@@peterduro8379 it's synchronize no "suncronize" and thses Chinese people are very clever, they managed to make speed selection for each wiper, so it looks like wipers are not SYNCHRONIZED.
@@zedisded3406 you think American and European manufacturers are too stupid give China electronics then share their cakes? if China can success from buying why Japanese never success making this kind of plane? you mean they don't sell to Japanese? or they selled to Japanese but Japanese are too stupied like you that they can not use them to make a plan? and you really think a country can make their own rocket to the moon to the Mars to their own space station can not make a plane by their own? your mind still live in the past, so poor you are.
Well me too, as long as they keep out of western airspace. I wouldn`t board on one of theses even if they offer me the plane.. Don`t thrust cheap copyies of the over well proven Boeing, Airbus, DC-80 Supper, Embraer E-Jet series, & so on.
@@thunderbolt513 The days of the 'cheap copies' are long gone Thunderbolt, don't fall behind the curve. Сhina is already ahead of the U$ in many key technological areas.
I am not sure, but was it not the case that the Siemens magnet train was sold inclusive technical details to China, now China could help other countries like the Netherlands with a bullet magnet train from Groningen to Amsterdam to Antwerpen for example. I know that Chinese teams work with Germans on mobile cranes and they are dong a very good job with revising the older cranes for example with new hydraulic controls.
The chinese made Cockpit looks super cool. I think the avionics are made by honeywell or thales? They look so familiar. It looks a bit like 787 with a sidestick :D very nice
It is a welcome addition to the aviation market. Brazil and Canada already manufacture airplanes, thus competition would be good for the world aviation industry
Most plane accidents, except the 737 Max, happen because of human errors in the plane or on the ground. A good plane like this C919 needs good pilots. These are top notch.
The way the flying pilot (Captain) looks (observe his sharp, quick eyes especially when he looks outside) shows that he is a former air force fighter pilot.
@@topgunablek if you say so but I still think you're wrong, I've never heard something that crazy in my life,so that's what they tell there potential buyers.
@@thebobcat1964 The orange box is not in the commercial version: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KombhqtJz64.html. During the testing phase, all large engineering equipments such as cars, ships or planes have additional equipment attached for monitoring or configuration purposes. It's so common in engineering R&D, it's almost a no-brainer.
Is that PSY sitting at the back, see at start of the year CAAC has expressed its intent to work with EASA to validate the C919's airworthiness certificate for Europe.
Why did they land in the middle of the runway instead of the landing zone and why was A/THR set to 137Kts instead of the standard 145Kts? The cockpit layout looks suspicious like 787 but with airbus side-sticks but it seems pretty modern and easy to work with
Just some minor tweaks like; securing the parts that are rattling while landing, more comfort for polites especially the knee area, the windshield wipers, I do worry if there is a power failure would those gaming yokes fail resulting in 0 control of the plane.
Airbus uses the sidestick since 1986 (and the Fly by Wire systems behind it even longer) and there has never been an incident where the pilots couldn't control the aircraft due to a 'power failure'. That's the reason why everything has a backup in aviation, to prevent things like that! If one engine will fail to deliver power, you have the second one. If one flight control computer fails, you have the second one. If one sidestick fails, you have the second one.
well...i for one, welcomes the......instruments, the "interface", of a modern airliner being (a lil bit) more akin to Garmin stuff than ye'ol - stuck in the 70s - Boeing (and airbus) stuff.
In the future if I open an commercial airplane like American Airlines, I would use both Boeing and Chinese plane but not airbus although it’s good and bring profit to me. Boeing for long range and short range like international and domestic but for Chinese domestic and a bit international flights.
