Your videos are very helpful Sir... Cleared all my concepts. Thank you. A kind request..Some of your cpc videos are not added in your CPC playlist, kindly add them in the list so that other students would cover complete cpc. Videos not added are:- 1. Order 42 and 44 2. Order 39 3. Order 36 special case 4. Order 39 temporary inj. 5. Order 40 receiver lec 2 6. Order 41...All 4 lectures 7. Order 45 Appeal to SC 8. Sec 47 to 54 9. Sec 91 and 92 10. Sec 96 to 99A 11. Sec 100 to 103 12. Sec 104 to 106 13. Sec 113 14. Sec 114 15. Sec 115 16. Sec 132 to 139 17. Sec 144 18. Sec 145 onwards.
It seems, constructive resjudicata u/o 2(2) prevents multiplicity of suit on same cause.. In the first one if all the relief is not claimed and even not amended correcting the same in claim, the decision of first suit would later bar another suit on leftover claim with same cause of action..
Where the Plaintiff (one Person) sues Defendant(one Person) for the immovable Property and the suit was decided by Court on Merits and decree was passed in favour of Defendant, Whether the other Person or Third Person or New Person is precluded from Filing a fresh suit in relation to the same immovable Property.
Third person is not excluded from filing a fresh suit on the same property because 1. Its npt expressly barred by Cpc. 2. No res judicata has applied-because the parties are not same. The cause of action might not even be the same. Etc
Excellent lecture sir... thank you so much...🙏😇 One question, can we interpret that order 2 rule 2 is covered under section 9(courts to try suits of all civil nature) as an express bar ? Also section 11 Res judicata Ka ek dimension yha bhi reflect krta h ?
Hello sir you have cleared so many concepts, thank you so much sir... I have a question sir, What is the difference between sec 11(4) and order 2 rule 2 and if there was already sec 11(4) then why order 2 rule 2 was needed?
Res judicata relates to the plaintiff's duty to put forth all the grounds of attack in support of his claim, whereas Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code requires the plaintiff to claim all reliefs flowing from the same cause of action in a single suit. The two pleas are different and one will not include the other
Res Judicata and O. 2 r.2 difference 1. This refers to plaintiff's duty to bring forward all the grounds of attack in support of his claim. This requires the Plaintiff to claim all reliefs flowing from the same cause of action. 2. This refers to both the parties i.e. Plaintiff as well as Defendent and precludes a suit as well as defence. This refers to only to the Plaintiff and bars a suit.
Sir if claims divide kar diye to bring suit to the pecuniary jurisdiction of court..can we get the remaining amount in a separate suit for same cause of action..please clarify
Sir what is difference between dismissal of suit and rejection of plaint?dismiss kyon hota hai aur reject kyon hota hai sirji? Plz ans it sir........ 🙏🙏
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir ji pehli baat to yeki main believe nahi kar pa rahi hun apne reply dia..... Sir ap bahut ache padhate ho main apka Sare video dekh ta hu.......thanku so much sir🙏🙏
Sir criminal case main jo charge frame hota hai by argument ye to section frame hote hai actually...... Lekin sir yehi things civil main hota hai ya kuch alag hota hai sir plz thoda bata do plz sir..
Sir in order 2 rule 2 if the plaintiff with the leave of the court relinquishes or omits the claim then afterwards the plaintiff may frame a suit regarding the claim??
And further also if the plaintiff relinquishes any portion in suit in order to bring the suit within the jurisdiction, then afterwards for the remaining claim the plaintiff may file second suit or not??
