Is US military strong enough to conquer China on its own? 

Meh prefer other games

if US is attacked, the Philippines is bound for MDT, basically US can use its airspace or bases.

I used it to always play that

Sorry for not supporting you. I already played when simple history got sponsored by it and i used his link.

Bro!! Wishful thinking!! It would go nuclear ☢️ before this could happen. The reason it would go nuclear is because China would have nothing to close but to destroy the other countries that participate in the invasion of China. Japan and some parts of the United States would cease to exist. China has too many attack submarines and missiles to sit and let their country be taken over.

23 minute long video, comment post 21 minutes ago.

2 minutes late but it's better than nothing I for my self actually watched the video but I skipped the sponsor.

Im waiting for the angry chinese commenter who will claim they can take down america no problem

I’m still in the initial ad lol

Don't need to watch it. Already know the outcome. How? I'm a 5 Star General from the Kekistani Wars.

Where the history illiterates fight it out

onggg

It's sad seeing how little some people truly know about history "those who don't understand history are doomed to repeat it"

Carson Rist , leader don’t study history will end up repeating history . If USA and China really go to war ! We all going to eat some big shit and say good bye to the life you have now. From my point of view China and USA are in the same boat . Try to build hate in the generations to come.

@@Craisont And the ones who actually studied history can only watch the ones who didn't study repeating the history

Except the military industrial complex

It would be to defeat china in a Tawain war. Invading China would be impossible unless it got support from India because indias boarder and military is pretty good

@@ssglbc1875 India is not able to fight against China at all!

Invading china is impossible, the country is far too big, far too urbanized and dense and far too many people. It is literally impossible. Limited wars are the future. America and China fighting in Taiwan. India and Pakistan fighting in Kashmir. This is how big powers would fight, there is no point trying to invade each other directly because no one wins, it would be a stalemate.

Issue an embargo with all its allies and wait for a Chinese attack.

I wonder what A ww2 where Rommel was a us tank General like patton would be like.

@@williamblazkowicz5587 The allies intentionally didn't take Hitler out because they were worried he'd be replaced with someone like Rommel I guess that tells you how they felt about Rommel as a military leader 😂 Respect.

​@@alphacentauri1760 almost all stuff we use are made in china, think again, you hardly can find sth not made in china, we as world are dependent on china like we it or not. they also produce almost the half of medicine produced in the world. an embargo will be suicidal for all countries trying to fight china. we created the monster, now we deal with it.

@@tony001212 USA has been superpower for only 100 years. China had been superpower for thousands of years, so monster wasn't created by USA. Don't overestimate America.China recovers by her own hard work and intelligence.

thank you! I'm not American and I'm not Chinese, I don't care who wins this massive dick-measuring contest they're having. I'm just a guy who lives nowhere near the pacific, who would be exceedingly grateful to not have radioactive shit fall on his head and kill him as a result of a war he cares nothing about.

there will be no one left to win or lose with nukes.

China and US nuking each other and ending horribly, war never changes ig

Nukes won't be used.

Nukes design and useage is quite a controlled war these days. 1 example the right size nuke detonated in high atmosphere is an EMP result. Fries silicon but doesn't kill biologicals. Nukes design and size can be incredibly small yes they can use giant ballistic units but that's not the way to win.

Guess we will be bringing in the Nukes again if they want to try and pull a Japan.

@@CreatingAlong I don't see a world where the USA invades let alone nukes China, it would turn the entire world against them.

@@Nicolae_Mew I do agree they will most likely surrender without it coming to that. But if they try to make us do a land invasion I cant see any other options besides nukes. (since US would lose a land invasion)

Just wait til the American government finds oil in China, bye bye CCP XD

@@GodDragonLich You do know the US exports far more oil than they import.

@@GodDragonLich there's plenty of oil in Manchuria region of China, and bunches of coal to liquidise

@@theicmn It’s called a joke.

@@trihermawan9553 Yes I know, it’s called a joke.

Ok, CCP dude.

They also are clueless on what "hypothetical" means and the whole point of Binkov's videos.

What a coincidence, that's my favorite passtime as well!

@@simpleman4215 thank you for introducing me to join ccp. It is cpc actually. But I guess I will pass.

@@MrBigCookieCrumble I hope those tough guys won't freak out when their wifi is down.

Let the Americans never try to attack china, xi jinping has severally warned Biden not to pray with fire

You have no idea what an Anglo Saxons is do you.

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

Yahweh has bought back their evil upon them, He will destroy them in their wickedness.

You know you can like your own comment?

@@coconutperson1985 ?

The winner is me.

Which is why the US would win, nobody wants global destruction. Most likely we'll fight them to the last Indian

It would be very Aug 1914

we did "conquer" Afghanistan..we held it for 20 years then we left

​@@hs_fi8857It began falling before you left

@@finmacleod8383 yet we held onto it for 20 years? the country fell apart on our horrible leave

@@hs_fi8857 It took 20 years and spent $2t to replace the Taliban with......the Taliban.

@@finmacleod8383 Americans always Dominate the body count in every conflict!! 🇺🇲

Even someone rejected at MEPS should be able to see that this sounds like Cold War era strategy. I enjoy these videos, and it is _despite_ the fact that this is not how the USA and China -are- would be fighting one another

China doesn't have any Allies

@Haziq Rosli china and Russia are NOT allies. Guaranteed.

@@valiantstallion Yes, but this does not mean that Russia will not do anything

@@user-js9zt3hv2x Russia plays chess, not checkers.

Age racist

🤣

Deadass they are all anti-america and don't understand how modern day works the past don't mean shit you can't compare modern day US to 80s US and 80s china to modern day china. Especially when 80s china was to busy killing each other 😂

@@Lostname53 *PLEASE get out of Okinawa and GO FIGHT IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY, USA. Don't destory Asia please. USA is bad enough, don't sabotage other countries 🙏.*

@@robertgittings8662 realistically, they cannot fight in their own country. no chinese military base is near US. I'm chinese and i think the US is pretty good

Neither could China 🤨

@@who7129Why did Vietnam withdraw from Cambodia

Can US Army take Thaliban .. ? Now it is negotiating to give up .....

Special Forces are beaten so badly in Somali... experts are overrated

@@vr-gv2ks it’s not that the us army is weak lol it’s that the us hasn’t adapted to fighting against Guerilla war. A big problem for the us is sure they got weapons that can shoot enemies with like pin point accuracy, but the issue is when they don’t know where the enemy is, cuz they hiding in the population. They don’t got uniforms or anything, they’re essentially civilians with weapons. A lot of times they aren’t sure if it’s the enemy or just a civilian and may hesitate. Also even with all this, the us still wins the majority of battles against them, but obviously in their home country people won’t want to give up and will fight til the last person, and eventually the us is gonna say hey stop sending people over we been doing this for years and we haven’t won so the army leave. I realize now I probably could’ve just said that last like 2 sentences there and that would be a sufficient answer, but whatever lol

@@ifardedandshidded5519 , sure... us army was not weak. But could not win ! 1.5M Vietnamese died. Almost the numbers of wirld wide Covid19 victims. For "what purpose" did American kill, bom with orange-agent, napalm bom, Vietnamese .. ?

You don't need to be a general to understand deliverable nuclear weapons. If the US wanted to take China at Any cost they could. But it would never be worth it

Everybody gangsta until someone starts to lose family members. It's all fun and games until hundreds or even thousands of nukes are deployed. Most Americans don't understand the cruelty of war because they never faced a full-on invasion.

It’s practically our culture we’ve been at war for most of our countries existence

Zombieism. Lol.

@@americancountryball2077 yeah a "culture" spiraling down sooner than later.

If you study history every country starts wars somewhere sometime. If they bomb the bully china it feels totally justified.

with the DongFeng

This is a good one

China could never take DC

That won't stop the CCP from taking everyone down with them. Olympic genocide in full swing... after murdering 100million fulong gong

The day The US masters the non nuclear point and field emp, game over. Disabling nuclear capabilities for even an hr would be the end for them both.

True. It’s hard to invade a country without taking massive losses. That’s why america didn’t invade Japan

Of you look only in technology it is impossible but china dont know they are on a suicide mission usa can hire hackers to immobalize china's pfffttt equipment... usa may use emp that may help to immobalize china. for usa and its allies to go in... Have you heard of ilove virus that immobalize the world by one person?

@@jayceecirelos7943 are you 13

@@abinmathew8983 haha he is😂

@@jayceecirelos7943 how smart u are！ now we know it.thank you😅

@@jayceecirelos7943 You should take that to Hollywood where it belongs

video complete jokeeee

Of course they will do everything USA asks them to do. Its like the dog and his TAIL.

@@TheoGottwald they are forced to. They currently do not have the capabilities to supply their troops and manage everything on their own. They needed the US logistics and now that they are gone they had to go aswell.

Allies NATO United Nation Western Powers & Axis CSTO Eastern Powers Defectors Plan To Invade China Battle of Hainan 16:38-17:31,18:09/18:41 20:52 Invading China From 7 Direction

Allies NATO United Nation Western Powers & Axis CSTO Eastern Powers Defectors Plan To Invade China Battle of Hainan 16:38-17:31,18:09/18:41 20:52 Invading China From 7 Direction

Afghanistan has a cultural problem, not a governmental problem. There is no cure. They can't be helped.

War General Mike here ... ;) you like so many others seem to think it is US against China!? It is not! It is Taiwan, India, British, Japan, US and potentially others ...

The US cannot afford to let China take Taiwan, despite not having a defense treaty. The US/Quad alliance is the only country that can stand up against China. The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) is on the verge of global domination. If the US/Quad alliance dos nothing other countries will say the US ether could not or would not stop the CCP and so they cannot. They would have to aqueous to all the CCPs demands and eventually be controlled by the CCP. This used to be called the domino effect. In time the CCP would become so powerful the US would have to do so too. The CCP would spread its propaganda/censorship/surveillance state all over the world and no one would have freedom or democracy. Freedom of speech would disappear globally. Concentration camps would proliferate worldwide. > IT WOULD START LIKE THIS: The CCP assumes the US will help Taiwan. The PLA (People’s Liberation Army) attacks Taiwan, the US Navy, and US basses in and around the SCS (South China Sea) preemptively. The US/Quad alliance destroys china's navy, takes the artificial military islands, and lays sedge to mainland China with the hope of regime change or at least containment. The US maintains constant military and economic pressure on the CCPs” Military Industrial Complex” with standoff weapons. In time the CCP anti-aircraft capability might be degraded to the point where less expensive and more effective gravity bombs could be used. With their massive numerical advantage invading mainland China is not an option as it would result in massive casualties and if the CCP elite felt threatened risk a nuclear exchange. The CCP would welcome casualties to trim their population. This would only make them stronger as they already have more people than their land will support (1.4 billion, four times the US population and four times the number of mouths to feed with the same amount of land). China is not self-sufficient in oil, food, iron ore, rare earth ore and many other things. China would become another North Korea. A negotiated peace or even a cease fire would not work as the CCP would not honor any deal it made, rearm, and try again. The only thing that would stop the CCP is the inability to attack. To stay in power and preserve their luxurious lifestyle the CCP would become even more vicious and repressive then they already are. Hopefully, this would result in a revolt that brings down the CCP, vastly improving the quality of life of the Chinese people. The war might go cold in time all by itself without any type of agreement or declared end. There would be no exit strategy. Containment would be the order of the day or maybe the decade or even longer, leaving The Quad free to attack specific targets whenever necessary and close the Strait of Malacca to the CCP. With all deference to Binkov’s Battlegrounds the object of the exercise would be to protect Taiwan, stop CCP expansionism, keep the international sea lanes open, and eliminate the threat to and theft of resources from other countries, NOT the conquering of china. The CCP is watching the US military now free of INF Treaty restrictions reorganize, build capability and alliances in the SCS. Maybe this will be enough to deter them.

@@mikeriley7296 the governments of korea and japan may side with the usa but the ppl are not, the new generation prefer china over the usa

@@davidfraley4286 You must be smoking weed when writing this crap!

@@mikeriley7296 It would be hard to convince other countries to join in a coalition against china, especially with Japan and Korea, since they are very close and would be the first target. They are also economically tied to china, so they have a lot to lose and little to gain in such war. I'm sure Taiwan would join but since they are so close to the mainland, their effectiveness is going to be very limited. As for India, it might have some local advantage over Tibet, but effectively supplying over the the Tibetan plateau would be almost impossible.

I’m saying ! American will to fight is greater than any other country because we actually have freedom lol plus we’ve proven in 2 world wars our industrial might to produce ships and guns and ammo

i'll just summarize the ones after WWII otherwise the list will become way to long: Korea (1950-1953), Bay of pigs (1961), Vietnam (1955-1975), Laos (1959-1975), Cambodja (1967-1975) , Lebanon (1982-1984) Somalia (1992-1995) Bosnia (1992-1995) Croatia (1992-1995) Afghanistan (2001-2021) Yemen (2002-Present) Syria (2014-Present) Its good to be patriotic, its better to be realistic

where you learn that? some Hollywood movies you watched ?

really，do we live on the same earth?

Egos won't allow it....

Yes, it is difficult to find any unbiased videos and opinions these days. It is amazing that this video remains neutral in the modern day, and I respect the creator a lot.

The irony is strong, with this one lol

True

The comments tho….

历史上最强大的国家是英国

Neither does the rest of the world. Don't feel lonely it terrifies me too.

@@MICKEYISLOWD But we can collect caps together! And we can try mutating sometime~

@@zeflute4586 We will also be able to mod it, make the reality look like a jungle in no time

You do not understand fallout.

I don’t wanna ruin the joke or anything but the difference here is that, the nukes from fallout 4 were pretty small compared to modern day nukes. You could survive the ones from fallout. You won’t with today’s nukes.

Or the war against racism first

China lost to them too a while before we got involved and that was in the Vietcongs early stage when they actually were like farmers😂

Oh so China didn’t get their asses kicked when they leave but the Vietnam war ended in a stalemate and us leaving and we got our asses kicked😂

China’s way more racist then America

It’s funny cus that’s mainly due to Chinese drivers

A lesson the Japanese army learned the hard way

@Finn Hansen I think you're taking the wrong lesson away from Vietnam and Korea. . Korea's lesson was over ambition and a general distaste in the possibility of triggering another world war. While MacArthur wanted all of Korea under the auspices of the west, many others were content with two Koreas. . Vietnam was an issue of no real mission or goal. No clear objective. "Kill the other side" has its uses is not the be all or end all. Especially when a lot of the people didn't want us there and saw us as just more colonizers. The US only got involved to help France and fight communism. . and the American people really didn't give a shit about that. Not in the long run.

@Finn Hansen didn't lose. Neither side won, or there would be 1 Korea.

@Finn Hansen they didn't stop there because they didn't want to go further, rather because it wasn't worth it. Both sides decided it was good enough, and completely accomplishing their goals wasn't worth the cost.

@Todd Raine I was actually quoting from The Princess Bride, but yes, that is also true

May all wars be fought there.

The islands they already control?

Why'd you mention pakistan it was never invaded

agreed, its no longer a proxy war or to invade a third world country and toppling it's govt, it would be horrifying

@@assgrabber5473 it was.

@@grathesus4114 when?

@@grathesus4114 invading a country with nukes would be suicide

right

其用战也胜，久则钝兵挫锐，攻城则力屈，久暴师则国用不足。夫钝兵挫锐，屈力殚货，则诸侯乘其弊而起，虽有智者不能善其后矣。故兵闻拙速，未睹巧之久也。夫兵久而国利者，未之有也。故不尽知用兵之害者，则不能尽知用兵之利也。孙子兵法说打战就是要冲着赢去的，打久了大家都累，攻坚战疲软，战争动员太久了国内空虚。没兵没钱没物资其他国家就趁势而起，就算有一百万智囊团也无力回天。所以打战都是一下子推过去，没听说过打得久能打好的。看看历史那场持久战有真正的获利方？所以不知道用兵的弊端，怎么知道用兵的意义呢？

Dat is e accurate Answer for dis Stupid Question👍🤣

CHINESE BOT DETECTED: ‘l STOP();

Mr clueless, the USA ruled Afghanistan for almost 20 years! You peasants are lucky that the USA has morals and hasn't used our weapons of mass destruction since WW2. The world has never seen WOMD that powerful since WW2. imagine the type of WOMD we have today. There is a reason why the USA has a say in every area of the world. We keep the world in order.

thats true although the us in ww2 vs us in this scenario prob wont be the same

@@beliveau4943 indeed if anything it would be even more insane. Every man and women would be on the battlefield, the production line, or in the field growing food.

Sir Dude Dude it’s gonna be like a video game first until all the missiles are used up gonna be the biggest scary thing anyone could ever imagine and it can happen as fast as it takes to spark ⚡️ a match

@@AaronDrake22 M.A.D. will be the death of us all. Its the only reason china is safe right now

Gavin Visser the issue there is that current systems can’t really be created as rapidly as they were in WW2, there are just to many steps in the supply chain. Look how long it took the market to correct for a shortage of computer RAM, and that was without two major markets, and manufacturers, fighting a war

It's a rainy day on the U.S. east coast. We need something to do.

The signal fire has been lit

Already engaged.... Not really much off a fight. They are toast before they start...

I like the term keyboard warriors!!!

Simp has lost its meaning because of people like you throwing it around and using it in the wrong context.

Yes. If USA can't beat dudes in Gucci flipflops then I doubt they can beat China in a standup fight.

We couldn’t beat Afghanistan villagers because we didn’t go through and round up every civilians and kill them. That’s the only way to win a gorilla war.

@@sound_tsunami8436 Don't kept making excuses after losing 3 wars started by your chocolate army and cheese government.

@@taykokhuat hahahahaha. What great English you have. Someone must be mad that there country has collapsed multiple times in history and is set to collapse again!!

@@taykokhuat nato would steamroll through your army like the mongol empire.

As a poli sci major with a military science minor, I can tell you that this is nothing compared to the people who consider themselves experts on politics

@@hugejackedman7423 What does it have to do with anything?

@@ChadVulpes because in politic, we can't see who your buddy. If you didn't carefull, it's not your enemy kill you. But your friend

Khelsen Lei You’re not making much sense.

Your right bro, i got so much to argue with🙄🙄

Food is a much larger issue. If you'll read half the reason for genocide in ww2 was limited food stocks to continue the war. Farming then was more manpower intensive tho, and stalin had destroyed agriculture in Ukraine. Add in drafting all the farm help and out see this is a slippery slope. In 1944 corn was $7 a bushel. It's 3.50 today. But the point to make is I don't think China could survive a long drawn out action as their biggest asset (population) is actually their biggest weakness. Can they survive without protein imports? I don't know. But if they all cross the ocean to get there the american navy is in a stronger position to disrupt trade on deep water than china is to secure those routes outside of shallow water. Add in the british ex empire navies, nato, local navies etc, I just don't know where those soybeans will come from or how they can expect to get to china.

Unless Russia did that for the US I don't think that would happen and the US would not attack the Pipeline even on China side of the Pipeline. The processing plants yes. Pipeline doubtful.

@@Matt-mt2vi My figures assume Russia continuing their shipments unchanged; and they wouldn't be able to increase exports in wartime as the pipelines are already maxed out.

@@KrisWustrow my bag, I read as a need to disrupt the oil supply to choke off their supply of fuel. I am still not sure it would have a great effect, even max output prewar, the out put would then basically be all war drive only.. as it did with the US during WW2. all non essential fuel use would be basically cut off. Every thing not military related would be shut down or severely rationed. Plus with China operating in their own region they would not be a great increase consumption of fuel. One of many great failures of the German war effort was how far they operated outside of thier own country. ( Bigger area, bigger fuel use) Which greatly compounded when they failed to gain any of the oil feilds (Middle East or Soviets)

holy shit thats true, when mao zhendong was in charge of china everyone starved and it was NK lol, am chinese, can confirm

*cough* Japanese naval invasions succeeded

@@memer7987 The difference being that China at that point of time was still fighting a Civil War. And had a teenager ruling the country...

Ft. Greece

If it happens it's likely France would have the support of most of Europe and America But it depends on who the aggressor is . If no nukes then France might be able to take some islands but Turkish mainland would be unharmed. If nukes are allowed then Turkey is a gonna get stomped .

Yes it would be fun to watch people kill eachother. Imbecile. War is a “fun one to watch” Huh

@@hopperthemarxist8533 as a guy that will fight in this war (if it happens) i would love to the the vid.

@@hopperthemarxist8533 it is fun to watch hypothetical situations. Not actual war

sir, things changed, China currently has the most lethal missiles and better radars than USA I’m not bluffing but in fact Chinese military is extremely good when it’s doing a defense, it seems to believe that its missiles are future, so now we all know that it will lunch hundreds of hypersonic missiles from its mainland and they will destroy military bases in first island Chain and SK, Japan in minutes (actually they even have some naval based hypersonic missiles) and I believe that the US won’t take advantage in air combat either, the F/A 18s can not outcompete J16 (basically SU27+filled with Chinese techs and engines), and F35s also have problem: they can not arrive in the battlefield quickly enough before J20 wipe out the tankers and awacs(Chinese awacs are also more advanced now, why don’t you guys update weapons more often?????) But a brutal and costly damned war won’t happen if the US don’t intervene Taiwan affairs militarily… and for army: I REALLY WANT TO KNKW WHY THERE ARE STILL SOME PEOPLE THINK CN AND US CAN USE THEIR ARMY ACROOS AN ENTIRE PACIFIC)

Even with all that. The US could never land one soldier on Chinese soil.

I think russias best interest is to prevent this war from happening and just benefit from peking washington rivalry. However with chinese or american supremacy established in east asia there could be difficult times for Moscow. China grew arrogant, aggressive and hungry for resources (not unsimilar to US actually...) over years and russias far east might be the next dish on their menu.

Democrats: Better get the whole US government to look into that.

Nobody uses nukes anymore. That’s old technology. Outdated and cooks the chickens too much. 😁

Now, you're talking about a great General, and it's a pity that lunatic drog abuser did not listen to him ... and he was not a nazi, what makes me like him even more ...

@Rodfel Deuxmilleun Rommel Had Similar Views To Nazis, Similar Backstory To Hitler As Well.

@@AE_AnarchistAlexcianEmpire69Bi No wonder that lunatic S.O.B. killed the Wehrmach Greatest Infantry General he could count on. Well, it's the value on the ground that wins war, but the brain moves the troops ... and Carporal Hitler was not smart enough to listen to Guderian, Rommel and Paulus ...

As an American, 🤣🤣🤣 this is great

Oil, you say?

took me a second but hahahahahahaha

Oil 😂😂😂 China still runs on coal 😂

AWAKS my boyyyyyy. Also 250 hornets raptors and lightning going Mach 2 while tomahawks from destroyers and sub batteries destroy their defense infrastructure and THOUSANDS of decoy missiles overrun the system SAMs won't be as effective as they would be against another nation. It of course was an alliance offensive but just look at the air campaign that opened desert storm... the United States can outperform even that seemless victory by itself these days

Yes but USA also has quantitative advantage along with qualitative in some aspects

i think this is something he actually didn't consider. the video talks about a war that is longer than a year yet does not model the kind of industrial preparation both side would make before and during such an event. for example, china is the world's largest industrial power, it can, at this very moment, out produce any country. the US has a large industrial base as well. so those tanker losses would get replaced, those Chinese planes losses..will get replaced. the air war is going to last the whole war if china doesn't use them too much, too far outside of it coast there is going to be no total air domination. and taking Hainan is unlikely, far more so than presented, china's land based anti-ship capabilities are unmatched, with the air war undecided those slow defenseless landing ships are going to eat a face full of missiles what what makes it will face 300k well supplied chinese troops. But the end conclusion is probably close to real life, the us isn't going to take china on land without a massive alliance. and im sure some would join, like japan or Australia, but i doubt some others would be willingly joining unless they were attacked, such as vietnam or south korea, some members of europe might jump in, such as the uk, but those would probably be a minor help to the us at best and most would stay out, unless of course it was china that started the war but china has been careful not to, only 3 locations it might attack, india, taiwan if it declared independence, or a north Korean scenario, none of which is an attack on a European ally.

@@Carthodon Its like all of you forget just how large china is. china isn't japan. even right now china is the worlds 6th largest oil producer and can(do) get more from russia and the stans even if the sea trade is cut off, with civilian usaged limited and export business disrupted, it would have tons for the war industry. china is also the 3rd largest iron ore producer, again limit civilian usage/exports(china is the world's largest steel exporter) and there is plenty for the military, and food-wise china is 99% self sufficient in basic staple foods (this is an actual policy), most of the imports are luxury or for animal feed. so they will eat way less meat, thats not gonna kill off production

@@Carthodon most of the oil is used for civilian cars and export business, without/limit those and there is plenty, i literally just said this last comment, you didn't read or what?. iron, is again for export(a part of steel or manufactured goods) there is plenty of production inside china if civilian use is limited and exports halted. neither iron nor oil supply would need to be made up and this kind of scenario is a total war scenario, nothing better to unite the population than a large scary external enemy that is invading you. compared to being conquered i bet that living like it 1995 is not an issue for 99% of its population. simply put, lost of iron and oil imports is going to do nothing to cripple Chinese war capabilities even in a multiple year long war.

@@Carthodon brain drain because other places have better opportunity, the US DOES have some of the best schools in the world and it easier to get into than the best chinese school if you have money. Trump is doing his very best to change that by making it much harder for Chinese students. this isnt unique to china, other places from india to taiwan to turkey all like to go to us/uk for education, hell even kim fatty of north korea was schooled in switzerland. this is not because most people dont like their country, they just have better opportunities else where. and a us invasion of china, especially if china was not the one to start a war would absolutely enrage its population. or do you think most americans would not fight or do something as benign as eat less meat if the Chinese invaded the us? i find the very notion that you think a population of people in a war to defend their country from invasion by a openly hostile power would rather commit treason/surrender without a fight simply because they would have to eat less meat, drive less and maybe cant get a new tv they wanted, completely laughable.

Americans got kicked out of vietnam and the chinese pushed the americans form the Yalu river to the 38th parallel

US and China both got smacked by Vietnam

NK held off the UN!

Now their are hypersonic weapons 😏

We have to wait until 2077

@@Afrancis16 nah that's the game our kids are going to play

@@jeopardized9293 The game would at least be complete by our kid's time. Unfortunately we only get the buggy demo version.

Nah sorry mate We don’t need a nuke, a missile to their big ass dam and it will flood half of the country

but only slightly less well-known is this: Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line. LMAO!

Yeah china did so good vs japan

Yes , Drag them out to sea and drown them . Lol

@夜 Japan didn't conquer china cause USA stepped in. To be fair China just got done with a civil war and was weak.

@夜 And if trump had the most votes he would be President but he lost so whats your point. China never beat Japan.

Rok army is no joke. But the weakness is Japan and Korea will never play ball together.

Naw no one wants anything to do with North Korea, too many hungry mouths to feed.

@@ZZeeNiCey word. Preach. South Korea don't want to deal with that

@@SkinnerBeeMan exactly

Legit question: what is life like in China, under the CCP( your perspective,of course)?

@@LayLowOfficial oh it’s good a normal life nobody really cares about u personal. And btw, I was born in the US and lived in China for 6 years and now back in the US

@@skullity3896 interesting...so which is a better place to live,in your view?

@@LayLowOfficial China because it’s fun for vacation centers and in the US, I work for a living

@@iconquer1672 😂

Binkov is really advising the US to maintain peace, the country that is actively provoking the other party.

@@dznuts123 I dunno man, the USA isn't the one who steals and encroaches on Indian and Bhutanese land, fights with basically every country in SE Asia and claims independent countries as being wholly it's, and support the People's Democratic Republic of Korea

and also the other people who somehow think China would easily win or such

@@sword6381 well, not easily, but the advantage clearly lays on the defenders side

@David Lee ok wumao(chinese people paid 50cents for every post/comment glorifying the CCP or china)

@David Lee haha on point

@@v8vince761 you have made some pretty cringeworthy comments

Well I don't say much angry comment in here. And also Most of my friends including me not angry at all. Why should we? China still need progressing that is true and in the video the US did cost a lot to invade china with high possiblity still not win. By the way just something I need to say, Chinese' first language is not English. So if you wanna point someone whose first language is not even yours and say they have grammatical mistake you better consider something at first: Do you even capable to understand other ones single word in their language? If you cannot even understand what others said it is quite ridiculous to laughing at others' grammatical mistake

@@yiyangqin4527 I'm aware that the majority of people watching Binkov are perfectly reasonable and are just here to enjoy the content. It's not a jab at you or anyone else personally, just a joke.

Ah. The Switzerland strategy. Classic.

Wishful thinking for the Russians, because America has a score to settle with Putin.

Russia is Chinese military ally

@ChicagoMade Of course, but he poisoned so many of his opposition. So what is wrong with Russia, not enough candidates? Putin is an insult to Russian Democracy.

@@Jewel_Screaming_Chango8387 Wishful thinking. Russia still holds Chinese Territories.

No need for a mainland invasion or taking over any Chinese islands other than the ones in south China Sea. You see, China is heavily dependent on exports, all US and its allies has to do is cut China from the rest of the world and then play defensive and wait till China either tries to play aggressive, sue for peace or finds its economy devastated. Not a win for the US, but huge loss for China.

south korea isn't going to willingly join that war, doing so will reignite a new korea war(or rather, korean campaign of ww3) koreans will see heavy losses and devastation of their territory regardless of who won. only way it would do so if it was attacked. india would probably love to make a move on its borders but even if it won the combat there, thats about the extent of it, india has zero power projection capabilities and invading china proper would involve a supply route over the Himalayas, no way they get more than 100 km(probably close to 20km) into Tibet before they run out of supply and run into heavy chinese resistance.

@@mxn1948 India has some power projection capabilities, with 2 aircraft carriers and some supply ships. As for supply over the himalayas, it would only be truly difficult if China were to destroy the roads and bridges it has spent years painstakingly building up, and even then, replacement roads don't take too long to build, and tibet is quite flat. The biggest issue for India would be a two-front war as Pakistan would attack from the West, which would occupy 1/3 of the army in defence, or if India was to defeat Pakistan, then half of the army would be needed until Pakistan is conquered, meaning any serious progress over the himalayas would be impossible until then.

@Wuanslm yes, but they still have to get there. currently even american sea lift capabilities can only send ~50k well armed troops+support vehicles in one landing, who then have to fight 200k+ chinese. this is only possible if a large part of the world all fought china and over a couple of years, outproduced china then destroyed its navy then airforce then launched the largest sea born invasion in history making D-day look like a small skirmish. I highly doubt such a unified force would fight china, like why would europe go join this war or why would russia fight china for some reason. even then many millions will die, an actual occupation is going to be a nightmare. Well its all moot anyhow, things will go nuclear well before then.

The ROC would be a bigger help than either of them. Being able to call it a resumption of the Chinese civil war and merely assisting the nationalist allies could be devastating to the mainland's cohesion, maybe even break the party completely. Not to mention there's already effectively a beachhead in Hong Kong.

With information that will be coming out in the upcoming weeks and months everyone will be calling for china's head on a platter.

@夜 LMAO...Watch and see paper dragon.

@夜 I'm sorry what was that...your mother was slurpping the Star Spangled Flagpole.

Emerica is the main bully n agressor not china

@@michaelslack4937 China did not send any military to any country emerica m ENDia did

F16 is very old tech, easy target for china's anti aircraft missiles

Salim That’s up to the people to decide

Hernando Malinche My parents told me the same thing when I said I was going to college

You aren't funny

China is a threat you bot

Never underestimate the illogical ambitions of a dictator for life like Xi.

brain washed victim

@@chrisnamaste3572 propaganda does not work here.

@@ibungothangjam524 given how shitty Russia performed in Ukraine when under dictatorship, it appears most likely China will go the same route. China barely have any allies. The US led operation in Iraq shows how sophisticated the US and it's allies are. Japan alone can take on chyna