Тёмный

Civil Structural PE Exam Prep | Concrete Design | Fall 2021 Exam 

Kestävä
Подписаться 22 тыс.
Просмотров 10 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

19 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 24   
@f.c2130
@f.c2130 2 года назад
For some reason, you are more helpful than the school of PE
@Kestava_Engineering
@Kestava_Engineering 2 года назад
Foley you just made my day 💪
@hmaines5169
@hmaines5169 2 года назад
It is because he has personality and makes it fun. The PE prep teachers aren't necessarily the peppiest people around haha.
@CMRHM
@CMRHM 2 года назад
Hi, Rich, I am taking ARE architect licensing exam. I thought your teaching is fantastic. I wonder if you could give us a video regarding how to read steel structure drawings?
@estherbaas29
@estherbaas29 Год назад
I agree that the ACI is laid out terribly haha
@Kestava_Engineering
@Kestava_Engineering 11 месяцев назад
some day.... it will get better
@gabo9200
@gabo9200 3 года назад
Love your channel thanks for the examples
@Kestava_Engineering
@Kestava_Engineering 3 года назад
thank you Gabriel! going to be releasing a lot more content moving forward all for you!
@ericschmitz1372
@ericschmitz1372 2 года назад
Hey Rich. Great example and I appreciate you going through the additional Av-min checks. Can you plan to offer more concrete questions, ie. 2-way slab, corbel, torsion in concrete, or whatever you can think of. Tnx
@Kestava_Engineering
@Kestava_Engineering 2 года назад
I will push concrete design higher up on my list! torsional design could be a fun one to knock out. thanks for being part of the team Eric!
@InternetMoneyPE
@InternetMoneyPE Год назад
ACI is a nightmare 😂
@dylanbolton6297
@dylanbolton6297 Год назад
Hey Rich! Great vid and love it as always but just a heads up, you had your less than sign when it was supposed to be greater than for Av min checks so you actually needed shear reinforcement since 3.7/2 is 1.85 like you had but this is NOT greater than Vu so technically you would need shear reinforcement assuming that your d of 7.5" was correct. Let me know if I'm wrong after a relook but hope this helps. Love your vids and can't get enough of em my man you make it look easy as pie 🥧
@Kestava_Engineering
@Kestava_Engineering Год назад
Thanks for the info! Ill go back and take a look. always love the feedback on my calcs. I make mistakes just like everyone else! 🙌
@dylanbolton6297
@dylanbolton6297 5 месяцев назад
Of course we're all a team here! Great vids and thanks as always! Taking the PE here in a few weeks so hopefully I can get that W!
@davidblake712
@davidblake712 2 года назад
Hey Rich; Do you have recommendations how to solve this using the CBT exam provided references? Appears ACI 318 isn't provided, luckily the reinforced concrete equations appear also lacking.
@narathipkhanhansuk9469
@narathipkhanhansuk9469 3 года назад
thx
@Kestava_Engineering
@Kestava_Engineering 3 года назад
you're welcome!
@bobowman3158
@bobowman3158 3 года назад
I’m interested in slab on ground. I see 318-19 talks about it but how does it compare to aci 360?
@Kestava_Engineering
@Kestava_Engineering 3 года назад
typically ive heard it be called slab on grade, but yes we can do an example! Im not the most familiar with aci 360 so ill need to jump in!
@bobowman3158
@bobowman3158 3 года назад
I did some more research and ACI 360 & 330 are considered non structural. I would be curious what you take is on the meaning of non structural. Anyway the slab on grade is designed without rebar using a chart PCA method
@albazeqollari523
@albazeqollari523 2 года назад
Which book do you suggest for preparation to exam ?
@cesarreategui2693
@cesarreategui2693 2 года назад
do we get reinforced concrete design questions in breadth portion of the pe civil exam?
@Kestava_Engineering
@Kestava_Engineering 2 года назад
i believe you could get a few easy ones
@ear3800
@ear3800 25 дней назад
Watching this video made me happy. wanna be friends?
Далее
Yəni, sizcə, indi bu nə deməkdir?
0:23
Просмотров 82 тыс.
Massive Horse Hay Production
18:27
Просмотров 150 тыс.