Comparison Between F15 Eagle vs Euro Fighter Typhoon/Ultra Defence 

Lmao. Yeah the less aerodynamic slower less maneuverable jet with less range and payload has the advantage over the jet that is better in all of those scenarios. What are you smoking bud?

@@mopar1524 Eurofighter has a higher thrust-to-weight ratio, significantly lower air resistance and is more maneuverable across the entire flight envelope. However, due to being smaller than than the F-15 and having lower lift due to the low-drag design, it has a smaller payload capacity and lower internal fuel storage.

@RichelieuUnlimited not true at all. It has a much lower thrust to weight ratio and is definitely not more maneuverable. It would need 3 of its engines just to match the thrust output of the new F15. The new f-15 has a thrust to weight ratio of 1.475 to 1 compared to the eurofighters 1.15 to 1. The qa and ex are definitely more maneuverable than the eurofighter. It does things that planes with thrust vectoring are supposed to be the only ones able to do. Just do yourself a favor and go watch demos of each. The Eurofighter has 0 AoA in their demos because they have none. It's quite literally a paperweight in comparison. I've seen both jets and the Eurofighter isn't impressive. I'd say even less so than an F35 and that's nothing to brag about. The F-15 has a much better design.

@@mopar1524 Empty weight F-15EX: *38.000 lb F-15EX wet thrust: 59.000 lbf F-15EX max t/w-ratio: *1.55 Eurofighter max t/w-ratio: 1.67

@@RichelieuUnlimited how wrong you are. F 15 ex has an empty weight of 34,600 lbs. The only time the eurofighter has a higher thrust to weight is when the f-15 is fully loaded with fuel and all missiles. Then it weighs 81,000 lbs. That's the max takeoff weight btw. The ex thrust to weight empty is actually a little over 1.7. I'll say it again. Watch the demos. The eurofighter is mid at best.