Creality CR Scan Raptor Vs Otter - Accuracy Test

Подписаться 535

Просмотров 3,4 тыс.

50% 1

I do the measurement of 2 scans merging together with CR Scan Software. So the error induced from merging will be shown in this test.
Raptor max error = 0.05 mm (50 um)
Otter max error = 0.11 mm (110 um)
Please not that method I use only give approximate error value. The correct way is to scan standard steel block and measured with a micrometer.
Here's the link for marker target. (Sketchfab)
skfb.ly/oUKzC
Marker 30 deg
skfb.ly/oUNEO
Marker 60 deg
skfb.ly/oUNFx
Maker long distance target
skfb.ly/oURvQ
#creality #3dscanner #cloudcompare
Music by Bensound
License code: PBEZH9FNR7Z26NNO

Опубликовано:

16 май 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 16

@stevesloan6775 Месяц назад

Fa-rout at 7:00 the wireframe looks really incredible. Please ramp that up to full 0.02mm scanning. You have a 4090 GPU, that could easily handle 10,000,000 polygons. Your videos are starting to get mind blowing now.! 🥳😲😲

@alekseye1915 Месяц назад

Thank you for your work. I'll get my first scanner tomorrow. Raptor)

@MA-qx6rn Месяц назад

Another great one, thanks

@stevesloan6775 Месяц назад

Try and create a laser scan using all of the Raptors features to their fullest. Max it out! You have a 4090. E.G try and create a scan with 10 million polygons, or there about. I do speak for myself, but I’m sure I speak for others, I really like to see your wireframes. The geometry soup does look uniform. I’m betting that is because the 4090 can do tighter maths, using Tensor cores. Look up the meaning of tensor. Amazing people helped us have this technology. 😊😊😊 Hardware that does maths crazy fast😑🙂 🇦🇺🤜🏼🤛🏼😎🍀☮️

@stevesloan6775 Месяц назад

Oh you’re awesome! It would be cool to pick up a 23 hole precision measuring tool. I’m betting the scanner would have a really hard time scanning it, as it’s so three dementially symmetrical. Maybe use random markers when scanning it. Scanning something with a known dimension, is a true way to judge the accuracy of the scanner. Food for thought. Thank you so much for sharing this content with the World. You are helping me decide between the Otter and Raptor, and no one else is in the world. So much appreciated. 🇦🇺🤜🏼🤛🏼😎🍀☮️☮️☮️

@michaelblurry6559 29 дней назад

Anunaki tech. J/K

@alexandershinkarenko3725 27 дней назад

Thaaaaanks :)

@stevesloan6775 21 день назад

Is there a way to use the Otters scans for the Raptors realtime data logging?

@stevesloan6775 Месяц назад

It looks like the Raptor has a much larger field of view when in laser mode, compared to the Otters field of view in marker mode. 🇦🇺🤜🏼🤛🏼😎🍀☮️

@Pequenastonterias Месяц назад

New sub!

@Payo-TensileCreator Месяц назад

Yay! Thank you!

@garth285 19 дней назад

So which one is your favorite?

@Payo-TensileCreator 19 дней назад

For small - medium size object < 1m. I use Raptor. Anything else that I can't put markers on, I'd use Otter.

@ironmikeharrington Месяц назад

From what I see the raptor is very accurate for the price in marker/laser mode. But the otter is much better in markerless with its wider field of view. If possible could you try the scooter or similar with the raptor...if you think it will even work. The chair scan was not very good with the raptor....just wondering if it can handle larger objects either markered or markerless.

@Payo-TensileCreator Месяц назад

I'll try Raptor NIR with markers to see how much detail it can produce.