Structures be like Sacred Beast: the plan here is to summon one of these three as easy and fast as we can, then lockdown your opponent's moves by using our continuous traps and spells while regaining advantage and protecting our powerful monster to beat him as quick as possible Charmer: this new artwork of Eria looks cute, and look this token, isn't it cute too?
*Thanks for watching this new Structure Deck Duel! Which do you like more: Charmers or Sacred Beasts?* 👀 Pick up a Ridge Wallet today! ▶ www.ridge.com/aps10 (use code APS10 for 10%)
@@El-Gato69 its not that having link monsters is a loss. Look at decks like VW, they dont play any. My point is, charmer deck doesnt include the charmer links, which synergies with unpossessed etc very well.
These duels are my new favorite thing about this channel. They are exciting to watch; makes me hyped to play both decks. I wanted to learn the Sacred Beast deck and this gave me a better understanding of the deck functions. 😀
There is something I have always loved about the Spirit Charmer cards. It's a shame they didn't show some love to the Light and Dark Charmers but still really cool to see this structure deck.
I only just got here. 20 seconds in, already screaming "It's Time To Duel!"❤️ 1:44 The King of Games shows his face once again. Last edit, did anyone else notice the names change? Lol
Can you make videos reviewing each structure deck and how you would improve them? Like, 1 dude in Australia was able to get first place by merging 3 Sacred Beast Decks together. It seems structure decks are the cheapest starting point to building a competitive deck for most people. So if we can learn to use them as so, it might be useful.
The card type of each Sacred Beast's signature move card correlates with their respective summoning condition. Raviel requires Monsters (Shimmering Scraper), Hamon requires Spells (Cerulean Skyfire), and Uria requires Traps (Hyper Blaze).
Fun fact: Cerulean Skyfire can negate cards like Super Poly and Dark Ruler as while does cards say “you cannot activate cards or effects in response” Skyfire technically doesn’t activate
can also apparently stop counter trap cards based on the wiki info because it negates the resolution of the effects not the initial activation so the spell speed chain rules dont apply
I actually 1st heard about the very recent Egyptian godcard structure decks, only to now find out that there was previously a sacred beast structure deck. I legit love the Egyptian God cards and the sacred beasts, so this is definitely my jam. I really do hope that the wicked gods and the nordic God cards get their own structure decks as well.
Seeing Familiar Possessed and Charmers feels so nostalgic for me. Haven’t played a long time ever since my dueling buddy/rival and I graduated out of college. He’d always be playing his Gladiator Beast while I’m just a bag of tricks. Played him with Crystal Beast, massive losses, then Chemical Dinosaurs still losing, followed by Parshath starting to get some wins, and finally the Fairy Tail/Familiar Possessed helping me finally evening the score with him. Man I missed those days, and watching this duel just brightened up my day. Thank you guys for the video xD
Gotta love my Sacred Beasts!! Built a deck for them when they 1st came out in the GX era and I’m glad that they got this upgrade as it’s been overdue 😏
Great vid guys, as always. Editing error in the video; Paul and Larry's names are still at the top with the Battle Pack Draft 3 sub-header when Alec and Trell are battling. Nonetheless, always enjoy these.
This makes me so happy! The Charmer's Structure deck is my first deck! My BF got it for me and I love it! It is so great to see it do so well against another deck!
@@richardnguyen3413 the field spell says “if you control a spellcaster monster, your opponent cannot activate spell cards, but if you control no spellcasters, you cannot activate spell cards”
@@thatdudecolby I’ve played around with the new spirit charmers structure deck and it’s likely they both just forgot about the field spell bc my friends and I have accidentally played around it forgetting it was on the field
He is not fronting when he says the structure deck videos are great. I have yet to find a bad video on their channel. I'm so thankful to have found these guys.
I have just ordered these 2 structure decks online to start playing the card game irl. They should arrive just before my Birthday. It's a coincident that these 2 exact ones are what I brought and are featured in this video.
Whenever I play charmers, I usually run link or xyz monsters that can easily go off the effects and lvl4’s respectively. Because to get effect monsters out quick and a lot of them can easily go into a borrelsword dragon and other things
Before I finish the video my prediction is sacred beasts takes the win after a dead draw 2nd match. SB-charmer-SB. If I guessed right I require team APS to heart this comment.
My god I was kind of right. It was less a dead draw though more of he didn't get his negates immediately. Also sacred beasts are genuinely broken because its the definition of a zerg deck, just fast big damage, on top of the gaining lifepoints on opponents summon and let's be realistic, yugioh these days is about summoning 47 things in one fell swoop. Hence the 20k+ lp lmao
Fun fact: Cerulean Skyfire does not chain when it negates If you read the effect, it has no colons or semi colons. This means the card is not an activated effect (unless it were a super old card, but that isn't the case here, as Cerulean Skyfire came out in 2020). Because of this, you actually use this effect during the *resolution* of the effect that you're negating, rather than chaining it to the effect itself
I tried the Sacred Beast against the Orcust deck on YGOPRO, and turn 2, I already got more than 30k LP thanks to Awakening with one SB, and I "hyper blazed" them the next turn. You sometimes brick, but when you don't, it's almost always an instant win. I think it's one of the strongest Structure Deck they ever released.
As someone who also loved the Charmer deck, the deck is underpowered but great for go second cards for other decks. For charmers to be any level of threat in a duel they need a LOT more than this otherwise you have to make absurd decklists with things like Dogmatika and Magistus to make them viable even in locals. also the card art is really pretty. and htis continues to be my favourite yugioh channel
I feel you. I love the Charmers but I do feel that they would need more supports so they need to heavily rely on engines like the two you have mentioned to make them a viable deck against others. We still are missing supports for the Light and Dark Charmers and their pets, plus additional spells/traps for more extensions and consistencies. We really should have gotten retrains of the Charmers/ Familiar-Possessed monsters rather than another retrained pet but I guess this is fine too
The best cards in the Charmer Structure Deck for the deck itself specifically are the Awakening of the Possessed continuous spell and the Unpossessed continuous Trap... Use Spirit Charmers to add 1 to the hand and set the other and you have prime opportunity for a beatdown OTK with all monsters at 3000 ATK+ also with both continuous cards your Charmer monsters cannot be destroyed by either battle or card effect. plus, with the Trap, when a Spellcaster monster is destroyed by battle, you can search another and then with the Spell, you draw a card the first time you Summon a Spellcaster with 1850 ATK which is almost half the entire deck
I'd like to see you guys redo the Sacred Beasts deck VS the Egyptian Gods deck. Two no limit soldiers with no banned list in play or deck limit. I would love to see that iconic battle.
Team APS you guys really make yugioh such an enjoyable game. Your content never stops being great and you guys are an amazing channel for beginners or people who are getting back into the game. Keep up the awesome content, you all are awesome.
I'm just here spreding some love to you! I love theese theme duels! It was extra useful to me that I saw some spirit charmers action. I wanted to see that deck in a duel.
