Climate Change Makes Days Longer 

You could use this power for good, but will you?

Oh boy, have you considered going on a diet? 😊

It's okay. In Helsinki, you got all day or night to get there 😊

Please consider us when you go for your walk..

You must be from America.

We could build a large snowman at the poles. I suggest Greta Thunberg and Ricarda Lang as UN executives. They will do a most excellent job. Dealing with leap seconds had never been easier.

Typical programmer, kicking the can down the road. There's only so much water to freeze or melt, after that what?

@@2ndfloorsongs After that, we can start pumping magma up to build mountains where we need extra weight, and melting crust and pumping it down into the core where we need less weight. Easy peasy. I'm a programmer too, we're experts you know.

@@nycbearff no need to pump. Magma just spurts up anyways coz of the pressure. All we have to do is make a crussy in the crust

If you need precision down to seconds, over s time span of days, you should not base your calculations on the calendar seconds. But now I got curious about Unix time and leap seconds

I think meteorites would be more effective.

Don´t forget Bruce Willis.

the Core? the movie had been produced several years ago.

I'm gonna need an unlimited supply of Xena tapes and hotpockets.

Also swimming.

How about a giant highway ring across the equator that lets you drive from Mexico to Thailand or South Africa?

@@rupertchappelle5303 swimming? They can just run across the thin strip of tape holding the planet together. Duh.

You glober heads are spinning out of control

No, science illiteracy hitched to conservative ideology caused the "question".

@ConontheBinarian why, were you there?

Mass redistribution by any means would cause this effect, yes.

@ConontheBinarian You are not very educated on this topic.

@@crouchjump5787 They were engaging with the conversation humorously. You can understand this from the context of their second comment. Why do you need to speak to others in a patronizing way? What do you get from that?

Probably, we have no way of knowing either way. And in the scheme of things the slowing of the earth's rotation is the least of our problems.

There were no hours in Paleocene :-D

@@user-yy6kc2lb4k Wait how come your reply was posted 3 hours ago and the comment you are replying to is from 2 hours ago? Are you a time traveller?

youtube algorithms are idiotic 😂​@@Welgeldiguniekalias

​@@WelgeldiguniekaliasRelativistic effects.

@@user-yy6kc2lb4k There may not have been clocks but there were definitely hrs...

Similarly we should stop the summer/winter time madness everywhere

@@thijsvanleeuwen yeah because 2 weeks snow in michigan is normal

Well they say the ice is melting and that will slow the Earth, but it's not slowing, so I guess not as much ice is melting.

Most predictions of climate change have been conservative. Reality has been much more apocalyptic.

@@nycbearff Time will tell.

From the studies I've seen, "man is causing climate change because what else could?" and things of that sort. It's extremely lazy and I've seen better highschool BS papers.

​@@zanitzeukenWell, what are the alternatives? A Nobel prize await you!

@@zanitzeuken what studies have you seen

Then again the belief in "the settled science" around many topics that make you pay more and lose rights seems to be the real joke with all of these mainstream topics.

It never sped up, what you've been told is misleading. The rate of it slowing down has slowed down. That's what they're calling "speeding up".

Obviously you need to eat a lot more baked beans...

@@seriousmaran9414 Bwahahaha!!! Sorry all. But I wish I had intended it. I might have been able to be funnier! Cheers!

The more we build wind power to harvest energy from wind, the less windy it will be.

@@Munakas-wq3gp it isn't going to affect the wind that much, plus a lot of energy can be obtained from solar, far more than we need, including EV cars. What is really needed is combined infrastructure, more storage, and faster permission to connect to the grid.

@@seriousmaran9414 It defies logic that harvesting energy out of a system doesn't effect it. It's already seen in geothermal cells which lose effect when the energy gets depleted locally due to the heat-pump operating for a few years.

Sabine is only human....

@@Anton-tf9iw Im not dissing Sabine or anything. Honestly its a freaky idea and realizing glaciers have melted before helps me stay calm about it.

The Opera browser is owned by China. Everything you do in it will be recorded and noted by the Chinese government.

Extreme weather... by slowing the winds! Can't observe this, can only make it up. Remember folks, wherever you are, it's heating up twice as fast as everywhere else!

Climate activists think they can collectively stop the earthquakes by sticking themselves to the ground.

​@@jasongrundy1717total energy is going up, but energy is more equally distributed. She explains it in the video

@@eingyi2500 soo, we are suffering from equally distributed energy?

@@eingyi2500 Jason is referring to articles published in a lot of different countries in their local news papers. All articles claimed that the country the news paper was published in was warming twice as fast as all other countries.

hihi, says that and afterwards calculates "indefinite causal structures". She´s lovely.

The moon is rising in its orbit, and the earth is slowing down, due to the earth's rotational energy being transferred to the moon. Sea levels have been going up at about 1.5 mm per year for the past 170 years (daily observation). The only way you get acceleration is math tricks, or by changing the observation method. For instance, changing from harbormasters and marks on a stick, to satalite measurements from space. Satalite measure is 3.5 mm per year, and harbormasters don't agree; go figure. (The cumulative discrepancy between harbormasters and NASA is about two inches. Someone is going to notice.)

🤡

a 300 megaton nuke maybe can too?

The Opera browser is owned by China. Everything you do in it will be recorded and noted by the Chinese government.

And then you have the core shifting, or the whole shifting around the core. Theyve only just changed their mind last year about the nature of the core and its various parts. No current model would accurately predict the changes.

But really, isn’t any motion of the location of the North Pole technically southward? No wonder your head is spinning.

@@charliedulin You could have all kinds of core changes that might not be reflected in what this video is talking about, it could dick with the location of magnetic poles without doing anything to the axis of rotation poles.

Southern land masses (continents) are moving north, so eventually the world will fall upside down due to the extra weight :)

@@axle.student Something tells me you probably saw the spinning wet tennis ball proof of a flat earth. I think a lot of them also think the water would just fall off if it wasn't spinning but I don't want to look because it's just too horrible to contemplate being the same species.

I trust everything Sabine says about Physics. And I discount everything she says about climate change.

I've used it off and on over the years, it's been useful. I'll give it a try again.

Using a CCP controlled browser. +100 social credit

The Opera browser is owned by China. Everything you do in it will be recorded and noted by the Chinese government.

@@freesk8 Same here. It's laughable at this point. Just this past week in the news, some dullard on "The View" connected earthquakes and eclipses to climate change.

They do calm down the wind of course, but you're right in that it's a very regional and small effect. I don't really see what's dangerous about calm wind tho.

@@SabineHossenfelder . Protesters representing the Kite Flyers Union and the Open Pollinator Society would like to have a word.

Windmills kill birds. Irritates me.

​@@MikePhumanaut So do coal plants. So much pollution in addition to CO2, although maybe the modern designs' scrubbers work better.

@@SabineHossenfelder Maybe its that the reduced level of wind allows the land to absorb more heat?- if the planet really is slowing this would add to the effect also. I wonder what would happen to Cloud cover?

Can't wait for the giant penguin habitat carbon capture project built from rainforest trees. Which celebrity will be the public face?

@@RandyCampbell-fk3pf Flippant denial is just another form of idiocy.

​@@astronautical1082 so is fanatical zealotry...

@@Unmannedair Nothing fanatical about the problem, except in denial and the kind of prideful ignorance behind it. Tell the reader about the importance of biodiversity and trends related to disruptive climate change to know your error is your own.

The earth is 20% greener than in the 80's.

Not under communism

If a storm is a hurricane, wouldn't that imply it to be a thunderstorm?

@@Apollorion No. A hurricane is a large rotating mass of air & water.

@@larry785And so is the Earth's atmosphere. But due to the relevant high speeds of the winds occurring in a hurricane together with the enormous rainfall also occurring there, I'd say it still is a storm. It also evolved from a tropical storm by growing in strength and size whilst over hot waters.

Clearly there's no point in explaining this to you because you're a science denier, but it's plain and simple if you just look at the graph. It has always gone up pretty regularly. Now it's hit a plateau and is going down. Clearly something has changed.

@@Zombie-lx3sh Science denier? Oh, yes. OK. Ad hominem attacker.

@@Zombie-lx3sh Yes, the earth's normal cycle has advanced a bit. That's whats changed.

The moon is slowly moving away from the earth. I believe the figure is something like 8" 200cm-ish a year. Over the years this will have an effect on the earths rotation and, I would expect, seismic activity. Trouble is our, so called, scientists always latch on to something to promote the current mantra. I'm sure there will be large government grants to pursue the climate B/S.

Well that's still the case?

@@Ryan-jn2os the moon is being pulled away from us ever so slowly .... I kind of thought this was common knowledge. That same force is slowing Earth's rotation. The moons rotation has slowed for example are you telling me that there's any usable atmosphere on the moon?

Who is they?

@@Arisaem so many like scientists from NASA who looked at extremely old records of moon position & shadows to actually get the opposite idea. Including stating that the climate change and melting would speed up rotation to somewhat offset it

Sure. But most of the ice on Earth was previously concentrated near the North and South poles, which lies nearer to the axis of rotation of Earth. You do not find random icebergs floating along the Equator. So when this ice melts on the poles, the liquid mass tends to distribute itself along the equator and thus slows down the rotation of Earth. That is one counterargument to your rebuttal. The other counterargument is: suppose that ice is indeed present along the Equator, and this ice melts, it would be more-or-less inconsequential to the angular momentum since the mass distribution along the radius is barely affected (as much as redistribution from nearer the axis of rotation anyway)-- the solid ice has exactly the same mass as the liquid water. Sure, one can of course argue that "technically, there would still consequentially be a slight change in angular velocity", so for the sake of argument, "yes, one would be technically correct".

Yeah. Besides sea surface height is being monitored by satellites and one look at such map proves that the claim of water from melting ice moving to equator is baseless and the whole study is practically useful only as toilet paper (if you first soften the paper with water from melting ice)

You mean the angular speed. The angular momentum is conserved.

you do know they take into account all the pluses and minuses. We also emit cooling gases, we have to use those in our calcs of total AGW. If you want to submit a proper paper debunking them, id love to read it and then watch sabine's eventual video on it.

@@AstralTraveler You have read the paper ?-all of it?

Didn't watch it she explains how it works

Sunny is as good with science as she is fair.

Sunny Houston is a TV Host, not a scientist. Sabine talks about science. You talk about cultural wars.

Climate change can cause earthquakes. Consider this - as we remove tons of mass from the poles, they experience uplift while as all that mass collects on the equator in the form of liquid - it will push down on the crust. Obviously this could definitely cause shifts in plate tectonics.

@@Arisaem This video has nothing too do with earthquakes caused by climate change. It's about redistribution of mass to the equators and that's slowing down the rotation by a very tiny amount. Milliseconds we are talking here just watch the video people.

That's if it's true and as for other species they have damage their environment in the past which lead to population reduction, so natural self regulation of the environment

You’re not wrong, it is the difference of scale that is striking to me.

Yeah centrifugal force is a density identity for air if the air density expands it increases heat. And it's an indication to a decrease in gravity a pound force expression to mass distribution over a volume. In the form of air. With or without a measurement. A visual method is seen and used when expressing physics.

As T²/R³ is an expression of astronomical unit representation to inertia and what part rotation period plays in inertia. Both in rotation period daily and rotation period yearly in Intermediate axis. Revolutionary or not. A ration of identity is used for the calender cross section identity of the physics in the field in relation to daily living. 365 days as 365/1 and 1/365 1/360 1/100 all equatable fractals to retranslate the subject of sub language imagery to it's purpose

A day One reciprocal expression of intermediate axis Intermediate axis: timely quoted Dvanebikov effect or tennis racket theorum 3.33333333 1.66666666666 6.666666666 ratios to equate a circumference in arc travel to a diameter length.

The year flips in the same way It's midpoints can be seen at the seasonal high noons Jun 21 and Dec 21 the sun sits at 12oclock dead center of the sky 2x the entire year. Not every day The sun visually rolled backwards and forwards again They say...due to axis tilt. I say it's a pole flip as Dvanebikov effect intermediate axis that occurs in like 2 hours The moment it's sitting still. It's spinning you. It tracks back (that does go against rotation polarity laws for rigid body gyroscopics and it recorrects it's orientation. 2x a year. Natural. Ignored.

when academia is nothing but D ei hires and wokies you get this

@@rhetorical1488 Laughably inept right wing idiocy. "Woke" is another term for developmental maturity and conservatives lack it as badly as the symbol they want to normalize immaturity; the former president.

@@astronautical1082 found the triggered snowflake with terminal tds🤣 how unnatural is your hair color.

​@@astronautical1082 Both can be true.

It's because we've had the shortest day on record in the past two years. Set a new record (2022) and broke it the next year (2023). That was a measurement. She's talking about a hypothesis or maybe a theory, about what might happen when xyz happens.

lmao. you only need 3 names to be absolutely certain that climate change exists and is bad... Eunice Newton Foote, Tyndall and Hansen. I can tell you now that the 'climate hysteria' is very much under played not over. Most people will refer to the IPCC. but we can safely say that they are clearly wrong now. We have Hansen's latest work, an actual quantum physics explaination of why co2 is so good at heat trapping. And now there is another climate paper confirming Hansen's Forcings. Even if we went carbon zero today... the earth will continue to heat at a rate of at least 11 hiroshima bombs per second until such time as we reach the CURRENT +10 thermostat based on the new climate forcing. NONE of these claims of this warming or this sinking or that bleaching mean a damn thing. The climate is so massive and has so many nuances and even counter tipping points that it is EXCEPTIONALLY hard to predict such things because the earth may move that heat somewhere unexpected. The earth itself has countered many of our fear with sinks we did not even know existed....but we have been given all possible chances by nature to correct our mistake. Too late now, hothouse is certain and people alive today that you care for will starve to death before we die of old age. If you do not believe this then you simply have not learned enough about the immutable physics of it all that has absolutely nothing to do with human opinions on what will happen and when. Science will do it's absolute best to give us accurate data, but it can only be as accurate as reality and if the earth itself throws a curveball then of course predictions will be misplaced. what most people do not even register is that we are already about 3.5 if you remove all the dimming. It is already over as soon as we hit a war or pandemic or civil unrest enough to reduce industry.

Copium is bad for your health, you know?

Did Prager fund that? 😂

Your view’s becoming increasingly aged over time as the effects of our insatiable consumption of fossil fuels continue. The global south are in much less denial about our predicament because it’s hitting them harder, however if it hasn’t been so obvious for you yet it soon will be.

Cope

You guy are so ridiculous, if topic climate is named you're attracted to that like flies are attracted to a heap of shit, to make a bit trouble. Happily not successful🤣

Conservatives are like little, noisy children except for the obesity.

Weak minded, what are you doing in a science channel if you can't cope with how science works?