Elöbb utóbb mindennek lejár az ideje. De nincs sugárzó anyag!!! Pár hónap és már tud termelni. Amit helyette telepítenek. az már csak módernebb lehet az előzőnél. Az egymegavarttosakat, ami valamikor acsúcs volt. Cserélikre 3-5 megavattosakra! Amíg egy atomerőmű a tervezéstől az áram termelésig eljut. Az akár 10-15év. Nálunk még közrejátszig. A Duna vizmennyísége, ami a reaktor hűtést veszélyezteti. 25 fokcelziusznál ugyanis nem lehet magasabb hőmérséklete a viznek!!!! Ha már termel. Közbe fűtőelemeket kell folyamatosan beszerezni, majd a kiégetteket biztonságosan tárolni. A kiégett fűtőelemek még akár több ezer évig veszélyesen sugároznak!!!! Ami folyamatos függőséget akozhat egy országnak. Amit igen igen komolyan kell venni!!!!!
To się nazywa ochrona środowiska! Kto posprząta te odłamki rozsypane i odpryski! A tą betonową podstawę kto z ziemi wydobędzie? ZIELONA ENERGIA to jeden wielki przekręt!
Bringing down a fire damaged windmill. Nacelle has burned, top of tower is also damaged and is unstable. Easier, faster and safer to drop it with explosives. Controlled Demolition Inc brought one down last year outside of Portland, Texas.
How long it takes to pay for itself depends on way too many factors. They last longer than 15 years though especially when you add in a “repower” job to replace and upgrade certain parts like the gearbox and blades after 15 years. The tower itself and most of the equipment can probably go 50 years. We’re not sure yet though. I do know that before rates were raised, new more efficient higher capacity and more reliable turbines were profitable even without tax breaks. All that being said. It’s pretty fucked for that industry rn when loan rates are high. They like low rates since it takes time to pay off.
The green new deal is such trash. That being said it cracks me up seeing people jump to so many conclusions because a single wind turbine had to be demoed out of several hundred, 10-15 year old turbines on a wind farm. Wind has its issues but this type of thing is Very rare these days.
@@haydenlee4804 I’m aware. I’m a field engineer in the wind industry lol. But half the world calls them windmills so I use both words for ease of communication.
@@windy619 Ah my bad. Should have figured from the professionalism in your title. It's hilarious how I'm on the internet as an amateur telling a field engineer the correct terminology. Apologies!
Зелёная энергетика очень опасна для природы! Производство энергии не стабильно, вибрации на почве, утилизировать лопасти вентилятора не выгодно, обслуживание дорогое! Российские атомные станции на много предсказуемые и безопасны!
@@windy619 Чернобыль, да печальная авария! Однако подобные глупости давно учтены в технологиях и безопасность очень большая! Поделись, как перерабатывают лопасти с ветряных генераторов? И то что земля становится почти мёртвой! А после ста лет использования атомной станции будет красивый и чистый парк!
Este Tierra fue desierto… no deforestado.. tambien solamente uno turbina es mal de tres mil en región, despues trece años… no es perfecto, no es “Limpio”, pero es rentable y no es inservible mi amigo.
@@windy619 es la peor inversión.acaba con todo a su alrededor pajaros, Animales y plantas. Es pésima y muy contaminantes los materiales necesarios para fabricar estos aparatos. De limpios no tienen nada es solo propaganda.
@@maximomartinez8596 soy un experto de viento. No es perfecto. La cosa de “limpio” es muda.. Necesita aceite. Despues es basura… Pero los nuevos maquinas son 5x mas mejor de los en el pasado. Ellos trabajan..
@@windy619 pues felicidades. Pero no siempre nos dicen lo mismo que una cosa es mejor que la anterior pero nunca ah sido Asi todo es solo un gran negocio para los mismos siempre. Y al final el ciudadano normal y la fauna somos los mas afectados.
Seems the materials are not fitted with the weight of the structure seems they used substandard materials, noticing when it hit the ground it looks like crumpled tin.
The blades are made of fiberglass as are all wind turbine blades. Nothing wrong with the tower materials just had a fire after 10 years due to probably improper maintainence
Yup damaged beyond repair from a fuck up, possibly technician caused, possibly not. Out of 350 turbines it’s almost bound to happen to one of them after 12 years.
1 turbine out like 300 on this farm went bad after 12 years. First one I’ve ever seen demo on all the farms I’ve been on. I’m not anti oil at ALL but I’d take that over fukashima or deep horizon disaster 🤷♂️
Why would you want them to fall? The money has been invested and now they produce massive amounts of electricity basically for free just off the wind blowing
Isso foi uma demolição (veja os cabos ao lado). É um aerogerador em final de vida útil. Isso logo começará a acontecer no Brasil, pois os primeiros já estão chegando ao final da vida (20 a 30 anos).
Wind is a lot more cost effective than it once was. We keep using more and more electricity and without wind, solar and other renewables, we won't be able to generate enough. Coal is just too expensive to build and the ROI is ~40 years. Payback on wind and solar is much better. I'd like to see new nuclear too, but it just scares too many people. But large investment to go nuclear too, with longer ROI than wind and solar. With electrical storage getting cheaper, wind and solar just make too much sense
Nie ma takiego czegoś jak magazynowanie energii w takiej skali!!! Zabiera głos dyletant, popieprzony ekolog ale najpierw musi przyswoić podstawowe zagadnienia z energetyki! Z ekonomii też. Zadam pytanie: co ze zużytymi panelami słonecznymi i wiatrakami?
I see that you know nothing about wind turbines other than rumors my friend. Doesn’t even take that much oil in an entire year, especially hydraulic. Maybe needs a couple gallons of hydraulic every decade at most. Gearbox oil may need a top off once every few years at most. That’s it.
@@windy619 20 years experience says yhey leak. Mitsubishi turbines blow o-rings or gaskets and quickly overcome the drip pans almost nightly. The next day techs are sent to these towers that shut down and are sitting in safe mode with boxes of oil diapers, simple green, 10lbs of paper towels, hundreds of cloth rags and most importantly, 10-15 gallons of hydro oil needs to be hoisted up tower, using a gas or diesel powered service truck that averages 7 mpg due to the constant off road and extended idle time it sees in this type of service.
@@windy619And, wind turbine gearbox oil changes are a thing. In fact there is a whole industry, powered by Fossil fuels from a to z. So is Lubricating them, at any wind turbine maintenance facility you will find pallets of grease and hundreds to thousands of gallons of hydraulic oil in storage. The older sites hide broken leaky gearboxes, nacelles that ripped apart, broken blades and other hard to dispose of parts in an our out of view location on site called the graveyard. Often, you can follow the oil leaks to small streams that flow through farms of all types, livestock, grains, all of it gets exposed and reporting of these conditions if often frowned apon because it's part of the green new energy hoax backed by government and tax cattle dollars.
@@Dat_Sun I spent a week on old mitsu “leak”i towers once when I used to be an O&M tech, before moving up in the industry. I got off that site. Absolute garbage worst towers I had ever seen
Supposed to be putting the things up You know the UK has 10.000miles of coast line. Including all the craggy bits. Now if a turbine can produce enough power for 5000 holes .then 10.000 turbines could power 50.000.000 homes. That's more than we have in the UK. And at 4.000.000 each . That's 40 billion. And also one turbine to every mile of coast line. Also if we all paid £10 a month all 70.000.000 of us. That's 8.4 billion a year so just over 6 yrs they'd be payed for. Then cheap as fk electic from then on. All the factorys can put solar panels on there bloody roofs . should do anyway Use the nuclear power stations to balance the grid and were sorted .. Just how many turbines do we already have As I feel were being ripped of for our electric and it has bugger all to do with Russian gas. That's just there way of justifying it. We're been talking about going green for decades now So why are we still no where near it.. The government put £350 billion aside for the pandemic . So why can't they buy 20.000 turbines and produce an abundance of power . Or atleast the majority including industry
I can’t really find where you’re wrong in here tbh other than fact that turbines will need “repowers” every 20 years or less, probably especially offshore turbines. Also a LOT of energy storage if it’s such a crucial part of the grid. That’s all pricey. But shared amongst everyone I see how that would make sense forsure 👍
Tu już nic nie naprawi.Cywilizacja Lipy.😄😉🤔.Trochę za słabo i za tanio.Pisze że to kontrolowany upadek.Moze być.To jest duże nie nie trzeba spowalniać.
🙁 it caught fire after 12 years of service. So it was brought down. There are hundreds other turbines on the same wind farm still operating smoothly after 13 years now or so.
