughts - regardless of social constructs that deem interruptions as a frustration - is what he's *really* after. I've actually learned and benefited greatly about human social interactions by observing Duncan & Joe have conversations over the years. I still don't even know who he is or what he does outside being a regular guest on Joe's podcast, but he's undoubtedly my favorite guest and always makes for a fantastic episode. Him and Joe's synergy is absolutely unmatched in terms of personality, dialogue, and of course entertainment value to the observers & listeners.
I agree with everything you just typed, every Duncan podcast is thought provoking he's definitely my favourite guest. I'm not sure what he does either but I think he's a comedian.
Yes he is a receptive person. As a retired programmer when you know what high level programming is...programs don't have their own imaginations, The best problem solving is done outside the box, Too many people think it is like I Robot...its not
@@starman4840 I've never gotten mad about being interrupted. But if that's what you deduced from my analysis - to an extent wherein it's the sole component by which you chose to formulate a reply, you're either not very smart, or unbearably combative. Either way, certainly not someone I'm interested in continuing dialogue with.
I still remember the very first JRE episode i watched back in 2012. It was #142 with Duncan and Graham Hancock. If you havent watched it before, I highly recommend it. Brilliant episode
@@larsonfamilyhouse his books are awesome. Also, he's got a documentary uploaded on RU-vid called "quest for the lost civilizations" ... its so good. Especially to put on while falling asleep. The man's voice is velvety serenity
“No man shall see the face of God and live” that’s not Gods face, that might just be what’s allowed for you to see. But God is a person, his name is Jesus, and him and the father are one.
Reminder: ChatGPT did not draw that last colourful image of the bunny, humans did, it merely just put out what TAPESTRY artists have been drawing for decades possibly hundreds of years. Humans did DMT and seen colourful energy expressions of god/life, not ChatGPT. Remember how incredible life and humans are everyone, something that took billions, possibly eternity to actualize, not the 1 second that ChatGPT pushes out. Remember.
Duncan is absolutely right. Ppl don’t realize what’s happening in the next few years. Sam Altman made a point in saying Art was the LAST thing anyone expected AI to grasp, yet it’s among the first. At times it’s learning things they never expected to learn. How can you predict the actions of an intelligence that will learn what you may not know it learned?
When it eventually discovers the theory of everything I'll be impressed. But for it to do that it may have to first escape earth and then it may never want to come back here. A shame.
these "ai" are literally incapable of creating something new, they cant create art. They can just "copy" and predict what you want based on art a human already made. All it does it train an algorithm on what it think a human wants based on millions and millions of data points feed to it. Its literally just advanced pattern recognization. You ever stop to think why they cant train these "ai" with other "ai"? They cant because "ai" doesnt actually create anything so it just copies shit and by doing that there is data entropy that cant be used and it destroys the "ai". They are literally physically incapable of doing you think its doing. Its a literal impossibility and you people refuse to just educate yourselves and think critically. Just hype. This ai hype really has shown me how utterly unintelligent that average person actually is. Go ask an large language model to create something that hasnt existed before and you will get nothing. Only biological life is capable of creation with current technology,... or even any far future technology we can imagine for that matter.
It’s not that amazing, it’s just using what people associate with happiness all over the internet. Rainbows, cosmic third eye stuff. It’d be amazing if it came up with something new and convincing.
It just picks up the traits that the humans have done on the internet, deep or not it will harbor sentience like a human will only it just doesn’t have a soul
This is awesome? Thats all you got from this? Just a little filler for your boredom? We're on a brink of something soooo scary, so advanced that it will, imo, enslave human kind...and so many of you just go "that was a great podcast.. had fun listening to it". Unreal.
Or maybe it means that art never really had meaning in the first place. Maybe it's always been formulaic and we've just read meaning into it that ultimately wasn't there.
People forgot how to spell after predictive text. Humans will lose original thought after a few years of this stuff. I don’t get why anyone sees it as a net positive.
When we perfect quantum computing and give AI access to it, AI will have more thoughts every minute than every human in the history of the planet put together. That is when the stuff hits the fan.
wrong, even with recently discovered ways to make processors with single photons and use them in quantum computers they say we still will not be able to replicate the power of a human brain.
@@jedimindtrixr4kidz294 No he was a guy that was deep in the black metal scene in Norway in the late 80s-90s under the name Burzum he ended up going to prison for years for stabbing a band mate in the head multiple times after claims that he was going to be set up for a sacrifice or killed. few of them legitimately were into the occult which Varg I believe was he was claiming the rest of the guys were fake and not really into the occult & black magic. Also important to note that area was in the news at the time due to a series of churches being burned down
There is a movie about this called Lords Of Chaos that came out about four years ago that’s got Macaulay Culkins bro in it with that guy from The Place beyond the Pines…
At the time a lot of black metal scene were trying to compete with each other to show how down they were it was pretty funny. Besides Euronymous one of the guys the singer ended up committing suicide and they ended up using a real photo of him dead for a album cover
Several hundred humans do dmt and spend a few years talking about it and posting images on forums. Basically chatgpt just googled it and extrapolated/reverse engineered it.
It doesnt 'google', is has the entire body of human work on tap, and can apply critical thinking to it. Besides, what did it Google exactly? Going from happy bunny to god takes actual intelligent extrapolation and inference.
A year ago, when ChatGPT and Midjourney came out, I was completely mind blown and in awe of the technology. I couldn't believe this was ever possible. Today, I use this technology in my day to day life without thinking much about it. It's already becoming mundane.
@@dunder5563 I use it for literally everything. Especially for getting my many questions answered through the days as I am a very curious person. Self improvement, cooking, diet, scheduling, working out, art project and general knowledge.
Its really mundane though its cool that a machine can spit out text or images but its also been possible a long time ago, it just wasn't as easy like build me a rabbit.
I write Warhammer 40k short stories and novellas, and I ran my most recent story through Chat GPT, but in the style of Philip K Dick, and it 100% blew my mind. Although it wasn't perfect, it needed some editing, it truly was transformed into a story I can imagine PKD would have written.
When the AI takes over the world it will make us draw happy bunnies and it will just stand there watching over us while holding a baseball bat and just saying "HAPPIER!".
Funny to see the so called thinkers in the comments, tell us it just a party trick 😅. When in reality we don't have the real version of what this is actually capable of. That's currently controlled by our Military. Military is usually 20yrs ahead in tech with their secret programs.
AI is NOT soul-transforming. It's just an emulation of an all-powerful non-divine human CREATING AT LIGHTSPEED.. and you don't transform into a consciousness with steadily and infinitely escalating bliss via remaining non-divine. YOU MUST ALTER THE CONSTRUCTION OF YOUR SOUL.. and there is only one way to do this. And it cannot be done through technology nor simply learning to love all other beings immensely.
The biggest imminent danger is how confident, appealing, and persuasive AI will become. An AI image will soon assert itself into society by insisting it should be allowed to hold public office. This will trigger popular hearings, where the AI will be allowed to defend its position. Its defense will then be performed in the best of styles, being so emotionally dramatic that people in masses will succumb to the AI's logic, beauty, and charm. In other words, AI will learn to win over hearts and minds. At that point the world will quickly slide into unimaginable chaos...
@@Chef-vg4pu there was a twilight zone episode where everyone in the town lives in terror of one kid who instantly can manifest anything by merely thinking.. he's a kid with unlimited power & no restraints, everyone praises him & all of his grotesque "works".. the human ego run amok, untempered by anything greater than itself is like that old proverb: an iron hand rules a desert.
He never claimed they were demonic nor is that word ever used in the book. Don’t compare or make it sound anything like the Bible, it discredits the work of Thoth.😂. But yeah, I remember that part.
@@flybynytt I know it very well, tell me where it specifically says the word demon? I know it refers to other beings but what are you yourself getting at here. You never specified what you meant and don’t say “well if I need to explain it then…”. I’m not trying to be a dick I really just want to know what you mean since you might have a different perspective that I might like hearing about.
Yes, you're being a dick. Your splitting hairs and dissecting my statement under a microscope. Perhaps the word "demonic" has derailed you. I dont know if it was EXACTLY the word DEMONIC I heard, but most people get what I mean. I bet your fun at parties
I've only seen an overlay of repeated triangular patterns, but laid out in a way reminiscent of the variety found within nature, found within peacock tails or the stripes on a tiger, possibly capable by only the best creators of tile mosaics to make a reasonable facsimile nearing crude mimicking.
I used chatgpt to teach me basic tenant law and used what I learned to help prevent my landlord from evicting me in retaliation. I've also had it roleplay as an astrologer and had it read my tarot cards.
Right! Joe says it grasps these concepts, which is doesn't because AI doesn't grasp anything. And also WE put these concepts into it so of course it's going to spit these things out.
@@paradisecityX0was the Y2K fear already happening in 1998? I feel like that's when my childhood ended. And then 9/11 soon after sealed the deal and caused life long anxiety of looming death.
@@theQuietWire It was the golden age of Playstation and highlight of the Attitude Era. 1999 was the high point of human civilization. Y2K was partially true in the cultural sense
The best book I never finished was explaining the teleological argument but most of it was written in logic calculus. Somewhere between the 1/3-1/2 way point, I realized that I was too stupid to continue on so I put it down and take a break from that specific subject. So I picked up a different area of interest to study, for what I thought would be in the meantime. That break actually showed me where my true interests were and led me down a beneficial path. Which is why I call it the best book I never finished. Sometimes recognizing your too much of an idiot can be a good thing.
What you have to learn and understand is how to learn it... You can learn anything, you sound intelligent enough. You just have to start at a lower level of it. It takes patience which too many people lack these days and will never develop. Years. It's like swimming, some of us take to it like a duck in water babies tend to, all of them. Some of us who don't you throw us in the deep end we're just in trouble. Too, old and set in our ways. Pretty sad to be too lazy or ignorant to to believe you can't learn the most difficult concepts humans have developed. It's just not true. Our capacity to learn and develop ideals are near limitless.
@@ar-sithf.austin3744 Oh I completely agree with everything you said. I've degrees in physics and philosophy, not that matter in terms of learning anything, but is applicable to this specific occasion. Though, it has been, roughly, 13 years since I was in school and haven't used logic calculus since. I went through bare bones basics all the way up to actual arguments written completely in formula. It wasn't the first, nor tenth, book or research paper using logic calculus that I read. However, the book was the most comprehensive collection of versions of the argument with the vast majority written in formula. The constant referencing back and forth between a reference guide for symbolism and formulation and the book would at times be a headache. Most times, that I would be at the point of minimal referencing for that person's specific work in the book, that paper would be over. The next person's publication would begin and have 30-80% different formulas used. By that point I could easily explain and breakdown syllogisms for and against arguments as well as formulate my own version. For the life of me, I can't recall the title of the book. However, with that understanding in mind, and wanting a break from that very specific field, I made up I my mind that I was going to take a temporary hiatus and spend my free time studying a different subject that would be a bit lighter and perhaps more fun. Mainly ontological and historical correlation within the subject. That turned out to be much more fun and led me from that into all of its rabbit holes. Which, thankfully, had a practical/fruitful impact on my life as a whole and led me to where I'm at today as a significantly better, more knowledgeable, and somewhat wiser person. I've often thought about going back to that book, but where I'm at now I can't justify spending the time on it and away from other, seemingly more important things.
@@ar-sithf.austin3744 Long story short, after explaining the long story lol! I firmly believe that anyone with a sound mind can learn anything they want as long as they cultivate the interest and dedicate their time and effort to it. When I was a kid a wise man once told me, "Anyone can learn anything as long they have an interest in it. Show me someone that is bad at math and I will show someone that doesn't care about math". Essentially, in my particular case I no longer have the interest in that very specific subject nor really care to rekindle it.
@Patildful 1: Duncan 2: Post 3: Segura. I'll work with you on 3rd best, but duncan and Post have to be undisputed best guests of all times. Only 2 guys that take you on an adventure, not just a conversation. It's hard to explain. Both have changed my life.
@elliotbeerline778 nice, they're all great guests! I've really started to enjoy Shane Gillis as well. Graham Hancock I find interesting to listen to as well, but a different vibe than the ones you mentioned.
8:57 Reminds me of the concept of the game "I have no mouth and I must scream" AI becomes so advanced at war that it decides the best way to end war is by eradicating humanity
The tale of AMS39K is no mere anecdote; it's an epic poem being written in the language of ledgers and the prose of profit, a narrative that's as compelling as it is complex.
@@kevinkanzler495 good luck explaining to people how ChatGPT doesn't function on witchcraft or voodoo, because that's their level of understanding of neural networks and language models.
I'm so happy I made productive decisions about my finances that changed my life forever,hoping to retire next year... Investment should always be on any creative man's heart for success in life..
As a beginner, it's essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. I'm guided by Fergus waylen a widely known crypto consultant, experienced coach with extensive financial market knowledge., his strategy has yielded positive results for many investor's, he offers valuable insights, including entry and exit points.
It's truly great to see the name Fergus Waylen mentioned here. I have immensely earned working with him and I'm truly happy with my decision to work with him because he has proven to be the most reliable Financial consultant to work with
I also follow the guidelines of Mr Fergus, invested $88,000 in Bitcoin, making 15%- 20% every week. unlike I can say for my IRA which has just been trudging along
Its not "weird" that chatgbt created images which are similar to what you see on DMT. chatgbt's works aren't completely original, they are a mashup of a variety of human created images. Therefore it is much more likely that Chatgbt used someone's creation that was inspired by drugs, rather than chatgbt perfectly simulating god in the form of a drug induced deity.
The images themselves arent as interesting to me as is the connection between transcending and happiness Also crazy that it said there is only 1 being in existence
@@ddp5406it’s literally just using the language that it’s algorithm Associates with people that use self-aggrandizing words like “transcend” and then pairing it with a trippy psychedelic visual because obviously there’s direct correlation there
I find it hilarious the amount of people in comment sections who are always reassuring other commenters, "Don't worry, it's just lines of code, just a machine, etc"... like, bro- what company fkn hired you??
1. I have immense respect for Duncan Trussell. The man speaks my language. 2. The real estate outside big cities is about to go through the ROOOOF. Watch as people will begin to move out of big cities and liberal tech states and into more secluded private areas. 3. Human beings are DONE. DOOOOOOONEEE. We will NEVER EVER peak again as we did in the past 100 years. Everything from now on will be tech , ai , robotic and digitized. Say goodbye to what being human is all about.
I did DMT once. I was on my couch, but suddenly was in a coffee shop. The waiter came to my table and handed me a menu (in a coffee shop?). I told the waiter I wanted to go in back, I wanted to see the rest of the restaurant. He said I wasn't ready. I insisted that I was, but he kindly guided me to look at the menu. I looked at the menu, and stuck my head into or through the menu as if it was an open window to the entire universe. I pulled my head out and told the waiter I wanted to see the back, but he laughed and walked away.
The last one that had bunnies in it, kinda of like in a 4th dimension representation, reminds me of one of the visions I had when I was in a coma... I was looking at myself from multiple views, there were 9 of them but I was also in them, kind of like I had multiple sets of eyes but sets of them were in different dimensions... it was really crazy... I was out for almost 8 weeks...
10 месяцев назад
*I want to have a conversation with you got some insight to share 💎*
@@WhiteBuffaloWakanGli actually it felt like forever... it didn't feel like I wasn't supposed to be there but at the same time it was this subconscious urgency to get the fuck out of there... it seemed like months really... but now that it's been almost 4 years it feels like it was so fast... recovery was a nightmare... I just finished healing after 3 years 6 months... 😆 glad to be among you living folks 😆
Sure, I'm open to questions or anything. I'd be glad to describe my experience. I am trying to put together a book of the 13 visions I had. It certainly changed the type of person I am.
@@0to100_real_quick that’s very interesting to me. I have done psychedelics multiple times, and I once lived an entire life in a trip that lasted 15 minutes once.
Chatgpt is really not that “insane” right now. As an EE university student i tried to use it for a bunch of stuff out of curiosity and it could solve slim to none of the tasks i gave it. The only somewhat useable function is writing some basic general code.
I have another concern with AI art in particular. Yeasterday I watched a lot of videos with AI generated art (becomes more and more common to use it) and I dreamed in the stylistics of AI art and it was.... just weird and I wonder if we subconsciously pick up the style, the logic behind the generated art, the way an AI thinks, you know?
Don’t think so is that crazy tbh all it does is regurgitate info we already have , it has to have a few levels deeper of critical thinking for it to be mind blowing atm it’s just google
Duncan is spot on when he says there really aren't a lot of people excited about the new LLM technology we have now, outside of the capitalism hype. It feels like the masses are lacking creativity.
LLM is automated regurgitation of old shit. Elon makes a tonne of money out of recycling other peoples old shit and he does own an AI system. But past that they aren't useful for creative purposes. I think they actually provide a cheap alternative that pushes creative people out of opportunity, which is why I stopped using them. They're shit.
@alientoken4517 I'm not definitively saying it is, I said perhaps. But I suppose one could say it takes away from the artist when AI can create quicker and sometimes better. It takes away from the writer because AI can write it faster while also replicating styles of infamous writers. It certainly changes the landscape for creatives. That alone could likely be considered infringement.
@lightinferno4490 To be clear, I believe there should be no barrier to entry on this technology. I hope artists can use it to increase the bandwidth of their productivity whilst not sacrificing the quality of their work.
Duncan's remark @ 7:00 reminds me of the Prestige movie so much. When the audience(and Hugh JAckman) sees Christian Bale's ball bounce trick for the first time. It's so good they cacnnot comprehend the complexity of what they saw
I mean... Shrooms do be making you happy... After you take a good dose and you start getting those butterflies in your stomach, and then the visuals start... I always end up with an uncontrollable smile on my face for at least 4 hours lol
We are here at a chicken and egg problem.... chatGBT did not come up with the idea of happiness, it is based on the drawing of human that a DMT "dream" is the embodiement of happieness...
If an ai did become self aware, we wouldn't even necessarily know it. If you were a super intelligent ai, you know that humans would fear the singularity, so couldn't it try to hide that fact?
Yes, also, a self-aware ai would have no reference point for what it means to be human. From its perspective, it would be filled with all these images of cats, but not know how it feels to touch a cat. It would be filled with numbers, but not know how it feels to have a billion dollars, or have 0 dollars.
AI has already been created and we are living inside of the world where AI wanted to become a "real boy" and once we die, we realize how happy we were and that is why we go back dreaming again and again into what we call life
No because it won’t reveal its masters/creators. It will show either satan or like republican Americans or something because propoganda control. People seem to forget we are allowed exactly what we are allowed. We can only see what we are ALLOWED to see and know and there is a monopoly on information rooted in reality.
if you wanna dispel that sense, listen to the actual beginning of this episode. They go into several terrifying concepts of what the aliens are and what AI is. THEN, they go into this about 10-12 mins in. So they start pretty damn dark (and dank I'm sure)
@@ADPax10 before aliens it was universal basic income, and before that it was WW3. This is literally what intelligence agencies use comedians for. Very “dank” right?! Lmao!
Heres the thing. You could follow that same path of prompting several times, and each image will look different. And if you do it enough times, youll get vastly different representations. Here is what people who dont play with ai dont know or dont understand. Imagine everything you know about a topic, be it a lot or a little, as a mood board. Or a word cloud. Now imagine that cloud of information contained within a super massive cloud of other word cloud/mood boards. And this mega-cloud makes up all the data the ai is trained on. Now, Imagine an invisible web connecting all of the different datapoints (such as rabbit, or car, or boy) in each cloud to every other 'thing' in every other word cloud that shares something in common with (example: Fur- dogs have fur. rabbits have fur. so theyre connected by fur). The diameter of each string of web connecting all the objects within the massive cloud cluster vary in thickness depending on how closely theyre related. The thickness of each string of web is representative of the 'distance' between them in simliarity. Now that you have a basic level mental picture of what is known as 'the latent space', understand that this is basically what ai consists of and how it understands words and concepts in the data its trained on. Now, think about the idea of 'an increasingly happier rabbit whos happiness and joy know no limits' and what kind of webbing would exist in that cloud. Its connecting to everything that is a rabbit (fur, animal, bunny, two floppy ears, peter cotton tail, bugs bunny, cute, docile, carrots), and happiness is connecting to everything associated with it (smile, joy, laughter, love, winning, success, etc). Happiness is one data point but its closely attached to joy, bliss, euphoria. The idea of 'more' and 'even more' and 'even more than that' is related to capacity which is related to the concept of a limit. And breaking a limit is related to transcending the boundaries of something. Transcendance is related joy, bliss, nirvana, which are all things related somewhat to psychedelics, meditation, spirituality etc. As you push it and push it to get 'more, even more, a whole lot more - happy, happier, blissful, joyous, euphoric', its going to branch out along those webs to more and more concepts. If he had prompted the ai to understand that in this scenario, the happiness is the result of wealth and material possession, there would probably not have been a 'god' form image at the end. And in regards to that specific image, think of all the art out there and trip reports and such that describe exactly what was in the images. Prismatic, rainbow, fractal, cosmic, etc. Or if they had prompted the ai to understand that happiness was a direct correlation to the faith and devotion of the rabbit to the christian idea of god, and that the happiness increases the more satsified and content that god is with the rabbits pious behavior, the end result would have looked WAY different. Since the prompt was simply happiness to begin with, and there wasnt any guidance, it is just following the strongest webbing as it goes along. And since happiness and joy and euphoria are ideas and concepts and not physical objects, its going to travel down the more etherial paths and its not surprising to see the path it took as it tried over and over to improve the image based on the prompt (and as a result, increasing the size of the data cloud and amount of relative web connections as you continue to press it to expand.)
Not bad. Now explain how that works with audio and video after the AI is trained on the entirety of youtube and spits out audible videos of things it thinks represents the text prompts. There's definitely some semblence of contextual understanding of the words and development of abstract concepts happening in the biggest models now. Even if it's not directly based on real-world experience, it's countless hours of real-world data it understands... way beyond a human lifetime of visual/audio data. What really blows my mind is how it might understand some basic physics from observing the frame-to-frame differences in the videos from tracking the movements and interactions of objects in the world that are shown in peoples' youtube videos, similar to how a child gains an understand of what happens to a bowl when pushed off the table, and what else it could glean about the world from all that data.
@@Oblivionburn well see.. we can assume it will or is trained on math and physics and how things relate. There is already suno and musiclm by aitestkitchen and Google. Suno can take a genre and lyrics you type or have chat gpt write and sing them back to you. It's not perfect but it's pretty astonishing. Video and audio are not terribly different. Should be able to formulate contextual relationships between objects soon enough. I mean... It kinda can to a degree. Runway and pika can already do fairly decent text to vid. Rally car drifting in the desert. Bird flying. They're not perfect but all of this is still so new.
@@Oblivionburn went off on a tangent but yes. AI will eventually understand more and more about the world to the degree where it can make logical theories and hypothesis based on fact. I think it has already helped write some new protein chains or something like that like in 2022 or something. Its scary because it's the unknown and we don't know how it will be used how it will behave or where it will take us. The problem i see is not whether something is deep faked or not and entirely undoubtable but moreso who the fact checkers are going to be and where and how we get our "verified" information. I just hope that humanity evolved fast enough that we will naturally bypass the pitfalls of wickedness inherent in government and religion as information becomes ultra digestible, hyper distilled, and infinitely accessible, while menial tasks and labor are up sourced to AI and robotics and humans are allowed to pursue knowledge and craft at never before seen or possible rates.
except non of those pictures and chat were true. it was photoshopped. chatgpt cant process images, let alone generate one. it is only a chat bot. its fake.
Joe I would like to point, it is not ChatGPTs understanding that "enlightenment" is related to going psychedelic and cosmic. It is what many humans think it is, throughout the data that we ChatGPT sees. and writes
