I love your channel and the videos are really entertaining. I have a couple things that might be worth mentioning: At 51:50 you would need to use an ocio configuration with the agx viewport transform. The render is linear and so is the exr, the viewport transformation only applies in the viewport or when you bake it into the image/ video. In your case you are using the Nuke default configuration which is terrible (and even the iphone isnt that bad) and I think that using Agx and then degrading the color gives you more control. Auto white balance should be possible using the same method you used for automatic exposure. But instead of luminance you need to scan rgb. These can be used in a grade node in the white balance, and if you use a shuffle node, you can combine the luminance of the old backplate with the hue and saturation of the graded clip. Convert the hsl back to a linear. You should get a white-balanced video that retains the original brightness. The video that you use for scanning might need some adjustments beforehand like using a key and premulting it so that only the bright areas affect the white balance.
OMG THANK YOU! I've been trying to understand colorspaces and gammas and what-not, but it's been confusing lmao. I've been dirty compositing all my life and never messed with setting my color inputs and outputs but I will get better I promise! Thank you so much for the feedback, it genuinely means a lot! :)
@@curtskelton I’m still struggling with certain aspects but the basic idea is that you have your linear file that you carry from program to program to retain as much information as possible (think of it as the “raw” file). The linear file is great for the programs to do calculations with but it doesn’t look right so you have a viewport transformation (think of it as a lut). Internally blender, nuke, Houdini etc uses linear but they have a view transform like aces or agx to convert the “raw” file in to what looks correct to us. That transformation gets applied when you for example save a png in sRGB inside of blender or export a sRGB mp4 out of nuke. If the view transform is different from program to program the image looks different as well. In nuke you can use a custom ocio config and select the one you can find in the install location of blender. I think it’s under the data, Color management folder. It works if it’s a full cg composite but the default aces config that comes with nuke has all the transformations that you might need that convert x footage in to linear. So if you can use agx as it’s technically the best (compared to aces and filmic). The only thing you might have to do is to color correct agx after the transformation gets applied as it tends to look a bit flat. input transformation are there to convert whatever you give the program to linear so nuke can do it’s calculations. Output is the inverse of that. Linear to x.
@@curtskelton yeah i was going to mention this. The first thing i noticed were that the rolloff in the highlights were too harsh and the highlights too saturated. You tried to correct this but it just looks off. AGX automatically handles the tonemapping in a very realistic way. From here you could degreade to more closely match phone footage as he said.
I tried to use aces workflow but i got a problem. When i export as exr (both linear rec.709 and ACEScg color space )and i try to convert it back to srgb or 709 in nuke its darker and its not just a gama problem ( i tried using grade node ) How can i match color from exr ACEScg to the blender viewport render ( also png export ) ? I tried using custom ocio from blender directory and checked if it works and works absolutely perfect. Ps. I used srgb standard, flimic , standard and still no good. So if i wanna use acec1.2 in nuke and i wanna use my render exr ACEScg, what is the correct way to match the color?
I don't know how I got to this video, I'm really bad at 3D, never used nuke. But DUDE... Listening to you, that energy, passion in the project. The little details. Love it!
The schizo-rant delivery is honestly very refreshing given the overly-lax 'do this, then do this' commentary we've gotten used to on YT. To give you credit, people who don't know what they're doing tell people what to do, people who do know what they're doing tell people what not to do. This vid is 100x more useful for beginners than most tutorials are.
You got me with this one... I knew the main car was your handiwork, but I took the entire rest of the video for granted until I saw this breakdown! Fascinating work Curt, especially your efforts to take the subtle foibles of an iPhone into consideration!
I currently composite with after effects but you explained after effects concepts very well and i might finally switch over. Its currently the only adobe software I still use 😐 very entertaining video 😀
Damn, I've been doing VFX for 15 years and absolutely loved your tutorial. Your delivery was funny and engaging, and your footage out of blender already looks amazingly real! Comp takes it to that undetectable level. Absolutely amazing. Subscribed
Idk if fortunately or unfortunately I'm in the middle of the compositing spectrum, I use Davinci Fusion for compositing. I really enjoy using fusion for compositing, but even I notice its own shortcomings. It did get my brain to wrap itself around the node-based workflow for compositing and more basic/intermediate compositing language, so Nuke doesn't seem super daunting anymore compared to how I thought of it whenever I was using only After Effects. I still stick to Fusion mainly because of the 500$ annual price on Nuke, but whenever I think its time I'll switch to Nuke. Even the creative cloud nowadays goes for like 600$ so nuke seems more like a steal than AE does xd
Love it! At around 45:00 I was like yeah, but I'd blur it just a bit so it's not so perfect... then you said "iPhone doesn't have a f-ing matte of the sky" and you blurred it. Love the fact when you learn imperfections make perfect, that you start destroying the image a bit and it's more realistic.
You have BIIIIG Ian Hubert energy. Love it, even though I've never used Nuke and propably will not for some time (because Resove is Cheap and Fusion is okay, but slow and a lil cumbersome).
"iphone have no motion blur" of course when you're outdoors in daylight the effective shutter speed is very high. Of course there is no real shutter but there's electronic shutter by unearthing the sensor lines. Also mobile cameras do have rolling shutter, of course whether you want to simulate it or not is up to you, it might not be that important. Also Blender compositor consider despeckle -> kuwahara -> bilateral blur, then maybe blur and sharpen with different kernels with blur being wider and sharpen narrower to create just a little bit of sharpening ripple without actually increasing sharpness.
Just finished the whole video! This was absolutely amazing!!! one advice regarding the agx stuff would be to use the agx ocio in the project settings as with exrs you are exporting it as linear space....
Great video, man. Great educational content, the delivery was super chill, and I love the fact that you didn't just reopen your nuke project files. You actually composited from scratch based on what you remember. This video makes me want to learn more about compositing. Super educational and inspiring!
All those botaniq trees are so nice but getting Alpha Trees addon for background details is so handy and a huge time saver when rendering. Awesome job on this video man! Love the details.
@@curtskelton There's also Instant Impostors which are a good middle ground between billboards and full 3d models. You get actual rotation and fuller shadows.
@@curtskelton Absolutely! It works amazingly well for making background/distant forested areas, then I use botaniq trees for the foreground to give it depth.
I love your tutorial guidance and how you kept your character. Best way when it comes to learning, not serious but serious + decent amount of swearing and not giving a fuck on your opinion being put out! subbed :D
I have never paid attention to the Lens flare problem. That's an amazing trick. thanks. in case you didn't notice, I was a bit confused about why Blender doesn't write RGBA pass during multichannel exr
Something you did somewhat but didn't call out, is having an order of operations to your pipeline that mimics how the camera works. Lens flares and optical distortion (as well as CA) happen before the footage is processed and stuff like exposure, WB, etc. are applied, you could add a tiny bit of blur here too to represent the slight resolution loss that an image passing through glass has, but with the NR process this isn't necessary. Optical Distortion is its own can of worms, because modern lens manufacturers know they can use software to correct vignetting and distortion, so there's less need for super complex optical designs to compensate for that. This means in practice that your lens flares would get warped by that compensation, but also that the edges of the frame have less digital resolution as well as more noise relative to the center. IIRC a 1920x1080 image sensor isn't giving you true 1080p resolution, it's giving you 3 separate 360p images (Your RGB layers) and then interpreting a 1920x1080 image from that. Even if it's a native 4K sensor, that's still only 720p resolution per color. This is a needlessly complicated way of saying blur your footage a bit (and I'm pretty sure this is what the blurred HSL suggestion was about) BUT then once that image is processed, then you add your exposure, etc. but you should also crank up that sharpening. iPhone video is always over-sharpened, but most camera manufacturers do this as a way to compensate for the detail loss that happens in the capture of the image. Of course this is stuff that's so subtle that it will be more or less completely lost in the noise / NR process but like you said, little details add up! What I'm really surprised about was that you didn't try to mimic rolling shutter at all, that's a crucial part of the iPhone look, and even when the camera isn't moving around rapidly, it still has some subtle influence. Of course, in bright conditions, the rolling shutter read out of minimal (because of the high shutter speed) but it's worth mentioning! If I were to attempt to do this same thing, I would add a lot more jitters to the footage in Blender, add in rolling shutter artifacts, and then stabilize the footage digitally to mimic what the iphone is doing to compensate for your shaky shaky hands. Actually iphone might have some degree of optical stabilization, which would leave less artifacting (maybe a tiny bit of corner warping) but yeah idk sorry, this video lit a fire in the nerdiest corner of my brain. Which is to say I loved this video, and now want to do my own experiments. Of course this is the perspective of a person who does all their compositing in After Effects so a big grain of salt is necessary.
Dude this is great. I have struggled with creating 3D environments for my renders but I'm soooo sick of just relying on an HDRI because they're so flat and lifeless. Since making the shift from Keyshot to Blender, I really have to step it up now that there is so much more freedom to light and render a scene. Thanks for putting things in perspective on how to create something like this. Awesome work!
thank you so much for this, also i never really though about it in the end using premiere pro to add noise, then denoising it. it's all these little things, tysm 💕
Its a great great work, I dont know, still there is something that makes my eye tell me instantly that its digital I dont know what, I definitely couldnt do better myself, but maybe its too clean or whatever, smth looks off, despite the great work and amount of time u put into it💛
47:59 ohhh so this is why most of shots on GoPro in sunny weather looks bad :D there is always that light aura effect around shadows. i never knew it was caused by this
This is from that reddit post right?! I didnt even know how I was already subbed but awesome hell yeah this rules! EDIT: Just got 10 seconds in, yep!! Thats the one!
I appreciate the use of the Killjoy TransAm in this video. I own the black variant of it and would love to publish some photoscans of it when I have the time.
Love the video! I've been looking for beginner-to-mid level Nuke tutorials so this is super helpful. Please oh please stay close to the mic though 😭 the difference in volume is super distracting
Not to be rude but I just tested on my iPhone and there is motion blur- the difference is that you took a PICTURE not a video to check the blur. with pictures the shutter speed and whatnot is different. With videos you do get motion blur on iPhone, even with just a hand wave. Love you bro
I cut out a 5 minute chunk where I talked more in depth on motion blur when I really should have kept it in lol. I basically say to do exactly what you just did, which is get your own reference video. I filmed so many cars on the highway during peak sunlight and there was not a single pixel of motion blur with my camera (iPhone 11). HOWEVER, (and I really regret cutting this out now), there is motion blur when you film inside, in shadow, or at different times of day. And if I could do this video over again, I would've even keyframed my motion blur to go up just a tad, as I enter shadow. Ily2bro :)
@@curtskelton that’s fair- I also feel like motion blur like you said is a lot about point of reference, so maybe you would have some blur on things that are moving fast in relation to you but not much on like the actual car- so if for example you drive past that car one lane over to you it would have some blur especially on the tires, whereas stuff far away isn’t going to be very blurry because it’s just not moving that quickly across the screen
BROOOOOO blender's calculator works good.... if you do the calculation in one go. Like not like divide first then multiply. You can just 100/24*30 and it gives 125. And you can just multiply first then divide. BLENDER IS BEEEEST SOFTWARE EVER
I don't really mess with UE but I'd be lying if I said this video by Post Processed didn't help a ton when making this look :) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hPu7STf3wbE.html
1:58 Reason why it does not work there is that its not a float field so your calculation does not get you float. If you did whole calculation in one equation(100/24*30) you would get exactly what you need. This is how it has to work because you can not have float number where you want integer number.
I loved the video, you are a very good teacher!!! Could you make a series of introductory videos of Nuke? Or can you recommend me some courses or tutorials to get started? Thank youuu!!
Hey bro love this video it's awesome! I use AE and really considering switching to Nuke I had a question when you mentioned how non-destructive Nuke was when scaling and rotating footage. I feel like I'm missing something because in AE I don't lose any information when using the transform controls to scale or rotate a footage layer?
@@williamgaither6351 Hey thanks for watching the video! When you typically scale down a video and then scale it back in AE, you’re not gonna lose any quality, don’t worry lol. I was referring to a different video I made a while back where I actually WANTED the quality to decrease so I scaled down my footage in AE, precomped it, and then scaled that comp up. And the quality was terrible. I should’ve explained that a little bit better my bad lol.
@@curtskelton dude I thought I was tripping or something I had to pause and go check in AE myself. 🤣. Thank you for the quick response and clarification man!
Don’t get me wrong, I can’t do better at all. Even though it looks so fcking good and very realistic, yet there’s still something that prevents me from fully believing it’s real. Maybe because I know it’s not real (if you know something’s not real, your brain automatically starts looking for things to confirm it’s not real.).
