CoD Vanguard Attention To Details | Call of Duty Vanguard Details and Graphics Showcase 

Nothing special

Looking at the state of vanguard, I’m kinda shocked they managed to put these details in there as well lol, but yea you’re right

Details like these aren't necessary if they dont' do anything for gameplay. So its complete fine to be impressed. Especially for a game that supposedly had troubles development. (At least better development compared to Cold War's)

I think the put more attention to detail in some things over others from Mw2019. Like in Mw2019 the smoke from a grenade explosion lasts a little longer than Vanguards, but popping a Tire in Vanguard makes the tire deflate slower than Mw2019 where it just drops down. So I think they put more Detail in some things over others from Mw2019. I would also like to mention that despite Cold War being made in 6 months, that game also has some impressive attention to Detail, which only improved as the games life went on.

It's cod dude who cares about realism

@@toke1880 A lot of dudes do, dude

@@davidward3848 but if you want realism why would you play cod for it

@@bradboyer2274 what i was saying was get the things right that you need to get right

Can you play on keyboard and mouse? Yup, I think you can also plug your k&m to your console and use them

Counts as a mistake

Nobody cares

I'm sorry, did you expect a World War 2 game, or a Call of Duty game centered around World War 2?

@@bernardharrell6179 Idk, man. When looking for games I want to play I want games that fit with the aesthetic they are going for. I enjoy playing bf1. Fun game. Did every other soldier in the great war run around with semi-auto rifles or sub-machine guns? Of course not. That being said bf1 is a fun game to play that fits with the ww1 aesthetic within the battlefield game play framework. This game is just a reskin of mw and they fuck everything up. I understand in a ww2 setting shooter there has to be ways to balance the game in an arcade style shooter. There can be fun in being a German conscript running a kar98k, but that wouldn't be fun if everyone else on the enemy team has an auto loading rifle. I get that. Where to fucking start with the weapons in vanguard. Let's talk about my baby the MG42. The vanilla MG42 doesn't have the recoil enhancer which is important to the mechanical operation of the weapon. If you look at photos or videos from ww2 it is that uncircumcised bit at the end of the barrel. The 50 round drums can somehow fit 150 rounds of 8mm Mauser by some Kraut space magic. The belt link for the rounds almost looks like a disintegrating rather than a non-disintegrating link because of how poorly modeled it is. Next on my list is the fucking optics. Why not just stick to period correct optics? I'm not saying there has to be only stock weapons without mods or optics. You can put weird or kooky weapons in the game. That's what I love about bf1 because there is a lot of cool period correct firearms, except the hellriegel. Fuck that thing so much. Put the sniper variant m1 Garand or the No. 4 (t) "lee enfield." There are a lot of cool guns from that period. Take a play from the bf1 handbook and use experimental firearms. Weapons like the Pedersen rifle, the Johnson LMG, or the stinger LMG, to name a few weird American weapons that would be fun to use in a ww2 shooter. What do we get instead? bullshit Don't get me started on the STG44 or other weapons. This shit is so tiresome. I don't know if you've heard of cursed guns or "bubba gunsmithing," but this game is the definition of that. Don't get me wrong some wiggle room is necessary for a video game, and I'm not asking for a milsim. Instead of doing a hero based shooter just do a faction based game? Have it be Axis and Allies. You don't even need to have the weapons tied down to their respective faction. I don't care if Japanese soldiers running around with Lee Enfields are fighting along side Finish soldiers armed with m1 Garands are engaged against Soviet soldiers armed with Pedersen rifles fighting along side French soldiers armed with Carcanos. That could still be a hell of a fun game. I would play that shit.

@@davidward3848 Sure, but you have to understand that they're going to stick to their audience, their time frame, and what they're actually capable of doing in such a small time frame. One thing about Call of Duty is that they're aware that they're making a video game -- meaning that it doesn't have to be historically accurate because when have they ever went down that route? They know that video games are supposed to be an escape from reality, how fun would that escape be if it was indubitably accurate every single second. Now don't take this as me being completely composed to what you're saying --trust me, I'd like it too-- but I've come to terms with what this reality is and they're not going to majestically incorporate all of these fantastic ideas and innovative -- no, they're not going to do that. Let me tell bbn you why, when you work on a project you construct a plan, that plan becomes a formula, that formula becomes a routine. What the developers are doing now is making sure that everything fits in this little bubble to where it feels like a Call of Duty game, with that formula you have no choice but to include inaccuracies. I mean, you can just look bbn at the camo options and see that they're already taking this approach that seems way more fun than it does serious. It's almost like a World War 2 parody, not a World War 2 game. Just thinking about, it has zombies for crying out loud! As far as the story goes, that's completely up to personal preference and what they've decided to do is what they've done, so far it looks great. I know some gun enthusiasts are upset with how guns sounds, looks, behaves, but this behavior is strictly for the guns to play modernity, for the guns to be fun, and for the guns to be customizable for your liking.

@@davidward3848 you know what, there should be a hyper-relistic shooter that fits your desires. Man-to-man, this franchise isn't always going to give you want you want or what you expect. But it will give you a fun-to-play shooter with whacky weapons, mechanics, options, and environments.

Perhaps we treated mw 2019 too harshly

Vanguard sounds will be changed by release. Nothing from alpha changed in the beta so it didn't get the Cold War treatment. Not to mention, Raven won't let these guns sounds as they are now with the upcoming Warzone map with the MW/Cold War guns that sound more realistic.

@@Krecklus I think so. Ive always held MW19 in high regard...best cod since cod 4 in my eyes...certainly in private FFA.

WW2 better than Vanguard? You're high buddy.

@@raizenlord2169 Nope. Look at the gun graphics..very basic in Vanguard..almost ps3. Look, im not sure what kit you have...you might have played ww2 on base xbox and Vanfuard on series X, in which caae Vanguard would edge it.

The funny thing is the thought of NOT having them or the gameplay would be annoying.

A few of them did actually exist - why not provide the option? Nobody complaing back when it was W@W

Just like how people complain about basic shit. Both parties are guilty.