As soon as I learned of LFTR technology I recognized its enormous value and potential as a rapidly achievable solution to energy production in the face of the global fossil fuel climate crisis. I have been following your work and progress for 5 years now, and for a while was watching for ways to participate and support your efforts as a small investor, all the way up until you outlined the doomed proprietary thinking of your business model and operational plans. The unbounded successes of open, cooperative, community based technology development are everywhere around us. By your own admission, if you had adopted that open, cooperative model 10 years ago you would be far, far closer to your goals today. I hope you will rethink your directions and steer away from the greed models that are burning the planet and find paths that restore my enthusiasm and allow for your success in creating LFTR technologies that can benefit all of humanity.
Way to go, guys ! Sessions like this should be repeated on a regular basis in order to share your progress with the public. There is an abundance of questions to be asked, by interested peers. It would be great if those sessions could be transcribed, as the sound, the acoustics is challenging at times, given the sometimes elaborate technical descriptions. Also, I hope there is a lot of focus on the legislative part of your project, knowing that the local Danish regulations are not aligned with the EU directives and legislation on nuclear power. Politicians in Dk must be made aware that this alignment is necessary asap. Keep up the good work.
Great job lads, really enjoyed hearing all the updates. I heard mention of Australia - I truly hope you can influence the attitude to nuclear energy in Australia as well. its very negative at the moment, but a groundswell of positivity has started now.
One thing I did not see in the answer about the price per MWh, is the mentioning of the estimation of the maintenance cost for the design. I understand that most of that will come through the period of running of the reactor, but still there should be some, at least understanding, at the current development level, what that will be. Also how do you plan to provide the thermal power available, assuming some kind of heat exchanger, to the next stage for transformations to electromagnetic flux vibrations.
I think the design of your reactors is fantastic! Just a suggestion on raising capital. Try Saudi Arabia. Show MBS your design and all the positive features of your reactor. He is young, modern, rich and may surprise you. All the best to you!
They plan to IPO at some point. No official deadline. However, a small portion of their stocks are listed on Funderbeam, search for "CPH Atomics" if interested.
Cool! Thats good news! I am actually swiss and when i foud CA a couple of month ago i had the idea that it would be a great combination with the psi institute. here you made it! One Question: if you compare your reactor with the German Dual Fluid Reactor, what are on your opinion the pros of your design?
Good day from Goonellabah, NSW, Australia. Has Elon Musk contacted you or invested. I am promoting the Copenhagen Atomics reactor. Thorium encourages me and will be a Game-Changer in Energy when I circumnavigate Australia. I'll embark on a six-month journey to circumnavigate Australia in two CYBERTRUCKs and a Tesla Semi, covering 22,000 kilometres at the beginning of February 2025.
If you can convert, by Correspondence Principle Perspective Imagery, from conventional scientific practices to seeing things as they are functionally, ..that relative-timing reciprocation-recirculation potential thermodynamical real-time Superposition-point Actuality is one and the same as "fusion", therefore deliberately ignorant obfuscation of Nuclear Energy availability will make intellectual and financial accessibility for Investment a bit more realistic. Abstract reserves of Money is used as a substitute for good conscience to allow the destruction of the planet to proceed, ..reverse the process.
