Isn´´t this also a danger to traffic? i mean you´re doing the shoot on a road. Did you acquire some sort of permission to use smoke bombs in live traffic?
I really enjoyed this project, thanks for sharing and tutorial. Being retired from a 42 year career in anesthesia, I couldn't help but think about your subject breathing in the smoke but looks like it wasn't an issue. I really liked the part when using Hue, you changed the colors. ..Thanks, Ted in Sebastian, Fl.
Mike he is using lr in this video and if you search through his videos he sells the presets for lr and shows you how to use lr. Picking the software is what you feel most comfortable with CO has a free trial and lr is included with the photo plan from Adobe. You cant go wrong with either one. For studio both lr and co offer tethering. Co works better with certain cameras for tethering and some people likes how co renders colors. For weddings or high volume events you may want to look into culling your images before importing into a catalog based editor. Adobe Bridge is free there is also photomechanic and just some raw viewers that speed up the process tremendously. I hope you have fun getting started as it can become overwhelming.
Hey Mike, I agree with J Lopez below. I feel that LR is better if you're doing portrait/wedding and volume-based work. LR is our primary editor and that's where we develop our education/presets. CO is the more powerful of the two, better for those that are tethering, editing a small number of photos. Within our industry, most wedding/portrait photographers lean toward LR, while most commercial/editorial photographers lean toward CO. Both are solid options, but two different ways of getting there.
