CMMG .22LR Drop In Kit 3000+ Round Review

Подписаться 39

Просмотров 1,8 тыс.

50% 1

We tested the CMMG .22lr drop in kit for over a year and more than 3000 rounds
Welcome to Obsidian Fieldworks, tactical, gaming, reviews and more! Join us as we do lots of dumb stuff!
Support us through the foillowing:
Star Citizen Referral Code, get an extra 5k UEC when making a new account: STAR-DFV9-G5SK
Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/obsi...
Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.com...

Игры

Опубликовано:

26 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 9

@unauthorizedreprehensible8821 Месяц назад

Solid review, appreciate the note on copper jacket v non-jacket as well as the note on drop-in trigger light strikes.

@djindigenous1 Месяц назад

I have the same comp

@farcinue 24 дня назад

Mine has been inconsistent. It will go through dozens of rounds fine, then start misfeeding, then be fine, then the trigger gets squishy. I have a bore buddy recoil spring stopper that helps. Still trying to figure it out. But, in the end, it saves me a ton of money.

@obsidianfieldworks 24 дня назад

I''ve noticed that if you push the mag in any direction, they tend to misfeed. What trigger are you using? Also, what is your rifle chambering? I've heard that .223 wylde hiccups a bit, but I haven't been able to test that, all of my barrels are 5.56 NATO chambered.

@SuspiciousGanymede Месяц назад

How badly was the barrel/gas tube fouled? Does it affect accuracy with .223/5.56 after that many rounds? Looks good for doing close range drills on the cheap.

@obsidianfieldworks Месяц назад

Accuracy with 5.56 was unaffected as far as I could tell. Lead fouling of the gas port and barrel is only an issue if you use non jacketed rounds. If you exclusively use jacketed rounds, there is less general wear than shooting 5.56

@kouger21750 Месяц назад

What kind of accuracy did you get out of your kit?

@obsidianfieldworks Месяц назад

We didn't have much to compare to, but we were getting about 5-7 MOA depending on ammo, but we didn't really test it past 100m

@kouger21750 Месяц назад

@@obsidianfieldworks Thanks for the update. I figured it wouldn’t be crazy accurate. At least it functioned well, something to be said with volume of fire haha