Could US military successfully invade Iran? 

Actually you need to do all ww2 plane or tank for have the modern tank or plane but ok

Let's hope this won't happen.

Binkov's Battlegrounds First, let me thank you so much for the big effort you are attempting to put every video you issue. Second, I wanted to give you a proposal for your next video. In fact, I have given this proposal also in the comments of your last two videos. Fortunately, a lot of people interacted with this suggestion. The proposal is to make a video about a hypothetical war between Egypt and Turkey. Both countries are competing immeasurably a lot; politically, economically, and militarily. Both are competing over political presence in Mideastern countries, such as Libya, Sudan, the Gulf (the Qatari crisis), as well as Syria. In addition to all this, they are competing militarily in the Mediterranean for discoveries of oil and gas fields. Additionally, despite Turkey’s membership in the NATO; however, Egypt’s military power is rivaling the Turkish one. And if we take Turkey’s NATO-membership into consideration, then we should also take Cyprus and Greece, who are also members in the NATO and the European Union 🇪🇺, that have a lot of alliances with Egypt also into consideration. Thank you a lot for your hard work, again.

Pls do croatian video

Please make India🇮🇳 vs Bangladesh 🇧🇩

I just thought of this video as well

Me either

@arsacesofconcobar search it up homes

Do you dislike the government or having a supreme leader or what is it exactly?

@@ahmadjaber3611 to be honest I don't dislike the government but I do believe that state and religion should be separate and the country needs to free up a little. which in my opinion will happened gradually and eventially

As a Turkish person i believe Turkey and Russia will send military equipment, militia, volunteers, food, medical supplies etc. US can't do that mistake. Even if they gather 1 million soldiers, when Iran call it's people to fight against Americans :D and then it will be the huge nightmare for americans and saudis. Also if you watch the videos of saudi army which tries to invade yemen, you'll see how those idiots movin like :D in a war situation, Turks will support Iran. I'm pretty sure about this.

Burak Yay şu aptal ABDlilere karşı çıkan tek milletler bi biz İranlılar bide siz Türkler, umarım herkes karşı çıkarda şu aptallara bir yerleri kalkmaz, adamlar 200 yıllık bir ülke, milleti bile yok, ama gelip 4000 yıllık İranı yok etmeyi planlıyorlar, artık Tanrı neden böyle şeylere izin veriyorsa

So what’s to say they wouldn’t help support a regime change? Trump has made it clear to Iran that he and the US have no ill will for Iran’s people. Only the government that oppresses them. Those massive protests weren’t for nothing.

as a canadian i agree

@@udegill8610 As a German I agree

@@udegill8610 agreed

It's so civilized of you. The majority of the people in Iran love and cherish The U.S.A.

@aamerican aaron Amazing👍👏

Yeah, they seem to have a very delusional attitude about their own capabilities. I grant you that an insurgency would cause the US major problems, they always do, but in a stand up fight they would be steamrolled over. It is entertaining to watch their idiocy unfold though

How about the rain of missile on U.S basses by Iran? The only reply was " so far, so good " . How funny is that?

@@pofaknamaki8847 fuck it, I’ll bite. Show me proof this “rain of missiles” actually did something?

@@admiralsnackbarkekwalice6167 I refer you to pictures released by the Pentagon. Also General Mcensy's recent TV interview. While we are on the subject, let me remind you of president Trumps response to downing of U.S's most expensive plane over the Persian Gulf by Iran. He said: " Thank you for not downing the plane with 38 U.S intelligence officers aboard ". I wont go on about almost daily attacks to the U.S embassy and personals and assets in Iraq because it will make you cry. Fortunately there is a way out of this self occurred disaster for the U.S and that is to leave our neighbourhood and the chances are that Iranians will be kind enough and let you leave without causing you any more harm.

@@pofaknamaki8847 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-63rT3CrzS8M.html My BRRRRRT says otherwise, my Iranian friend.

David DuBay couldn't not agree more, people watch a few RU-vid videos and all of a sudden they have expertise they need to share -.-

Oh, yes, but we armchair generals do have fun

On spot

Not true. My nonsense is well-informed. :o)

the best armchair military expert is Binkov battle grounds, who makes videos with information of 1970 for 2019.

Very true, Iran would be the strongest nation we'd fought since WW2.

Sure, and Iran will burn, their culture and identity destroyed, their cities razed to the ground, their people dead by the millions and they will not receive any help from anybody, due to them attacking the refineries. Iran isn't stupid enough to do that, because refineries can be repaired, but a country that has been bombed to the stone age never will.

@@worldman3218 They will.

@@worldman3218 If the US decides to be warmonger again and go forward with war, Iran has been preparing for decades for this war, they will attack hard and cause irreparable damage. No one will win. Iran is not Iraq. The Persians have dealt with invasions for a long time through their culture, and they are quite well aware of their harsh geography, which USA troops will have an extremely hard time in. Like I said no one will win. Iran does not want this war. Iran has been cooperative while the USA has been the bully and an immature fool breaking international law over and over.

That would turn shaky us allies into rather blood thirsty ones seeking revenge, so I guess that could be a choice....

Iraq war was a complete different story because people taught their government was the best and loved them(kinda brain washed) but now with the new generation if you ask any of them they would fight for Iran it's probably a no

In my opinion, as long as this regime is in Iran, peace with the United States is far from expected, but war is not the right way. I hope that one day the Iranian people will achieve what they really deserve 🇨🇦❤🇮🇷

@@ariamh823 How and why they do not want to fight for their homeland. They were born there. Iranians are wonderful people.

@@swanton4319 agree but my point is they're not going to be risk their lives as much as they did in the Iraq Iran war

@@swanton4319 me too

In 2002

Ya with the woke chiefs of staff we probly will lose to iran

Me too :D

Me too

No your wrong iraq iran war went on for 8 years while iraq war went on for 7

@@koschei8136 hes still wrong

iran and iraq?????? iran was alone against Iraq america israel germany england france and more than 70 other countries dude ...for example germany used to send gas and chemical warfare for iraq and france used to send best air force and tanks to iraq ...do u know how many egyption and american pilots we got as prosoners? they ahd all support yet iran was succesful to hhold them back

@Natural Healing Methods I live in Iran dude 🤭no one can teach me what happened 🤫... Iraq lost so much lands to Iran 😉we conquered many lands in there... Ur information is what western media teaches u 😂western information are all lie and they keeps u a fool... Good for u

@Natural Healing Methods Iran is so much on backfoot, but still they never acknowledge

Threads?

@@massengsle8779 nah i watch threads, it’s not it

Let's go bowling Niko!

That's all Iranian controlled area, IRGC Quds Commander, shadow general as he is known, General Qasem Soleimani commands most of southern Iraq. They are all Iranian Shia backed forces.

Exactly. And even an Air Campaign alone won't make the Iranians sit still. They will cross into Kuwait and Saudi Arabia to target the Air Bases, forcing a land war. They know casualties are a factor with the US public. So a ground war is beneficial to them, not to mention China and Russia whom will supply large quantities of light weapons and endless ammo. The entire region will be in flames. Maybe that is the plan.

In Iraq we are with Iranian brothers

Iran started this with funding terrorist groups and causing trouble with other Arab nations.

@@martinjenkins5471 they do it cause saudi arabia does it

@@martinjenkins5471 The definition of a terrorist from the point of view of the United States and its allies: Whoever is with us is a hero, whoever is against us is a terrorist. It really was a comprehensive and human rights defender of a terrorist.

@@martinjenkins5471 America started it by supporting Sadamn's invasion of Iran and sanctioning the country from day 1. And Iran does not supp0rt terror1sts. p1ss off.

@@mrhood8073 Do not upset yourself In the American dictionary, someone who opposes usa and their allys is called a terrorist, and someone who is with them is called a hero, like in the Hollywood movie "Green Zone" and "Sniper" American soldiers who invaded another country are portrayed as a hero. They showed a boy defending his family with a Kalashnikov against an invading American soldier as a terrorist.

Yep, It's a geographical fortress

You are absolutely right brother.

There would bo no need to pursue them into that location, once the cities fall, the country falls and almost all of the major cities fall well with range of the US Navy and after the Air Force takes control of the skies, can be bombarded in submission. If the Iraqi military falls back into the mountains, no one cares, because they aren't going to be doing any harm there. The US can implement arial surveilance and when anyone or anything moves, they can drop in Apaches to wipe it out. Anyone that retreats there is going to need supplies, and as soon as they come out of the caves and crevices not only will the people be identified, but so will the location where they are hiding. The US would not have to send a single soldier into that terrain to neautralize them.

Raison, vous etes

Ok, but America will still win, and Iran can't even THINK about touching America's mainland. America's primary will end when someone can successfully invade us FOR ONCE. Nobody can even touch us.

Iran will be a cake walk compared to gulf war 1

@@Ghastly_Grinner lol

@@Ghastly_Grinner Optimism is not always a good thing . it gets you killed sometimes .

@@Ghastly_Grinner You couldn't be more wrong man, just look at the geography alone. Gulf war 1 had the best terrain for a war, it was literally all flat and perfect for US forces, not to mention how Saddam had worse equipment, fewer men, and less training than Iranian forces. Like seriously, good luck having a cake walk when you're trying to push troops through the mountains of Iran.

@@Ghastly_Grinner Iraq was cake walk too, and it cost taxpayers, 7 trillion. how much do you think that Iran cake walk will cost for taxpayers? could you tell me, where's ordinary taxpayers benefit in all these wars?

@@thecrow618 could also happen, if public support drops

​​@KingdomofBabylonLost what in 2003? Afghanistan and Iraq were both successfully invaded and occupied with minimal casualties. Stretching that shit out for decades without any clear goal anymore is where it becomes muddled. Trump wanted to grandstand with the Afghanistan withdrawal, but we'd still be there otherwise, just like how we're still in Iraq.

1. Iran has much worse geography for an invasion, it is filled with many mountains and barren deserts, it is more similar to Afghanistan than Iraq 2. Domestic resistance to the Iranian government is very large, however I doubt much of them will be supporting the US in this war as they would be seen more as a foreign invader than liberator. 3. The Iranian government is not in as bad of an economic position as the Iraqi government was before Desert Storm. Yes, you can make the argument that Iran is under heavy sanctions, however Russia and China have come in to fill this economic gap. Iraq's war with Iran was so costly for Iraq that it costed more money than all of the money Iraq had made from the oil industry in the decades preceding it. 4. The US would likely not have a big coalition backing them like they did in '91. The main reason that the Gulf War even happened was because Iraq invaded Kuwait, which angered the international community into forming the coalition. In this situation it is the opposite, it is the US invading a country, and much of the international community would either be neutral or release unbinding condemnations on the USA (with the possible exception of Russia and China, who may supply Iran). In addition, as the USSR was falling apart during the Gulf War, this was the first year in which the USA had a free-hand at doing basically whatever it wanted as it became the sole superpower. As a result, they did crippling bombings of Iraq before the invasion which was so bad Iraq regressed into a temporary stone age and never recovered for the next 12 years. Today, the situation is different, and Russia and China will most likely back Iran, in this multipolar environment the USA would not be able to do these things again or else they would risk facing harsh retaliation. I still do think, despite all these factors, that the US would still win out the war. However, it would be EXTREMELY costly, and once the US takes over, the guerilla war which would follow (in terms of casualties for the US) would be less like Afghanistan and more like Vietnam, possibly higher. Millenium Challenge 2002 already showed that Iran would likely be able to inflict crushing defeats on the US even despite their technological and military inferiority compared to the US.

Talk about your own Jewish leadership

@@NM-ho5qt ours is better Jewish or not lmao

@@NM-ho5qt Jewish leadership = no ISIS or Hezbollah, i think you might want to reconsider sides ngl

​@@gamingrex2930lol Jewish leadership is worse than any terror organisation in the world combined

😂😂😂

TOMCATS

Because we want to see how a us invasion into Iran would go down, duh

Why? I personally have no idea...beyond entertainment and that it's interesting

@@gcard2112 us drone some time ago killed an Iranian general

Plot twist. Binkov killed Iranian general

iran is a geographic stationary target lmao the taliban is all over the middle east and north africa

@@uncovidvaxxforthestrongand3582 That'll be your little secret ;)

@@uncovidvaxxforthestrongand3582 taliban in north africa ? wtf

+Nicholas Knet Iran couldn't beat Israel, along with the rest of the Arab league.

@@hacienda2490 IRAN never beat Israel Palestine will do it

I'd be more worried as to whether Inbredistanis could count that high

@@rosiehawtrey White moment

Easy, the US will start letting immigrants into the military lmao

@@That_GuyRU-vid Create penal battalions, with the 2.5 million body-building gangstas in America's prisons.

Even with 30% being fit, that's more than 8 million that you would need. The US doesn't need to occupy anything. Occupation is totally optional. The strength of the US is the ability to win in offensive campaigns. Sitting around in an occupation is a recipe for insurgency. Simply razing the country to the stone age would secure the US's strategic goals without the need to provide Iranians fairly stationary targets. I think the US has learned that lesson.

Aye call up papers anyone ?

Seen that one I'm on number 4 now mate.

@@syntaxerror8955 haha very smart can't wait...

So far it seems to be the bloodiest front of the war. Some estimate thousands of IQ point casualties

@@royxeph_arcanex rofl

best comment on the entire thread

well done somebody got some history!

@@amirmahdimemari1838 thank you UwU

Usa even cant beat isis and afghanstan cues mountain also iran have hormuz he can close it and oil will destoryed also iran can ate arab gulf country in minute

@@Edward_Malez based department?

Yes, you can wait!

It’s a shame because you can tell Binkov really puts work in each video

@@UnsungSoldiers yes. not like the mappers you see that just use ms paint and conquer entire continents in a year.

ben dover.... I agree. I have never seen a comment section filled with literal terrorists and human rights violators until now.

Fr bro Iran would legit crush anyone with its militias let alone their military,basij,IRGC,Hezbollah and alot more...... The 2002 millennium challenge says it all

@@bluemask8182 lmaaaaooo please stop embarrassing yourselves

@@makaveli4000 bruh what???looks like ur one of those kids who base their knowledge off of Hollywood movies🤣

@@bluemask8182 you really think iran is capable of facing the us...? Dude bahrain could dominate iran 😂😂😂 please just please be quiet

@@makaveli4000 DUDR WHAT WHAT WHAT??????HOLD UP DID U JUST SSY BAHRAIN?? kid sit down ONE of irans proxies defeated Israel TWICE Iran would literally send your soldier back in bodybags I'm not even iranain but this is a known fact Iran is uncoqurrable in the middle east

@@alifayazi9496 its obvious. A iranian general once said that the wont let the enemy come any closer than 1000km to the iranian borders

@@alifayazi9496 i dont like the regime, but I sure do support strong iranian armed forces

US would destroy all their missiles and drones well before they make a impact

@@alifayazi9496 precision has been their priority since general hajizadeh has taken over the air division of irgc in 2009.

@@alifayazi9496 the leader ayatollah khamenei said iran's missiles percision is between 10 and 5 meters imagine them in 10's of thousands the U.S would cut short of missile supply too early and would get dealt with.

What is pointless about Iran?

@@mohsenpanahi6773 حمله به ایران بی نتیجست.

i think i will be more than 1 million at least 4 or 5 million may be more but people hate government i don't know

Yep just looked at covert cabal Iran video too.

*I love you* ❤ ❤ ❤

You think you're fanaticism is gonna save you?😂😂😂 Look at the Nazis n see how far that got themmm ....🤭🤭🤭

@@bonafidehater692 They got the Nazis at a cost of six (6) million Jews. Is it worth the cost and the sacrifice of 6 million Jews.??

The United States withdrew due to political reasons and did won almost every engagement but in a conventional war Iran would get decked

@@Juan-qu4oj Good excuse to say political reason.🤣. How about Afghanistan, Iraq. Is it political reason.?🤣.

@@Juan-qu4oj lol we didn't actually lose my ass

Good, now Biden and his puppeteers have to agree.

Morale is almost impossible to predict, anyone could say "my country is braver," but the thing with human psychology is that it can flip upside down in mere minutes. Binkov do include morale in his analysis, but it's not emphasized upon because of the aforementioned reason. The US, on paper, would win in the war of attrition against Iran due to larger population pool and larger economy, but modern, real-life war have never been fought "to the last man," political, morale, and logistics determined the victors. If your country has an overwhelming numerical advantage, but your enemy is half the world away and you can only send few thousands troops at the time, you lose by logistical failure. If you have all the advantages except for morale and politics, your citizens will eventually think the war is stupid and will resist draft and other supports (like in the game of chess, it doesn't matter if you lose only few pawns but your enemy have only king left, if you knocked your own king piece down, you lose the game).

But he's Russian, so he should be on Iran's side and not on America's side. Russia would support Iran.

@@albertk3677 He's impartial, which is very important in conflict analytics

Thats the great part, reading such radical comments is always fun

@Stephen Jenkins The example I gave is just to make a point, and is completely arbitrary, and I didn't specifically said it was the US.

People need to realize that war isn't just a bunch of pretty markers moving on a graphical map.

Agree and iran have not only one army iran have 'the'army and revelationary guard search about us rq 170 in Iran's border they take down that spy drone without any damage

Genghis Khan see that reference to 12 strong

Team oRbz I thought it was because he’s Genghis Khan

Didn’t take long for it to be irrelevant

They won't be much help, if the USA decides to use air strikes on all of them they wouldn't last 1 week

Lol those are your bet for stopping a US invasion?

@@evila9076 who said that lol?

@@evila9076 we have mountains who said we even need others to help.

Nikolay Mikhayluts Yes the Iranians would be a very tough crowd. Even after the collapse of their government and loss of their military, some ex soldiers or even civilians could take arms and start a guerrilla war against the occupying Americans. This could lead to Iranian freedom fighters and terrorist groups ambushing US forces, terrorist plots, and even launching attacks on American civilians, committing acts comparable to 9/11, leading to a whole new can of worms. Would truly be a shit show if the Americans went to war with Iran. The war itself would be brutal and long, the Iranians have a decent military. After the Americans eventually won over, the occupation and keeping the peace would be hard. Look at Iraq. 16 years after the 2003 invasion and its still a war torn country. Iran would be like that just on a much larger scale, having further repercussions on the wider world.

Iranian moral is high until bombs start dropping on their heads.....That is what happened to the Iraqis

@@alphaandomega1275 👍🏼😂

@rdrent , civilians ? I remember how Iranians cried when we took down their air liner

@@alphaandomega1275 You're talking about people who used to clear minefields with their own bodies in the Iran Iraq war.

They helped Vietnam in the Vietnam war they helped Middle-East countries vs Israel and Iraq army was mostly USSR bought equipment. Every modern war was supported by one side of the other its nothing new.

We've seen the RF's weapons orders and weapons exports collapse since the conflict started. Everyone has seen how poorly they stack up against 30+ year old NATO gear wielded by half trained Ukrainian soldiers. Chinese arms, maybe though.

So... Russia and China would do what they've already been doing since the end of WW2? Why would we be surprised by them supplying America's enemies? America supplying Ukraine is basically Vietnam in reverse, they like dishing it out but not taking it?

Attacking the US is definitely not in Irans best interest. Pearl Harbor and 9/11 shows that Americans come together after attacks and that war support rises. If Iran's goal is to use the US public's war support against the government then it would think twice about attacking US soil.

@@RutgersPride27 Terrorism is often used when a country is outmatched in a conventional warfare, but its effectiveness is unpredictable. Sometimes it'll just piss the invader's nation off more, the other time it can cause the invader withdraw, or if they haven't invade yet, make them reconsider. It's a dangerous bet, regardless, terrorism can sometimes keep the defender nation's free, but it could also risks retaliation that may lead to more civilians (that insurgents are "supposed" to protect) being killed. But then again, if someone resorted to terrorism, they have no other choice left (the reason why US war with Japan and Vietnam didn't lead to terrorism from those countries because their conventional forces can still hold up).

@@RutgersPride27 Depends on what they target. If they target civilian, ofc it will backfire. But if they attack administration or military facilities, while not being the aggressor (unlike Pearl Harbor), they could get the same effect on the US population than during the Vietnam war.

@@evoluxman9935 The military is very popular with Americans as it has some of the highest favorability ratings out of all institutions. Attacking bases will backfire on Iran also.

@@RutgersPride27 Iran' goal is peace, that's why they signed the JPCOA. If USA attacks however Iran has a culture than praises matyrdom. They are an incredibly proud people. They will never surrender and would prefer death. If USA attacks they will have to be prepared to kill every Iranian

iran cant even sustain an war with there eco so bad

@@brandonye2569 most of military products are made in Iran or reverse engineering . yes Iran's economy is bad . but don't forget they have been preparing for Us the super power of this world for nearly 40 years. only foolish people will underestimate their enemy specially a country as strong as US .

@@nastaranebrahimi6486 Yea thats True and They have the islamic revolutionary guard,but i could see desertion

@@nastaranebrahimi6486 yeah but superior numbers and tech will make up for it.

@@nastaranebrahimi6486 I think a war between Iran and the us would be a steam roll initially but it would be the occupation that would be the problem but that depends on how motivated the Iranian people are to fight and from what I understand they dislike their own government

Not anymore

Not anymore I guess

Oscar Wheatley you work in the us army

@@teamorbz4463 i think he is speaking of draft

A US blocade of the straight of Hormuz and extensive air supremacy and bombing campaigns would be the end of the current Iranian state.

@@newwaveinfantry8362 33.3% or 1/3rd of oil and natural gas to the world flows through the Strait of Hormuz, imagine the gas and food prices skyrocketing all over the world. Also, US cannot block it anymore as even US aircraft carriers are scared to enter the Persian Gulf or anywhere within the range of Iran's missiles.

@@blehbleh5095 The US is self-sufficient for oil and during war time it would ramp up domestic production. Iran would be hurt way more than the US would be, especially considering its exports are not to America as it is already sanctioned. This would kill two birds with one stone as China's economy would completely collapse and they wouldn't be able to supply Iran with anything. The US navy and even coast guard are constnatly in the Persian Gulf. I don't think there is much that scares the US navy.

He forgot, because he didn't want mention iranian allies and small groupssss....

In all fairness the Israelis might be completely tied down trying to re-invade the Gaza Strip and possibly Lebanon in case of a U.S. Iran war

I saw it a longtime ago because i'am a subscriber of binkov a long time ago I'am rewatching it because of what happened recently

tfs2O3 neither do You....

It's going to happen one day.

Yep new administrations always flex their muscle, often needlessly.

dIsAsTeR

ya it just goes to show that this guy does not know what he is talking about.

🇰🇼kuwait 🇦🇪united emirates

Everyone could’ve made that mistake lol

@@flavien1093 not someone who actually knows the middle east this guy clearly does not.

Lol true hahaha

Russia knowes that if Iran falls they are next. They can't let that happen

@@michaelpetrovich5353 I don't believe America will attack Iran unless they get the full backing of NATO. Russia will give Iran all the weapons it needs to defend itself. American government will need public opinion to be on their side as well. Vietnam ended because Americans lost the will to continue. Afghanistan would definitely go the same way if American troops come home in body bags in the same way. Iran would be tougher than Afghanistan because their population would be as the population of Vietnam determined to protect their homes. With that kind of will, America can not win. America can defeat armies, but not peoples minds.

@StrategicFooyoo And China is big enough to do that. I will bet that America won't stop Chinese ship picking up oil in Iran.

I also think that this analysis misses the major point that Kuwait is largely dependent on the Gulf for its oil exports which Iran’s fleet of speed boats and mini subs could easily blockade. Maybe only for a few weeks but that would no doubt hurt Kuwait’s economy.

America cant attack to iran because it will be so expensive for them in this economy situation . I think world war 3 will start in taiwan .the persian empire Guaranteed by the alliance of China and Russia. And we are witnessing the transfer of power from the West to the East, and the mafia that emerged after World War II will be destroyed .America will disintegrate in a few years and the glue of federalism will disappear .If the Americans reach Iran, Iran will have access to American territory through Venezuela, and the world has seen how incapable of American missiles defense against Iranian missiles. Hollywood is not real media is not real .what do guys think ha?Two hundred or three hundred years America whose ancestors took over the land through the genocide of Native Americans and slavery ،Countries that are colonial in nature. These artificial countries They are not as big as a country like Iran, which after ten thousand years of history and thousands of years of unwritten history, and the first empire of the world and the first builder of modern civilization and a country that overthrew the slaveholders and savagery under the command of Cyrus the Great He freed the Jews from the shackles of their rulers, a country that has so much pride and culture and its name is rememberd good in history . It is the only country that has the ability to implement world peace i mean real peace

It's not like this, As an Iranian I have to say something around 95% of the civilians don't like this government, I wouldn't be surprised if the people start helping American troops. plus, nobody hates America at least as far as I'm seeing in the society. What you see about people in Iran is just propaganda, they are bunch of extremists payed by the government to be in iconic protests against United states.

@@arminasaei3448 so you'd prefer a government like the shah's that would sell out the national resources to foreign companies? didnt you fell any slight joy when the talibans defeated america? how come iranians would help america over their regime, america is the one making iran's existence difficult..

and that would be the end of israel, ,saudi, iran will not be attacked, america doesnt like lots of casualty,s,,the deaths would be too high,

Israel 🇮🇱 may be a puny country but will not face utter destruction. Before any enemy will lay a hand on Israel, the Almighty will send fire 🔥 from the heavens to smoke its army. There can be no victory without God.

@@tshavfengvang7831 dont wait for god to do something, he gave up on us a long time ago, ,his experiment failed,

@@jamesreddington7140 Sorry to hear that. I supposed we're all doomed then. The whole world and the cosmos was just an accident or an experiment per say. You have not even fought the war and already surrendered. Life sucks!

It really wasn’t. After all it was a war against the North Vietnamese where couldn’t actually invade north Vietnam

True.

Remember guys the US has lost more of 50 000 soldiers in vietnam war

Binkow should have compared to Afganisthan. Moutains all over the country and NATO simply cannot win against a 20 million people country. Forget about Iran at 83.

The Vietnam war was just a police action war the USA never declared war on Vietnam. It was just a battle in the cold war against the USSR, a battle that the USA lost A-war that it won.

Iraq was considered a top military.

​@@TheOpethOfMastodonqith no air power

Long story short: if America wanted to take the gloves off, its military would be more unstoppable than it is in the movies. In other words, if they fought w/ the same morality as its opponents (e.g. Islamofascists or commies), the other side would beg for mercy.

@@TulsaSooner1979 Yeah, keep telling yourself that. Lol

@@TulsaSooner1979 you Americans already lost in Afghanistan and you still cry about how great you are lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@jvgace6883 there’s a difference between conventional militaries, that wear uniforms, and are easy to see, and forces like the Vietcong, and the taliban, which are not conventional, against a force like Russia, the us definitely would NOT be unstoppable, but as we have seen with invasions into Iraq in 2003, which was a comparable military to Iran of now, it was completely one sided, and Iraq had no chance of winning

@@jvgace6883 how can you go to war with enemies posing as civilians and hiding in caves? USA didn't go to war with Afghanistan military....

And Turkey

Ta Ha turkey is US bitch

Would they really risk a war with NATO? I am not so sure...

@@randonlando418 Russia would not want the USA to take control of Iran so they would definitely provide Iran with some support. If Iran was an easy target, they would have been invaded many many years ago. But the US has always been very scared of a conflict with Iran.

@Eric Smith Russia isn't just going to let the USA overthrow Iran hahah Rusia and China both helped Syria fight back against US attacks. Btw The USA won't do jack shit to Iran without the help of other western nations.

Sounds fake

@@olivernoah2887 too lazy to use google

Your on drugs. America would turn off the electricity in all of iran in hours and we wont be fighting in the day. Wed be fighting peimarily at night (like normal)..

you're right... im sorry.. thank you sir

Appreciate the advice

I wish I would have seen this comment sooner lmao.

Clap clap them alien cheeks

Nope! Not possible since it is remote in the desert of Nevada. The logistics of the March are impossible to organize by random people who are just showing up. Plus Las Vegas does not have enough hotel rooms for two million people.

I don't think that would be a very good idea unless you would like to spend some time in a federal prison!

@@tolmie1141 if too many people actually attack area 51 the government will use 👽 alien technologies to teleport them away!!!

@@alilabeebalkoka GOOD that way my tax dollars won't be spent to house the idiots in Federal Prison!

Just like Iraq or Afghanistan or Ireland for the English

Ehh... Scorched earth is a good solution.

Time is a cruel mistress. The reason is is considered mediocre now is the radar cross section and maintenance issues. Theirs probably still has the 80's radars and would struggle to identify our partial stealthed planes from a safe distance. Unless someone managed to steal our improved radar designs and sold them upgraded radars (cough China cough).

They probably couldnt build enough of these weapons.

@@leosch6706 Iran keeps everything they do a secret. Its impossible to tell if they have or how many they would have. Imagine if they only had, say, a dozen. 12 small nuclear blasts against the United states military is nothing to take lightly. Not to mention, the radioactivity it would cause in the air.

Ava Fury Escalation calls for escalation. You use a tactical nuclear weapons on the US the US will probably use one on you. And before claiming that the US using nukes would cause a reaction from the Russians or the Chinese they will deliver via bomber not missiles to avoid misinterpretation. It would not be a reasonable approach by the iranians. Less they go into a “TOTALENKRIEG” type of mentality in that case is free game and tons of deads, mostly Iranians.

@@Alvi410 the Iranians are probably crazy enough to do it though. They don't think like most people. Their leaders are religious extremists.

@@Alvi410 I think if any country in the world is likely to do it, it would not be N. Korea. It would be Iran.

Iran fought Iraq for 8 years to a stalemate. The US overran Iraq in 2 weeks and had their leader living in a hole in the dirt. Who's kidding who.

@@Crashed131963 countries can recover and be a superpower in a couple of decades. It's your brain that seems to have stopped at 30 years ago. Today's Iran in no way is comparable to Iraq 30 years ago. The US only attacks countries that cannot defend themselves and loses even at that. You couldn't even win over Afghanistan. So what are you boasting about. Destroying something from afar is different than winning wars.

@@Crashed131963 well iran had no military at the start of the war

What regional allies? Syria is in ruins and won't play a part, Hezballa in Lebanon is completly dependant on Iran and does not have the ability to assist in such war, Russia and China might support it with equipment and maybe try slow down the economic decline, but both would never engage in direct war with the US.

This war is not going to be about oil fields bro...and Iran is not going to sit idly by while american troops move in those (exposed) flat fields. For such an invasion U.S needs a million troops. Not at all that simple