COMPARISON: NIKON 17-28mm vs 14-30mm vs 14-24mm - first impressions 

I can't decide whether to buy the 14-30 Z f/4 or the 20 Z f/1.8. Any thoughts/pointers for me now that you've used the latter?

Exactly My 2 x Wide Angle Lenses >> 14-30 f4 for interiors , Landscapes and 20 f1.8 S for Milky Way

Me too: while I'd love to have the 14-24 f/2.8 (especially having had the Sigma Art F mount version of that with my D750) I can't justify the cost as an amateur, so I also have the 20 1.8 to complement the 14-30. Similarly, I have the 20 1.8, 50 1.8 and 85 1.8 (with the 35 1.8 at some point to come) to complement my 24-70 f/4. As much as I'd like 2.8 lenses again, it's more important for me to dedicate savings to upgrading my Z6 to a Z6iii or Z8 when one of those comes out. So let's see whether there's substance to that 'save the date' for next Saturday from Nikon Philippines.

@@revddf Nikon Philippines has clarified what the Save the date is for… It’s not an announcement event. Just a regular event with some swags

@@loitruong4821 That’s a shame, but thanks for letting me know.

they all take a filter :) so it depends on what size your ND filter kit is. The 14-24mm takes a special 112mm filter, the 14-30mm an 82mm filter, and the 17-35mm f/2.8 a 67mm filter

TT artisans 11mm 2.8, cheap and cheerful punches above it’s price. Use it on my z6 was in Malta and found the 14-30 wasn’t wide enough in most churches.

I own the 20mm 1.8 S and the 17-28. Love them both.

what did you end up doing and what has your experience been may I ask?

@@indrajitadvani3742 money was the issue. So I didn't buy the F/2.8 Nikon Trio of 14-28, 24-70 and the 70-200 that have VR S I bought the 17-28, 28-75 and the 70-180 mainly for the price but of the weight. Tamron makes those same lenses for Sony and have gotten rave reviews. I still have the 14-30 and the 24-200 but hardly use them. Primes 26mm, 28mm and the 40mm are my favorites. I own all of the F/1.8 Primes including the new Plena 135mm. The F/1.2 85mm and 50mm not that much interested in them because I do more landscaping and scenery shots. For RU-vid its the video that I enjoy more than the photos. So Great quality for the fraction of the price is the reality that I am enjoying in using and not regretting in the purchases of the lens. Theory is you always are changing out the cameras but hold onto the glass. I have Canon and Sony and all of the glass are at the lowest end and are small and compact but still great quality to me. Sorry for the Rant. Cheers!

There are only fisheyes with this zoom range

The „S“ Versions.