Тёмный
No video :(

Chord Electronics FPGA DAC Technology Explained 

Chord Electronics
Подписаться 3,4 тыс.
Просмотров 69 тыс.
50% 1

You’ve seen the awards, now here’s how we explain the magic of a Chord Electronics FPGA DAC. This is our advanced video, so we’ve taken the wisdom of our digital designer, Rob Watts, and converted it into this short video.
This video explains the technology which is the same for all of our DAC range, including; Mojo, 2Qute, Hugo, Hugo TT, and Dave, whereby we use an field programmable gate array rather than a traditional industrial DAC chip.
For more information please see our Chord Electronics website: chordelectroni...
For more information please see our Chord Mojo website: chordmojo.com/
Like us on Facebook: / chordelectronics
Follow us on Twitter: / chordaudio
Follow us on Instagram: / chordelectronics

Опубликовано:

 

27 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 144   
@eboboboy
@eboboboy 20 дней назад
I found Mojo 2 is underrated right now. I have known this product for a long time, but I only really believed in the beauty of its sound once I tried it in an audio store. I compared some dongle DACS to some that are much more expensive than Mojo 2. I found some wins in soundstage, some in 3D imaging, some in bass, and so on. But when I listen to Mojo 2, it has a different song presentation. And it works in all genres. Thanks Chord for bringing this beautiful product to our life 👍
@i0001w
@i0001w 7 лет назад
Love it and love my Mojo, real breakthrough achievement and hope to see other video for other product
@ca77721
@ca77721 5 лет назад
Best DAC under $1000. Probably one of my best purchases ever.
@ks_3.14
@ks_3.14 4 года назад
Don’t think it’s this cheap
@evshrug
@evshrug 2 года назад
@@ks_3.14 mojo and mojo 2.
@moverecursus1337
@moverecursus1337 3 года назад
This video is an art, so beautiful.
@HifixCoUkFrankHarvey
@HifixCoUkFrankHarvey 7 лет назад
Great video!
@SoundmagUa
@SoundmagUa 6 лет назад
Моджо - удивительный аппарат. Такой взрослый звук в таком крошечном аппарате - воистину чудо. По нашему мнению, лучший портативный ЦАП/усилитель. (не считая Хуго)
@Paul_Henshall
@Paul_Henshall 2 года назад
I have the chord mojo, the sound is amazing.
@AliBekirKlckaya
@AliBekirKlckaya 6 лет назад
I have almost 0 experience with the high segment on audio. But i think Chord will be my choice in the future. Their technology, R&D, papers about high res audio etc. and even this explanatory video is very good. Thank you!
@dr.zoidberg4313
@dr.zoidberg4313 7 лет назад
Why do I giggle every time he says "flip flops"?
@loremipsum7471
@loremipsum7471 7 лет назад
or bi-polar transistors with ADHD
@LeHuy-ts4nn
@LeHuy-ts4nn 5 лет назад
coz it is a GAY term :))
@Sir2wired
@Sir2wired 5 лет назад
flip flop is such primitive wording, these are clowns selling the emperor's new cloth
@dn3a591
@dn3a591 4 года назад
@@Sir2wired A flip flop is a standard device throughout all digital electronics. Look in any textbook about electronics and you will find a section on flip flops.
@JudgeFredd
@JudgeFredd Год назад
Best ad ever for a product : explaining how it is perform better than competitors and why
@EnnTomi1
@EnnTomi1 5 лет назад
Didn't understand a thing but I enjoy my mojo
@nithinravi4401
@nithinravi4401 7 лет назад
awesome!!
@williamh5780
@williamh5780 3 года назад
Ah yes.....it has a direct output stage directly from the flip flops, exactly as I expected .
@slaving300
@slaving300 3 года назад
that's bad?
@williamh5780
@williamh5780 3 года назад
@@slaving300 I have no idea.. lol.
@evshrug
@evshrug 2 года назад
It’s good in audio, though I guess it would be bad in politics?
@rumcoffee3067
@rumcoffee3067 4 года назад
Superb video!
@miroslavkelekovic2507
@miroslavkelekovic2507 Год назад
Discrete analog output with no hi quality parts in? Just single Mundorf cap is bigger than half of the case, no tantal resistors, etc.. I mean, as long as the filter output is clear, next analog stage require even better buffer but you need a proper power supply and discrete components which do not fit in here..
@ribonucleic
@ribonucleic Год назад
Tell me you don't understand the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem without telling me you don't understand the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem. Beautiful video though.
@cliffd7164
@cliffd7164 4 года назад
Does Chord issue firmware updates to its FPGA Dac's? I see where PS Audio often updates their Direct Stream Dac and that seems to be an advantage of an FGA Dac but I have seen nothing about Chord issuing similar updates.
@chimi2169
@chimi2169 4 года назад
Cliff Dillard dont think so
@petercook7502
@petercook7502 2 месяца назад
Its really just a marketing video which is fair enough but comes across as trumpet blowing without actually proving anything. Not saying they are bad the video is just what it is.
@clonedmosquito
@clonedmosquito 5 месяцев назад
I need them to make 100w+100w cheap amplifier with built in chord mojo. Amp is diff business. I know chordmojo is good because of FPGA. Amps are same everywhere. Unless they reduce hum noise from amp.
@AGB-
@AGB- 7 лет назад
Not to be a pedantic, but a lot of not-Chord DACs and not-FPGA DACs use a crystal oscillator. I have $3.00 USB sound card that has a non-FPGA DAC and a crystal oscillator. And a lot of not-Chord DACs and not-FPGA DACs have ways of reducing jitter; it's not unique to a Chord DAC. That's very misleading. Now, later on, they do explain things that do make their FPGA DAC different and other ways in which they explain how they eliminate jitter. I don't know if they eliminate jitter 100%, but they explain unique ways, so it's possible. The video is good I just got rubbed the wrong way by how they claim that a crystal oscillator and jitter reduction are unique to them.
@shreyatongya6706
@shreyatongya6706 7 лет назад
bro. you seem audiophile.. suggest me a amp dac for athmx50 headphones
@AGB-
@AGB- 7 лет назад
It depends on what you want to achieve. I find the athmx50 to have too much treble, but that's my opinion. Now if I had the athmx50 I would try and balance out the treble with a tube amp. No, I'm not an audiophile who says tube are the best and only way to listen to music. I think tube and solid state amps are both good and it's about your taste. I prefer solid state amps, but I do like using tubes from time to time. However, I think the best way to balance the treble of the athmx50 would be with a tube amp. The best affordable tube amp I know is the Schiit Vali 2, and try different tubes with it; the stock tubes won't add the warmth that helps the athmx50 sound more balanced. If you can't get the Schitt Vali 2 the look into the Bravo Ocean or another one of Bravo's tube amps. Not as good as Schiit's but still affordable. As for a DAC, in my opinion, DACs don't affect the sound to the point that you need the "right" one for a certain pair of headphone or speakers. No, if you want a good DAC you could just go for a Schiit Modi 2, Schiit Modi 2 Uber, Or a version of the ODAC. If you want a DAC with new technology, you cold go with the Schiit Modi Multibit. Does this info help? Or do you want to achieve something different? Maybe you can spend more and want the best not period, not the best wallet-friendly picks. Or maybe you want a single DAC amp unite. Or maybe you love the treble sound from the athmx50 and don't want the tube amp. Let me know.
@Tigerex966
@Tigerex966 6 лет назад
thanks
@jimjiminy76
@jimjiminy76 5 лет назад
Agreed. I don't think it is possible to completely "eliminate" jitter.
@jamesmccoy8568
@jamesmccoy8568 Год назад
Who’s watching this in 2023??
@wric01
@wric01 6 лет назад
How does it compare with Directstream DAC that cost 2-3x more. Both fpga.
@MarshMellowChronic
@MarshMellowChronic 5 лет назад
Psaudio DACs covert all pcm to DSD
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo 4 года назад
i'd actually would love to hear the DirecStream DAC vs my Hugo TT2!
@johnadams2815
@johnadams2815 2 года назад
This a ridiculous pile of lies. You are using an FPGA to unnecessarily drive flip flops. Flip-flops are digital devices and do not convert to analog. At some point you've got a transistor that is driving the load or switching a resistor on / off to output analog. Not a flip-flop. All clocks are subject to jitter and even if you clock them directly, you should have been doing in that in the FPGA where the clocking would be more stable. Then there's a pile of lies about "excellent crystal oscillators." All micro-controllers use crystals. All clocking signals in all digital devices are "ultra fine" in the Mhz range,. If you actually cared you'd use a 10Mhz stable clock and derive from that like every other recording studio does, but you fail to do that. Then you go on to blame the silicon in the chip (which whoops, by the way, your FPGA is also made of) for noise. The secondary pile of lies about a discrete output stage being more noise immune than a sealed, on die op-amp (which are typically shipped with laser-cut and tuned sections) is another falsehoold. It would take too long to disprove most of the lies in this video.
@leafyleafyleaf
@leafyleafyleaf 2 года назад
But wouldn’t the flip-flops help with drive current going to the output transistors?
@johnadams2815
@johnadams2815 2 года назад
@@leafyleafyleaf Doesn’t matter. The microcontrollers can handle that or a simple drive transistor
@leafyleafyleaf
@leafyleafyleaf 2 года назад
@@johnadams2815 I hear you about the marketing hyperbole here. Too bad, as there is some interesting stuff they are doing in the FPGA. As for externally clocked DACs, is there one you would recommend? Full disclosure, I own a Chord Mojo and love it, but wary of grand claims in the audiophile world.
@johnadams2815
@johnadams2815 2 года назад
@@leafyleafyleaf Unnecessary. A simple buffer would have been sufficient and most microcontroller pins are strong enough to drive a transistor, which does the real work.
@johnadams2815
@johnadams2815 2 года назад
@@leafyleafyleaf I would recommend buying an actual device that most studios would use and don't buy "audiophile" gear. E.g. Antelope, Prism, Universal Audio, etc...
@josephmunn6897
@josephmunn6897 4 года назад
Rob Watts is one of the best digital audio designers around...why don't you email him direct with all your issues, tell him where he's going wrong? ;) They concentrate on the music which is to be applauded. I have the Qutest DAC and it's amazing for the £850 I paid for it . Used through a top transport it's superb.
@LeHuy-ts4nn
@LeHuy-ts4nn 5 лет назад
better than multibit/R2R architect?
@hellopomelo2
@hellopomelo2 4 года назад
Well then time to buy myself a basys 3
@jonlaws4493
@jonlaws4493 5 лет назад
Wow, so much pre processing of the signals and so many waffle words. FPGA are digital only, so I’m guessing this is PCM output, then you put it through a flip-flop, which is liable to massive jitter. The marketing Wank is high here..
@jimjiminy76
@jimjiminy76 5 лет назад
Not "wank", simply audio terminology you can easily Google is you are not familiar with it.
@jonlaws4493
@jonlaws4493 5 лет назад
@@jimjiminy76 You obviously fall for the BS. FPGAs are general re-programmable Gate-arrays for digital circuits. This "DAC" is just a digital filter and PCM output implemented in the Logic fabric. FPGA's are notoriously noisy and their clock jitter is dependent upon the circuit you implement in the fabric. Outputting the PCM stream to a CMOS logic gate to magically create Analogue (again from a digital logic gate) is just bullshit, the logic gates are also inherently jitter prone and noisy. This video is using a load of pseudo-technical words to fool you into thinking it is something magical or special. A dedicated audio DAC is designed to minimise THD, Noise and Jitter whilst providing a true analog current or voltage output then is then amplified. This video is very inaccurate and it pure hype.
@josephmunn6897
@josephmunn6897 4 года назад
@@jonlaws4493 looking forward to hearing your DAC Jon ;) I have the Qutest and it sounds amazing...all I need to know and understand...
@clonedmosquito
@clonedmosquito 5 месяцев назад
I was looking at mojo for years. why this color crappy looking stuff. Finally i jumped in. What i find was WOW. I mean it removed all metal noise. only music.
@petermartin9494
@petermartin9494 7 лет назад
Now I understand why these things are so expensive. They are actually worth it, in contrast to a lot of expensive snake oil hi-fi out there. I want a DAVE.
@youwhatmadeidk
@youwhatmadeidk 6 лет назад
Gradius2k not really. Nobody builds something and sell it at a break-even price. Everybody has to make a profit otherwise the exercise is pointless.
@loendsti
@loendsti 6 лет назад
it takes millions to pay for programmers, mr genius.; :P
@xPROxSNIPExMW2xPOWER
@xPROxSNIPExMW2xPOWER 7 лет назад
complex != better sound
@njack1994
@njack1994 7 лет назад
ProSurviver why does complexity not equal better sound?
@youwhatmadeidk
@youwhatmadeidk 6 лет назад
njack1994 because he's not very complex 😂
@ML_314
@ML_314 5 лет назад
Because it's simply just digital to analogue conversion, known zo mankind for a century. 99% of this video is complete gibberish.
@truthseeker6649
@truthseeker6649 6 лет назад
watch 1:24 : NOISE SHAPING and filtering. essentially it's just typical "measures good, sounds bad" delta-sigma DAC chip with more complex filtering techniques (aka delta-sigma + upsample chip). this FPGA is just low bit depth processor like typical delta-sigma with maximum of 10 bit but because of noise shaping and filtering able to achieve 24 or 32 bit. it's widely known in audio world that this noise shaping and filtering is the culprit of "digital sound". there's nothing new here. sorry not interested ...
@FriedEgg101
@FriedEgg101 5 лет назад
Have you heard it? No? Didn't think so.
@ca77721
@ca77721 5 лет назад
Their DACs sound nothing like delta sigma or any other DACs for that matter..Chords DACs are way more naturally organic and faithful to the music while digging deeply into music with euphonic imaging.Their technology involves more than just noise shaping.As explained in the video.They are the industry leaders for a reason.
@leafyleafyleaf
@leafyleafyleaf 2 года назад
There is a lot new here, actually. Noise shaping and filtering done with such a high level of overkill that it pushes any artifacts down to unnecessarily (but welcomed) low levels. This is the best DAC I have heard. And I was skeptical too.
@MkUltra-sk6dx
@MkUltra-sk6dx 2 месяца назад
🤣🙆amir has already tested your dac and it is worse than the dac for 100f. even this special chip didn't help you and it's as big as a barn🤣
@mariocassar3117
@mariocassar3117 4 года назад
The proof of the pudding is in the eating i.e listening.
@johnadams2815
@johnadams2815 2 года назад
naw, the proof is in bench test equipment and spectrum / THD analyzers.
@utomo8
@utomo8 7 лет назад
Keep improving the product. New programming Maybe add display Add heatsink
@evshrug
@evshrug 2 года назад
I think most of them are directly mounted to their aluminum enclosures to use the enclosures as heatsinks. I had a mojo: it got warm, but had no problem running for it’s entire battery life (though I’m more interested in the Battery Bypass desktop mode of the new Mojo 2). It could be argued that all necessary information is displayed by the Chord colored balls… though I admit I had to reference the manual to see what any of the colors meant besides volume 😅 New programming… why? It’s already new programming compared to DACs made with off-the-shelf chips and reference programming. I think the new Mojo 2 has new programming to take advantage of the additional FGPA taps, but the DAC and filtering programming is “solved,” the only thing they might update over time could be their DSP effects like the EQ functions.
@DrTune
@DrTune 6 лет назад
This is pure, undistorted marketing nonsense.
@MrGorpm
@MrGorpm 5 лет назад
Don't buy it; you would ignore the benefits anyway.
@ca77721
@ca77721 5 лет назад
Go listen to one.
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo 4 года назад
I own the Chord Mojo + Qutest, and just upgraded to the Hugo TT2. I've had the RME ADI2 Dac for a couple of weeks. I can assure you, Chord DACs, especially when you have something like the TT2 is insanely resolving and lifelike. I'm hearing things I've never heard before on my system (Cayin HA-300 tube amp + Audeze LCD-3) even with the Qutest or RME-ADI2. I can detect variations in a drummer's cymbal or hi-hat taps, I can hear distinct notes within chords, distinct differences between instruments. Perhaps you've never listened to a Chord Dac, or on a highly-resolving system, so you don't know what you're talking about.
@aqwandrew6330
@aqwandrew6330 3 года назад
@@JoeGunawanfotosiamo i have hiby is it worth to upgrade to chord mojo sir?
@Zxays
@Zxays Год назад
@@JoeGunawanfotosiamo Maybe you should give "The Emperor's New Clothes" a read.
@VirusForPrez
@VirusForPrez 2 года назад
my Khadas Tone 2 Pro ($199.9 US) is better than Mojo !
@DJMikeron
@DJMikeron 4 года назад
You must use sophisticated word and PR to justify the price :))) Chord has beautiful products but there are DACs for 500 Euros that kick chords ass .
@Cestmoi50
@Cestmoi50 8 месяцев назад
I am curious which one? Because I had my share of dacs, an my opinion most ‘under 1000 euro dacs’ suck. On average around 2000 euro you are getting somewhere . Always something missing. (And Yes I listen to decent amps and speakers!) and I am not a chord fan boy. But a gustard A26 or X26 is already 1600 euro… so 500 euro is just BShit!
@jc51373
@jc51373 3 года назад
Worst sounding DACs I've ever heard.
@CarlVanDoren61
@CarlVanDoren61 3 года назад
Run: W4S DAC2v2se, what dac do you have now? What model did you have? thx
@shahinabbasov790
@shahinabbasov790 6 лет назад
Z - Review Zeos not impressed by Chord Mojo. Considering he is honest reviewer. He didn't said it is bad he just said sounds like another DAC'S from different manufacturer's he own. This video exist for promotional reason only some people have money to burn they could buy one. Most reviewer in Headfi- org. pointed Chord Mojo 15-20 % better than another Dacs. In this video they demonstrate their fancy FPGA chip can process 500 X times more, why then it is only 15 % - 20% precent better ? Some reviewer in head org also mentioned this Dac have little bit deeper detail retrieval in expense of narrow soundstage. Of Course this is Chord's entry level product it can't be this good. Then Nobody will buy Hugo, Dave another they products.
@Ch3sT3R888
@Ch3sT3R888 6 лет назад
sound is subjective so ye. dont knock it till you try it. The dave itself is already one of the best dacs out there that money can buy.
@IHearEverythingDude
@IHearEverythingDude 5 лет назад
Sorry but Zeos is... I have nohing to his guy but his knowledge about sound is lacking. If he doesnt hear the difference mojo vs others dacs than its his fault.
@youwhatmadeidk
@youwhatmadeidk 5 лет назад
So what? That’s his opinion based on his ears/headphones/music. I worked in the industry for a few years and have heard more systems than he’s ever reviewed. My thoughts? It sounds better than anything near its price range. Though I have young ears without damage - something middle aged Zeos doesn’t have...
@JeongYongKim1
@JeongYongKim1 5 лет назад
i fucking hate zeo- fanboy, you are really saying that mojo is bad because zeos, the only- true- audio god said so??? pathetic
@FriedEgg101
@FriedEgg101 5 лет назад
Zeos had an issue with the cost of the mojo, which then coloured his review. He reviewed it at $600, but I paid £370 for mine, with a case. It was also done during his "all dacs sound the same" phase, which he has recently grown out of. I would like him to revisit the mojo, but that's not gonna happen. I own a few portable dacs and daps, and the mojo is clearly the most capable by far.
@Audio456
@Audio456 6 лет назад
The problem with chord is the management hold everything too close to their chest. The sound is fantastic but lots of the products are clunky and not the easiest to live with
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo 4 года назад
nah, you get used to it. Sometimes, simplicity is great. I had the Qutest until I recently just upgraded to the Hugo TT2, and in between, I borrowed my friend's RME ADI2, and THAT Dac is way too complicated. Too much to fiddle around, and I still couldn't get the kind of texture in the mid-bass that I was getting with the Qutest. The RME ADI-2 is a smoother sound, but at the cost of being too aliased in its sound and at times, less natural (like the saxophones! Just not as good as the Qutest). Now the Hugo TT2, though, WOW! That's on an incredibly other level! I did not expect it to be so much better than the Qutest by a wide margin!
@BR.
@BR. 7 лет назад
Yeah. Too bad the human hearing is not that fancy.
@MarshMellowChronic
@MarshMellowChronic 7 лет назад
Bogdan Rădulescu I think your underestimating the complexity of the human ear, just because we dont have dogs ears doesn't mean it's shit and we can hardly hear anything.
@BR.
@BR. 7 лет назад
Keith You just had to take that a bit too far
@MarshMellowChronic
@MarshMellowChronic 7 лет назад
Bogdan Rădulescu nope, you think human hearing isnt fancy... you couldn't be further from the truth
@jeroendenheijer9034
@jeroendenheijer9034 7 лет назад
Keith nl
@i0001w
@i0001w 7 лет назад
How you know it too far, I'm sure you never heard chord mojo or any of there product
@slap_my_hand
@slap_my_hand 6 лет назад
Sounds like snake oil. The high sample rate doesn't do anything because speakers / headphones can't reproduce those high frequencies and humans can't hear them. Anything above 192 khz is a waste of money. Even 192 khz is overkill for most applications. The huge FPGA and the fast clock also add a lot of noise to the power rails.
@MrGorpm
@MrGorpm 5 лет назад
Sample rate is not the same as frequency!
@youwhatmadeidk
@youwhatmadeidk 5 лет назад
The benefit of higher sample rates is in the time-domain, not because of ultrasonic sound.
@steven2809
@steven2809 5 лет назад
Oh dear you’ve just shown your lack of understanding.....🙄
@davidgriffin79
@davidgriffin79 5 лет назад
@@MrGorpm It's proportional. Sample rate is twice max frequency; therefore 192 KHz will have a max frequency of 96KHz.
@davidgriffin79
@davidgriffin79 5 лет назад
@@steven2809 Elaborate.
@EllasPOSEiDON
@EllasPOSEiDON 4 года назад
Chord Mojo uses the standard "shelf" chip, absolutely not FPGA technology. FPGA cost far much more unfortunately, yet.
@HandbrakeBiscuit
@HandbrakeBiscuit 4 года назад
Absolutely incorrect comment. All Chord DACs use an FPGA programmed with the WTA algorithm. Why didn't you just check Chord's website before commenting??
@EllasPOSEiDON
@EllasPOSEiDON 4 года назад
@@HandbrakeBiscuit You're completely right. I thought Chord uses FPGA in their higher priced DACs. Shame on me.
@HandbrakeBiscuit
@HandbrakeBiscuit 4 года назад
@@EllasPOSEiDON Wow - thanks for getting back to me. Reading my comment back it looks a bit harsh so thank you for not reacting angrily! Take care and keep safe in these crazy times... :)
@Tigerex966
@Tigerex966 6 лет назад
others claim pretty much the same
@ML_314
@ML_314 5 лет назад
It's simply just digital to analogue conversion, known zo mankind for a century. 99% of this video is complete gibberish. Reported it due to misleading information. It represents things as good and "necessary" that aren't. Customers are getting mislead by stuff like this.
@rustygates3367
@rustygates3367 5 лет назад
You are an idiot. Of course D/A & A/D conversion technology has been know to mankind for decades, since the mathematics of discrete time data manipulation was created. Converting data from digital to analogue faithfully is extraordinarily difficult, and audio, though it doesn't sound like a mission-critical application such as military, medicine or aerospace, is actually a more difficult domain for the application of quality DA,AD conversion due to the brains sensitivity and ability to perceive sound. DA & AD conversion is done everywhere, how well its done is another story.
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo 4 года назад
What system have you heard the Chord Dac on, and which Chord DAC? I own the Mojo, and I've just upgraded the Qutest to the Hugo TT2. In the past, I've had the Xduoo XD-05 before going to the Mojo and before the Qutest. I used the Schiit Lyr 3 and the THX AAA 789. I sold those to get the Cayin HA-300 tube amp with the Psvane ACME 300b tubes. Even going from the Qutest to the Hugo TT2, there's a very big jump in sound quality. I'm hearing details, separation, and timbre that I haven't heard from the Qutest, which is already very resolving. It's like driving a car. If all you've driven are Hondas and Toyotas, even if it's one of their more sportier cars, you still can't compare how a Porsche 911 drive until you've driven one. Chord DACs, especially the higher end ones and especially on a higher end system (Mine is a $4000 300b tube amp with $1000 pair of 300b tubes), you'll absolutely hear the difference right away. So no, you absolutely don't know what you're talking about.
@aqwandrew6330
@aqwandrew6330 3 года назад
@@JoeGunawanfotosiamo Xduoo XD-05 and mojo which one is better?
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo
@JoeGunawanfotosiamo 3 года назад
@@aqwandrew6330 Oh the Mojo for sure! The XD-05 distorts on LCD-2C
@weeg91
@weeg91 7 лет назад
"noiseshaping" - I'm out
@youwhatmadeidk
@youwhatmadeidk 6 лет назад
weeg91 it's too complex for you to understand.
@k-doggy1762
@k-doggy1762 5 лет назад
You Brexit nuts seem to want out of everything. Likely out of your minds too 🙄
@Ky_du
@Ky_du 7 лет назад
Great video!!
Далее
what will you choose? #tiktok
00:14
Просмотров 2,4 млн
СМАЗАЛ ДВЕРЬ
00:31
Просмотров 263 тыс.
How did Chord Electronics start?
10:58
Просмотров 9 тыс.
Chord Hugo TT M Scaler & DAVE
14:37
Просмотров 23 тыс.
How does an FPGA DAC work?
6:22
Просмотров 25 тыс.
Chord Hugo TT2 and M Scaler Review | Moon Audio
20:37
The Chord Mojo 2 is 2022's BEST DAC
12:23
Просмотров 147 тыс.
Analog Computing is GENIUS - Here's Why!
15:28
Просмотров 480 тыс.
Explain the different types of DACs
8:25
Просмотров 140 тыс.
Chord Dave FPGA DAC
15:43
Просмотров 30 тыс.