China’s aims in a shifting global order 

China is focusing on developing China using the win win cooperation with countries around the world while US and the EU are trying hard to slow down the growth of China at any cost and of any country around the world.

The main point is that China gives the developing countries an alternative. These countries now have two sources of credit, trade, technology, industrial goods. China had already broken the monopoly of the West. There is no possibility of all these countries lining up with China. But China enables them a degree of freedom they did not have before.

Imagine the African participation dialogue was the most constructive and informative, espousing China's vision for world cooperation and peace, especially in the abandoned Global South

Ms. Rolland is very worth listening to. And her African colleague as well. Thanks a lot. Ms. Rolland has a deep understanding of China, has a critical liberal European lense to it without going into china bashing as the American panelist does. The American guy just rejoices on the perspective of China loses and the US wins.

China is not asking anyone to take side. US does.

Find it odd calling Global South a creature. Is North America or EU a creature? Not sure the intention of using that term.

So refreshing to hear the African perspective on China

Multi-polarity is coming and worth noting USA is major power, not superpower nowadays

It would be good if China can accomplish the straightening of current " world order " which is basically dominated by hegemony ( MIGHT IS RIGHT ) . China has been striving to achieve superb strengths in the military , scientific and economic aspects ....

Each time Schuman opens his mouth, he projects onto China what the western imperialists did to the rest of the world, which is to dominate. Rolland would be better off applying the zero sum mentality to the west, not China. The west, especially the Americans, desperately wants to hold on to the number one position, with an "if you're not with us, you're against us" outlook. China, on the other hand, has always advocated the win-win relationship. I gather that Bilahari is somewhat anti-China but not totally. But he's right, China will be sorely disappointed if she thinks that the global south countries will always stand by her side just because these countries have benefited economically from working with China. Every sovereign country naturally will work and take a position towards self benefit and not blindly support another country to their own detriment (except if one is a vassal state of the US).

When you are discussing about China and not getting someone from China to give their voices is already a big mistake and degrade the standard & value of this discussion significantly, worst still when nobody in this forum from China yet speaking on behalf of China & putting words into their mouths instead how arrogant & naive isn’t?

So many China trolls and bots, tell me, are you guys outsourced or in-house? HAHAHAHA🤣🤣🤣🤣

India has a visibility only in former british colonies, especially in East and Southern Africa. In former French colonies in West Africa ondia is not visible

freedom & democracy for global order.

Having an economic implosion bigger than 1929 would certainly have an influence. The concept of GDP did not exist in 1929 but planned obsolescence had started and economists have been pretending that it hasn't existed for 60+ years. Of course they do not even talk about NDP.

Soon as I see Kausikan on any forum discussing China, I just do myself a favour, turn off the video and move on to other more productive activities. That's what I'm doing here.

The condescending tone when describing or talking about the "Global South"... wow Global order readjustment is not an exclusively China thing... Indonesia and ASEAN have been talking about this for quite sometime, far before the BRI...

The woman is pretty and that’s why she is talks that way😂😂😂😂

China brings infrastructure and trade and non interference into countries internal affairs. USA brings military bases and blackmail i.e the Africa growth initiatives.

If the order is out dated, it should be shifted for vetter anyway.

It really confused me how Bilahari Kausikan could be a former diplomat, I could not find any trace of that profession in him

Statements of the obvious.

Beautiful 😍 l🥰 lady

I see a lot of sense from Mr Nantulya’s analysis

Lies and Hallucination from USand Singapore participants.

49:44

Reading and researching about china does not make someone a China expert 🙄

😂😂😂 this man has never had a positive approach or analysis towards China 😅. So not surprised on its analysis.

The gentleman from Singapore is not a real genius speaking China from the leadership mission again, and again will never interference. Any country with the large or small country is political systems do not involve the government neither all they need to do always trade the business wing wing situation help of infrastructure

Extraordinarily mundane analysis - is this the best this think tank can do?

Questions posed about China’s coming doom. Why not ask Chinese experts.