Тёмный

Classified Delta IV Rocket Launch Aborted With Seconds To Go 

Scott Manley
Подписаться 1,7 млн
Просмотров 343 тыс.
50% 1

The NROL-44 Launch for the National Reconaissance Office is carrying a secret payload on a massive Delta IV rocket. After several delays the rocket got seconds away from launching, even creating the massive Delta Fireball, but the launch was aborted with 3 seconds on the clock.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

28 авг 2020

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,1 тыс.   
@scottmanley
@scottmanley 3 года назад
Update: it sounds like SpaceX are going to be able to launch SAOCOM on Sunday after all.
@jamestrexler6329
@jamestrexler6329 3 года назад
Given the week-long delay, we might as well. The folks at the RANS were hoping we'd manage a weekend hat trick: One Delta IV Heavy this morning and both Falcons on Sunday. If we get both Falcons up tomorrow it'll still be cool.
@demonorb8634
@demonorb8634 3 года назад
Nice! Better get reds rhetoric back out there! 👍
@williamswenson5315
@williamswenson5315 3 года назад
I heard it here first. Thanks, Scott.
@jefflee1189
@jefflee1189 3 года назад
why is an aborted launch embarrassing? ive noticed in your videos about the space shuttle and a few other vids of yours you seem to have no regards for life or safety. at this point i think i'll cut off the notifications and unsub for a while and give you some time to reflect
@Michaelo90
@Michaelo90 3 года назад
Does that mean that the Delta IV will be rolled out of the way, or will they allow the Falcon 9 to go over it?
@gordonmcmillan883
@gordonmcmillan883 3 года назад
Simple enough. Grommit left the handbrake on again.
@RalphEllis
@RalphEllis 3 года назад
Ha, ha....
@riparianlife97701
@riparianlife97701 3 года назад
Of course.
@williamswenson5315
@williamswenson5315 3 года назад
The launch commentator did remind me a bit of Wallace, now that you mention it.
@PureAmericanPatriot
@PureAmericanPatriot 3 года назад
Wait, NASA put inertial dampeners on the Delta IV? So that's where $4T went and we're still not on the Moon or Mars. Like inventing the aresol can before the wheel.
@williamswenson5315
@williamswenson5315 3 года назад
@@PureAmericanPatriot Perhaps you left on the parking brake, Mr. Sulu? Was that the reference?
@protocol6
@protocol6 3 года назад
You always say "until then, I'm Scott Manley" yet you always remain Scott Manley.
@scottmanley
@scottmanley 3 года назад
I have to keep making videos, otherwise I might become someone else
@endrioinfiniti
@endrioinfiniti 3 года назад
@@scottmanley you'd become elon musk
@pianoraves
@pianoraves 3 года назад
@@scottmanley it's like the 50mph bus
@henrijayy
@henrijayy 3 года назад
Scott Manley is one of Jeff Bezos's more wholesome alter-egos.
@vanpaalen5594
@vanpaalen5594 3 года назад
you made me realize that's why he starts his video's with Hello I'm scott manley. To show us he has indeed remained scott manley XD
@paulhaynes8045
@paulhaynes8045 3 года назад
To misquote the old Japanese proverb, "If you sit by the computer long enough, a video by Scott Manley will appear to answer all your questions".
@HiroNguy
@HiroNguy 3 года назад
"... when the watcher is ready, a video appears."
@ulrichs.3228
@ulrichs.3228 3 года назад
6:37 a very polite way of saying "the engineers tried to hide they were playing KSP at work".
@chacecrowell3638
@chacecrowell3638 3 года назад
Always blown away how you can release such professionally researched and detailed videos right after an event. As I was watching Everyday Astronaut's stream in the middle of the night and we were all trying to figure out what was going on I kept thinking "Well surely Scott Manley will come along tomorrow morning and explain exactly what happened like he was there in Mission Control!"
@anthonym7412
@anthonym7412 3 года назад
That’s why I’m subscribed to both Tim covers the launches and answers the general everyday stuff in ways that give a decent grasp that I can break down for my son and then Scott gives me the details that I understand with my military and mechanic background
@andybrown4284
@andybrown4284 3 года назад
Bunch of solid motors dressed up as a rocket sounds like some of my kerbal carrying projectiles.
@Thect
@Thect 3 года назад
@Franklin Ratliff delta iv does have solid rocket motor, delta iv heavy don't. And he's talking about omegA, I think?
@L33tSkE3t
@L33tSkE3t 3 года назад
I'm pretty sure Delta IV uses Hydrogen and Oxygen, that's why the flame is orange and it appears to light itself on fire prior to launch because it runs fuel rich. I could be wrong. Please correct me if so because I'm not 100% sure
@Thect
@Thect 3 года назад
@@L33tSkE3t There used to be two other main variant of Delta IV, the medium variant have solid rocket motor on it's side like how the Atlas is configured.
@helicocktor
@helicocktor 3 года назад
@@L33tSkE3t the flame isn't orange because of hydrolox, it's orange because the RS-68 uses ablative cooling. Hydrogen flame is transparent. The Shuttle's RS-25 has a transparent flame because it's actively cooled, the RS-68 is just a cheaper version of the where they use less parts and the nozzle wall is cooled ablatively instead of actively. Oh and the medium variants of the Delta IV had solid boosters. They don't fly these anymore I don't think, you'd use the Atlas if you needed a medium-lift launch vehicle iirc.
@HappyBeezerStudios
@HappyBeezerStudios 3 года назад
The japanese are at it with solid-fuel only rockets and are even working on the smallest orbital launch vehicle, so far they got under 3t total mass.
@defective6811
@defective6811 3 года назад
To be fair, given the risky business of rockets and the accepted risks of failure, this baby worked as intended. A fault presented, and automated control systems aborted effectively and safely within their window and parameters of operation, and the payload was not lost. Embarrassing, especially given the context of the current SpaceX/ULA contract awards, but definitely preferable to a lost payload.
@ke6gwf
@ke6gwf 3 года назад
Yup, and if it were an issue with the rocket, some new part, or something that can't be fully tested before launch etc, I might give them a full pass, but this was one of multiple ground support equipment failures, which tells me that they are not properly maintaining their ground equipment, and not properly testing it between missions. Some unforeseeable issues are expected from time to time, and some things won't show up even in rigorous testing because they require a specific set of circumstances, but to have that many GSE errors in one mission indicates something deeper going on.
@Daniela-pr7rz
@Daniela-pr7rz 3 года назад
@@ke6gwf Well said. And it doesn't look good when their competitors manage to have so many successful consecutive missions without unwanted events. They better hope that the 2 (TWO) launches Spacex have today don't go all that well, for it would just further their embarrassment.
@carljohan9265
@carljohan9265 3 года назад
The funny thing is, is this had been a falcon heavy, the problem could potentially have been sorted out withing a day instead of at least a week. Merlin engines are designed to be re-ignited many, many times, so an abort after ignition is no biggie. An abort of an expendable engine after ignition however gets huge problems.
@alphagt62
@alphagt62 3 года назад
It proved the emergency system worked, that’s not too embarrassing. If it had exploded and tore up the launch pad and payload, that would be embarrassing.
@ke6gwf
@ke6gwf 3 года назад
@@carljohan9265 ya, you have to run to the hobby shop and pick up a new pack of Estes engine ignitors, and crawl up under the rocket and replace them lol (they actually use large ignitors underneath to burn off the vented hydrogen gas, which have to be replaced after an abort)
@homomorphic
@homomorphic 3 года назад
I was at Vandenberg for NROL 71. It is spectacular. The hydrolox engines are amazingly quiet for the size.
@Shuffledudee
@Shuffledudee 3 года назад
Id rather take an abort over a full on destruction.
@mduvigneaud
@mduvigneaud 3 года назад
I completely agree!
@tdgreenbay
@tdgreenbay 3 года назад
Yes but full on destruction looks very dramatic
@robertelmo7736
@robertelmo7736 3 года назад
Doesn't make quite the RU-vid video though.
@aellis6692
@aellis6692 3 года назад
Baby want big boom
@cpthornman
@cpthornman 3 года назад
That said how many times have they tried to launch this? At some point you just have to say "Come on ULA. Figure it out."
@rufo
@rufo 3 года назад
At least it will give ULA a little taste of how it feels to launch a previously used rocket.
@biplabkumarghosh6300
@biplabkumarghosh6300 3 года назад
😂
@hamradio2930
@hamradio2930 3 года назад
LMAO 😅
@fffUUUUUU
@fffUUUUUU 3 года назад
Savage
@bbeen40
@bbeen40 3 года назад
Bravo!
@cpthornman
@cpthornman 3 года назад
rekt
@Kineth1
@Kineth1 3 года назад
Complex, folding (unfolding) antenna structures sound like a good reason for vertical integration; it would require less hold-down complexity for the "loose" ends of the folding structure if they could count on just hanging out (always pointing "down" relative to the payload vs gravity/thrust orientation).
@pmj_studio4065
@pmj_studio4065 3 года назад
And since it's useful for some payloads, all payloads must be vertically integrated, so no one knows which one is which..:)
@aleksandersuur9475
@aleksandersuur9475 3 года назад
@@pmj_studio4065 The only downside to vertical integration is the initial extra investment needed to launch facilities, once you have done that you might as well integrate all of them vertically, no point in maintaining dual processes.
@JMurph2015
@JMurph2015 3 года назад
@@aleksandersuur9475 actually for SpaceX they probably would only do vertical integration for NRO launches. It's still much easier for them to do it horizontally since the Falcon service structure is horizontal. Likely they would have to do something like ULA does with the rollable "shed" that allows vertical integration on the pad which is just somewhat less convenient.
@AliothAncalagon
@AliothAncalagon 3 года назад
Imagine being the only company not getting money to develop the solution for a problem, because you have already finished developing it xD
@biplabkumarghosh6300
@biplabkumarghosh6300 3 года назад
Actually no, they still needed money for a vertical integration facility and larger fairing development
@watcherzero5256
@watcherzero5256 3 года назад
They already received government grants for Falcon Heavy development.
@biplabkumarghosh6300
@biplabkumarghosh6300 3 года назад
@@watcherzero5256 Lol, which government grant are you talking about? There was none. Stop dreaming The Government bought some Falcon Heavy launches, but no money specifically alloted by the Government for the development. The development was fully privately funded
@watcherzero5256
@watcherzero5256 3 года назад
@@biplabkumarghosh6300 Under the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program SpaceX was given $278m in 2006 for rocket studies, then under the Commercial Resupply Services program SpaceX was given $396m in 2014 for Falcon and Cargo Dragon development. Those were pure R&D grants and dont include the cost+ launch contracts they have been awarded.
@biplabkumarghosh6300
@biplabkumarghosh6300 3 года назад
In 2006, were they even alloting 1% of their resources towards Falcon Heavy? I think that money entirely went into Falcon 9. And CRS also uses only Falcon 9 (I mean the SpaceX part of CRS, Cygnus and Dreamchaser don't use SpaceX launch vehicles)
@jamesfieweger8648
@jamesfieweger8648 3 года назад
I was wondering how long this would take to come out. Thanks for the insightful video Scott.
@howardbond1583
@howardbond1583 3 года назад
Thanks Scott I learn so much from your shows. At my age I don’t know how much I retain, but it’s definitely a Disney E Ticket ride. Thanks! Stay Safe
@spudthegreaterusa8386
@spudthegreaterusa8386 3 года назад
Good episode Scotty, keep em coming. I didnt know 75% of what you discussed today, and I always believe i learn new to me things when I take the time to listen to your channel .
@julese7790
@julese7790 3 года назад
Scott Manley, reverse-engineering spy satellite since 2018 xD TY for the high quality content. Can't wait to see your review on Artemis 1 next year !
@DARisse-ji1yw
@DARisse-ji1yw 3 года назад
Not embarassing. The safeguard systems worked as intended.
@eurybaric
@eurybaric 3 года назад
My thought too. Impressive actually, 3 secs before liftoff!
@drink15
@drink15 3 года назад
It’s embarrassing how many issues it had. Not so much that it aborted. It’s good the safety systems work but they shouldn’t be needed/used often.
@k1dicarus
@k1dicarus 3 года назад
Scrubs are cheaper than booms
@DARisse-ji1yw
@DARisse-ji1yw 3 года назад
@@drink15 they're needed when they're needed.....
@drink15
@drink15 3 года назад
D.A. Risse yeah, they shouldn’t be needed often.
@JamesOKeefe-US
@JamesOKeefe-US 3 года назад
Wow, this was quick, I was just watching this live last night :) Awesome job!
@MrNas42
@MrNas42 3 года назад
Neat! I love the time and effort you put into producing these.
@dmacpher
@dmacpher 3 года назад
3 cheers for hold down clamps!
@laprepper
@laprepper 3 года назад
I need a montage of clamps with that song that goes "holdddd on for just one something" lol...
@luz-5020
@luz-5020 3 года назад
at first I was kinda scared, if they'd give in the whole rocket would go boom
@Tuxfanturnip
@Tuxfanturnip 3 года назад
@Agent J What does gender have to do with any of this?
@James-cb7nb
@James-cb7nb 3 года назад
@@Tuxfanturnip The hold down clamps business is historically a male dominated field.
@Tuxfanturnip
@Tuxfanturnip 3 года назад
@@James-cb7nb bruh
@jshepard152
@jshepard152 3 года назад
Who else remembers the good old days when ULA would diss SpaceX as the unreliable upstart?
@Proger-sj8cj
@Proger-sj8cj 3 года назад
Lol yeah , watch as SpaceX diss another startup and then the same thing happens over and over again lol. But yeah , ULA needs a wakeup call
@MrWATCHthisWAY
@MrWATCHthisWAY 3 года назад
Proger13 11 - you will probably never here those words out of Elon Musk because he’s a firm believer of karma, and karma’s a bitch sometimes! I wonder if his employees feel the same way?
@ranjaxwolf9725
@ranjaxwolf9725 3 года назад
@@Proger-sj8cj No, we're years past that now, ULA needs to be put to sleep
@_mikolaj_
@_mikolaj_ 3 года назад
@YoshiPeach Mario since when ula makes capsules lol?
@TheRedbeardpirate
@TheRedbeardpirate 3 года назад
@YoshiPeach Mario ULA has never attempted to dock a capsule, they only provided the launch service for the boeing starliner. The launch of the starliner OFT-1 was completely successful as the capsule did make it into orbit.
@elopeous3285
@elopeous3285 3 года назад
Thanks for the analysis scott
@bobbailey4954
@bobbailey4954 3 года назад
I love your through coverage and comparisons
@SteveSiegelin
@SteveSiegelin 3 года назад
I know one thing, I stayed up for the darn thing and had to be up really early. I am tired but I saw something last night I've never seen. I saw the glow of a rocket and then no rocket in the air 😂.
@Ottee2
@Ottee2 3 года назад
Same, although I missed the abort. Fell asleep in my chair, then clicked it off and went to bed.
@VanquishedAgain
@VanquishedAgain 3 года назад
Yep. We were there too. Ugh. Second launch in a row I've gone to that had the abort after engine start (falcon 9 in March)
@SteveSiegelin
@SteveSiegelin 3 года назад
@@VanquishedAgain fortunately I was in my front yard. That sucks though I hope you're able to go to a good launch soon.
@VanquishedAgain
@VanquishedAgain 3 года назад
@@SteveSiegelin probably not lol. I paid 200 bucks a ticket for the falcon heavy launch but they scrubbed it lol. Couldn't make it back the day they launched it. I also went to the Parker solar probe one but they scrubbed it too. lol C'est la vie.
@cheddar2648
@cheddar2648 3 года назад
Unlike you, I was up gaming and drinking, and drunkenly tuned into YT while winding down to see a livestream. It was the tail end of the abort. :P
@daredaemon8878
@daredaemon8878 3 года назад
I suspect that the strict requirement for orientation has to do with [REDACTED]. At least, that's what makes the most sense to me.
@rappermerch7785
@rappermerch7785 3 года назад
especially the part where the [redacted] government gets mad and tries to bribe ULA, the US government then got mad and made sure [redacted] and then [redacted]. So yea that's probably why it was canceled.
@metanumia
@metanumia 3 года назад
@@rappermerch7785 Your hypothesis about *[REDACTED]* sounds fairly accurate, except for the part about *[REDACTED]* doing *[REDACTED]* with *[REDACTED]* so the Russians can't *[REDACTED]* near the *[REDACTED]* on a *[REDACTED]* trajectory. Really interesting stuff!!!
@aerojetrocketdyners-2538
@aerojetrocketdyners-2538 3 года назад
@@metanumia translate this to DOD powerpoint.I only understand DOD powerpoint.
@nathancommissariat3518
@nathancommissariat3518 3 года назад
Thanks for an amazing video once again mate! Cheers!
@k.v.v.k.6635
@k.v.v.k.6635 3 года назад
We have to be patient, there will get it right soon. Cheers from Sydney Australia!
@sixstringedthing
@sixstringedthing 3 года назад
I was super excited for this one because it was around 5pm on a Saturday here in Australia, and launches NEVER seem to happen at such convenient Antipodean hours! (Or else I'm just not paying enough attention and miss them even though I got the notifications.) Watched about 30mins of the leadup to the big fizz, I thought ULA did a good job with the detail in their coverage considering it was a classified payload, and keeping viewers updated regarding the temp anomaly. Thanks for the analysis Scott, looking forward to your post-launch vid too!
@laprepper
@laprepper 3 года назад
Now I have to google antipodean
@sixstringedthing
@sixstringedthing 3 года назад
@@laprepper "Of or relating to Australia or New Zealand". ;)
@sixstringedthing
@sixstringedthing 3 года назад
@Peter Mortensen There was an unexpectedly low temperature in one of the vehicle compartments that did not match predicted pre-launch conditions, discovered after they finished tanking. It delayed the launch by about 15-20 minutes during the T-4min countdown hold while they worked the problem and decided whether or not to proceed, then they announced a revised T-0 time. It will be interesting to find out if this was related to or somehow caused the hot-fire abort.
@frankhage1734
@frankhage1734 3 года назад
The NSA reminds us to "Be sure to carry your personal tracking and surveillance device with you at all times".
@Hansengineering
@Hansengineering 3 года назад
Hm. You know, one of the strategies for follow on 5G are frequencies to which oxygen and water vapor are opaque. You are able to increase bandwidth to an absurd degree, because range is fucked by the atmosphere absorbing everything. Then, you put a "tower" on the side of every building. Bam, everyone's got all the bandwidth they "need", and no one is stepping on anyone else's pp. But, do this, and space based cell phone tracking is less possible.
@gorak9000
@gorak9000 3 года назад
@@Hansengineering But the mm band is just for extra bandwidth, the phone still talks on the lower frequency bands as well. Also why would they need to track phones from space when they can monitor the data on the network anyway? You don't spend hundreds of millions launching a 100m dish to track things you already have access to the back end of the network for. Clearly they're tracking things they don't already have access to
@lknanml
@lknanml 3 года назад
My dad was in the Air Force Space Command for 22 years (launch officer). Ret in 1988. Lots of Bomarc crashes ahh I mean launches and other fun out of Eglin, Diego Garcia and Vandenberg. I had a lot of failed rocket models as a kid and a few "toys" that the public never knew about as they were still on the hush hush side of things. I had a Brilliant Pebbles launch device model. Nobody knew what it was but there it was next to GI Joe on the lawn. I've had many a conversation about why they launched this or that and why they didn't do some else. He would just say I could tell you the reason then I would have to aah ground you. Later I understood that as under ground you about 6 ft. Family jokes..... The whole they can't load the payload on it's side dug that memory up. I also want to say thanks Scott. Because of your channel I started asking questions again about what he did and he was excited to talk about it more. I guess I just stopped asking after so many I can't tell you answers. I have shown him some of the rockets gone wrong footage on YT and he gave ground zero reports on what it was like to be there. Ok. No wonder you didn't say anything. How are you still alive? Back in the day a rocket blows up and people are running into pickup trucks to get away from the orange cloud. Ahh the early days. Thanks again!
@bearlemley
@bearlemley 3 года назад
Mr. Manley, thank you for the update.
@DutchBlackMantha
@DutchBlackMantha 3 года назад
Well, better 3 second before liftoff than 3 second after.
@robertkeefer1552
@robertkeefer1552 3 года назад
Gemini 6 shutdown is the one I most remember back in December of 1965. Very tense situation.
@10000words1
@10000words1 3 года назад
"It's sort of like a drift turn but in a rocket." This is why I ♥ you Scott
@avejst
@avejst 3 года назад
Thanks for the update
@paulgemperlein626
@paulgemperlein626 3 года назад
I was confused about vertical integration for a long time cause I thought it was the business buzzword definition but no it's literally integrating the payload vertically.
@jamessheppard4372
@jamessheppard4372 2 года назад
Same
@davekorbiger
@davekorbiger 3 года назад
While you stayed up late, I got up early. Greetings from the other side of the pond. :)
@mplaw77
@mplaw77 3 года назад
Fascinating as always !!!
@richardsleep2045
@richardsleep2045 3 года назад
Thanks Scott.
@justspace103
@justspace103 3 года назад
Scott: “Omega will probably never fly” Me: but...what about more boosters :(
@aterfelis4708
@aterfelis4708 3 года назад
Still won't fly. It may yet fall in the wrong direction though.
@vnth2186
@vnth2186 3 года назад
I had a wierd dream two days back that I was being scolded by Scott Manley for not tightening the bolts on a Soyuz's launch escape system and because of me, two cosmonauts had died. He then tied me to the launch escape system with a loose bolt and said "Hullo this is Scott Manley, Fly safe.". 😂😂. Love from India ♥️
@rahuln5676
@rahuln5676 3 года назад
This is a condition experienced by Rocket Nerds, when they binge watch Scott Manley instead of Netflix...It's nominal behavior. Fly Safe!
@vnth2186
@vnth2186 3 года назад
@@rahuln5676 😂😂
@vnth2186
@vnth2186 3 года назад
@Андрей Бахарковскй BRUH.
@vnth2186
@vnth2186 3 года назад
@Андрей Бахарковскй STOP FOLLOWING ME! I DON'T WANT YOUR PRESCRIPTION
@jamessheppard4372
@jamessheppard4372 2 года назад
This is nominal
@bohicajohnson7203
@bohicajohnson7203 3 года назад
Too many you tubers have 1 minutes of material covering the video title, then 10 plus minutes of woffle. Scott has about 1 minutes of material covering the video title and then 10 minutes plus of fascinating and extremely interesting information on closely related areas. Just brilliant.
@adamdapatsfan
@adamdapatsfan 3 года назад
I'm really excited to see pictures of the DIVH on the pad today, all crispy-looking.
@revertfpv2928
@revertfpv2928 3 года назад
I knew scott manley was going to do explanation on that topic i ve been waiting to see it
@jonasbauer798
@jonasbauer798 3 года назад
Man, scotts quick
@mariodumais2153
@mariodumais2153 3 года назад
Very informative as usual
@railgap
@railgap 3 года назад
I suspect the reason for vertical integraton is the Orion spacecraft's enormous deployable antenna which is pretty much made out of gossamer, moon-beams, and prayer. The stowed and compressed structure probably cannot tolerate sideways loading (given that it would then be suspended sideways from its base, with the antenna's weight attempting to deform its shape while stowed, and this might severely impair either its ability to deploy reliably, or its close-to-ideal-parabola shape once deployed, so as to be able to focus signals on the LNA or whatever most effectively.
@stage1greg
@stage1greg 3 года назад
why did i laugh at "killed a cow."?
@williamswenson5315
@williamswenson5315 3 года назад
Relief perhaps. No human was killed or injured and the cow's fate was preordained.
@valentinaou6579
@valentinaou6579 3 года назад
I think Scott had to avoid laughing too at 2:38
@user-nu3ft4ve5o
@user-nu3ft4ve5o 3 года назад
I laughed to. But thinking about it fidel Castro did like his cows.
@tarmaque
@tarmaque 3 года назад
A friend of mine in Australia once was riding her motorcycle (chicks who ride motorcycles are hot) when she went around a corner and crashed into a cow. _She_ didn't hit the cow, at least. She laid the bike over while trying to stop and the bike slid down the road and hit the cow. She was injured but not badly. (Mostly some road rash and a twisted knee.) The cow was not so lucky. How can you _not_ laugh at an accident like that? Cows are inherently funny. Ask Gary Larson.
@fabiog801
@fabiog801 3 года назад
@@tarmaque what happened to the cow?
@23chaos23
@23chaos23 3 года назад
You know its super secret when they redact the artist impression lol
@aterfelis4708
@aterfelis4708 3 года назад
Hopefully they haven't redacted the artist as well.
@SamaritanElad
@SamaritanElad 3 года назад
@@aterfelis4708 lol
@robertnelson3179
@robertnelson3179 3 года назад
To cool. My dad after helping build up in Arizona the titans went to Vandeberg for some cool work a few years ago of course. Did the tour of the silo he work titan 3c was my favorite
@zachreyhelmberger894
@zachreyhelmberger894 3 года назад
Fascinating presentation!
@androidas79
@androidas79 3 года назад
"It's highly classified, but here's what it is and what it does" :))
@collguyjoe99
@collguyjoe99 3 года назад
Its a NRO Payload - Meaning its either an Intel, SIGNET, or Recon satellite
@Miata822
@Miata822 3 года назад
"Liftoff!.... um..." Love it when the PR play-by-play announcers step on their (thingie)
@M4RC90
@M4RC90 3 года назад
Liftoff... Disregard
@ivorypoacherplays
@ivorypoacherplays 3 года назад
Damn that’s crazy, love you Manley and that glassy rotund orbital head of yours
@siennakluza9064
@siennakluza9064 3 года назад
Am a new subscriber, great info thanks !!! Who knows what is really on those payloads !!!??
@grexursorum6006
@grexursorum6006 3 года назад
Scott: Delta IV from the 90s becomes an old lady by now Sojus: Cute 😅
@snookerkingexe
@snookerkingexe 3 года назад
can you turn the lego-saturn-v-tower in the next video? I would love to see the other side with the pipes!
@simonmikkelsen
@simonmikkelsen 3 года назад
With a video about the build. Which version, how did you get the bricks?
@waedi73
@waedi73 3 года назад
Great show with fireball ! ✌🏻🚀🌍👍🏼
@wayneschenk5512
@wayneschenk5512 3 года назад
Great information .
@chadmcelroy4194
@chadmcelroy4194 3 года назад
I'm starting to believe that GSE is the arch-nemisis of rockets today...
@Spedley_2142
@Spedley_2142 3 года назад
Vertical = large structures that require structural support, i.e. mirrors.
@cpthornman
@cpthornman 3 года назад
Yep.
@gustavlicht9620
@gustavlicht9620 3 года назад
How did the Russians and Soviets before them managed their reconnaissance satellites with horizontal integration?
@Mythricia1988
@Mythricia1988 3 года назад
@@gustavlicht9620 It's not impossible without vertical integration, it's just easier, and allows for more complex and bigger mirrors, more easily and more reliably.
@Spedley_2142
@Spedley_2142 3 года назад
@@gustavlicht9620 probably with thicker heavier mirrors and less fuel.
@stargazer7644
@stargazer7644 3 года назад
This satellite has antennas, not mirrors.
@draskuul
@draskuul 3 года назад
One thing I've heard about vertical integration is it may require less 'structure' work on the satellite--it only has to worry about forces from one direction, which saves on mass, letting them maximize their mass usage on other things.
@Trek001
@Trek001 3 года назад
Small point about the Five Eyes - one of the obscure points in the agreement is that each country will permit its satellites to be used to transfer data between other craft and then to ground stations which, technically, includes Prospero
@firstnamegklsodascb4277
@firstnamegklsodascb4277 3 года назад
Nobody had a problem with leaking information through symbolism on the patch?
@blackhawks81H
@blackhawks81H 3 года назад
They LOVE to do shit like that. Because it's always just enough to cause speculation, but not enough to actually reveal anything mission critical or that they don't want revealed. The more speculation that's out there the more disinformation naturally follows. If you have 100,000 peoples wrong guesses floating around. It muddies up the waters more than 10 peoples wrong guesses. It's an old weird disinformation technique that I'm pretty sure the Christians In Action first came up with. Hard to remember exactly. Been many years.
@anthonym7412
@anthonym7412 3 года назад
Blackhawks81H exactly and even if a few of those 100,000 are right there’s so much other speculation no one will know except the people that deal with the actual work
@rfichokeofdestiny
@rfichokeofdestiny 3 года назад
blackhawks81H It’s also a way of taunting those of us who know they pull the same evil crap that they accuse other nations of doing.
@albertbatfinder5240
@albertbatfinder5240 3 года назад
I was watching through most of the “countdown hold” at the 4 minute mark. I just had a horrible feeling about the launch, so horrible that I switched off. I ain’t no ghoul. Glad nothing worse happened.
@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017
@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 3 года назад
My dad worked with the reconnaissance office at the CIA and got to see a bunch of classified launches. He also got me in the cockpit of an SR71 when I was just young enough to not represent a security threat. : )
@davidking4672
@davidking4672 3 года назад
Great videos
@dom1310df
@dom1310df 3 года назад
"We can't tell you why we can't tell you why this is classified because that's classified too."
@dewansnehra7827
@dewansnehra7827 3 года назад
Please make a video on what will be the cargo that starship will carry to Mars in 2022 and what are the difficulties that spacex will face and love your vidoes
@dewansnehra7827
@dewansnehra7827 3 года назад
@Lassi Kinnunen I said what will be the cargo that starship will carry to Mars from earth in 2022 as spacex have planned till now
@lukesalisbury6031
@lukesalisbury6031 3 года назад
That kind of speculation isn’t really Scott’s thing. If say SpaceX came out with their cargo manifest, he would probably make a video about it, but Scott probably won’t do that. Someone else probably would (Everyday Astronaut) but not Scott.
@andrewparker318
@andrewparker318 3 года назад
YES!!! PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON THIS!!!
@_mikolaj_
@_mikolaj_ 3 года назад
But... Will it..? Well, id say that that would be extremely hyperoptimistic
@dewansnehra7827
@dewansnehra7827 3 года назад
@Colin Berg I think they will because as of current progress they are slightly late with there schedule so I think they will make it to mars
@richiecuzzz1
@richiecuzzz1 3 года назад
I watched it live last night. I’m glad it didn’t end up exploding and ruining the payload. P.S. Tory Bruno is the man!
@boatingboy1011
@boatingboy1011 3 года назад
I drove 3 hours from Miami on August 26 to see it launch. It was canceled. Drive back to miami. Drove the 3 hours back on the 29th just to see this. So frustrating. Drove 800+ miles to see it get scrubbed TWICE!
@zoperxplex
@zoperxplex 3 года назад
Delta IV Heavy is so cool because it uses the most powerful cryogenic rocket engines in the world and because it is the most powerful rocket currently in operation with the exception of the Falcon Heavy. The difference is that the Falcon Heavy requires 27 engines whereas the Delta IV Heavy only needs 3.
@Proger-sj8cj
@Proger-sj8cj 3 года назад
Ah that's nice , I mean SpaceX needs more R&D for engines I guess
@alanmcrae8594
@alanmcrae8594 3 года назад
I wonder if the Falcon Heavy ends up being more fault tolerant by having lots of smaller engines and able to survive multiple engine failures during flight?
@RenzeKoper
@RenzeKoper 3 года назад
More engines doesn't count, SpaceX goes for 9 smaller engines per booster vs 1 big one due to the fact that it's easier to produce 9 smaller engines then 1 super big one
@_mikolaj_
@_mikolaj_ 3 года назад
@@Proger-sj8cj well, no? Merlin is quite simple engine and rocket is already developed
@diesistkeinname795
@diesistkeinname795 3 года назад
I may be incorrect, but I'm pretty sure Raptor has more thrust than the Delta IV and both use cryogenic propellants.
@bonetonelord
@bonetonelord 3 года назад
When the Delta IV does a pad abort, does it require any repairs to the tank insulation before they can attempt another launch? The fireball can't be great for that stuff, after all.
@ke6gwf
@ke6gwf 3 года назад
Tory said on Twitter that it can handle a few fireballs.
@stargazer7644
@stargazer7644 3 года назад
It’ll buff right out
@jeremiefaucher-goulet3365
@jeremiefaucher-goulet3365 3 года назад
That Orion stuff sounds mighty impressive and interesting
@Mr.Deleterious
@Mr.Deleterious 3 года назад
Waiting for Scott's SAOCOM 1B video! Probably Monday night or Tuesday moring i presume. 🤘🏻🤘🏻
@ashokiimc
@ashokiimc 3 года назад
when did you get the launch escape tower of your Saturn-V back?
@stallfighter
@stallfighter 3 года назад
2:26 should we call it "meatobraking"?
@EvilSp0rk
@EvilSp0rk 3 года назад
We were waiting for this also. I now live within range of the rocket launches at KSC. I want to see this big boi fly from closer now. We were out and listening to the owls while watching the live stream when they scrubbed. I caught the Space-X launch yesterday! The sonic boom of the reusable rockets returning scared my cat out of the window. SPACE!
@mikemathews9277
@mikemathews9277 3 года назад
Hey Scott could you do a segment on how the Space Shuttle SSME and how over time the engineers eventually figured out how to start them up I saw something from NASA that explains that it took over 2 years to get it to run up to speed in the turbines just to initially get spooled up and burn for under 2 seconds and it took them 2 years to get that far.
@ybaccunt6767
@ybaccunt6767 3 года назад
I honestly don't know why I'm subscribed to this channel. I don't know anything about rockets. But it sure is interesting. Thanks Scott. 👍🚀👨‍🚀🛰🌌
@oneistar6661
@oneistar6661 3 года назад
One thing you can do: KSP
@AtlasGaming4k
@AtlasGaming4k 3 года назад
It’s the prettiest operational rocket until Starship is complete.
@FrikInCasualMode
@FrikInCasualMode 3 года назад
*cough*Ariane5*cough*
@joanbohlman1679
@joanbohlman1679 3 года назад
Benjamin McCann at least we can all agree that it looks better than SLS
@calebwidener8554
@calebwidener8554 3 года назад
Sls looks like the center core of the space shuttle with an abort tower on top
@Unknwn-fw3po
@Unknwn-fw3po 3 года назад
Agreed.
@Unknwn-fw3po
@Unknwn-fw3po 3 года назад
@@calebwidener8554 because it is basically that?
@dotdankory
@dotdankory 3 года назад
this was my first Delta IV launch, good to hear it was a special one
@ad2181
@ad2181 3 года назад
Vertical orientation because it contains a large foldable antenna. The packing is critical not bend the antenna arms from gravity.
@kerrythompson9506
@kerrythompson9506 3 года назад
When did the solids light up on the shuttle? Kind of hard to shut them down once they're lit...
@HiddenWindshield
@HiddenWindshield 3 года назад
At T-0.
@scottmanley
@scottmanley 3 года назад
T-0
@t65bx25
@t65bx25 3 года назад
Yeah, they had to wait until the very last moment at T-0. They don’t really spool up so ignition and liftoff are pretty much simultaneous.
@NoName-pt1yy
@NoName-pt1yy 3 года назад
Scott Manley I love you❤️
@Hansengineering
@Hansengineering 3 года назад
HEY fun follow on info: The SSMEs light, and the entire stack leaaaans toward the boosters and the external tank. Once the lean has reached max deflection, and is coming back, right at the instant the whole stack is vertical, SRBs light and 4x each explosive bolts free the SRBs and the stack. At that point, it was always going _somewhere_.
@tuxedo_productions
@tuxedo_productions 3 года назад
The real star was the cricket immediately after launch abort matching the mood of everyone watching.
@fensoxx
@fensoxx 3 года назад
I came for this comment. Set the mood so perfectly!
@r0br33r
@r0br33r 3 года назад
@@fensoxx xD just like a good comedy show xD your life is a meme and you treat theater as reality xD so perfect!
@jnib6090
@jnib6090 3 года назад
Since it has a massive mesh antenna folded away inside a fairing. It makes sense that they could want to keep it in the downward position.
@jfan4reva
@jfan4reva 3 года назад
Has to be kept vertical to keep all of the secrets from spilling out! (These things are full to the brim! - Lol!) Of course, it may be something simple like Richard Feynman's story about watching Shuttle boosters being assembled. There was a procedure where they checked the roundness of the booster sections before attempting to assemble them. It involved two guys with a tape measure, counting bolt holes by hand to determine where to measure the booster. When Feynman saw it, he said it was crazy and asked why they didn't just have the manufacturer put some paint stripes on the boosters insteam. The assembly crew said it would be too expensive. "Too expensive! That's 5 cents worth of paint!" They said yes, it would cost about 5 cents to put the stripes on, but it would cost thousands of dollars to change all of the procedure manuals. Changing the assembly procedure and testing it would probably be way more expensive than paint stripes, not to mention changing secret manuals....
@sta292
@sta292 3 года назад
2:30 The cows will be evacuated this time.
@Zolbat
@Zolbat 3 года назад
Last time I was this early people still said "first" instead of "last time I was this early"
@excitedbox5705
@excitedbox5705 3 года назад
A launch puts huge loads on the cargo so it might not be strong enough to hold it's own weight in the horizontal without flexing due to the weight of making it strong enough in the vertical direction for launch. There may also be some mechanical mechanism that unfolds and if it is tilted something could shift and get stuck. You would be pretty angry if you launch a sat and then your solar panels don't open because an edge got caught on a corner or something.
@BlueJazzBoyNZ
@BlueJazzBoyNZ 3 года назад
Thanks for the Gloops of Data
@samlaw5959
@samlaw5959 3 года назад
I'm just chuffed it didn't hurt anyone. I don't think embarrassment exists in space travel when nobody gets hurt but that's why you're a rocket scientist and I'm an oompa loompa :P
@Exalerion
@Exalerion 3 года назад
Talks about Falcon Heavy, shows Falcon 9.. lol
@michaelbiggs4313
@michaelbiggs4313 3 года назад
I am so happy you noticed the Five Eye Easter eggs in the patch logo. I was going to explain that to someone else the other day and then I decided they would think I was a little crazy. Rhyolite also picked up microwave relay traffic by getting right behind the receivers. The number of microwave relay towers is not what it once was, because of fiber optics.
@stargazer7644
@stargazer7644 3 года назад
How would that work? The sat would only be in the beam for a split second. Unless the beam just happened to line up with a geostationary orbit slot.
@michaelbiggs4313
@michaelbiggs4313 3 года назад
@@stargazer7644 The orbits were planned and adjusted to be right behind the receiver. Military bases in the Soviet Union were in remote areas. All you had to do was line up with any of the line of sight relays stations they would have to use.
@stargazer7644
@stargazer7644 3 года назад
@@michaelbiggs4313 Orbits don't work that way. The only orbits that allow a satellite to sit in one place in the sky (geostationary) are directly over the equator, and at a fixed elevation. This is called the Clarke Belt - it's a fixed arc across the sky. Microwave beams are quite narrow and are pointed at the horizon, so the satellite would have to be sitting pretty close to the horizon. The only places that would be true would be very close to the north and south poles, or at the two fixed locations in the east and west where the Clarke Belt touches the horizon. You'd have to be really lucky for a microwave relay to be precisely aligned with the Clarke Belt to be able to do that. You can certainly plan an orbit to align a satellite to pass behind a particular relay as it rises and sets, but it would only be in the right position for a small percentage of each orbit - a few seconds to minutes each day. It can't hang out there.
@michaelbiggs4313
@michaelbiggs4313 3 года назад
@@stargazer7644 ROFL There is nothing lucky about it. Putting a $3,000,000,000 satellite with a 300 foot primary reflector on a geostationary orbit directly over the equator is science not luck. Luck is catching a large roll of film while it re-enters the atmosphere using a helicopter. The current SigInt Satellites make the old ones look like the a covered wagon. The changes that USA 202 made to its orbit over time show how developed the technology really is.
@stargazer7644
@stargazer7644 3 года назад
You missed that the luck part is finding that the foreign military microwave link that you want to snoop on just happens to align perfectly with one of the only two azimuths that happen to point at the Clarke belt where it intersects the horizon. And all geostationary sats can (initially) change their orbit over time. It isn't a big deal, it's a mission requirement. Geostationary orbits aren't stable. The sat will drift over time, so they all have the ability to adjust their orbit to stay in their box over their design lifetime. Sats launched as on orbit spares also have to change position in the belt to takeover for another sat. When the gas runs out, the mission is over.
@greenshadow622
@greenshadow622 3 года назад
Holy crap, your ending theme nearly gave me a heart attack! Too loud!
@ReedCBowman
@ReedCBowman 3 года назад
SigInt from the 1960s "there's no civilian use for that" ... Yes there is. History. Historians are the nosiest, most eclectic magpie type collectors of everything outside the NSA itself.
@wilurbean
@wilurbean 3 года назад
FVEY wolf? Always knew the "intelligence" agencies were furrys
@wilurbean
@wilurbean 3 года назад
@Peter Mortensen at 8:38 they admit they're furries
@gg3369
@gg3369 3 года назад
Scott. I don't know why they need verticle integration but that is the standard integration for US gov S/C. Europa Clipper is maintaining a number of LVs. FH is one of them. The random vibe loads during transport to the pad on a fully fueled S/C are not insignificant. This is a S/C lateral load case. Also, the path at KSC put a -3degree incline on the S/C so we have to control fuel and oxidizer backflow. Just some possible contributors. I know SpaceX is working on a larger fairing. That might mean there is a kick stage like a Star48 or Orion50. That could also complicate the horizontal transport issues.
@publicmail2
@publicmail2 3 года назад
My guess after some reading is the antenna structures have to be kept vertical because of Gforce and bending under gravity. The precision of these antenna and their gain is amazing. They can zoom in on RF down to 1km size area and frequencies from 2MHz to many GHz and pickup signals that are not pointed up but ground based. Pagers, cell, telemetry, anything radio, including EMPs. People may not realize but every cell phone text and call is permanently recorded and analyzed for possibly future intel without a search warrant.
Далее
The Worst Looking Rockets Ever Designed!
12:06
Просмотров 558 тыс.
Before The First Nuke Exploded... It Imploded.
21:50
Просмотров 353 тыс.
Delta IV - a very expensive pleasure
23:08
Просмотров 70 тыс.
Model Rocket Battle 2 | Dude Perfect
7:55
Просмотров 182 млн
The NRO: America's Eyes and Ears in Space
12:49
Просмотров 41 тыс.
YOTAPHONE 2 - СПУСТЯ 10 ЛЕТ
15:13
Просмотров 149 тыс.
Развод с OZON - ноутбук за 2875₽
17:48