This is a continuation from the last meeting we had with John Macken. Here, he will get into more details about is wave model of particles which should be very interesting.
@@FractalWoman As part of Team Fractal it may be worth exploring the Quantum Speed Limit(QSL). There are several ways of looking at this but I played around with the Bremermann limit, essentially maximum communication rate for matter per unit of energy. (2/(hbar pi) can be reduced to (4/Plancks constant) is about 6.037×10^33 seconds kilogram^-1 meter^-2. Taken to the energy limit(Planck energy): (4/plancks constant) planck energy ~ 1.1808×10^43 hertz We are in the Planck frequency magnitude but not quite. When we take the Planck frequency and divide it by this derived frequency: (1.8549×10^43 hertz)/(1.1808×10^43 per second) ~ 1.571 ~ pi/2 Not sure is a pi/2 relationship helps but this discussion was quite inspiring. Thanks! ^.^
Very insightful !....John Macken builds his electron model by starting with a sine wave that reflects upon itself in a bound condition [ laser ] and generates a standing wave . He then explores the modulated envelopes that develop as a consequence of the doppler shifted effects in a moving frame of reference [ De Broglie waves ] and how an electron model emerges when these envelopes are again superimposed on each other. I am wondering Lori if in your model of the OM particle , you have considered the possibility of considering a circle of Diameter = electron radius [ e.g. currently your inner charge separation distance / diameter ] as a single reflected sine wave in a bound condition e.g. a circle of light , that creates a standing wave that traces a circle of radius =electron radius [ OM particle radius ], and that this is moving in a circular moving frame of reference at the speed of light....this would then create a circular modulated envelope === twice the circumference e.g. 2 cycles around the circumference ? This would make your model completely consistent with John's process and may shed light on some interesting possibilities e.g. Electron radius= diameter of the core creating a standing wave which when moving in a circular self referral frame generates the electron as a modulated wave of the inner core....a fully self referral sine wave of light ! [ this could also be considered to a be the equivalent of a pure quaternion particle , with all possible rotations present simultaneously, with the initial standing wave as the real component ] ....this can be easily modelled with your own helix wave code where wave 1 and wave 2 are the same size but opposite sign e.g.1and -1...note : when wave 1 and 2 are the same sign then the system oscillates [ ....www.fractalwoman.com/Code/HelixWaveInterference.txt ] The electron then could be seen as simply confined circular light spinning at the speed of light.. This would give the electron a total momentum of c*2. If C*2 is simply the primary unit of mass , then in the equation E= mc*2 , c*2 is the primary unit of mass and M is simply the no. of those units with Energy being the total no. of mass units present e.g. the no. of self referral OM particles present / number of OM cycles ......All is Light upon Light [ verse of Light ....Quoran]
"The electron then could be seen as simply confined circular light spinning at the speed of light." Yes. " This would give the electron a total momentum of c*2. " C^2 does not have the units of momentum. It has the units of [m^2/s^2] which are the units of absorption and emission. In terms of theOMparticle model, you can think of the two "bumps" as emission and absorption of The Medium. I am still investigating this and trying to reconcile my ideas with John's ideas which only differ slightly in terms of the model.
@@FractalWoman Thanks Lori.... are you aware of the work by Nassim Haramein regarding the Schwarzschild proton. He calculates the mass of the proton at its Schwarzschild condition in terms of its Quantum vacuum density [ 5.16x10*93gm/cm*3 ]. Then he calculates the gravitational force between 2 contiguous Schwarzschild protons and the relative orbital velocity of 2 contiguous Schwarzschild protons which equates exactly to the speed of light in a vacuum. Following this , he calculates the period of rotation of the system and it equals exactly the interaction time of the strong nuclear force. In other words , he creates a compelling case for considering the proton as 2 Schwarzschild protons in contiguous relationship spinning at the speed of light. He has also explored and developed the idea of Planck spherical particles very similar to your ideas . Wondering if you have considered applying a similar approach to the electron and the electron in its Schwarzschild condition ?
@@hvkuql yes I am familiar with Nassim's work. I actually visited The Resonance Science foundation and presented some of my research to him. He tried to apply his own theory to the electron but it didnt work out as well as the proton. I think if he used the Compton wavelength he would have better luck. Will have to have another look at his proton paper to see if this makes sense.
I have always been a supporter of Robert's work. It's too bad he went the Patreon way. This unfortunately limits his visibility. I was a Patreon supporter of his for a while but he wasn't moving fast enough for my liking and I couldn't really afford it. Need to save for retirement. That said, if you setup a meeting with Robert, I will be happy to join in.
Hi Lori... a couple of questions regarding your model and John's model...... 1. All wave modulations in the model are considered as amplitude modulations. Does / could frequency modulation or phase modulation play a role in any way? 2.The model is presented as an expression of Euclidian geometry.....would there be any value in considering the model from the perspective of other geometries E.g. Riemann sphere or hyperbolic geometry / pseudosphere.....The reason I ask this is because the electric and magnetic field geometries as depicted by Eric Dollard, Ken wheeler and yourself look exactly like the complex roots depicted on a Riemann sphere. It seems to me that In all creation myths, God creates through division e.g. divides the waters from the waters, and the simplest form of division is the root function e.g. square root , cube root etc......In fact even Spinors have been considered as the square roots of geometry e.g. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RmCvGgbdWYQq.htmluare All our sensorial observations are done through a mind and if the mind is dynamic and curved rather than static and flat then it may be worthwhile considering our observations from the perspective of these geometries as well e.g. the world as it appears is the result of light shining through a geometry that may not be flat and static but rather dynamic and curved. I would value any comments that you may wish to share.
"God creates through division". This is what the fractal paradigm is all about. "In fact even Spinors have been considered as the square roots of geometry" This is technically true since Spinors are directly related to quaternions and quaternions are directly related to complex numbers which emerge from the square root of 1 and -1. The universe is not flat. It is not round. It is fractal.
@@FractalWoman I am 😁 i just spent the last few minutes representing c3/g in my model because I didn't start at planks constant, ive been building neocortex models!
