Interesting distance test. Would have been cool if there was a way to see where you were in relation to the audio setup. I liked the waveform thing tho. That was helpful
So I have always used the evo series products in different ways as a mobile DJ. Primarily for doing small ceremonies (up to 200 people). I put the G4 receiver on top of a PA towards the back (unfortunately where I often have to setup), and it's fantastic as I'm typically within 50 to 75ft of the handheld transmitter.... I'm very interested in this new EW-DP as I very often don't have power, making these Sennheiser products perfect for me. I'd love to have a true diversity setup over the G4. My question is... do the detachable antennas use normal BNC, thus allowing for the use of a directional fin antenna?
That Gear Street QUATTRO T-shirt brings back such great memories! Seeing Lance (China Mike as most know him), and meeting everyone there, including my favorite Canadian... Glenn (Ok... Pete Thorn, is a really cool guy and I talked way more with him at NAMM than with Glenn at GS4)... but I digress... just want to say Thanks You for being you... you're the most righteous dude I've ever met! Looking forward to the next chance I get to visit... or see you at NAMM 2024? You could visit San Francisco... I'd love to show you around! Awesome mics...BTW!! Great video as always!
Thank you very much for all of your videos ! I am a bass player. I would like to add a wireless system on my pedalboard but I do NOT want to use a 2.4 GHz system. That's why I'm seriously considering buying an EW-D system. I return a little (you mentioned it a little in this video) on the fact of using or not the EW-DP receiver (portable) as a guitar or bass player.. For obvious space reasons, I would be strongly interested in using the EW-DP (portable) receiver instead of the EW-D (Rack). (I have almost no more space in the pedalboard and I want to stay with a compact pedalboard) It would be SO easy to place the portable receiver in the pedalboard. It is so compact. I see in your video that range is not a problem. My question is: Would there really be a problem using the portable receiver rather than the rack receiver ? Is it possible to have, as with the rack version, a unity gain (same level as a cable) with the portable version ? In terms of sound, do you think it would still be preferable to prefer the rack version (I think not, it must be very similar I think) Actually, my main question is: If I get the same result as with the rack version, why wouldn't I take the portable version ? Maybe there are reasons I didn't thought and I would be interested in hearing your opinion. Thank you so much for your answers.
Henning your mono wheeler test scenario should become industry standard reference for testing wireless systems. Not because it's technically sophisticated or anything, I can't really judge that. It's just endlessly entertaining watching you ride up and down the hill, preferably with a guitar mounted.
Thanks for the review! Question: For your distance test, could you not just use one single transmitter to be received by both the rack and portable receivers on the same frequency? Using two transmitters in close proximity like you were can cause RF intermodulation, interference, and dropouts.
Hello, Thank you very much for all of your videos ! I am a bass player. I would like to add a wireless system on my pedalboard but I do NOT want to use a 2.4 GHz system. That's why I'm seriously considering buying an EW-D system. I return a little (you mentioned it a little in this video) on the fact of using or not the EW-DP receiver (portable) as a guitar or bass player.. For obvious space reasons, I would be strongly interested in using the EW-DP (portable) receiver instead of the EW-D (Rack). (I have almost no more space in the pedalboard and I want to stay with a compact pedalboard) It would be SO easy to place the portable receiver in the pedalboard. It is so compact. I see in your video that range is not a problem. My question is: Would there really be a problem using the portable receiver rather than the rack receiver ? Is it possible to have, as with the rack version, a unity gain (same level as a cable) with the portable version ? In terms of sound, do you think it would still be preferable to prefer the rack version (I think not, it must be very similar I think) Actually, my main question is: If I get the same result as with the rack version, why wouldn't I take the portable version ? Maybe there are reasons I didn't thought and I would be interested in hearing your opinion. Thank you so much for your answers.
Vielen dank... 1) But in the outdoor comparison, would you please use meters to estimate the operating range / break up for the two units? 2) Maybe... the small advantage of the rack unit is in the slightly larger antennas? Or that it's diversity switiching s bit better? 3) Also, I read that even though the portable also has two antennas, it is not a "true diversity" system. Not sure about the rack mount version. Do you know? Thanks for your time - cheers
My helmet does need a new lav system… I’ll check these out. 22:26 I too have a P in my name and enjoy riding around on stupid shit , for research purposes.
