Over 1 billions spent in less than 2 years is a major crisis mate as chelsea finishing 6th is a pure joke and you will be lucky to finish above that this season lol @@kieranfinch123
What are everyone talking about, let the future show. Your beloved Utd handling of legend Roy Keane is one for the historybook. Dont throw stone in a glas house
@@PeterLundin-x7m But they kept winning even after Roy Kean. Chelsea ownership is chaotic. You have to admit that. Hire Goldbridge as a consultant to help you out.
I agree they need to sell him but realistically sterling should never have been bought by Chelsea, it was a strange signing and he’s shown that he is very much a system player and only worked at City. He was great at City though.
@@Black-gr4eg150k a week of that goes towards your NHS or schooling ,amazing how the elite of football dont have the same protection you guys give to the actual elite.
As a Liverpool fan, I don’t want Chelsea to win anything but I don’t want this for their fans either. No football club should be run like this. What a shame! The EPL should protect clubs for owners like these.
Maresca not wanting Sterling isn’t disrespectful in itself, but stripping your highest earner and one of your most experienced, senior players of the number 7 shirt while you push him out the door certainly is.
I don't believe the narrative that Maresca doesn't want Stirling. I think the owners have said that they need Stirling's wages off the books and they are using Maresca as the excuse for why he needs to go. Stirling is not a dud and for a while was the player most responsible for Chelsea's goals. I've also seen reports that his wages are actually 350k per week.
We all need his accurate description of all the crisis at these PL clubs. Without him, we would never know anything. The PL should hire him as a consultant to solve their many issues.
Hope you are joking.. They have 45 players that are on 1st team selection and have another 16 players on loan.That is 61 players in their senior roster. No team has more than 25 players.
With Chelsea, it’s all okay now as they’re able to sell their academy players who’ve broken in and around the first team. In 5 years when they have no Mounts, Gallaghers etc to sell, they’ll be toast
Very good points made, there's no point keeping a player a manager doesn't see as an important part of his squad going forward. A club ploys a manager to 'manage' the players and the squad absolutely nothing wrong in him coming in seeing a pre season and identifying best players for his system and then putting all his energy into refining the skills of them players and having players move on. Ultimately it will be the manager who either gets applauded for these decisions if they work out or loose his job if they don't work out.
How's it embarrassing when villa bought diaby last season and now he's playing in the saudi league? They bought him thinking he would add value and it's the opposite. They're trying to correct some mistakes made especially with the wages. They're even trying to correct the mistakes made under Roman's era. What's the crisis?
1. Sterling was a signing made by Todd when he was acting on Tuchel’s request and was freestyling the window, hence why his wage doesn’t fit into the structure that’s been laid down in the following seasons. 2. Gallagher was sold mainly for profit, but he was also an insanely limited player who actual fans who watched every game and didn’t just look at SofaScore could see his flaws and his lack of ability to go further as a player for us, Atletico was a move that suited all parties and I wish Conor the best but he wasn’t needed in the squad. 3. All the players that are being let go bar Chalobah are all players that we don’t need, because they’re not good enough, there’s a reason Sterling has been kicked out of City, England and now Chelsea in the last few seasons, it can’t all be Chelsea’s fault, especially with the terrible performances he’s given whilst earning £300k a week. 4. This massive squad bullshit lie by the media is hilarious, half of the players they put on the screenshots posted on social media are young players that were always going to be loaned out, and the biggest earners in that second group are all from the Roman era of signings aside from Sterling.
The first articles, from outside Chelsea, outlining that players like Sterling and Chilwell needing to leave started middle of last year. Maresca pointed out this “integral to preseason” thing being a lie by flat out showing the minutes and who started each game. Sterling is a cut inside, one trick player that has not excel’d at Chelsea. They haven’t threatened to not play him. If he wants to accept a check to play darts in a lobby it is his right, but no one in the staff thinks he should be playing. That simple. Sterling has now agreed and after sitting fine again is willing to work with team to find a good move for him. Not all of us want to keep Phil Jones around on the roster for 8 years for no reason.
It's tiring at this point, it's always "they spent over a billion" "they buy everyone on the planet" "their squad has 45 players" It's true, but everyone seems to forget that in the last few years chelsea are among the clubs with the highest sales as well. Of the 40+ players, a lot will train with the youth team, get loaned out, or get sold. After all that there's going to be a normal sized squad left. All in all i think they had quite a decent transfer window.
Strange hearng Maresca say Sterling wasn’t his type of winger. Then SSN shown a slide this morning of Wingers who were simular, Felix and Mudryk were shown to be the same style,
Can you talk us through the squad and what your opinion is on it. I have seen so many creators talk about that sky sports graphic but when you actually breakdown the players. Chelsea have a decent sized squad.
Goldbridge is now just farming for views at this point. Your commentary about Chelsea is just trash these days, do fix up or people will start unsubscribing.
I'd have Raheem at the Villa on the conditions that he takes a fraction of the wages he's on and the understanding he comes in as a squad player. He's only 29 and i think he has a bit of gas left in the tank but he's nowhere near the player he used to be. He could be useful coming on against tired legs in the 70th minute but he definitely doesn't start until he dislodges someone on merit.
Chelsea have over 40 senior players when you can only register a maximum of 25 for Premier League squad. So no surprise that the manager has to pick the 25-30 players he can use and train them. However, with Sterling have the owners told the manager that to balance the books they need to sell him so don't plan on using him. With Joao Felix the way the deal nearly collapsed was it more a case that Atletico Madrid could afford to buy Gallagher without them offsetting the purchase cost with the sale of a player.
You missed the point. It's fine to decide you don't want Sterling but if you believe Sterling then he was told he's in the plans 3-4 weeks ago, he's used for promotions and PR... And now they don't want him? That suggests no planning, and no real transparency or man management
problem with these big players is when they rejected from big clubs to play enough mins they will never take a paycut to go to a smaller club and recreate their value and fame. sterling can easily go to smaller team and be a baller and main player but then wanrs to play for big team with 0 value
Iv always felt Chelsea somehow manage to fund their own outgoings and comply with ffp. Always remember them selling Lukaku to Everton and Schurrle to Wolfsburg for mad money and buying Costa and Fabregas.