Battlefield 5 vs Call of Duty: Vanguard- Attention to Detail PART 1 

3:43 there should only be 4 rounds in the ec bloc clip cuz the 5th round is in the chamber and no way that 1 round can put itself back to place

There is a shock wave in call of duty. There always has been, it's just very subtle and hard to notice. If you're playing at a high frame rate and record at a high frame rate. You can slow it down and see it yourself.

or u can just use a free vpn like proton vpn lol

I didn't notice this until I got like 5 kills, and then the sixth kill I got I heard the chick say 6.. And I realized that was 6 headshots I got 😅

Really? That’s amazing this is definitely the most underrated battlefield of the series.

I think the reason why it was underestimated is because the producer tried to release 2042 instead of being more interested in the game. It would be great if a little more attention was paid to it, for example, Russians were added, new game modes were added, servers for 128 people were opened, innovations such as filling while aiming were added. It's my favorite game of the series and it still has a great prone mechanic that many games don't have. A game with high potential. I wish the producers could see this too.​@@drinknukacola5315

I was going to say this. Most guns will emit a flash, as you can clearly see on the MP40. Not all guns will smoke afterwards.

True, for example if you shoot a 1845 Colt Navy, it’ll smoke more than a Glock 21, and if you shoot an GAU-8 Avenger Gatling Cannon it will smoke due to how fast the rounds are shot. EDIT: the 1845 is a black powder pistol.

It was never underrated. It was rated well

@@noobplaysark1318 no, BFV is one of the best WW2 games (maybe the best one)

@@pabloolivares7425 its not the best but its good

@@fladigman9763 battlefield games have something special, his ambient, the frenetic gameplay... Is just so cool and awesome to play

World at War is one of the best WW2 games i.m.p.

One of the reasons I play, just the sound alone is enough to make me flinch in my seat 😅

and the soldier screaming in bf1/bf5 was brutal

I think it all depends on what you prefer in terms of playstyle. You are very much correct, BF V is more diverse and strategic, however, I've spent maybe 20 hours on BFV since it came out and have ground out every single gun in Vanguard to max weapon level, BF V may be more diverse but Vanguard just has more replayability to me, doesn't get boring as quickly.

Because water was actually a part of the game in the previous cod. They've had swimming in bo3, bo4, advanced warfare.

@@twodollarking8009 also cold war

Best explaination for ya: Back in 2013, BF4 built on BF3's swim system by including being able to shoot a pistol as well as diving. CoD capitalized on this with the release of Advanced Warfare by Sledgehammer Games in 2014, which allowed a similar system but it was more of a gimmick and the movement felt more free. In 2015, Treyarch made BO3 which boasted the advanced and crazy movement, and basically just made water a playable space. They then recycled the animations, physics, and effects across BO4(2018) and BOCW(2021). But SHG introduced direct water combat to CoD, why doesn't Vanguard have it? Well, AW was on the older CoD engine, and they have since updated to the engine that MW2019 has, which probably doesn't support water combat physics.

@@twodollarking8009 also in cod ghosts i believe,in the flooded map or any maps with water

@@spartacussmith7070 yeah

@The Apple Of Judgement I'm well aware of that. That's my only main gripe. It's no reason to hate on the game

Tanks are not that good. A tiger tank can die in 3 shots by a sherman

@The Apple Of Judgement its not hate on vets? Its a Video game.

@The Apple Of Judgement atleast its not some generic "hero and sacrifice always needed and works bla bla we're the hero bcs we save people and country bla bla bla" Moments its more bad than redheaded girl with robot arm bcs its always the american and its allies as heroes and axis as villains even though both of them not even a hero they're just a villain that is greedy for lands and materials, they atleast makes it more variable, more fun, its a game not a documentary or even real life, a game is where we have fun(some for exercising ur heart and tells stories of some people) not a documentaries kind.

@I hate myself it’s so unfair bro how can a tank die in 3 shots

We can agree both of them is better than Defectfield 2042

Can he beat? Modern warfare

@@norbertosodoy3771 bf5 is set in ww2 and cod mw is set in modern so it's difficult to compare

@@jolyne_kujo_04 vanguard has better gameplay and sound design but brother the graphics in vanguard are awful.

@@norbertosodoy3771 Yes it does best MW in attention to detail, graphics, optimization, performance, animations (you can argue for reloading animations)

How did cold war get a higher rating than vanguard?

@@csupordavid4145 Vanguard was very unnecessary because we just got a ww2 game in 2017. Also, Cold War has a great campaign and, in my opinion, better zombies. As for multiplayer, both are as toxic as the other and though it is definitely not like that mw2 lobby where your mother was the main topic, both games’ multiplayer is similar.

@@csupordavid4145 úgy barát hogy ez a legjobb cod ezek közül. A vanguard egy szar de az mw se túl jó csak tulertekelt

@@bryceparrish09 in my opinion mw is overrated while cold war is underrated

@@kristofletai6999 game still trash tbh

The alternate cod Universe that war zone spawned in is killing Cod

Nah btf 2042 isn't considered a btf game for me, there's just no actual battlefield vibe to it

@@boy--kisser the game is well made for a fan made game lol

@@pinecat3594 i wish it was a fan made

I think it was more of an artistic choice because Vanguard feels a lot more clean and alternate history while cod World War II acts more dirty and the war is the main subject

@@1upproductions423 Developer laziness = Artistic choice ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

@@1upproductions423 Also, historical accuracy seems like an afterthought in Vanguard, or at least not a main goal. They're now adding less WW2 guns and some sequences in the campaign are plain non realistic.

@@fabiandrinksmilk6205 every game doesn’t have to be more historically accurate you goofball

@@1upproductions423some of it has to do with the WW2 engine having more impressive material systems than the Modern Warfare/Vanguard engine. It’s a shame that branch of the COD engine is being thrown away as the developers all pivot to the MWII engine since that WW2 engine broke a lot of technical ground in rendering for COD.

Still, I'm spending countless hours on vanguard (not on BFV...)

@@Medzo2 why? Lmfao that game is shit

@@sgtmonkeypirate I guess, shit to you is fun to others 🤷‍♂️ just give people a break and do what you like. Nobody cares at the end of the day. Some will enjoy, some will hate. Live your life and give others a damn break 😁 vanguard lobby's are full !

@@Medzo2 don’t care + didn’t ask. No really, who cares that you play vanguard but not V here ?

@@melcorchancla9431 Hi Mr Nobody, who asked you? No one...so go play whatever you want, or don't want, the world won't notice at all 😬

Glad you enjoy it!

@@Stay_Frosty as always.

Thanks man

@@Stay_Frosty fr you are awesome

This is correct. Somehow in battlefield v the garand manages to eject the live round in the chamber perfectly back into the clip as its being ejected.

@@johntravoltage959 Yea I noticed that black magic lol

Except for the fact that theres plenty of documentation, training manuals from the time period, and people replicating it today that show that garand thumb isn't a thing that happens when you load a full clip. It happens when you are messing around with the rifle without a clip in it, or if you very carefully set it up. Alongside that the garands ammo count in bfv is wrong. 8 round clip, fire 3 rounds. 4 in the clip and 1 in the chamber, when they open it and eject clip it manages to somehow put the round in the chamber back in the clip?

@@johntravoltage959 brother you can’t have 8 + 1 in the chamber with an m1 garand. Brother you might be the stupidest person I’ve seen all week. And garant thumb literally can happen, if you do it right it won’t but on a war zone, there’s a high chance of it happening.

I very much agree with this opinion as a Battlefield Boy

I wish we could but it's kinda hard when btf 2042 is an absolute dumpster fire and a lot of cod fanboys, unlike you, a very respectful person, they just destroy you because of 2042 :( i want to go back in time

Opposite actually 😂

@@arneshpal7702 hahahaha no. There is no chaos like this in vanguard ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KFhU3ZA0zBk.html No graphics like this ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jbRig-bTMaU.html No team play, no graphics, no sound design, everything is shit, modern warfare is way better.

@@arneshpal7702 not really

Pour les personnages je suis d accord pour se qui et du reste , que se soit graphimes , son , Battelfield 5 et au dessus

Lmao nice lies brother Give me any footage of vanguard that doesn’t look like a PS3 game and looks better than this ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jbRig-bTMaU.html

Soldiers in World War II would not have soft skin after even a few days of combat. Most soldiers in that war were incredibly young, yet in Vanguard, they all look like they’re 30 or 40

I don't know how having a babyface in a warzone is aesthetically better even if it's graphically superior

It was originally shg’s game. But due to mass disagreements during game development, Treyarch had to take over a game they had to redo from almost scratch

I like how many people saying CoD is best of most games, but it lacks a lot of open world stuff.

I think many details are left overs from MW2019 because they use the same engine. MW2019 is surprisingly detailed and realistic so it's almost obvious they would use the engine again.

Granades rolling down slopes is a gameplay feature not detail

They hold on the bolt while firing so they can easily cock it

Thar might be the gas emitting from the engine

@@SlyCooper1920 no It's direktly above the vents under which the engine is. But it could be gas.

Thanks, I actually needed to know that.

can confirm, i am the waffle being eaten oh god help me i am being consumed as i speak

Thanks man, i need to eat some too.

*snap* nice

hi im doing something

did you really just say that

@@Venzelli Yeah, so?

@@jaydenvenegas8105 vanguard aint a reskinned codm bro you got it all reversed

@@Venzelli oh no it was a joke

حبيبي تحياتي لك من الجزائر أهل السعودية احلى ناس

@@abdouu2271 احلى شعب الجزائر🇩🇿 ❤️🇸🇦

actually in the other way around, vanguard has higher texture resolution, higher shadow resolution maps

@@marcm.official but doesn't look like it does, because of shitty AA, so point still stands

"built different" lol ok kid

Lmao good jokes

That has nothing to do with the animations, sledgehammer still had to make them.

Wtf does game engine have to do with animations quality lmao?

Also the third person animations of the soldiers are exceptionally well done, base on position, are interactive with water and others stuff like being close to other's characters, or structures, having different grounds and else.

Yeah and they will cry even harder when they find out that bf 2042 (2021), Black Ops Cold War (2020) and the upcoming MW2 (2022) has swimming.

Hi👋 Why don't you want to take BF2042 or MW3? A good a number of players + support (however, in Battlefield it will no longer be content). If you, like me, are a huge fan of the World War 2, unfortunately, you have already missed the best parts of it in the Call of Duty series - WaW and WW2. In the Battlefield series, IMHO I don’t think 1942 is a good one. So, returning to the topic, as an avid fanboy of BF and COD, I’ll tell you that mechanically, gameplay-wise, graphically, stylistically, Vanguard and BF5 are the best in recent years. I would prefer BF5: the anti-cheat was recently updated, the online presence on PC is stable (more than 2042), the experience is as immersive as possible, quite a lot of equipment, maps (but no Eastern Front), cosand interaction, and so on. In Vanguard there is a more interesting gunsmith for weapons, many attachments are given for weapons, which is unrealistic, there is a lot of grind in general. There is a sticky zombie mode. There aren't too many players. In general it turns out like this. And don’t consider other World War II shooters (like Enlisted), they are all very low quality

yeah im huge fan of ww2 and i also too prefer bf5 over vanguard, i saw some mechanics and graphics between bf 5 and vanguard, bf 5 much better when ended watching he vid comparison@@dr.romanfell1933

what

What. Call of duty is made by various developers, some of whom are owned by activison. It’s not 5 people. 5 people could not pull off something on the level of call of duty. You need a huge developer, and a large publisher backing it. Same thing with battlefield. EA publishes it, doesn’t make it. DICE does that even though it’s owned by EA, the same can be said for infinity ward, one of the main Cod developers. It doesn’t matter how big the studio is. Look at 2042.

Looks like people can't tell that this is a funny joke

This joke was so bad that people thought he was serious

@@danielsong4778 😐