Chelsea vs West Ham United | Highlights | FA Women's Super League 24-03-2024 

Le felicito por su honestidad... Un saludo...

No, the halftime score should have been 1-2 in favour of Chelsea. We had a clear penalty, when the west ham defender draged Aggi-bever Jones down in the penalty area, but the refree didn't give it.

not having any knowledge of all rules, I thought the ball was way gone and a penalty wasn't awarded because of that......😑 @@JemitualePrecious

She dragged her down before the ball was there, clear foul. Should have been a penalty and a yellow card.

2-2 actually, they had good chances wasted...on we go tho

Thunderbolt. The chest down and the strike. Wonderfully executed

What stood out was James n gang on the bench not celebrating the wonder strike!??

​@@frankystarrz that's false. Stop bearing false witness (lying.)

Erin Cuthbert she been helping Chelsea many times with her beautiful goals she has scored for Blues Amazing player 👏👏👏 Congratulations to you Blues Ladies you deserved 3 points today 👏👏👏 I hope we win everything this season 👍

Interesting observation@@frankystarrz

So? "Play on!" Chelsea still won it. What's your point?

@@user-dh6bj2me5p”so?” So we should either introduce VAR or hire better refs. It doesn’t matter whether we won, West Ham rightfully deserved that goal, which could’ve severely altered the course of the game. You’re in everybody’s replies trying to discredit their claim that the West Ham goal should’ve stood (which it should’ve). No need to go agro over a factual statement.

@@user-dh6bj2me5p:Gol mal anulado al West Ham... Saludos...

Cannot believe they stole that goal from her

agree

Up the Aussie❤🎉🇦🇺

I wonder if she's as racist as the other famous footballing aussie.

And? The score would have been 2-1 instead of 2-0. Horrors, huh?

Do you mean there’s actually controversy in woman’s game

@@user-dh6bj2me5pyesh but stuff like that can do can hurt their will a bit,

Huge mistake by the official. And for the DA saying it would not have affected the final score, that makes no sense - it's not linear. A goal could have given Westham more confidence, or forced Chelsea to be more defensive, etc, changing the outcome of the game.

Yeah that sucked. That was a sweet goal too. Clearly onside.

those Japanese players are very talented...........

I support that

It was a horrible call. It was so clearly onside and not even close.

and it was a clear penalty for Chelsea, is what it is, evens it out.

@@granth1238One could argue that the PK has to go in to be a goal (about a 60-70% chance).. so your argument it is not statistically correct 😄

As a retired player, coach, referee of multiple sports if I’ve learned anything it’s that one play rarely, if ever, decides a match. I see a lot of people commenting about the offside call, and I agree she was onside, but nobody has mentioned missing a wide open net around the 5:30 mark. That could have greatly affected the game just as much. Because I don’t have any bias towards one team or another it allows me to look at any match without coloured glasses.

@@RobinC63 we're talking about an officiating mistake affecting the possible outcome of the game. That is completely different from a player missing or making a shot or a goalkeeper saving or conceding a goal. As a retired referee 🙄 you should know this. For the record, I'm a Liverpool supporter so 🖕 both these sides. I'm only commenting because I love the game and I hate seeing these awful calls, no matter which teams are playing.

Concordo. Parece que não tinha VAR !

I agree!!

Yes, but she kept missing didn't she?

​@@alanbrown4703 because she kept trying...use logic

one of both, she will be a star player and of the best in history, or she will be lost in some years like Neymar or Ronaldinho after 28 years old cause she's not able to be a pure winger, or a complete offensive midfielder in a 4-3-3 lineup

Ok. Give them the goal. Final score 2-1...

@@user-dh6bj2me5p: Respuesta errónea... Saludos...

​@@user-dh6bj2me5p🤦🏽‍♂️think. Even just a little. Hopefully VAR gets introduced soon.

​@@user-dh6bj2me5pYou don't know that. Game could've went another way. Could've been draw or L for Chelsea.

VAR hasn't eliminated mistakes from the men's game.

Ikr. Sweet!

I don't think Kerr can work her way back into the starting lineup. James has improved greatly. She's playing a complete game now. Beaver-Jones has one foot on the podium, and Nuskin is lethal. I adore Kerr, but she's got hard work to do.

@@user-dh6bj2me5p Ramirez is there

😂 Chelsea is the team no one want to confront to...💙💙💙

@@user-dh6bj2me5p wasn’t referring to Kerr mate. Kerr is history

Talvez a Kerr faça falta contra o Barça na Womens Champions league... talvez...

You noticed that 😂 we missed Sam Kerr.

The girl is really trying and chelsea didn't pay a penny for her transfer what a great player

Nope. What idiot told you that?

No You're speculating.

Did you not notice... Cuthbert got a goal too.

@@user-dh6bj2me5p how do we know that goal would still happen if it was 1-1

Lol. A "knowitall" that really knows nothing.

@​user-dh6bj2me5p what exactly is wrong with what he said

2-1 then also Chelsea should had a pen

@@darkstar4102 No because the match would have been played differently if the goal stood.

@sh0t0kan differently meaning a lot more Chelsea attack and Chelsea had penalty which was not given too

@@darkstar4102 Differently meaning the events wouldn't of repeated itself exactly the way you just watched it.

@@sh0t0kan there's no way to know that empirically, all speculation.

Nope. Wouldn't have changed the end result.

referee 🤮🤮🤮😡

Why did City lose to spurs then? Lol

​@@stevieg5907Man City lost to Tottenham in the League Cup 😂

@deansmith9914 yes they did and if they were a better team than chelsea they still would be in it. So why did city lose to spurs again?

That is not true, for a team to be contesting for four trophy and playing every 3 days with number of key players out injured, check your statistics properly, having scored close to 80 goals already this season, also check the season man. City had alot of injury then where did they end the season, chelsea women are beast both home and in Europe, if the league should end right now, we know who will be crown champions, they are not mate, Man. City are looking up to Chelsea as a role model.

@@omorogievapaul.o.3424 Every team got injuries but the fact of the matter is -Chelsea got far more depth in terms of quality than any other team right now.But I am sure if both Chelsea and City had their 1st choice elevens available for a final I would back City 9 out of 10 to win most of the time in the first half.

Conspiracy theorists are losers.

@@user-dh6bj2me5p Empirically speaking, I think Chelsea have a higher proportion of pivotal incorrect decisions going their way. This may just be confirmation bias. If it is the case, it may be due to chance, subconscious bias from the refs, or a number of different reasons. Does not have to be conspiracy (although acting like such conspiracies are unthinkable is a bit silly)

West Ham are losers to a travesty of justice

spoke too soon, clear penalty for Chelsea not given.