Тёмный

Christianity & Science: A Survey of Church History with W. Robert Godfrey 

Ligonier Ministries
Подписаться 753 тыс.
Просмотров 8 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

20 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 62   
@AdamsTaiwan
@AdamsTaiwan 2 года назад
I like that part, "It's your parent's fault". Reminds me of this: "A new scientific study has revealed that, if your parents didn't have children, neither will you. This points out a biblical reality, a pattern that God has established: we produce after our own kind." Ray Comfort
@kevinclint7588
@kevinclint7588 2 года назад
WHY DID JESUS CAME TO OUR WORLD?,………..HE CAME TO SAVE SINNERS LIKE ME,………..PRAISE HIS PERFECT PRECIOUS HOLY NAME,……. AMEN
@georgefalconer6103
@georgefalconer6103 2 года назад
This is interesting and has salutary warnings.
@georgefalconer6103
@georgefalconer6103 2 года назад
There are still Christians who are scientists. I wonder why we are not told Isaac Newton was a Christian and preacher. There were and still are others. I have met some.
@12centuries
@12centuries 2 года назад
It's not even as rare as you seem to be implying. A great many scientists are Christians, including the venerable Dr. James Tour.
@norbertjendruschj9121
@norbertjendruschj9121 2 года назад
@@12centuries Though Tour is totally wrong about evolution.
@12centuries
@12centuries 2 года назад
@@norbertjendruschj9121, you're offering opinion; Tour offers science... science which has not been refuted as yet in regards to spontaneous generation, which is an absolutely essential foundational requirement for evolution, regardless of evolution's proponents attempting to separate the two.
@jburghau
@jburghau 2 года назад
George Falconer, Isaac Newton was not an orthodox Christian, he denied the Trinity. Newton did believe in God as creator and his writings on the Bible were extensive. Your point is well taken that one of the most brilliant scientific minds believed in God as the creator.
@CA_Watchman
@CA_Watchman 2 года назад
Is the audience paid actors? The camera angles we see, one of which gives a floating like effect seen in cinematic productions leads me to believe these are very helpful yet highly scripted productions. The window to the right of the pulpit, something isn’t right. Is this a ‘set’ . I’ve never seen so many believers taking notes, I’m usually among the few in any gathering that does. The audience always appears super pious and busy taking notes. I appreciate the content of what is said and am curious about these videos.
@12centuries
@12centuries 2 года назад
I don't think so, especially given the roll-jib-dolly happening at 2:00, and the shadows and brightness levels of the speaker, room and participants. If it is an effect, it's one of the best I've ever seen, and doesn't seem like something that would be within the budget of a small-time producer like this... we're talking motion picture studio level here, and let's be realistic, it's cheaper to hire randos to populate a room than pay for those kinds of effects, but I doubt they even needed to do that, since this is a fairly well-known organization. In fact, since I'm slacking off when I should be working, I checked out the satellite view of their headquarters in Sanford, Florida and the windows and landscaping matches identically. I think I even identified the window we're looking out of in the video.
@jackkassabian4544
@jackkassabian4544 2 года назад
Science is its own religion. Don’t be fool.
@zach2980
@zach2980 2 года назад
What's with all the note taking? 😂 Don't they realize it's being recorded? Hopefully they're getting decently paid.
@MrPatdeeee
@MrPatdeeee 2 года назад
"Christianity & Science: A Survey of Church History" (Sorry kind Sir; for the VERY long "comment". But I believe it NEEDS to be said) I love true Science almost as I love Jesus'; who IS the quintessential "Truth", the "Way" and the "Life". Thus, whenever there is something of true science on TV; it is like a magnet to me. I can't get enough. And I do the same thing when I read WHAT Jesus says in the bible; regardless of what other writers of the bible. Like Hebrew 6:4-6 and 10:26 vs Mark 3:28 and 29. And on and on and on; where writers say things that contradicts what Jesus said. Etc. Like Mathew 1:1 vs John 8:58 and Mathew 22:45. And many more...Believe it or not. I said all the above to say...MUCH of science is ensconced in lies. Oh indeed it is. Sadly; that is the same with all bibles. In other words, notice what Jesus said in...Matthew 19:26 But with men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible. What this is saying; shows the idiocy of most scientist's, atheist's and agnostics (to name just 3); when they try to use worldly "physics" and "logic", etc; to prove the bible is wrong; when it says the world is ONLY 'circa 6,000 yrs old. Again: "With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible". Worse; is when some Christians try to appease these heretics; by saying foolish things like this: "Well the bible didn't' really mean' 6,000 literal yrs". And on and on and on. So sad. So "True" Christianity and "True" Science is great; when it keeps Christianity OVER science; since Jesus (who IS God) has NO limits; and He is Omnipotent, Omniscient and Omnipresent. One example: foolish scientists say that it takes billions of "Light-Years" for a given star's light to get to this earth; so this means the world can NOT be only 6,000 yrs old!. OH Yes it can. For, the same Jesus who created light and the entire universe; could have put that light all the way from the star to earth; in one microsecond! Remember, "With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible"! Praise Jesus' Holy Name. I could list a myriad of miracle examples; that proves the above idiots; are as silly as a man overboard..."screamin" for water! End of Story and I rest me case... ...In any case kind Sir, Please Pray OFTEN and Praise Jesus OFTEN; for He is the ONLY true "God Almighty"; there will ever have been. And may Jesus bless you and yours always. AMEN!
@jesusweisbrod7662
@jesusweisbrod7662 2 года назад
pat dee I absolutely agree with you. Another example: They've discovered that one of the moons around Saturn is made of methane. Methane deteriorates with sunlight, so if the universe were billions of years old, said moon would no longer exist. And like this teacher pointed out, true biblical theology doesn't change, but science changes constantly. The universe was " a million years old" at first. Then the "experts" discovered it's a billion! Now they're up to "six to thirteen billion!" Furthermore, the true scientific method is something that's observable, testable, and REPEATABLE. Radio carbon dating is a pseudo science. They don't use the true scientific method, that's why they're always changing. But then again, the powers at be (the "experts"), aren't trying to help mankind by discovering truth- quite the contrary. They're doing everything within their capacity to disprove God, and refute the bible (Romans 1:18-19)..."men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness..." P.s.- Tests have shown(by biblical scientists using the true scientific method), that even the atmosphere around our own planet is deteriorating at a rate, that according to calculations would make it about 6,000 years old. May The Lord bless the reader, brother Jesus W. Central, CA
@MrPatdeeee
@MrPatdeeee 2 года назад
@@jesusweisbrod7662 I am honored and humbled dear brother in Christ. Thank you and may Jesus bless you and yours always. pat dee near Atlanta, Ga
@jesusweisbrod7662
@jesusweisbrod7662 2 года назад
@@MrPatdeeee in the words of a brother at my church,"Amen and Ditto". It was an honor discussing this with you. And likewise may the Lord bless you and yours.🙌 ALWAYS.
@pauldonnelly6691
@pauldonnelly6691 2 года назад
Remember only way to repent and be saved by Christ act 11:14-18, Luke 11:9-13 and Zeph 3:9/ acts2:4 just follow only the original gospel tradition teaching not churches beliefs but Jesus will guide and teach you to the end John 10:1-6,11-16, acts 4:12 and 1 John 2:24-25!
@carmensiekierke3579
@carmensiekierke3579 2 года назад
@Paul, are you planning to put that comment on every Ligonier video thread? Folks, Paul thinks you have to speak in tongues or you are not a Christian. If you believe otherwise, you have been lied to by pastors.
@pauldonnelly6691
@pauldonnelly6691 2 года назад
@@carmensiekierke3579 Jesus told Paul on 1 corth12:3 everyone must to speak Holy Spirit to enter the kingdom of God. I have no pastor Jesus is my teacher John 16:13-15
@carmensiekierke3579
@carmensiekierke3579 2 года назад
@@pauldonnelly6691 Paul, on a previous video comment you told someone you were a pastor. The person then asked you what church you pastored. Paul, consider not trolling the Ligonier comment thread.
@pauldonnelly6691
@pauldonnelly6691 2 года назад
@@carmensiekierke3579 I preach many RU-vid's to people for several years
@carmensiekierke3579
@carmensiekierke3579 2 года назад
@@pauldonnelly6691 @Paul....The biblical definition of a pastor is Not " a RU-vid content creator."
@VideoBible
@VideoBible 2 года назад
...
@cheddarurchin3844
@cheddarurchin3844 2 года назад
Science is based on facts. Religion is based on feelings 😂
@lawrencestanley8989
@lawrencestanley8989 2 года назад
Historical Inquiry consists of three modes, one by sight, and two by hearing: 1) The historian’s own personal experience of the places or events of which he writes 2) The interrogation of living witnesses 3) The reading of memoirs Ancient historians considered that only the history of the times within living memory could be adequately researched and recounted, therefore the most important method of historical inquiry is that of the historian’s own personal experience, closely followed by the reminiscences of living witnesses who could be questioned in person by the historian. (and this is precisely what we have with the Bible) While the theist is able to provide a vast amount of evidence along the lines of historical inquiry, because the atheist’s god is science, most will believe that all inquiry must be subject to the methods of scientific inquiry - this is not only illogical, but impractical, and in many cases impossible. Therefore when the theist presents evidence consistent with the methods of historical inquiry, but the atheist cannot see it, smell it, taste it, hear it, or touch it, he immediately dismisses it as mere opinion. While he may demand such scrutiny of others, he does not live his own life in accordance to this - for example, ask the atheist if he believes that Pocahontas was a real person, and then ask him what methods of scientific inquiry that he used to form his conclusion.
@cheddarurchin3844
@cheddarurchin3844 2 года назад
@@lawrencestanley8989 thank you for proving my point, and showing how little evidence there is of a Judeo-Christian god. I mean do you believe in Zeus and Hercules? 😂 They predate your monotheistic religion.
@skeletalremains3860
@skeletalremains3860 2 года назад
@@cheddarurchin3844 you realize that evolution had the same holes in it right? There is NO proof of how the world began. It is all speculation and yet Atheists put their clown shoes on and do a victory dance? Your world view has holes in it friend!
@cheddarurchin3844
@cheddarurchin3844 2 года назад
@@HearGodsWord You have zero facts. There is more evidence of the big bang than there is of Jesus
@cheddarurchin3844
@cheddarurchin3844 2 года назад
@@skeletalremains3860 it's more than speculation, it's theory, tested mathematics and data gathered from incredibly powerful telescopes and computer algorithms that map out the data and can see a trajectory path in the stars that suggest a big bang
Далее
W. Robert Godfrey: Ignorance Is Not Bliss
56:25
Просмотров 12 тыс.
W. Robert Godfrey: Against the World
51:46
Просмотров 18 тыс.
W. Robert Godfrey: It's Just a Book
52:38
Просмотров 27 тыс.
W. Robert Godfrey: Barbarians at the Gate
46:33
Просмотров 15 тыс.
America's Christian Roots
26:46
Просмотров 24 тыс.
AI, Man & God | Prof. John Lennox
53:27
Просмотров 1,6 млн
History of Christianity (Full Series)
3:01:15
Просмотров 2,1 млн
Q&A | W. Robert Godfrey | Sinclair Ferguson
58:07
Просмотров 16 тыс.