Controversial Shooting After Officer Jumps on Suspect’s Truck 

"Get off the.. OMG" *shakes head

Especially after he had _just told him_ that he was just trying to talk to the guy

Never understood why they do that. I mean who jumps on a moving vehicle? Too much Hollywood movies. Normal people call in a fleeing vehicle.

They could have waited for another time to arrest him. Have his daughter press charges against him for property destruction . His daughter took him in. Let him be her problem. Don't turn these situations into control situations. It was a welfare check.

@@3rdreichball525 It is so they can escalate the encounter and get a justified use of force. Many people that seek authority are sociopaths and will always do things like that.

The cop was insulted.

Absolute facts

😂😂 really? It wasn't the crazy guy driving the car? 😂😂 Ok dude

Cops are basically dumb guys with guns

Yup

Yes their job is very dangerous.

@@briancleveland6115 yea but he put himself into that he could have not had to shoot him or put himself in that much trouble.

​@@parkerrust7796Yes he applied for the job, and he shouldn't have got on the truck but the dude should have stopped.

He jumped on the moving vehicle of a subject who did not have a criminal claim against him.

@@briancleveland6115but he didn’t stop. Doesn’t mean the cop can just jump on his vehicle. Not like he’s saving a child or anything he’s just being dumb and reckless

Until that guy in the moving vehicles goes and hurts someone and u are like ...why didn't they stop him???

@@frankmaunde9471they have no right to stop him. Why do you hate our rights? Maybe you should be locked up because you might hurt someone one day?

​@@Jimbo0341usmcu complain about your rights but want to take away someone else's rights..Democrat

They're stunned, pretty simple

Cause they want to turn "murder" into self defense

The office didn’t seem to be finished at his home and his behavior was extremely erratic

​@@Kiyonce.Kartierpolice aren't therapist. He had no reason to talk to them. He was free to go. Officer never said you're detained and don't leave. Then they made a BS stop just to talk. Didn't seem like a lawful stop imo. But the courts normally side with the 🐖 so the outcome was expected.

I hate that you are technically right. At the same time, don't drive off with a cop hanging on your car.

100 % I was coming to make this comment but you know cops have to back each other if he would have actually said it it would have been acknowledging that what they were doing was wrong

​@@Cee-i4pwrong

He got on before it started moving.

​@@howlinwulfYou should watch the video a little closer.

He did jump up there but just from what I’ve seen on other body cams he was most likely trying to throw the vehicle in park or grab the keys. I doubt he was trying to catch a ride!

The fact they cut out the witness reporting and talking about the situation. It’s clearly the officers fault.

It happens a lot.

@@elmooncrack6963 Yes

They accidentally reversed the syllables " fare well" check. I fixed it for everyone

@@paul-ld9vhI laughed too hard at this 😂🙈

He was charged.............by the psycho in the truck.

I agree; I respect the police immensely, but this could've been avoided ,,why didn't he let go?? He could've gotten in his cruiser, or gone back & completed the welfare check at a later date. He wasn't arrested or detained, they simply wanted to talk to him. It's just sad a man lost his life bc the cop decided to hang on to a moving vehicle & not let go & then he shoots the guy bc he was probably scared.

​@@tmo4330was that shown in this video? I didn't see that.

@@ZoidbergMustache I was being sarcastic. Pretty sure the officer was not charged of any crime. Only the truck charged him.

Jumping in HIS car and kill him? From 0 secs, everything was wrong from PO

Ask his family

They got a call.

Exactly.

Driving while high on meth IS a crime and so is obstruction of an investigation

One cop. It wasn't his "stop." He pulled it over for the other. That's all. He should not have had any dialogue with the driver. It was obvious he didn't know what the matter was. A back up unit stays quiet and merely observes. Period. Cops should not create deadly force encounters.

No.. It was due to their egos...

Just obey the police you hired to maintain order. No problem.

@@johnmceiver3769men like you would have us still paying taxes to the crown🤡

​@@johnmceiver3769Why should people obey police that refuse to follow the law and protocol? If a citizen had done what this cop did it would be considered attempted car jacking and 2nd degree murder. The cops didn't have him detained or suspect him of a crime, they had no right to stop him from leaving the stop which wasn't legal in itself. The cop chose to put himself in a deadly situation, he literally climbed onto a moving vehicle.

Both of those deputies have no business being in law enforcement

@@Sam11747 the first deputy was doing fine. He had been de-escalating and was trying to determine what if any intervention was needed.

I was thinking the same thing, it was preventable. The only thing I can think they (the state) said to justify it is he was a danger to society/himself so they HAD to act. I can see both sides but obviously I’d prefer they chose the option where no one was game over. (Trying to use RU-vid friendly lingo) He wanted to be left alone and get some food. We will never know if he would’ve done that and gone home calmly. The idiot who jumped on a moving truck changed the trajectory of this case IMO.

well u avoided being war criminal working for military industrial complex not for ur country

Funny you say that. I was a Combat Engineer during those fun years after 9-11. When I left, local cops back home tried to recruit me, I declined stayed private.

Exactly!

and the cop lied to

COPS should know by now not to jump on cars after multiple COPS have been killed doing so..SMH

There's a reason they're in those clown suits.

You spelled MURDERER wrong!

yeah fr. 1st officer was handling it decent, 2nd guy was too ready for conflict from it

A welfare check ended in the death of the person being checked on. The second officer escalated the situation. Unreal

oh ya he clearly stepped on the gas pedal to escalate that situation alright, the cop didnt make the best decisions but lets not create a victim where there isnt one

@@brucebiendarra9843 Welfare checks aren't always just because someone might be sick or missing. Many times, the person is experiencing a mental health crisis and/or is intoxicated, which poses a danger to themselves, the police, and the public. Especially in cases like this where that person drives off. It's unfortunate and sad that this man was shot, but he kidnapped a police officer by speeding off with him on his car and put that cop's life at risk. Had he not sped off or stopped to let the cop get off, he wouldn't have been shot. The cop is a victim who defended himself, don't twist the facts.

@@Vanderhoekx grow a brain cell and get a clue.

Where are yall when they do this to a black person?

@@Ghostface944cause blacks guilty

The driver chose to put the officer in danger. No different than if the officer stood in front of the vehicle and driver attempted to run over him.

@@Ghostface944race has nothing to do with it. You’re a lost cause

They wanted to shoot their guns... Probably can't find anything else to shoot with.

You dont have to talk to the police even if you do commit a crime. Its called the 5th amendment.

@@MikeSmith-ug3fg I didn’t word it correctly I did mean you don’t have to talk to the police even if you commit a crime but since there was no crime they shouldn’t of detained him at all

Definitely law enforcement overreach. Gun ho attitude

You guys obviously aren't paying attention...

Technically battery on a LEO when he hit him with the door. With that being said this is a mental health case that didn’t need to go like this. At no point should that deputy have jumped on the truck as he did. Mental health is a serious issue in the US and it needs to be addressed but this is not the way it needed to go. The officer if he believed he would be able to send the suspect for psychiatric treatment or evaluation should’ve never let him drive off; unfortunately, there isn’t enough training on mental health issues like this for LEO’s and these deputies messed it up.

That’s the way I see it. I’d like to know what crime he was suspected of that justified a detention.

@@burleman how they supposed to know before they investigate, you don't seem to understand how reality works.

​@stevenmoore3480 They're supposed to investigate and then go after the person. Not stop everybody and force them to tell them what they know. That's not how it works in this country. You don't have to talk to the police ever. Even if you're arrested, you still don't have to talk to them. We learn this in seventh grade. How do you not know that.

You're absolutely correct. Backup cost. The problem jeopardized his own safety and shots. Omebody because he made a lot of bad decisions. The cop needs to go to jail. His actions caused adaptive another person.

Not only that but even if he had a legit stop, why would you put yourself in that situation? Now you're in a moving vehicle with someone who doesn't want to be arrested.

Exactly…. Cops think they can fix a broken family!

That's what they do. Welfare Check huh? Great way to show consideration for someone's well being!

@@clucier1 That's on the daughter. A welfare check was unwarranted because she knew he was ok since she was there. I wonder if she made up that story about her Dad to force the cops to show up? They would not have come to resolve plain old family drama with no violence. I'd be angry too if I was him.

@@clucier1 You are a very confused person.

Being an arsehole isn't a crime.

Cop should be in jail. It's disgusting what he fid to this poor old man

Agreed

They investigated and found no wrong doing...

That doesn't make it right

@@nathanchrist4831 If it isn't wrong, then it must be right.. Right?...

@@anotherperspective8263 that's probably what the slave owners used to say lol

You’re exactly right, you can see the cop jump on the vehicle just before it started to move!

1000%

The way that guy reacted to the whole situation makes it clear he doesn't have the temperament to be a cop.

I agree

He can still face a civil lawsuit

​@@unclejohn2572absolutely. No business being a cop.

Exactly what I’m thinking

That's not what he got shot for if you didn't watch. He was on a traffic stop, and you can't just flee from those when you feel like it.

@@calebb231 He wasn't on a traffic stop. The cops can NOT force anyone to talk to them.

​@calebb231 was he being detained? If so, for what reason?

@@calebb231 I'm talking about why the cop was therein the first place. Get on the same page. no one is talking about the illegal stop

Wrong

Agree

Wrong. You can’t just leave when you’re detained.

Detained for what crime?

Yeah it's well known in every law book and every ancient tomb and scroll of law that if a police officer is investigating you for any reason, you have the right given by God and all intelligent life in the known cosmos to leave. Now full disclosure to be fair and balanced, there have been rumors that obstruction, resisting, interfering, fleeing, and eluding are sort of like, not technically illegal of course but sort of frowned upon or breaking a light social taboo of sorts. Of course these can't be a crime because as stated in the most ancient of legal lore, you have the right to disengage and leave no matter what the so called "officer" says, and especially if the so called "law enforcement" says they are investigating a crime or checking on the welfare of someone. How do we even know these "officers" are even real law enforcement? Anyone can identify themselves as law enforcement, anyone can get a police car or badge off TEMU. They should have been contacted by a JUDGE, the president, AND the secretary of defense showing video footage locked behind no less than 5 layers of encryption of the officer being sworn in and officially being given authority by the state. Without this you have the right to deem these "police" as fake kidnappers who can be left or fought in self defense. Besides, it was clearly stated that this innocent man was not against the law, and it was clearly stated that the so called "cops" are against the law.

You see how the officers were civil until the guy wanted to try to drive off and continue to drive off with an officer hanging off the side of his vehicle and be actively trying to kill an officer and others on the road. 😂😂 You just proved how little you should be trusted as a reasonable human being. Your IQ and reasonable thinking is no nonexistent, It doesn’t amaze me at all that you think you’re right because you literally don’t understand how not to Offended and wrong at the same time. 😂😂😂

mass shootings?

​@PsychoOnSteam is a bootlicking goof

hahaha ..This

This!

How about.... the cops had no right to attempt to deprive him of his liberty?

@@annpeerkat2020 Exactly!

"These rural cops"... No mate, all cops. If you want to improve welfare send a counsellor or ambo, cops look for crimes and often create them when there isn't one.

@@annpeerkat2020 How about going along with the cops to help you take care of this?

@@Straydogger Since I'm not the long lost daughter trying to commit the victim... what you wrote makes no sense. Will you be trying again?

It's america you don't have any rights

I don’t know which is more sad, that you don’t understand what civil rights are or the fact that this gentleman has so many rights that he has the right to be crazy however that does have consequences

​@jasonmcmillan6598he broke no laws. No reasons for escalation whatsoever.

@@PhillipFelix-kw3zi 1) terroristic threats, disorderly conduct, resisting/obstructing, kidnapping, reckless driving, reckless endangerment. All of these potential charges were listed in the investigation of the shooting

@@SuperTrikeBicycle. Maybe you don't have rights but most people do. I come and go as I please. I keep to myself and don't bother people. The police trouble me or most people I know

It IS ok to drive with someone on your vehicle, it's entrapment or something. Like when a protestor sits in the road and people said that was equivalent to false imprisonment, and everyone KNOWS vehicles are less violent than guns.

@@diegomonti1751 exactly!

says the felon

@@scootar097 says the bootlicker.

@@scootar097 says the bootlicker.

@@scootar097 how does that leather taste?

He was unlawfully detained

They need JAIL TIME

*fired

No probable cause? Is your last name Magoo?

@@chriskiefer7493do you even understand what constitutes probable cause?

Jail needs

There was no aggression on the cops part before he had to shoot him. Actually watch the video next time.

@@shanetrent8799 Read policy and procedure and learn the laws about LAWFUL detainments. YOU need to educate yourself instead of being a SHEEP and always thinking the COPS are in the right. Back the Blue til it happens to you!

Maybe try to nail down grammar and proper sentence structure before you tackle Nationwide justice reform.

Knucklehead, ask your mummy if you can leave the basement, there's another world out there called reality.

Police abuse of power nothing new . Imagine you had that power to maybe stop a boyfriend or girlfriend from LEGALLY driving away being allowed by law then held later as prisoner on the side of the road to be what ? Reprimanded vocally the claims to the welfare is none existent at the point in him driving away he show genuine panicking and disparity however not a sure reason to arrest. Police abuse of power and excessive force by far is showing you tell me

Yeah I am angry af

Real talk how many spoons are in your shed?

​@@Liluziburt69 great question.. im also curious...

they allowed a special needs person to police

The brightness attracts the bugs and animals. The more you know....

@@Liluziburt69facts I see some people in comment defending the suspect

Exactly!! Everybody is over looking this very critical detail. Especially given that the officer just assumed the trespassers were a vetted source of factual information with no context whatsoever. That cop just took their word, even though the owner of the house told the cop that they were thief's and trespassing. If anything, the two he let go should have been detained. There's the probable cause of a crime, the two he let go. Not the house owner. It's absurd. And nobody even notices.

Dude was clearly having a dementia attack.

YUP

No, this all started as a mental health call, in which the officer had to determine the status of the individual, and if he was a threat to himself or others

​@@valerierodger Its not illegal to be mentally ill and police can't detain someone because of it. Police can investigate a mental health crisis but if that individual is not being violent and if they haven't made any threats then they literally can not do anything and cannot detain someone just because they suspect they may have a mental illness. You can't force a deranged person to get help and cops had no right to detain the guy.

@@valerierodger Did the officer establish anything? No, he did not. Was there any indication the man was a threat? No, there was not.

But he doesn't have a right to simply drive away while the police are doing an investigation... they were called... hence, they were investigating!

​​@@covertpuppytwo3857But he actually 100% does, unless he's being detained for a crime, which he wasn't. The fact that they were called means literally nothing, unless they suspect him of a crime.

@@kahila6605 You seem to believe that the police only have the right to detain someone if they commit a crime.... and that is not true. For example, traffic violations are not a crime, and the police are in fact allowed legally to detain a person for it. However, in this particular case which happened in Wisconsin, the relevant law governing police authority to detain individuals for mental health reasons is found in the Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 51, often referred to as the Mental Health Act. Specifically, Section 51.15. Look it up!

I agree. The driver should not have disregarded the officer and taken off with the cop on the side. Good point. Its still amazing that some people think that not complying with police will have a positive outcome.

@@Greghh1960 sad little boot licker…..I am a retired cop and even I can see how wrong this is…. your truly pathetic PS: we as cops don’t like bootlickers like you and your pathetic ilk anymore than the regular public does…..your truly truly pathetic

Exactly!

@@Greghh1960 Your intelligence is protruding just past the level of your big toe

@@Greghh1960 Your brainpower is shining brighter than a refrigerator light

It's almost like a free hit.

we don’t know a TON of background here. I DO think that the 2nd officer should not have hung onto the vehicle. The mental health system is a broken one. I WONDER if the decedent caused the fire that killed his parents? We don’t know that. I’m just curious. What they DID say is that he was spiraling out worse and worse. Using hard drugs. Paranoid. He was a ticking time bomb. That said, by HIS OWN actions (driving away from when he was detained INITIALLY-that started the whole thing, being pulled over, etc.) pulling away a SECOND time.. he caused his own demise. The police saved his remaining family and community from any future harm. And THAT’S the duty of law enforcement. To protect and serve the public. They did that, CASE CLOSED.

@@paulc-xj9ck Right? It's like if you want someone out of your life forever, just call in a welfare check on them.

And look where that got him genius

​@@phantomfilms87That's not the reason he ended up where he did, Genius.

​@@phantomfilms87That's not the reason he ended up where he did, genius.

@@phantomfilms87 just because you address the outcome doesn’t mean you’re speaking to the moral obligation of a human being I agree. But they’re two separate issues. The cop that killed him couldn’t tell the difference either… it’s hardly ever, “either or” it’s more likely that it’s , “yes and…” GENIUS

@@phantomfilms87 that’s the problem with arrogance, if you believe you have all the answers, you never acquire more than what you have. Have fun in your bubble. Sounds safe inside your own ideas

And don’t forget getting in front of cars too. Sometimes you shouldn’t call someone’s bluff.

That’s not how the law works.

​@@staliokontos8763law is inhumane. Like you demon

@@staliokontos8763 How does it work? Do you have to break the law first?

@@staliokontos8763 LOL We don't have "Rule of Law" in the USA and haven't for many decades now.

@@horseathalt7308 ohh we live in a total anarchy then gotcha you’re a brilliant man hahahahahahaha

No, he didn't.

I mean, in the big picture, I'm sure the guy was a threat to everyone, being a methhead tweaker and all, but definitely not worth risking your life for in that moment. I have no idea why some cops feel a need to do this. This isn't the first video I've seen with them needlessly attaching themselves to vehicles.

@mplslawnguy3389 sdfuuuu dat man didn’t Harm Nobody

So much for the "police only shoot non-white people " arguments

@@yungspitta24he was still a Threat

They like to create the threat it’s like they are taught escalations tactics it’s ridiculous

@@howlinwulf You spelled investigating wrong. They were doing their job, that's what's right with law enforcement.

it was a welfare check unfortunately Officer didn't understand what that means

and he is free back on duty because there is shortage of police officer so they have to keep him

@@briancleveland6115 brainless in cleveland... they weren't doing their job... they were illegally detaining the victim, without even telling him he was detained.

​@@briancleveland6115we are under no legal obligation to assist in their investigation. Stop was unlawful.

“Three men can keep a secret if two of them are dead” -Benjamin Franklin the death of the second man is metaphorical, the primary officer remained silent or dead to the truth, This I perceive in the sigh and body language. The silence and lack of interrogatory dialogue like hey partner you ok? The guilt of indirectly aligning the factors resulting in death.

​@User0000000000000004 wrong you're a sheep who doesn't deserve to live that's why you got vaxed

Not with a cop on the side of the car

The stupidity of the Officer…. (acts like he’s a family therapist)🤷‍♀️

I don't know how many times I've heard someone explain the facts to a cop and they still say "well I'm trying to figure x out" If it was laid out for a 3 year old they couldn't figure it out.

Exactly, why is this cop allowed to keep pestering this guy when no crime has been committed?

a living domestic situation where the daughter hadn't seen dad for several years, but calls to have him committed.

More like 70% but yes.

What would you have done?

Do not ever, EVER call the cops for a “welfare check”. This is the result in the US time after time. It is a reflection of the terrible joke Americans call healthcare.

@@Bouitaz Was he legally detained during the first investigation? Do you think his thought was "I'm going to hang on to the side of this vehicle while it drives away" or do you think he was trying to pull the keys out of the ignition? You can repeat your first 3 words again

He should have never jumped on the car. Cops are not particularly bright

​@@Bouitazhe wasn't detained,

No, he handled it badly. He was vague and kept hedging, asking for irrelevant specifics, like "what was said?" The whole thing was one consistent event, poorly-handled and predictable.

How do you figure he wasn’t detained? He was ordered not to leave his own house. Then he was then he was pulled over for no reason, they tried to take hush keys from him. For what? So the cop could ask him what’s going on? That’s a detainment! They had no authority to stop him. He doesn’t have to talk to them. Just because somebody calls in a friggin welfare check doesn’t mean that gives police dominion over that person and his rights are suspended. If a cop responds to a welfare check and the wording says go away and leave me alone and using an obvious threat to himself or others, the cop needs to leave like he was told. Cops get it in their head somehow that a phone call us supposed to be taken as absolute truth and a grant of authority to do whatever they please in the name of whatever they decide needs to be done in response to the phone call. These cops kept ending with this man and trying to get involved in his business when there was no crime involved. And if there’s no crime, there’s no reason for police to be there. If anything, he was accusing his daughter of a crime. Why were they not up her ass? They illegally detained him twice. He said screw you I’m leaving. Rather than accepting that they had no authority to act, the idiot grabbed into the side of a moving vehicle. Then he killed the guy for not letting him harass him without justification. If you’re dumb enough to get on the side of that man’s truck as he’s driving off, you better hold on and deal with it because you brought it on yourself.

No he didn’t

Obviously NOT

@@phantomfilms87 ahhh... has it changed to the land of the weak and indentured? no it hasn't you fool

@@Lindaiv3lb exactly what law/s is it that you believe entitles a cop to interfere with a citizen not breaking laws, going about his business? Are you a dumb cop?

​@@phantomfilms87what law was broken by the man?

Indeed, TPTB are well on their way to creating a totalitarianPoliceStateMatrix.

What did the cops lie about?

@@pitbull113 the cop that got on the vehicle said he took off with him on the vehicle, but he didnt. He hopped on after the truck was moving. And he said the guy hit 20 cars. The cop is the one who hit 20 cars.

@@MWolfe He actually said he hit 20's vehicle. 20 is the other cops number.

That's what they do lie lie and lie they can't help it.

@@mavricksroadside2667 and are never held accountable either

NONSENSE... the police were called... hence they have a LEGAL obligation to investigate.

No it’s not

You're at fault

@@User_92020 Lol

What? Cop 1 didn't leave the man's property when he established no crime was committed.... then radioed for cop 2 when the man had enough of him and left. Cop 2 illegally stopped the victim, then jumped on his truck, then shot him. Which cop are you saying is the "good" one?

No he doesn’t.

in general population

First officer was doing fine, trying to determine if there was someway to help him or if a hold was needed. Second officer was an idiot

DOIN THEIR JOBS FOOL

@@stevenmoore3480 I supposed you are correct, they are domesticTerroristsAfter all.

You’re so smart! I bet you always do it differently when you’re making arrests, these officers should take some notes from you!

@@Ptrocles I agree, thank you. 😁

Completely AVOIDABLE, you mean.

@@tvrbob8681 Thank you for the grammar correction. I appreciate it.

Me neither man

what?

You don't know if he was talking out of his head. The dude was mental.

​@vivalaleta why? Because the police said he was? Nothing the man did in the bodycam made him seem mental to me!

@@j-manedd9139 No, because his family said so and he was acting paranoid and peculiar from the get go.

Which absolutely none of that behavior is illegal cops were definitely in the wrong. They couldn't have handled the situation much worse. ​@@vivalaleta

😂