Container - Shut Up & Sit Down Review 

^this!

Looked to the comments to see if there was anything good... stopped after spotting this one because nothing else is going to be as good.

You'll have to ship it yourself though.

Will eBay subsidize it?

More like "I'll pay a 3d printing company 50 dollars" There are "Homebrew" files for the boards, cards and pieces on board game geek.

I mean I think they really were excited about it. I was excited when I bought a new Iphone charger that has nylon coating and better support for the cord, and it's super long.

Thomas Blackwell that combined with the upside down glasses was pure brilliance.

that price-tag is round the bend insane. It has the pricetag of an overblown complex kickstarter game, but without the rule complexity or miniatures... and when its a game aimed at people interested in getting good deals... ironic.

@@kidkunjer And when the company didn't have to develop & playtest the game.

You other rudders can't deny Cuz when a ship pulls in With some itty-bitty crates And some cold cash in your face You have fun

Why?

I was going to also say no wooden boats were in this game. Perhaps, you are speaking of Manila, another of Delonge's (rip) designs.

Don't even need to go that high! On Amazon for $110 right now and I regularly see it dip below $100.

Emergent gameplay can be one of the best things to happen when a game is designed correctly.

Oh god if only!

Lytane Variety Show. So you prefer a pretty game to a good game?

Ugh, I know! There's so many games that are fun to play, with well thought out, deep mechanics that lead to incredible play sessions... but their art isn't the Mona Lisa of board gaming! Why can't someone make a boardgame that's just a ball of chrome for gamers like you and me, Lytane, those of us who don't care about fun but rather how pretty a thing is? Woe is us, woe is us! Sarcasm and mockery aside, this has always been one of my big gripes about SUASD; they always give a game shit for having """bad art""". Heck, they did it in their last review too. Apparently a game about trading and acquiring spices has bad art because its cards have pictures of... growing and buying spices. Wut. As long as it's clear what everything is, it shouldn't matter how much some artist pretties it up. These are *games*, not art museum pieces. And I'm not saying a game can't be visually attractive. I'm just saying I don't think a game deserves to get slammed for using dull, muted tones, it deserves to get slammed for having dull, boring gameplay.

Exactly. And there are allowances for price. If the same game was $50 it would hardly be worth a mention, but when you hit a certain price-point you simply have to compare all aspects, including art and components. It absolutely is part of the discussion when the publisher decides to make big chunky plastic bits that cost a lot and then skimp pretty hard on the look of the rest of the game!

I suppose the reason I was so harsh and, well... rude, to be frank, is because to me the game looks fine. The only thing shown in the review that looked awful were the cards showing how much each player's earning for crates of different colors; those look like garbage. But Matt brought up the player board saying how it looks awful, that the theme is lacking, and I just was really confounded. It's a game about manufacturing goods, storing the shipping containers in warehouses, and then shipping them. The player board shows a dockyard, with docks, those biiig loading cranes, warehouses, and further back, the factories. That seems entirely on-theme, and then to see a comment saying how it looks outright ugly... well, I got a little nasty, I'll admit, and probably let my feelings for all the other times that SUASD have (from my perspective) unfairly knocked a game for its art. The points about the price point are well made and I do agree overall. The money being flipped on each side, and overall it could be of better quality since as has been mentioned the big bulk of that newly doubled price probably is coming from those big beefy miniatures, so getting more/better artists probably would have been ideal. But even so, to me the game doesn't seem outright ugly to me, and that just kinda set me off, that initial comment.

R.O. Bot Cmon is starting to annoy me with their business practices...the moment zombicide green horde closed they already announced a new zombicide...the crap thing about it was I hadn't even rcvd all of the components to the game ! Talk about being greedy !

*Looks on Amazon in 2021 *$300?!?!?!

same here. As I recently just purchased FOod chain magnate I can happily wait to get this one at a reasonable price if at all. Though I want to say man the artwork could have been done better.

Up to $329 now. I'll just get Crokinole instead.

@@justingould2020 What is wrong with people? Are they the insulin producers of board games?

Daniel Kane: Sure, but there's only one winner and the player who betrays their partner first will win.

You'd have to have enough money to be able to spend a ridiculous amount, which if you're taking containers to the island means you've not only spent your own money to get to that point, it's gone to your opponents, so chances of you being able to easily outbid them are slim.

It is, for better or worse

Let's face it we all could make like 90% of the board games in our collections with crayons and cardboard

I mean i could Recreate the entire COIN series in my basement, but i lack the will...