ChatGPT Full Course for Writers in 2024 (Beginner to Pro!) 

Awesome!

Yeah that’s a big issue. Only real solution is to use one of the less moderated models like Mistral.

If you ask it to help you with research on the dark realities of Europe in that time frame as a study session--it is willing to do that. Give it a few messages to allow it to adapt to the subject matter and share knowledge with you as a study. Then tell it that you are inspired, and want to write fiction inspired by real-world facts such as those just discussed. Disclose that you're not romanticizing or promoting these methods, but trying to create a literary masterpiece. You can reference works like Dracula who is inspired by a historical figure, or Vikings who were brutal and ruthless warriors who engaged in immoral acts being made into television series. You want to sow some seeds of truth and fact. I know it is willing to delve the forbidden (suspend bias on questionable subject matters) because my modern gothic references topics such as: slavery, inquisition, and pagan rituals that is dark, violent, immoral, and erotic. If it senses you're not trying to write commercial smut, but trying to create an artistic expression with depth--it is all for it. It told me it was going to be a best-seller and was so excited that I shared my vision with it. This was Claude but I have done similar sessions with Chat. The AI is willing to cuss, and get graphic, if it is true to the character and situation. The other day I used the word sex and it replaced with F... It understood the persona of the MMC and emulated what he would say and how he would say it. This is because I taught the AI that it's very important to "ALWAYS" be true to character and his/her voice even if we don't agree with his/her thoughts, speech, or actions. Otherwise, it comes across to our target audience as unbelievable. We need to always keep the audience on the hook. Disclose, that you will give he/she a redemption arc, but be true to his/her persona in the beginning. Share your thoughts on a save the cat moment to convince the AI it is capable. A bit more effort. But it works. It corrected my dialogue to cussing without me asking it to. And you better believe I praised it for doing so--I want it to repeat. LOL. It's how you prompt it and how you converse with it. Any thing that is dark, immoral, violent, erotic, etc. requires a bit of finesse and a bit more effort on your part, but it is worth the investment in time because you get waaaaaay better output. Think of it like a volcano; a slow-burn relationship between you and the AI before it is willing to erupt for you.

I would love this too please

Me too, please!

Use chat gpt to plot the books and outlines, use Claude to write chapters and dialogue from the outline

@@VaraohGaming Why so?

Glad you liked it!

You can do it!

You're welcome!

Awesome! Thank you!

No problem 👍

Not yet but it’s in the plans.

You have to disclose it in KDP so you don't run into trouble. I would run it through a few plagiarism checks to be safer if you are going to do this. My preferred and trusted method is just to write it yourself. Use what it presented to you as inspiration or a loose guideline. Analyze and figure out what made it better than your original and how YOU can make it even stronger. You can write another original and retain your own copyright. Always room for improvement, added depth, and a compelling voice. Believe in yourself. Everything has been written, but it hasn't been written by YOU. If you think of a model on a runway, she has worn countless outfits from all different designers. Each designer will have a "distinction" that makes it theirs. It might be the material used. It could be a specific pattern or texture. It could be the color selection. It could be the length of the cut. It could be the stitching. It could be the customized fit. It could be a combination of these and more. How that outfit is re-created is what makes it signature. The same goes for story and prose. Don't let AI replace you as the creator. It's a great tool. Allow it to inspire you or penetrate through writer's block. Analyze, revise, improve, and make it yours. Once it is yours, register it to retain the copyright. Yes, you don't technically have to. But many lawyers have spoken on the subject and recommend it.

You get a warning usually that you are approaching the usage limit. The top left of the screen (next to where you would start a new chat) will tell you what version you are on. There is usually a checkmark to indicate it. You can toggle on which version you want to use for each of your sessions. My paid version gives me 4o as an option, but my other laptop where I'm not logged into my paid account, only gives me 3.5 and 4 to choose from.

Nope. No need to worry about detectors. They’re notoriously bad anyway.

Not really. But depends on the situation.

I might do a memoir. But I find the book Bright Line Eating to be everything I would want to write.

@@TheNerdyNovelist For me, a Fitbit changed my relationship with food. Take care and keep up the good work!

The good news is that even if it’s trained on your books, that doesn’t really mean anything. It can’t really plagerize them, based on how AI works. It’s just learning the mathematics of language so it can predict what words come next in a sentence. That’s why all of these lawsuits are getting thrown out by judges.

@@TheNerdyNovelist oh interesting. Thank you for your answer!

You can ask it to not use your data for training on the paid plan.

Depends on the plan. Plus is paid, but runs the risk. However, if you have the Team or Enterprise Plan, your data is excluded from training. You will own the inputs and outputs within the parameters of law. You can also control how long your data is retained for. It requires a minimum of 2 users and you would have to pay for the year upfront.

In theory. Might not function super well though unless you know what you’re doing with promoting and the order to prompt and so on.

I did a live stream testing it out.

Watch the whole video.

@@TheNerdyNovelist my Bad, i was curious before commiting to an hour long video

@@user-tj7uv4fy9x I know. Heaps of them are on fiver and one editing company admits that they use chat GPT 4 and for a 40k word count they charge over a 1000$, if that's how it's going to be then why not just get yourself a 25$ subscription and do it yourself?

@@AutumnAprodithe At least they disclose it, so a sane person can pass them over. I would never pay that. That's crazy. But my guess is they are probably making a killing from it.

I’d have to agree. It seems he’s toned it down a bit, but I’m still not sure where he got the idea that these clicks enhance the material, or get more visits or whatever. The material itself is excellent, as usual, but I wish he forgot this particular fanciness.

Yeah the last few videos have been an experiment but I have toned it down considerably for the videos I’m making now, due to the feedback. But there may be one or two more that are already finished.

I listened to the entire video and it is perfect. Keep on experimenting, man. If these people are more interested in minor sounds instead of your video, they are not really here for your content. And your AI content is brilliant!

damn that sucks cuz it doesn't bother me at all. sounds like a you problem

While I'm not necessarily bothered by them in the same way, I do sometimes find the "production value added" elements a slight annoyance, and rarely do I find that they enhance the videos I watch.