Evidence last player was cheating: joined 9 days ago; has a really high rapid rating yet only meh blitz and bullet ratings; played a very odd bishop first capture; a wierdly rapidly thought out clever defense against rook invasion (getting his rook to b6); had ealier piece shuffling that seemed computer like; that Bf6 move the streamer found wierd; kept picking the 2nd choice of stockfish; showed in the chat suggesting stream sniping which doesn't speak well for his character; gave a laughable explanation that he was just being extremely careful. (most untitled players would be very careful against higher rated titled opposition, which still doesn't yield the best results usually) The rational verdict: guilty
They cited their FIDE rating as evidence they were not cheating, but that's only 1457. If anything that suggests they were cheating. IMO there is evidence, but it's not iron clad.
Bro some people play on apps. I’m not playing bullet or blitz on my phone. So I can get mouse cheesed by a mf instant moving on one depth, but I’m playing on a touch screen tiny squares. My rapid rating 2050 on phone, but that’s as fast as I can physically play due to technology.
change the thumbnails a bit because these look like your older videos so i didnt pay much attention when it got recommended thinking it was the older video, later clicked on it when i saw time of upload. Many like me will miss your streams this way
The never ending struggle. I make this mistake too so much as a viewer but then when its my turn to make a thumbnail, im like, "AH HOW MAKE ill just do the same as last time" lol 😅
I credit you with an improvement in my understanding of the game. My biggest issue is not the opening, but the middle game. In recent weeks I have won against two FMs in over the board blitz.
ArthurChessYT played pretty damn well at just 12 years old. He was uploading to youtube 2 years ago and was 10 years old at that point. Much better than me at less than half my age, the struggle lol
Game Time - 1 hr 50 min - i am curious why you never considered bishop on e3 pinning the queen on b6 & next moving your knight to e6 handing a check and winning the queen
In the last game, at 2:29:42 in the video, Nelsi has 9:23 on the clock, right after black Nxe4, follow up with Bxf7+, Kxf7. Q-f3+, K moves, Qxe4, you get the pawn back, and black can't castle. Further, black is not developed enough to attack your queen, as the pawn on c6 makes the knight develop to d7 or a6, and the bishop is blocked by pawns. What's wrong with that? Sure, you trade a good bishop, but opponent is underdeveloped and can't castle.
Месяц назад
1:09:21 black K capturing h3 pawn, then in most cases moving black K to g3 should be good for black.
I'm amazed at your ability to commentate on your moves while playing. I tried this with my son today. 15/10 game. I'm 1500 rapid. I won, eventually, but time was tiiiiiiight! 😅
Knight sack...pawn takes and blocks bishop from pawn promotion defence
Месяц назад
1:03:53 I was considering to play pawn a2-a4 then after capture K c4, Kn d3 to go to c5 blocking bishop while King eats pawns to make passed pawn or two.
At around 13:12, why not push the pawn on G6 instead of moving the king? It would have trapped the bishop. You had no mistakes or blunders, so I assume it’s a bad move, I’m just not sure why.
Nelson, half of everything I know about chess I learned from you. You're so much better than me that if I play you 10 times, I might win once if I'm lucky. In your game with Trashy, the only thing on your mind was that you were bad in the endgame. If I could see the opponent's plans and the moves to prevent them, you should be able to see them much more easily. You're much better than that. You had a piece that could change colour and your opponent didn't. You could have made better use of your knight. At the end of the next game, try to concentrate on your opponent's plan, not on how bad you are at endgames. I'm sure you'll get the Elo you deserve.
Месяц назад
1:58 I was thinking about kn f6 to e4 instead of bishop to d6
20:15 What about sac’ing on Bxf2, luring king out, then pawn takes and the rook is aligned with the king as well.
Месяц назад
I don't see any goods, only temp knight pin. White recaptures pawn, then can develop white bishop to c4 with check. Can't castle, but up material and what then?
At 1:43:07 why is e5 better than Nxd1? The bishop seems hanging with and attack on the rook and then black has e5+ In reserve.But perhaps its that after Nxd1 white can harrash the king with Rb6+, and then black cant play Ke7 because of the fork, so that might loose the e6 pawn. I guess thats why.
Can u do a video on time management, I always seem to get into good/winning positions but still lose on time. How do i play fast but good moves like you or 10mins is too fast for me maybe and i should shift to a more longer time control
Missed a tactic at minute 13:05. Could have taken the pawn on d4 with your rook then king takes rook then check with your pawn to get the rook back and gave an easier game.
I have noticed that a lot of your mistakes are related to knight moves. Either not seeing that yours can do something, or missing an annoying move by your opponent.
I am almost 2000 ELO bullet at lichess. Do not call others a chess cheater. They maybe some random mistakes. I know the guy gave the pair bishops which are good in a open board but
well he's from the us. USCF awards you the title of "Chess expert" at 2000elo, up to 2200 where you become a National Master, which he also happens to be. what were your titles again?
NELSON BOOKS to buy if you can THE CHESS ENDGAME EXERCISE John NUNN GAMBIT books MODERN CHESS PUZZLES GAMBIT books MARTYN KRAVTSIV CHESS EXERCISES FRANK ERWICH HOP THAT HELP Anthony England uk
