Yep. Exactly what I said to myself when he started bashing a particular party. I was enjoying it until he stopped and started in on that. Now I'm done with it.
Go to any tropical country and see the level of environmental destruction that is just happening. Madagascar, Malaysia, Jamaica, Indonesia, the effect of the east Asian demand for bullshit rare animal medicines (like rhino horn, tiger meat etcetera) etcetera. When you see the destruction you will realise earth is done for.
@brendan wrightemotionally frail people like you tend to be unable to accept ugly truths hence you get disgusted and switch off. Just watch a nature documentary or go to a slaughterhouse or even a red light district and see what the world is really about.
I started graduate school in Biochemistry in 1986. I learned that science, something I had loved my whole life, is of secondary importance-at best-in the research science world. I very soon realized that there is a power structure in research science, and that no matter how smart somebody is, no matter how good their new ideas and research may be, unless the new scientist is willing and able to play within the rules set by that hierarchy, and to play the political game long enough to become a major power in the hierarchy, your research will not be respected. It’s like a game, but one in which the players are also the referees, and the rules committee, and league board of governors. It is quite literally insane. So I am not at all surprised that Weinstein was and is forced out of the mainstream. The people who make up the hierarchy have too much invested to allow something that threatens their own body of work-and all the prestige, income, and security their body of work has gained for them-to survive or thrive. The best and brightest biochemists I studied under acknowledged this. We are now in a dystopian world where scientific progress has run down the deep dark rabbit holes of quantum theory to the point that there is no longer any progress. The only real progress happening is in fields where real experimentation and real world applicability can occur… and physics does not qualify on either score.
Academia "writ large?" has undergone the same pathology that American Politics has by not having term limits. Can we maybe coin the term "Tenure Abuse"? Another possible thing happening is that there are more potential scientists being generated, probably worldwide, than their are positions and financing to support. Has become a ruthless "survival of he fittest", some call it a hunger game, that brings out the worst of humanity in far too many folks that survive the process. I think this is called intellect without ethics or some such. On the other hand we have the so-called Review Boards that have generated even more pathology.
yes ! but remember !! PHD in physics working for Apple, Boeing, or General Dynamics, etc. gets you 400K a year with a pension. Piece of cake. Play the game, get your degree, and then leave the research to the nerds. Meanwhile, you work 5 hours a day, have a free membership to a prestigious gold club, free air travel on company jets, an expense account, and lots of paid holidays.
@@fried_riceee This stuff very easy to comprehend. He breaks it down so much that a middle schooler could understand. What I am saying is that he keeps asking himself questions and answering them continuously. He is interviewing himself. It's hilarious.
I don't have enough scientific knowledge to confirm or discredit what Weinstein says but I must say this: Once you get used to his very unusual train of thought, it's purely fascinating to hear him talk.
Yea, vote against the only guy who has avoided war, in place for a bunch of corrupt democrats who have gotten us to the brink of ww3... Kinda hard to listen after he said that.
When it comes to Trump, all the thinkers and talkers suddently cannot explain their dislike towards him as precise as they do it on daily basis with their other thoughts. even when they live from explaining their thoughts.
When it comes to Trump I will never vote for what I perceive as a draft dodger Now he's a patriot?😂 And weren't New York elites recently considered suspect by right wingers?🙄
Bro is trying to gather great minds to focus on what they do best but to collaborate as a collective. He clearly keeps stating I don’t know what is required or how to get there but he’s confident that there’s an engineer, a programmer, etc etc you get the point. He wants to focus on what he’s best at. So we can make this feasible. I’m high af
Yes I can tell you're high as fuck. We can't be trusted with nukes. Okay then. How the fuck can we be trusted with extremely advanced science such as faster than light travel? Go google what happens if a rogue pilot flies a space ship into the sun at faster than light speed. This clown is a gigantic oxymoron on two legs. Stop smoking weed, it's turning you stupid.
In photon propulsion, a spacecraft is propelled by directing a laser beam onto a reflective surface on the spacecraft, and the photons in the beam exert a force on the surface, propelling the craft in the opposite direction. However, nuclear fusion could potentially be used to generate the energy required to power a laser for photon propulsion. The energy generated by a nuclear fusion reactor could be channeled to a high-powered laser, which could then be used to propel the spacecraft. This method has yet to be developed and is still in the theoretical stages. Overall, while nuclear fusion is a promising source of energy, it is not a practical solution for directly powering a photon propulsion engine. Nonetheless, nuclear fusion could play a role in providing energy for other propulsion methods such as ion engines or plasma thrusters.
I watched this and was completely lost. Then I smoked pot, and was still lost. Then I did DMT and GOD explained it to me, and hes right we need to get off this planet.
What do you think happens when you invent faster than light travel???? Instead of worrying over nukes destroying the planet, we will have to worry about someone flying a ship into the sun at post-relativistic speeds and destroying a quarter of the galaxy. This is basic fucking science. Life is not Star Wars. FTL is the most dangerous fucking concept imaginable. This guy is a bozo ass fucking clown. He says we can't be trusted with Nukes. HOW THE FUCK can we be trusted with even heavier science then?
I've been convinced of this and saying this exact thing for years: human beings are not developing in a harmonious, balanced way where the speed of our technological advancements is occurring at a similar pace of as the evolution and growth of our wisdom, our emotional intelligence and our psychological integration. There's too much contradictory, self-serving savagery there, forever. We're going at high velocity when it comes to the tecchie stuff but our nature as a Being is crude and terrifyingly underdeveloped; the integration is just not there. It's terrifying to ponder. Such a lopsided species. I almost wonder if we've been engineered to destroy ourselves.
The problem isn't our planet, the problem is us and even if we could leave for another world we'd bring the same problems with us. We need to fix ourselves first.
Elon is mentally bent on Mars.. earth first but it's too late cause they are SO stupid, Sick how blind & 👾 obsessed Elon and NASA are, to be BUCK ROGERS, The out put doesn't match the input*"*INSIDIOUS*"*'
We ourselves are the Great Filter. Will we learn to live better and mature our technology before we destroy the planet in the process? Tune in next week for the continuing soap opera, “Human’s Gonna Human”.
"We do not have the wisdom to be able to fuse nuclei. We do not have the wisdom to investigate the cell..." ... therefore we should infect the cosmos with our unrestrained ignorance?
Here's my take: You may totally disagree with him (I do). And it may be that what he's espousing as a solution to the unification of relativity and quantum mechanics turns out not to be the answer. But Eric Weinstein is not just talking nonsense. He is an extremely smart guy. It would seem the reason he takes awhile to get to his point is that this has been a long time in coming for him. It sounds like he only came to this point reluctantly after being prodded by Joe and Sam. He's telling the story of how he got to this point. I was able to follow. 1) Long ago, he developed a theory for the unification of gravity and qm 2) He got caught up in some academic politics during grad school which he did not have the patience or inclination for. 3) He moved on to other career fields and spent 20+ years contemplating whether he would ever submit this to the powers that be. 4) He has now decided to talk about it and he believes this may somehow provide us access to the most fundamental aspects of reality. He may not have your views politically, but cut him some slack. He is an extremely generous guy. He's normally very cautious in his speech. He's obviously frustrated with the status quo and has laid the gauntlet down so to speak by naming some names. Who cares! Give him this moment to present his ideas to the world. I totally disagree with him on a lot of things. I'm not a democrat. I'm not an atheist. I doubt that coming up with the unification of physics will provide us a way out of our global problems. But I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt in the presentation of his ideas. I for one will be listening to his new podcast, if for no other reason than he's really smart, really kind, and really interesting.
You made great pts. Im not scientific at all but just from observing humanity its obvious much technology is used with greedy or evil intentions. We have the same frame of mind when messing with atoms so eventually some lunatic is going to push the line too far with no regard to who it hurts. Were harnassing powers that our moral compasses are not worthy of, eventually if things continue that way we destroy this place.
I dont believe he stated having a complete unification theory, but that there were a few instances where they work together as he searched on his own for a unification theory. Maybe?
I think we are capable of gaining this wisdom but it is lost on the majority of people. They give into things that distract them from questioning the big things in life, and if they somehow get to the point in which they do question they get frustrated and go back to being numb to it. There are only a very small amount of people that are capable of gaining this wisdom and passing it down and unfortunately none of them run things. I think establishing bases on the moon is the first step. Being able to launch from there after refueling with lower gravity will allow us to travel much further, so i think that's the first realistic step for humanity and again unfortunately the people in charge seem to have lost all interest in the moon because you cannot gain any money from going there
Translation from Pretentious to English: 1. On leaving the planet: Climate change. That's his point. That's it. 2. On Theoretical Physics: He is mostly telling stories. He seems optimistic about our ability to make pretty much anything, but pessimistic about how we handle such an ability.
I wish we were half as smart as so many think we are. What have we really done since the 60s other than destroy civilization by making big computers small and social media. Can we at least be able to predict if going to rain tomorrow before predicting the weather in 100 years.
I had the same summary. I wish he was better at sticking to a point and not wandering into stories. I was interested in hearing some more theo phys discussion but this is just rambling for the most part
Leaving the planet was actually more about nuclear war or some other reckless human actions. He used climate change as an example that society can't even slow down for a few seconds, to take tangible action towards mitigating humans negative effects towards climate. Some people on the right turning a blind eye, people on the left trying to legislate the problem away, usually with the main intention of raising revenue or supporting an industry (basically focused on money) (or just virtue signaling), rather than actually trying to fix the problem, or have the patience to actually advocate for it to those who have no reason to understand it, beyond name calling, and belittling those who don't believe. Alienating those individuals, for the purpose of feeling social superiority. (selfish reasons, not actually caring about the issue) At least that is in response to your #1. And my take on the issue.
1. Not just climate change. His higher level point is that our wisdom is low while our power is high and accelerating. Low wisdom + high power = a recipe for disaster. May come in the form of climate destruction or some other form. 2. He's saying that Einstein's theories can be built upon. There are examples where Einstein falls short and Weinstein is simply trying to complete the puzzle.
@@connorfischer3283The fuck are you two on about? "Women watching this need to get back in the kitchen?" This video has nothing to do with feminism/women's issues, it's about space/advancing technology and the possibilities of what humanity's future will look like.
Photon propulsion is a type of propulsion system that uses photons, or light particles, to produce thrust. Here are the steps to use photon propulsion: 1. Generate the photons: To use photon propulsion, photons must be generated from a light source. This source can be a laser or a powerful light source such as a solar sail. 2. Reflect or refract the photons: Once the photons are generated, they must be directed towards the spacecraft. This is done using a reflector or a refractor. Reflectors work by bouncing the photons off a surface, while refractors bend the photons using lenses. 3. Produce thrust: As the photons are directed towards the spacecraft, they exert a force on the spacecraft. This force is what produces thrust and propels the spacecraft. 4. Maintain thrust: Photon propulsion is a continuous process, and the photons must be generated and directed towards the spacecraft continuously to maintain thrust. Overall, photon propulsion is best suited for long-term space missions where sustained thrust is required. While it is a relatively new technology, it has the potential to revolutionize space travel with faster and more efficient propulsion systems.
He's definitely hard to follow, goes on side tangents and bounces between threads. Cliff notes: -Were too irresponsible as a species to reasonably care for our planet or handle our current (and future) levels of technology. Given human behavior we're likely to destroy ourselves. -Our only real hope is to travel beyond our galaxy as Mars and our moon are not viable - so we may thrive as a species. -Currently, Einsteins laws of physics limit us from travelling faster then light. So we can't travel anywhere meaningful. -He believes Einsteins's Theory of Relativity is incomplete (because of the Schwarzschild & initial singularities) -Einstein's theory is the foundation by which we understand theoretical physics. Because its so encompassing were unable to scratch beneath it to "the source code" ~Begins to jump around a lot here~ -Einsteins Theory of Relativity is based on a form of Geometry, we later found out (1970s??) that Borhs Quantum Theory and further Particle Theory are also based on a different form of geometry. -The two parent geometries from which quantum theory and theoretical physics derive don't unify. We don't know why. He believes he found a unifying model utilizing non-chiral asymmetric geometry, to which the fundamental chiral nature of our universe emerged. (This is important) -If his model is correct, we could possibly circumvent Einstein's laws of relativity while potentially creating a new foundation by which we understand the universe. -He has two fears if he's right. One, it'll be weaponized before it's useful. Two, it will only reveal that we are indeed stuck within our solar system. -The physics community discredited his model, writing him off as delusional. He dislikes the community because they fukt him before when he wrote a thesis as a Harvard Grad that would have put him at risk of graduating had he pursued it. In 1994 his theory was discovered to have completely revolutionized Gauge Theory. -They double fukt him when they barred him from defending his PhD thesis (something about the 4th dimension). He left academia after this and is essentially dedicating this podcast to all his haters. -Sean Carol's wife doesn't like him. He doesn't like Trump. He's either on to something or he's completely delusional.
This is what Mr.Weinstein says the problem is; We need to leave the planet because nobody is doing anything about our problem with Nukes and a world full of dictators not to mention pollution and arguing about climate change. And we can't leave because we don't have a space ship that can do it ! Physics isn't going anywhere, we stopped at Nukes and we're done. If you try to investigate other theories in College you are ridiculed and threatened with expulsion. He was also talking about how people like you have a small attention span, and can't help fix the problems we all face.
@@lordjaraxxus663 though I agree credentials don’t mean high iq, which I never mentioned here, the breakthroughs are proven with math and observations.
Tesla referenced human energy 🌬👻jesus christ referenced living waters 💎👩🎓👨🎓science described water memory 🌊👨🎨👩🎨existence reflecting psychologically, psalms16:24 k,j proverbs 27:19👻💎👩🎓👨🎓💖🗽🤍🧮⚖🌪☄🌬
I can provide a list of materials that could be used to create a spaceship. Materials used in a spaceship will depend on several factors, including the type of propulsion system, the requirements for radiation shielding, the need for low weight and high strength, and more. Here are some materials that could be used: 1. Lightweight alloys such as aluminum, titanium, or magnesium for the spacecraft's structural framework. 2. Carbon-based composites for components where strength is a critical requirement. 3. Ceramic materials for thermal protection systems to protect the spacecraft from high temperatures. 4. Radiation shielding materials such as boron-based composites, hydrogenated plastics, or water. 5. Energy-absorbent materials such as Kevlar to protect the crew from impact and debris. 6. Electrical components made from silicate-based ceramics, nickel alloys, and high-temperature polymers. 7. Solar panels or other energy-generating sources like nuclear reactors that can generate sufficient energy for propulsion and other functions. 8. Life support systems for the crew made from materials such as carbon dioxide scrubbers, oxygen, filtration systems, and other specialized components. 9. Sensors and imaging technology made using advanced electronics such as flexible silicon circuits and MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) sensors. 10. Advanced speciality materials like graphene, aerogels, and super-alloys for specific needs in the spaceship. It is important to note that the choice of materials depends on the requirements and specifications of the space mission, and we may need to develop new materials in the future that are more efficient and better suited to the unique challenges of space travel.
Chris Bova It's part. Colonization of space would open up literal infinite resources, reduce overcrowding on earth, and encourage technological innovations that would improve the lives of every human.
Yeah but when you listen to him without the bias of being on his side no matter what from the start, you are naturally overlooking the fact that he is obviously full of himself and that's what most likely segregated him in the science community. Going out on a limb to be different doesn't mean you are correct about any theory. He wants to think he another Einstein obvious and he is very far from it! He gave that away in his talk here.
Look, the dude is intelligent. But dont go on the Joe Rogen podcast and just tease people. If you have a revolutionary idea, then spill it. Dont rant how no one takes you serious and then not be serious about your ideas, and say wait for another podcast.. bro
There's so much he says here that's so short sighted, and frankly, somewhat stupid it's unbelievable. As an example, Elon doesn't think Mars will save us. He believes it's the first step to making humans interplanetary. If we can solve mars, we can attempt more difficult colonisations further away, in more challenging environments.
Yes! Beware! Its a business as well. Some say a lot of things that sound good together and feels like it explains something but at the end they leave you with nothing concrete. Just BS.
Of course intellectuals squeeze a living out of their talents however the only way to argue with what the man is saying is to have understanding of his points, otherwise you are simply objecting to thoughts that are strange to you and that is a symptom of the anti intellectualism that afflicts this age.
@@Tinyflydeposit Please reread my comment. At no point did I: 1. Object to earning a living based on your knowledge. 2. Explicitly object to his thoughts. Setting that aside... What was the most pertinent point made in this video?
@@cmack17 yes I admit you do not specifically attack anything he says; you are in fact so non specific it's difficult to say what your point is. Eric doesn't mean it, he is doing a clever intellectual dance for money/fame? EDIT: why don't you tell me the most pertinent point of the vid ma'am. May I sit ma'am while you dazzle me ma'am.
I believe it was Neil D Tyson who said once that if you have the capability to terraform a barren planet, you probably have the technology to save Earth.
Mr Tyson is an arrogant know it all and talks to everyone like they are children. I don't listen to anything that guy has to say he thinks everything has been figured out and only he knows the answer.
Shaping a spaceship as a prism and using photon propulsion should not affect the crew in any significant way, even though the photons are being launched in different directions. The photons being used for propulsion would be directed towards the rear of the spacecraft, away from the crew and the sensitive equipment. When the photons collide with the spacecraft, they would generate some heat, but this would be dissipated away from the crew and the equipment using the spacecraft's cooling system. This system uses radiators to dissipate heat from the spacecraft and maintain its temperature within a safe range. However, it is important to note that any spacecraft making use of intense sources of energy, including photon propulsion, will require careful design, construction, and operation to ensure the crew's safety. Materials with radiation-shielding properties will also be required to prevent harmful radiation from impacting the crew, especially if the spacecraft travels beyond the Earth's protective magnetic field. Therefore, when designing a spacecraft, the impact of radiation and heat generated by various propulsion methods should be taken into consideration to ensure that the crew is safe and the equipment operates optimally. Can we go to Mars now!!!!!
They found a few Earthlike planets...can we just focus on bettering this one first?? So, we can evolve and figure out a way to create/farm planets/Stars?
"I have this theory, but I cant tell the world about it because only I understand it enough to be responsible with it. And if the president finds out about it, I'll be responsible for unleashing devastation on the world." This is a perfect example of someone thinking they are more important than they actually are. Kids, don't be like this guy.
@@axelpalmen5025 yes,let's not be a successful Harvard professor on the biggest podcast in the world. Instead , let's all be like you, a random RU-vid commenter.
What we need less of on this planet: pride and arrogance like this guy’s. Joes humility as this guy loves himself into more words is what we need more of.
loves himself into more words - haha that's pretty good . I wouldn't have got that unless I listened to him . I think he's entertaining but he is full of himself . I watched the one where he was saying - almost in tears - it's up to the jews to save the world because the towering intellect of the jews had brought humanity ultimate destruction by inventing the H bomb and only the jews towering intellect can save us . Keep stroking Eric . I'm neutral on jews , really don't think about them much .
Joe: what was your thesis on? Weinstein: it was on self dual equations not being as peculiar to dimension 4 as was claimed. Eddy Bravo : I will look into it
Gregorio Garcia. It's a bit odd that Weinstein said that was his thesis. A thesis is what you write for your masters degree. A dissertation is what you write and defend, for your PhD.
Dude you have understand that “today” may not be the day to have this conversation. On a fundamental level, your brain and body may not be able to have this conversation “today”. Yes I agree with you Weinstein’s coherence wasn’t at the usual level he hits us with.
His opening statement: "Humans have developed the god-like capabilities of nuclear fusion and DNA engineering, but lack the moral and ethical capacity to wield such power. Ergo, we must go to other planets" Which solves... what exactly? Is technological amnesia a side effect of space travel?
Lol, that's a good point. I'm assuming what he's recommending gives us more of an "eggs in multiple baskets" advantage. In that situation, we could still destroy the Earth, but at least there are other inhabited planets for the human race to survive on.
@@MIGnanimous Yea, that's probably what he is going for. For my rebuttal, I will channel my inner Bill Murray: "You're right, let's spread out. We can do more damage that way" 😁
I think he’s suggesting that if we spread out across the solar system - and eventually beyond that - our evolution will advance as a side effect of adjusting to a variety of new and different environments.
I took that, and his comments about human savagery, as saying we're like feral animals stuffed in the same cage. Separate continents are no longer sufficient, we have to move to different planets.
Always fascinated listening to this guy and really think he is on to something, but…… really wish he’d spend a little more time working with sociologists and psychologists
Really? He says we can't be trusted with fusion so we must unlock the deepest level of technology to build faster than light travel, which is a million times more dangerous than nukes. And you think this walking oxymoron is "on to something"? Stop fucking smoking weed. Instead of nukes destroying the planet, we will have to worry about faster than light vehicles flying into suns and exploding entire solar systems. What a fucking solution dude. Get the fuck out of here, WeedVaper420, bet that's your fucking screen name in video games you fucking bozo guy.
I’ve met people like this…they aren’t as bright as they think they are. Full of bravado but dampened by a lack of guts and a lack of confidence. Give me a paper Eric.
No, he's incredibly smart, only problem is that he's not smart in regards to this subject. He's a very intelligent con-artist who knows how to choose his words to make himself appear credible.
Weisntein is clearly exceptionally intelligent. His speech lacks brevity. Sometimes he can break down complicated ideas, but it's not something he's particularly good at. He speaks about concepts at such a high level (avoiding Complicated details) he sometimes essentially says nothing at all, I go back to see where I missed it, and after several listens realize the main idea just wasn't there. Smart guy though. He is very aware of it too.
Jonjo Senna if you were to figure out what lies behind Einstein’s theory, it’s plausible to assume you’d have figured out how to travel through space way faster than we’re able to, so theoretically we could reach further distances
Brandon Beliveau But he mentioned nothing about the ‘theory of everything’ combining standard model and the quantum theories. At least string theory has some conclusions. But theoretical and practicality are so far apart regarding near light travel.
A photon propulsion engine is a type of spacecraft propulsion that uses highly concentrated beams of light to propel a spacecraft. It works by absorbing and reflecting light particles in a specific direction, creating thrust that can ultimately move the spacecraft forward. One example of a photon propulsion engine is the solar sail, which uses the pressure of sunlight to push the spacecraft. To build a photon propulsion engine, it would require advanced knowledge of optics, materials science, and engineering. It's not an easy task to replicate such an engine. It would need specialized equipment, a team of experts, and significant financial resources to research, develop, and test a functional prototype. If you have any specific questions on this topic, I will try my best to answer them.
@@brianunderwood3109Exactly. Even if the planet has oxygen and is similar to ours we still have to worry about viruses, adapting to a new planet,supplies,weather etc.. That's implying we find a way to travel fast enough(close to the speed of light) since most earth like planets are light years away
I can provide a theoretical solution for a photon propulsion engine. Photon propulsion or laser propulsion is a proposed method of spacecraft propulsion using lasers to propel a spacecraft. Here are the steps to build a photon propulsion engine: 1. Choose a suitable laser: A photon propulsion engine needs a high-powered laser capable of generating continuous laser beams. One of the suitable lasers is a carbon dioxide laser, which generates a wavelength of 10.6 microns. 2. Design the spacecraft: The spacecraft should have a reflective surface that will reflect the laser beams generated by the laser. The reflective surface should be made from a material with a very low absorption coefficient for laser light. 3. Install the laser: Install the laser on the ground or in space. The distance between the laser and the spacecraft should be such that the laser beam will focus on the spacecraft. 4. Align the laser beam: The laser beam should be carefully focused on the reflective surface of the spacecraft to ensure that the maximum amount of energy from the laser is reflected. 5. Generate the laser beam: The laser will generate a continuous beam of photons that will strike the reflective surface of the spacecraft. 6. Propel the spacecraft: The photons in the laser beam will exert a force on the reflective surface of the spacecraft, which will push the spacecraft forward. Overall, the design of a photon propulsion engine is still in the theoretical stages, and much research is still required to make it a practical reality.
No you are not listening, we as humans live in countries bound by politics and laws. He is afraid that since high leaders and politicians will have access to weapons of mass destruction, we will kill ourselves and never ascend higher to other forms of thinking, remember the real goal for humans is to make life better for ourselves. I really hope one day when our conscious minds are somewhere else, we laugh all together at how stupid things were.
"Elon musk is wrong about going to mars" spends the whole time arguing about why we need to leave this planet, "only going to the stars will save us"...you gotta walk before you can run buddy, the propeller came before the jet, if there were no gemini missions than no apollo moon landings...
Watch interstellar, there's a reason why it was such a widely well received movie. It had taken multiple ideas, looked at them and manipulated a movie to fit a narrative they found to possibly be true. Of course it's just a movie but there's something to learn from it
@@raydare2002 i think the guests heart was beating a million miles a second here, you could tell he was super nervous that so many ppl are watching his every move
It is quite commendable for Mr Weinstein to have progressed from working in the motion picture industry for many decades to finally deciding to step into the limelight of scientific discovery. Although Mr Weinstein has gone out of his way of procuring an Afro wig to disguise himself whilst learning the lexicon of scientific jargon, he doesn't fool the more intelligent and astute among us such as myself from being aware of his former life. I wish Mr Weinstein all the best in his new endeavours. ☝️🙄
The problem is that we are running out of time and we’re no closer to figuring out time travel. Modern problems require problem solutions. We don’t just need a mind as smart as Einstein; we need one even smarter. And Einstein was so bright that individuals like him only come around once every few generations.
32 minutes of saying so many words, but saying nothing. Let me save you some time...He doesn't like Donald Trump or the academic community, and has a new idea about spacetravel but refuses to say what it is. End of video. You're welcome
Corvux IX What’s with you people and insults. Fuck, can’t you carry a rational discourse? I liked the original comment, was pretty slick; wish I could like it a dozen times. I have 2 degrees from an Ivy League school (twice as many as Dr. Weinstein here, and from Brown, a more exclusive school than Harvard). Professionally tested genius IQ. Maybe some of you folks should hero-worship me! I even bragged on myself! Shit, I forgot to directly compare myself to Einstein multiple times and throw out a few lines about how I’m saving the world through my big brain while outright refusing to explain provide any information. This Weinstein cat doesn’t have a stellar record with his scientific resume thus far either...
